4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sex-specific influence of communal breeding experience on parenting performance and fitness in a burying beetle

      research-article
      1 , , 1 , 1 , 2 , 1
      Royal Society Open Science
      The Royal Society
      burying beetle, carry-over effects, communal breeding, parental investment, previous breeding experience, sexual conflict

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Communal breeding, wherein multiple conspecifics live and reproduce together, may generate short-term benefits in terms of defence and reproduction. However, its carry-over effects remain unclear. We experimentally tested the effects of communal breeding on parental care and reproduction in burying beetles ( Nicrophorus vespilloides), which use carcasses as breeding resources and provide parental care to offspring. We subjected individuals to communal or non-communal breeding (i.e. pair breeding) during their first breeding event and to non-communal breeding during their second breeding event. We measured the parental care of individuals and of groups and the reproductive success of groups during both breeding events. In communal groups, large individuals became dominant and largely monopolized the carcass, whereas small individuals (i.e. subordinates) had restricted access to the carcass. At the first breeding event, large males in communal groups spent more time providing care than large males in non-communal groups, whereas such an effect was not observed for large females and small individuals. Reproductive successes were similar in communal and non-communal groups, indicating no short-term benefits of communal breeding in terms of reproduction. Compared with males from non-communal groups, males originating from communal groups produced a larger size of brood during their second breeding event, whereas such an effect was not observed for females. Our results demonstrate the sex-specific effects of communal breeding experience on parenting performance and fitness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references120

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Carry-over effects as drivers of fitness differences in animals.

          1. Carry-over effects occur when processes in one season influence the success of an individual in the following season. This phenomenon has the potential to explain a large amount of variation in individual fitness, but so far has only been described in a limited number of species. This is largely due to difficulties associated with tracking individuals between periods of the annual cycle, but also because of a lack of research specifically designed to examine hypotheses related to carry-over effects. 2. We review the known mechanisms that drive carry-over effects, most notably macronutrient supply, and highlight the types of life histories and ecological situations where we would expect them to most often occur. We also identify a number of other potential mechanisms that require investigation, including micronutrients such as antioxidants. 3. We propose a series of experiments designed to estimate the relative contributions of extrinsic and intrinsic quality effects in the pre-breeding season, which in turn will allow an accurate estimation of the magnitude of carry-over effects. To date this has proven immensely difficult, and we hope that the experimental frameworks described here will stimulate new avenues of research vital to advancing our understanding of how carry-over effects can shape animal life histories. 4. We also explore the potential of state-dependent modelling as a tool for investigating carry-over effects, most notably for its ability to calculate optimal rates of acquisition of a multitude of resources over the course of the annual cycle, and also because it allows us to vary the strength of density-dependent relationships which can alter the magnitude of carry-over effects in either a synergistic or agonistic fashion. 5. In conclusion carry-over effects are likely to be far more widespread than currently indicated, and they are likely to be driven by a multitude of factors including both macro- and micronutrients. For this reason they could feasibly be responsible for a large amount of the observed variation in performance among individuals, and consequently warrant a wealth of new research designed specifically to decompose components of variation in fitness attributes related to processes across and within seasons. © 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 British Ecological Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Reproductive Effort and Terminal Investment in Iteroparous Animals

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tropical winter habitat limits reproductive success on the temperate breeding grounds in a migratory bird.

              Identifying the factors that control population dynamics in migratory animals has been constrained by our inability to track individuals throughout the annual cycle. Using stable carbon isotopes, we show that the reproductive success of a long-distance migratory bird is influenced by the quality of habitat located thousands of kilometres away on tropical wintering grounds. For male American redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla), winter habitat quality influenced arrival date on the breeding grounds, which in turn affected key variables associated with reproduction, including the number of young fledged. Based on a winter-habitat model, females occupying high-quality winter habitat were predicted to produce more than two additional young and to fledge offspring up to a month earlier compared with females wintering in poor-quality habitat. Differences of this magnitude are highly important considering redstarts are single brooded, lay clutches of only three to five eggs and spend only two-and-a-half months on the breeding grounds. Results from this study indicate the importance of understanding how periods of the annual cycle interact for migratory animals. Continued loss of tropical wintering habitat could have negative effects on migratory populations in the following breeding season, minimizing density-dependent effects on the breeding grounds and leading to further population declines. If conservation efforts are to be successful, strategies must incorporate measures to protect all the habitats used during the entire annual cycle of migratory animals.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Journal
                R Soc Open Sci
                R Soc Open Sci
                RSOS
                royopensci
                Royal Society Open Science
                The Royal Society
                2054-5703
                Feburary 16, 2022
                February 2022
                Feburary 16, 2022
                : 9
                : 2
                : 211179
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES), University of Groningen, , 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Aeres University of Applied Sciences, , Arboretum West 98, 1325 WB Almere, The Netherlands
                Author notes

                Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5834292.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6911-0684
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6638-820X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9241-0124
                Article
                rsos211179
                10.1098/rsos.211179
                8847889
                35223054
                371abac7-74b5-4e71-b0d3-9a8084bf6b0a
                © 2022 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : July 13, 2021
                : January 20, 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: China Scholarship Council, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004543;
                Award ID: CSC-201506230168
                Funded by: Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research;
                Award ID: NWO-TOP-854.11.003
                Funded by: Ecology Fund Grant of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences;
                Award ID: KNAWWF/DA/973/Eco2018
                Funded by: NWO;
                Award ID: 863.15.020
                Categories
                1001
                14
                60
                70
                Organismal and Evolutionary Biology
                Research Articles

                burying beetle,carry-over effects,communal breeding,parental investment,previous breeding experience,sexual conflict

                Comments

                Comment on this article