13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    3
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Accelerated Researchers: Psychosocial Risks in Gendered Institutions in Academia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In recent decades, scientific institutions have undergone significant changes due to new managerialism and the application of excellence in research. This research model has given rise to tensions related to increasing pressures and working demands in a competitive international environment that accelerate the pace of academic life. In addition, precarious working conditions and job insecurity have affected academics’ lives and careers. Academic literature has already addressed these organizational changes and their impact on academics, however, few studies have focused on psychosocial risks related to time constraints, meritocratic pressures and career insecurity from a gender perspective. This analysis is relevant given the gendered distribution of responsibilities and the evidence of gender biases in academia that hinder the advancement of gender equality in scientific institutions, as the persistent lack of women at the top of research careers show. In this paper, we explore the psychosocial effects of the new organizational model of science characterized by accelerated time regimes and precarious working conditions from a gender perspective. We draw attention to gender-based discriminatory practices that may yield an accumulative effect on the well-being of women academics. We analyze 36 interviews from women and men researchers from five areas of knowledge in Spanish universities and research centers, following a ‘gendered institutions’ approach. The results highlight psychosocial risks for both men and women academics as a result of accelerated work organizations, intensified by uncertainty and hyper-competition due to lack of positions. The hegemonic male work model characterized by total availability confirms academia as a gendered institution, especially damaging women’s well-being and careers, as well as those of men committed to care responsibilities – challenging motherhood explanations – which may discourage them from the pursuit of gender equality. Our findings highlight discriminatory practices toward women academics which create psychological harm and feelings of being unwelcome, putting their career progression at risk. Lastly, we suggest a different model of work organization following the implementation of a culture based on an ‘ethics of care’ feminist approach.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions

            Joan Acker (1992)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                19 July 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 1077
                Affiliations
                Internet Interdisciplinary Institute, Open University of Catalonia , Barcelona, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Eva Cifre, Universitat Jaume I, Spain

                Reviewed by: Shannon N. Davis, George Mason University, United States; Lena Wånggren, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

                *Correspondence: Ester Conesa Carpintero, econesaca@ 123456uoc.edu

                This article was submitted to Gender, Sex and Sexuality Studies, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01077
                6062159
                3748bdf8-9078-493f-9577-636def42019f
                Copyright © 2018 Conesa Carpintero and González Ramos.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 31 March 2018
                : 07 June 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 79, Pages: 13, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                gender,academia,time,well-being,precariousness,scientific careers
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                gender, academia, time, well-being, precariousness, scientific careers

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content62

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors374