3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Supportive Care - Essential for Modern Oncology

      Submit here before December 31, 2024

      About Oncology Research and Treatment: 2.0 Impact Factor I 3.2 CiteScore I 0.521 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Mesenchymal Subtype Has Worse Survival Outcomes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is a rare type of breast cancer that accounts for 0.2–1% of all breast cancers. To date, there are only few institutional studies comparing survival rates between different subtypes. In this retrospective cohort study, we aim to evaluate factors effecting survival rates of different subtypes of MBC. Methods: This retrospective cohort study observed 118 nonmetastatic MBC patient records extracted from 15,244 breast cancer cases between December 2000 and December 2020. In order to analyze factors effecting survival rates of mesenchymal subtype of MBC, all cases are classified as mesenchymal ( n = 45) and other ( n = 48). Twenty-five cases could not be sub-classified due to the missing data. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to define factors associated with survival rates. Results: Of the 15,244 cases, 118 (0.8%) were nonmetastatic MBC. 105 were triple negative and 12 were nonluminal HER2. There was no significant difference between mesenchymal and other subgroups for age, median tumor size, AJCC staging, and type of surgery. Of the five local recurrences with known subgroup, four of them had mesenchymal subtype. It is demonstrated that mesenchymal subtype was significantly associated with worse 5-year disease-free survival and disease-specific survival (HR: 2.35 [1.01–5.48], p = 0.049, and HR: 3.16 [1.06–9.47], p = 0.040 with 95% CI, respectively). Conclusion: This study is one of the few studies presenting the survival outcomes of subtypes of MBCs. Nonetheless, it is the only study demonstrating that mesenchymal subtype had worse survival outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine the outcome of different subtypes of MBCs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A comprehensive overview of metaplastic breast cancer: clinical features and molecular aberrations

          Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is an exceedingly rare breast cancer variant that is therapeutically challenging and aggressive. MpBC is defined by the histological presence of at least two cellular types, typically epithelial and mesenchymal components. This variant harbors a triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) phenotype, yet has a worse prognosis and decreased survival compared to TNBC. There are currently no standardized treatment guidelines specifically for MpBC. However, prior studies have found that MpBC typically has molecular alterations in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor, PI3K/Akt signaling, nitric oxide signaling, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, altered immune response, and cell cycle dysregulation. Some of these molecular alterations have been studied as therapeutic targets, in both the preclinical and clinical setting. This current review discusses the histological organization and cellular origins of MpBC, molecular alterations, the role of radiation therapy, and current clinical trials for MpBC.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators

            Background Metaplastic breast carcinoma is a rare aggressive malignant neoplasm. The purposes of this study are to review the pathologic features and clinical outcomes of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared to invasive ductal carcinoma and to evaluate the prognosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma. Methods The cases of 55 patients with metaplastic breast carcinomapresenting between 1991 and 2006 were analyzed and compared to the cases of 767 age-matched patients with invasive ductal carcinoma from the same time period. Results The group of patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma presented with a larger tumor size, lower lymph node involvement, higher percentage of triple-negative (estrogen receptor-, progesterone receptor- and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative) cases, and Ki-67 over-expression compared with the group of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas. Patients in the metaplastic breast carcinoma group tended to have more local (often chest wall) recurrences (P = 0.038) and distant (often lung) metastases (P = 0.001) than those in the invasive ductal carcinomas group. The prognosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma was poorer than that of invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas; the 5-year overall survival rate was 54.5% in metaplastic breast carcinoma versus 85.1% in invasive ductal carcinoma, and 73.3% in triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas (P <0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 45.5% in metaplastic breast carcinoma versus 71.2% in invasive ductal carcinoma, and 60.3% in triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas (P <0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size larger than 5.0 cm, lymph node involvement and Ki-67≥14% were significantly related to 5-year overall survival (P = 0.010; P = 0.010; P = 0.035) and 5-year disease-free survival (P = 0.020; P = 0.018; P = 0.049). Conclusions Metaplastic breast carcinoma shows a poorer prognosis than both invasive ductal carcinoma and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinomas. Tumor size larger than 5.0 cm, lymph node involvement and Ki-67 ≥14% indicate a poor prognosis in patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Metaplastic breast cancer: clinicopathological features and its prognosis.

              The prognosis of metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is reportedly worse than that of triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma (TN-IDC), but the determinants of poor prognosis are not yet known. Patients from two Korean cancer centres were included in this study (67 MBC and 520 TN-IDC). Characteristics of the two disease groups, including clinical parameters, histological features, chemoresponsiveness, disease recurrence and survival estimates, were evaluated. MBC presented with larger tumours, more frequent distant metastasis and higher histological grade compared with TN-IDC (p<0.001). All but nine patients with MBC had triple-negative disease. Disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) of MBC were worse than TN-IDC (p<0.001). Multivariable analysis of disease-free survival revealed MBC type as an independent prognostic factor (HR 2.53; 95% CI 1.32 to 4.84) along with lymph node metastasis and implementation of breast conserving surgery. For OS, MBC type remained a significant prognostic factor (HR 2.56; 95% CI 1.18 to 5.54). Chemoresponsiveness of MBC and TN-IDC were similar in both neoadjuvant (p=1.000) and advanced disease settings (p=0.508). For a given MBC type, risk factors for disease recurrence included the presence of a squamous component (HR 4.0; 95% CI 1.46 to 10.99) and lymph node metastasis (HR 4.76; 95% CI 1.67 to 13.60); the risk factor for OS was initial distant metastasis (HR 10.77; 95% CI 2.59 to 44.76). MBC had worse survival outcomes compared with TN-IDC. Poor prognosis for MBC was likely caused by frequent recurrence with high initial stage and the unique biology of MBC itself.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BRC
                BRC
                10.1159/issn.1661-3791
                Breast Care
                Breast Care
                S. Karger AG
                1661-3791
                1661-3805
                2022
                December 2022
                02 June 2022
                : 17
                : 6
                : 554-560
                Affiliations
                [_a] aDepartment of General Surgery, Başarı Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
                [_b] bDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
                [_c] cDepartment of Pathology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2597-3119
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0989-7411
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6156-7260
                Article
                525324 PMC9801396 Breast Care 2022;17:554–560
                10.1159/000525324
                PMC9801396
                36590148
                3748d3ae-ff7e-4b90-8464-cb527f85ea36
                © 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

                History
                : 14 April 2022
                : 31 May 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Pages: 7
                Funding
                This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
                Categories
                Research Article

                Medicine
                Overall survival,Breast neoplasms,Survival rate,Disease-free survival,Metaplastic carcinoma

                Comments

                Comment on this article