138
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Classification System: An INRG Task Force Report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Because current approaches to risk classification and treatment stratification for children with neuroblastoma (NB) vary greatly throughout the world, it is difficult to directly compare risk-based clinical trials. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system was developed to establish a consensus approach for pretreatment risk stratification.

          Patients and Methods

          The statistical and clinical significance of 13 potential prognostic factors were analyzed in a cohort of 8,800 children diagnosed with NB between 1990 and 2002 from North America and Australia (Children's Oncology Group), Europe (International Society of Pediatric Oncology Europe Neuroblastoma Group and German Pediatric Oncology and Hematology Group), and Japan. Survival tree regression analyses using event-free survival (EFS) as the primary end point were performed to test the prognostic significance of the 13 factors.

          Results

          Stage, age, histologic category, grade of tumor differentiation, the status of the MYCN oncogene, chromosome 11q status, and DNA ploidy were the most highly statistically significant and clinically relevant factors. A new staging system (INRG Staging System) based on clinical criteria and tumor imaging was developed for the INRG Classification System. The optimal age cutoff was determined to be between 15 and 19 months, and 18 months was selected for the classification system. Sixteen pretreatment groups were defined on the basis of clinical criteria and statistically significantly different EFS of the cohort stratified by the INRG criteria. Patients with 5-year EFS more than 85%, more than 75% to ≤ 85%, ≥ 50% to ≤ 75%, or less than 50% were classified as very low risk, low risk, intermediate risk, or high risk, respectively.

          Conclusion

          By defining homogenous pretreatment patient cohorts, the INRG classification system will greatly facilitate the comparison of risk-based clinical trials conducted in different regions of the world and the development of international collaborative studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Regression Models and Life-Tables

          D R Cox (1972)
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neuroblastoma

              The clinical hallmark of neuroblastoma is heterogeneity, with the likelihood of cure varying widely according to age at diagnosis, extent of disease, and tumour biology. A subset of tumours will undergo spontaneous regression while others show relentless progression. Around half of all cases are currently classified as high-risk for disease relapse, with overall survival rates less than 40% despite intensive multimodal therapy. This Seminar focuses on recent advances in our understanding of the biology of this complex paediatric solid tumour. We outline plans for the development of a uniform International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system, and summarise strategies for risk-based therapies. We also update readers on new discoveries related to the underlying molecular pathogenesis of this tumour, with special emphasis on advances that are translatable to the clinic. Finally, we discuss new approaches to treatment, including recently discovered molecular targets that might provide more effective treatment strategies with the potential for less toxicity.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Clinical Oncology
                JCO
                American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
                0732-183X
                1527-7755
                January 10 2009
                January 10 2009
                : 27
                : 2
                : 289-297
                Affiliations
                [1 ]From the Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Section of Paediatrics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey; Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group Data Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom; Children's Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Section for Paediatric Surgery, Division of Surgery, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Children's Cancer Research Institute, St Anna...
                Article
                10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6785
                2650388
                19047291
                3647c9d2-0c27-4da8-ab6c-a171be16302d
                © 2009
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log