74
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A first step in determining appropriate amounts of obstetric anesthesia work

      research-article
        1 , 2 ,
      Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
      BioMed Central
      Obstetric anesthesia, Manpower, Workload

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ginosar, et al. describe a new performance indicator, the Obstetric Anesthesia Activity Index, to represent the current amount of obstetric anesthesia work done daily at each of 25 Israeli hospitals. The authors claim, correctly, that this index is a closer reflection of the anesthetic workload than simply looking at the number of deliveries at each hospital. However, the Obstetric Anesthesia Activity Index could easily be refined to reflect more closely the actual obstetric anesthesia workload by using the average cesarean delivery time for each hospital rather than one value for all hospitals. Although the authors state that they developed the Obstetric Anesthesia Activity Index out of concern for inadequate obstetric anesthesia manpower in Israel, they have not compared the Obstetric Anesthesia Activity Index with the size of the patient population or any measure of patient satisfaction or patient safety. In its current form, the Obstetric Anesthesia Activity Index describes the current work situation but does not evaluate the extent of the unmet need for additional anesthesia providers. Despite these shortcomings, the Obstetric Anesthesia Activity Index is an important first step in developing a tool to assess unmet obstetric anesthesia needs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The effect of house staff working hours on the quality of obstetric and gynecologic care.

          To measure the effect of house staff working hours reforms on the quality of obstetric and gynecologic care. Sentinel events, medication errors, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and decision making were measured before and after the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education work-hour reforms. Data sources consisted of the perinatal database at MetroHealth Medical Center (Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH), incident reports filed in the hospital department of risk management, the patient-satisfaction database at MetroHealth Medical Center, and the pharmacy medication error database. Two reviewers examined all incident reports separately, and discrepancies were resolved by mutual agreement. Patient demographics did not change across the 2 time periods. Obstetric outcomes were the same for third- and fourth-degree lacerations, umbilical arterial pH less than 7, fever, and the need for general anesthesia. Postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal resuscitations were significantly decreased over time (2% before versus 1% after work-hour restrictions [P =.008], and 30% before versus 26% after work-hour restrictions [P <.001], respectively). The rate of primary cesarean delivery rose from 14% to 16%, a nonsignificant difference (P <.06). There were no differences in rates of cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status, failed induction, labor abnormality, or repeat cesarean delivery. Reported medication errors associated with resident performance were too rare for comparison across time periods. The number of incident reports directly involving residents before and after work-hour restrictions were 3 and 10, respectively-too few to reach statistical significance. Although problems in physician performance may be underreported, resident work-hour restrictions show minimal evidence of improvement in quality of care. II-3
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Improving health outcomes: innovation, coverage, quality and adherence

            The Israeli health system has made considerable progress in reducing deaths amenable to medical care but has more to do. This commentary describes how progress in this area results from innovation, coverage, quality, and adherence to treatment. It describes what is being done in Israel and beyond to address each of these factors but concentrates on the often poorly recognised problem of adherence to treatment, describing the growing evidence that it is often sub-optimal and reviewing evidence on what can be done to improve it.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Definitions in obstetric anaesthesia: how should we measure anaesthetic workload and what is 'epidural rate'?

              Crude delivery rate is used to calculate requirements for consultant anaesthetic sessions in the UK, but this calculation is arbitrary and ignores differences in case-mix between units. The term 'epidural rate' is commonly used to indicate regional anaesthetic activity but has never been defined. We challenge both these concepts and illustrate our argument by applying different definitions of obstetric anaesthetic activity to prospectively collected maternity data from 31 211 deliveries over 5 years in two hospitals. Number of anaesthetic interventions is a more accurate reflection of obstetric anaesthetic activity than number of deliveries, with Northwick Park Hospital having about 200-600 more deliveries per year than Chelsea & Westminster Hospital but about 300-400 fewer anaesthetic interventions per year. 'Epidural rate' varied by up to 30% according to the definition used. We conclude that number of anaesthetic interventions should replace crude number of deliveries as a measure of obstetric anaesthetic activity, and that the term 'regional anaesthesia rate' should replace 'epidural rate'.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Isr J Health Policy Res
                Isr J Health Policy Res
                Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
                BioMed Central
                2045-4015
                2012
                14 December 2012
                : 1
                : 49
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8054, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA
                [2 ]Anesthesiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8054, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA
                Article
                2045-4015-1-49
                10.1186/2045-4015-1-49
                3534087
                23241348
                36b40cc2-62a1-4b85-a374-8ad1e815be3d
                Copyright ©2012 Varaday and Leighton; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 2 November 2012
                : 15 November 2012
                Categories
                Commentary

                Economics of health & social care
                obstetric anesthesia,manpower,workload
                Economics of health & social care
                obstetric anesthesia, manpower, workload

                Comments

                Comment on this article