1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Meeting in the middle: Luria's approach and cognitive approach to spoken language impairment in aphasia Translated title: Encuentro en el medio: enfoque de Luria y enfoque cognitivo para el deterioro del lenguaje hablado en la afasia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this paper is to compare and analyze two approaches to aphasia: The systemic dynamic localization of higher mental functions theory developed by A.R. Luria and neurocognitive dual-route model. To our knowledge, comparative analysis of these two theories was never done before. We found similarities between these two theories, as well as differences between them. One of the key differences is that while Luria's approach views various symptoms as systemic consequences of a primary impairment, the dual-route model sees these symptoms as independent and unrelated. This major difference between two approaches can be explained: Luria's approach is in line with classic “syndrome analysis” of aphasia, contrary to the cognitive approach, which assumes that classic syndromes are unable to explain all diversity of clinical symptoms.

          Translated abstract

          El objetivo de este artículo es comparar y analizar dos enfoques de la afasia: La teoría de localización dinámica sistémica de las funciones mentales superiores desarrollada por A.R. Luria y modelo neurocognitivo de doble ruta. Hasta donde sabemos, nunca antes se había realizado un análisis comparativo de estas dos teorías. Encontramos similitudes entre estas dos teorías, así como diferencias entre ellas. Una de las diferencias clave es que, si bien el enfoque de Luria ve varios síntomas como consecuencias sistémicas de un impedimento primario, el modelo de ruta dual ve estos síntomas como independientes y no relacionados. Esta gran diferencia entre dos enfoques puede explicarse: el enfoque de Luria está en línea con el clásico «análisis del síndrome» de la afasia, al contrario del enfoque cognitivo, que asume que los síndromes clásicos son incapaces de explicar toda la diversidad de síntomas clínicos. Palabras clave: Afasia, Luria, Modelo de doble ruta, Habla, Neuropsicología.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Dual route and connectionist models of reading: an overview

            Reading researchers seek to discover exactly what kinds of information-processing activities go on in our minds when we read; to discover what the structure and organization is of the cognitive system skilled readers have acquired from learning to read. Little is known about how the most elaborate aspects of this system work, but much has been learned about its basic building blocks such as letter identification, visual word recognition and knowledge of letter-sound rules. I contrast two approaches to theorizing about these basic reading components, the dual route approach and the connectionist approach, and offer reasons for believing that the dual route approach is to be preferred.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The logic of neuropsychological research and the problem of patient classification in aphasia.

              A critical analysis is presented of the assumptions that must be made to use the data from aphasia to constrain models of normal language processing. The implication of these assumptions for patient classification and research methodology in aphasia is considered.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                pappsicol
                Papeles del Psicólogo
                Pap. Psicol.
                Consejo General de Colegios Oficiales de Psicólogos (Madrid, Madrid, Spain )
                0214-7823
                1886-1415
                December 2021
                : 42
                : 3
                : 230-234
                Affiliations
                [02] Moscow orgnameResearch Center of Neurology Russia
                [01] Moscow orgnameLomonosov Moscow State University orgdiv1Faculty of Psychology
                [03] Moscow orgnameMoscow Institute of Psychoanalysis Russia
                Article
                S0214-78232021000300009 S0214-7823(21)04200300009
                10.23923/pap.psicol.2958
                362a9477-a250-4ead-b1cf-5a4688dacb2e

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 11 March 2021
                : 20 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 21, Pages: 5
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Articles

                Luria,Modelo de doble ruta,Habla,Neuropsicología,Aphasia,Dual-route model,Speech,Neuropsychology,Afasia

                Comments

                Comment on this article