7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The monaural nuclei of the lateral lemniscus in an echolocating bat: parallel pathways for analyzing temporal features of sound

      ,

      The Journal of Neuroscience

      Society for Neuroscience

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In echolocating bats, three cell groups in the lateral lemniscus are conspicuous for their large size and high degree of differentiation. These cell groups are the intermediate nucleus (INLL), columnar nucleus (VNLLc), and multipolar cell area (VNLLm). All receive projections from the contralateral cochlear nucleus. Previous anatomical studies suggest the hypothesis that these nuclei are important for analyzing the temporal structure of sound. To investigate this possibility, we recorded responses of single units in the INLL, VNLLc, and VNLLm of Eptesicus fuscus. The results show that each cytoarchitectural division contains a complete tonotopic representation. Certain response properties are common to all three nuclei. First, virtually all units are monaural. Second, all are broadly tuned to frequency; their average Q10dB value of 9.1 is considerably lower than values measured in the inferior colliculus of Eptesicus. Third, most units have little or no spontaneous activity. Fourth, all have short integration times, responding robustly to stimuli less than 5 msec in duration. The broad tuning, lack of spontaneous activity, and short integration time all make these neurons well suited for the accurate encoding of temporal information. Although there are many similarities, there are also important differences among nuclei. The clearest evidence of specialization is in VNLLc. Neurons here are more broadly tuned than those in INLL or VNLLm, have no spontaneous activity, and always respond with one spike per stimulus. The latency of the spike is precisely locked to the stimulus onset, with variability from trial to trial as low as 0.03 msec. In addition, the latency remains constant over large variations in frequency or intensity. In INLL and VNLLm, response patterns are about equally distributed between tonic, chopping, and phasic; there are no single-spike constant-latency responses of the type seen in VNLLc, although some choppers and pausers do respond with constant first-spike latency. The results indicate that VNLLc is specialized to encode very precisely the onset of sound; the other nuclei may encode ongoing properties of a sound.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Neurosci
          J. Neurosci
          jneuro
          The Journal of Neuroscience
          Society for Neuroscience
          0270-6474
          1529-2401
          1 November 1991
          : 11
          : 11
          : 3456-3470
          Affiliations
          Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
          Article
          PMC6575535 PMC6575535 6575535 jneuro;11/11/3456
          10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-11-03456.1991
          6575535
          1941092
          © 1991 by Society for Neuroscience
          Categories
          Articles
          Custom metadata
          11/11/3456
          3456

          Comments

          Comment on this article