11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Updates in ophthalmic pathology

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ophthalmic pathology has a long history and rich heritage in the field of ophthalmology. This review article highlights updates in ophthalmic pathology that have developed significantly through the years because of the efforts of committed individuals and the confluence of technology such as molecular biology and digital pathology. This is an exciting period in the history of ocular pathology, with cutting-edge techniques paving the way for new developments in diagnostics, therapeutics, and research. Collaborations between ocular oncologists and pathologists allow for improved and comprehensive patient care. Ophthalmic pathology continues to be a relevant specialty that is important in the understanding and clinical management of ocular disease, education of eye care providers, and overall advancement of the field.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Identification of recurrent NAB2-STAT6 gene fusions in solitary fibrous tumor by integrative sequencing.

          A 44-year old woman with recurrent solitary fibrous tumor (SFT)/hemangiopericytoma was enrolled in a clinical sequencing program including whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing. A gene fusion of the transcriptional repressor NAB2 with the transcriptional activator STAT6 was detected. Transcriptome sequencing of 27 additional SFTs identified the presence of a NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion in all tumors. Using RT-PCR and sequencing, we detected this fusion in all 51 SFTs, indicating high levels of recurrence. Expression of NAB2-STAT6 fusion proteins was confirmed in SFT, and the predicted fusion products harbor the early growth response (EGR)-binding domain of NAB2 fused to the activation domain of STAT6. Overexpression of the NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion induced proliferation in cultured cells and activated the expression of EGR-responsive genes. These studies establish NAB2-STAT6 as the defining driver mutation of SFT and provide an example of how neoplasia can be initiated by converting a transcriptional repressor of mitogenic pathways into a transcriptional activator.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group report number 1: prospective validation of a multi-gene prognostic assay in uveal melanoma.

            This study evaluates the prognostic performance of a 15 gene expression profiling (GEP) assay that assigns primary posterior uveal melanomas to prognostic subgroups: class 1 (low metastatic risk) and class 2 (high metastatic risk). Prospective, multicenter study. A total of 459 patients with posterior uveal melanoma were enrolled from 12 independent centers. Tumors were classified by GEP as class 1 or class 2. The first 260 samples were also analyzed for chromosome 3 status using a single nucleotide polymorphism assay. Net reclassification improvement analysis was performed to compare the prognostic accuracy of GEP with the 7th edition clinical Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) classification and chromosome 3 status. Patients were managed for their primary tumor and monitored for metastasis. The GEP assay successfully classified 446 of 459 cases (97.2%). The GEP was class 1 in 276 cases (61.9%) and class 2 in 170 cases (38.1%). Median follow-up was 17.4 months (mean, 18.0 months). Metastasis was detected in 3 class 1 cases (1.1%) and 44 class 2 cases (25.9%) (log-rank test, P<10(-14)). Although there was an association between GEP class 2 and monosomy 3 (Fisher exact test, P<0.0001), 54 of 260 tumors (20.8%) were discordant for GEP and chromosome 3 status, among which GEP demonstrated superior prognostic accuracy (log-rank test, P = 0.0001). By using multivariate Cox modeling, GEP class had a stronger independent association with metastasis than any other prognostic factor (P<0.0001). Chromosome 3 status did not contribute additional prognostic information that was independent of GEP (P = 0.2). At 3 years follow-up, the net reclassification improvement of GEP over TNM classification was 0.43 (P = 0.001) and 0.38 (P = 0.004) over chromosome 3 status. The GEP assay had a high technical success rate and was the most accurate prognostic marker among all of the factors analyzed. The GEP provided a highly significant improvement in prognostic accuracy over clinical TNM classification and chromosome 3 status. Chromosome 3 status did not provide prognostic information that was independent of GEP. Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prognostic implications of monosomy 3 in uveal melanoma.

              A high proportion of patients with uveal melanoma die of metastatic disease. In a subgroup of uveal melanomas there is the loss of one chromosome 3. To assess the prognostic implications of this genetic anomaly, we studied 54 patients for a median of 3.4 years. 180 patients underwent primary enucleation for malignant uveal melanoma at the Ophthalmology Department of the Universitätsklinikum Essen between 1987 and 1993. Tumour material was available for chromosome analysis and DNA preparation from 69 of these patients (for logistic reasons unlikely, we believe, to introduce bias). 15 patients were excluded from our study: nine because the methods for assessment of monosomy 3 were unsuccessful; five because of insufficient information about their relapse status; one because histopathological data were incomplete. Of the 54 remaining patients, the tumours of 16 were assessed for copy number of chromosome 3 by karyotype analysis, of 30 by comparative genomic hybridisation, and of eight by both techniques. Clinical status was assessed by contact with family doctor or a clinical check up. Statistical analysis was by the log-rank test and Cox proportional-hazard regression. The tumours of 30 patients had monosomy 3. 17 (57%) of these patients relapsed with metastatic disease, and the 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 50%. By contrast, of the 24 patients whose tumours had retained both chromosomes 3, none developed metastatic disease. In univariate analysis monosomy 3 was the most significant (p < 0.0001) predictor of poor prognosis in uveal melanoma, followed by tumour location (p < 0.0007) and tumour diameter (p < 0.0021). Histopathological subtype, age, sex, extrascleral growth, and tumour thickness had no additional predictive value. In uveal melanoma, monosomy 3 is a significant predictor of both relapse-free and overall survival.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Ophthalmol
                Indian J Ophthalmol
                IJO
                Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0301-4738
                1998-3689
                May 2017
                : 65
                : 5
                : 347-353
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
                [1 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Dr. Hans E Grossniklaus, 1365 Clifton Road NE, BT428, Atlanta, 30322 GA, USA. E-mail: ophtheg@ 123456emory.edu
                Article
                IJO-65-347
                10.4103/ijo.IJO_49_16
                5565888
                28573988
                37055273-9dd5-473b-821e-a19820399aaf
                Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 18 January 2016
                : 09 April 2017
                Categories
                Review Article

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                digital pathology,eye pathology,molecular pathology,ocular pathology,ophthalmic pathology

                Comments

                Comment on this article