10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Debriefing: A Place for Enthusiastic Teaching and Learning at a Distance

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In the rush to address the educational constraints resulting from COVID-19, many nursing programs are turning to screen-based virtual simulations and other creative innovations as alternatives to traditional clinical course offerings. Yet, many educators are not prepared to implement these alternative methods. Additionally, because of the cessation of nursing students allowed to practice in hospitals and clinics and complete needed clinical hours, undergraduate and graduate nursing programs alike are taxed with satisfying these clinical requirements. This means that all didactic, clinical, and lab courses are being taught remotely – never has there been a better time for debriefing across the curriculum (National League for Nursing [NLN] Board of Governors, 2015). Because of urgent learning needs, producers of screen-based virtual simulation resources have offered discounted access to valuable resources to provide new distance accessible virtual learning experiences that may not have been integrated into program curriculum otherwise. However, the importance of a robust debriefing as a component of these learning opportunities is often neglected, which could be to the detriment of the students. Extant simulation research has generated a base of knowledge exclaiming the importance of post-simulation debriefing which cannot be ignored during this current crisis. Now that the initial rush to a rapid solution has passed, it is time to pause, reflect, and return to the undisputable evidence that describes how the active learning occurring through alternate virtual learning activities requires a robust debriefing aligned with current simulation best practices and regulatory recommendations. Going forward, we need to evaluate our hurried solutions and ensure adherence to best practices in online education, simulation and debriefing (INACSL Standards Committee, 2016; Standards from the Quality Matters Higher Education Rubric) in both prelicensure and graduate programs. Regardless of how the learning experience is delivered online, a primary goal of nursing education is to teach students to think like a nurse. Debriefing increases students’ ability to develop clinical reasoning and clinical judgment which are essential to thinking like a nurse. While debriefing has traditionally occurred as a face-to-face conversation following a simulation or traditional patient care experience, the restrictions of the current pandemic demands a quick conversion to a virtual format. In fact, with the recommendation for debriefing use across nursing curricula (NLN Board of Governors, 2015), the current crisis of offering virtual didactic and clinical course experiences brings debriefing to the forefront of learning in higher education. Due to these quick efforts to convert learning activities as distance offerings, many students have been given virtual clinical experiences which they complete independently without reflective conversation and feedback. As a result of the race to provide distance learning quickly, many faculty are using reflective journaling and guided questions submitted to written discussion boards through the Learning Management System (LMS) as a way for students to gather and share their reflections on virtual clinical learning activities. These are not new strategies for nursing education and while they can be a valuable way to direct students to focus on their individual thoughts and responses to an experience, this is not a replacement for a faculty-guided, verbal, interactive and reflective discussion. In fact, the rich dialogue that defines debriefing as a dynamic two-way conversation is missing, leaving students without this valuable time when faculty facilitate reflection and anticipatory. Make no mistake, however, debriefing is taxing and requires faculty energy and intention, particularly during this current crisis. It is in this debriefing dialogue that the thought processes of students are made visible to both students and faculty so that deeper learning can take place. Regardless of the activity, debriefing provides the opportunity for students to see a teacher’s passion for nursing paired with their teaching expertise. As students and faculty alike are becoming overwhelmed with long days of screen time, it is even more imperative that faculty connect with students on a deeper level to create meaningful learning through verbal interaction. If learning to think remains a critical learning outcome then reflective dialogue should be at the forefront of debriefing rather than computer-generated feedback alone (Dreifuerst et al., in press). Good debriefing is a reflective, engaging, and informative dialogue which helps faculty understand the learners’ thinking, helps the learners affirm or correct their thinking, and cultivates anticipation and assimilation. Debriefing is not necessarily prescriptive or a solo activity with a prescriptive list of questions asking things such as what went right, what went wrong, what did you learn and how do you feel? Without the conversation, the meaningful learning opportunity is lost. Debriefing is not simply about ensuring knowledge gain about a specific condition, patient situation or clinical experience. Rather, it is a dynamic interaction between the faculty and students (Jeffries et al., 2016), based on a strong pedagogical approach that is engaging and enthusiastic with the intent of improving clinical judgement, decision-making and reasoning to improve patient care. During this pandemic, where students and faculty are both situated in new and vulnerable situations, debriefing is the space to teach students to think like a nurse by fostering reflection, conveying enthusiasm grounded in strong narrative pedagogy that is welcoming and inviting students into a rich dialogue (Ironside, 2015), and setting high standards challenging students to rise to them and immerse themselves in preparing for practice through teaching and learning at a distance. Key Points • The current crisis of offering virtual didactic and clinical course experiences brings debriefing to the forefront of learning. • Evidence-based debriefing is based on strong pedagogy that is engaging and enthusiastic. • Despite long days of screen time, it is even more imperative to connect with students to create meaningful learning through a rich verbal debriefing dialogue.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Narrative Pedagogy: Transforming Nursing Education Through 15 Years of Research in Nursing Education.

          This article provides a review of current disciplinary understanding of Narrative Pedagogy and describes the implications for ongoing transformation in nursing education.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Role: Assistant Professor
            Role: Assistant Professor
            Role: Associate Professor
            Journal
            Clin Simul Nurs
            Clin Simul Nurs
            Clinical Simulation in Nursing
            Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning.
            1876-1399
            1876-1402
            13 May 2020
            13 May 2020
            Affiliations
            [a ]University of Minnesota School of Nursing, 5-140 Weaver-Densford Hall, 309 Harvard Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
            [b ]Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Nursing, 3601 4 th St. STOP 6264, Lubbock, TX, 79430, USA
            [c ]Marquette University College of Nursing, PO Box 1881, Clark Hall, Room 368, 510 N. 16th Street, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881, USA
            Author notes
            []Corresponding author: Cynthia Sherraden Bradley PhD, RN, CNE, CHSE, cbradley@ 123456umn.edu
            Article
            S1876-1399(20)30033-5
            10.1016/j.ecns.2020.04.001
            7218380
            32406399
            36e4b7bf-c2e6-4e32-82e3-50950227b30b
            © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning.

            Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

            History
            : 7 April 2020
            : 11 April 2020
            Categories
            Article

            debriefing,nursing education,simulation,clinical,distance learning

            Comments

            Comment on this article