20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Linking physician attitudes to their breast cancer screening practices: a survey of US primary care providers and gynecologists

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite changes to breast cancer screening guidelines intended to decrease screening in younger and older women, mammography rates remain high. We investigated physician attitudes towards screening younger and older women. Surveys were mailed to US primary care providers and gynecologists between May and September 2016 (871/1665, 52.3% adjusted response rate). We assessed physician (1) attitudes towards screening younger (45-49 years) and older (75+ years) women and (2) recommendations for routine mammography. We used exploratory factor analysis to identify underlying themes among physician attitudes and created measures standardized to a 5-point scale. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we examined associations between physician attitudes and screening recommendations. Attitudes identified with factor analysis included: potential regret, expectations, and discordant guidelines (referred to as potential regret), patient-related hazards due to screening, physician limitations and uncertainty, and concerns about rationing care. Gynecologists had higher levels of potential regret compared to internists. In adjusted analyses, physicians with increasing potential regret (1-point increment on 5-point scale) had higher odds of recommending mammography to younger (OR 8.68; 95% CI 5.25-14.36) and older women (OR 4.62; 95% CI 3.50-6.11). Increasing concern for patient-related hazards was associated with decreased odds of recommending screening to older women (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.56-0.83). Physicians were more motivated by potential regret in recommending screening for younger and older women than by concerns for patient-related hazards in screening. Addressing physicians' most salient concerns, such as fear of missing cancer diagnoses and malpractice, may present an important opportunity to improving delivery of guideline-concordant cancer screening.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0322116
          6595
          Prev Med
          Prev Med
          Preventive medicine
          0091-7435
          1096-0260
          28 February 2018
          17 November 2017
          February 2018
          01 February 2019
          : 107
          : 90-102
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
          [2 ]RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA
          [3 ]RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA
          [4 ]Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
          [5 ]Department of Epidemiology and Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
          Author notes
          Corresponding author: Archana Radhakrishnan, MD, MHS, Johns Hopkins University, Division of General Internal Medicine, 2024 E. Monument Street Suite 2-300C, Baltimore, MD 21287, Telephone: 410-287-9526, Fax: 410-955-0476, arra@ 123456umich.edu

          Current address: Archana Radhakrishnan, MD, MHS, University of Michigan, Division of General Medicine, 2800 Plymouth Road, NCRC Bldg 16, 471C, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800

          Article
          PMC5846094 PMC5846094 5846094 nihpa946254
          10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.010
          5846094
          29155227
          3625ab04-6a81-4b58-9640-df05b241df35
          History
          Categories
          Article

          guidelines,breast cancer,gynecology,cancer screening,primary care

          Comments

          Comment on this article