15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust.

      1 ,
      The Journal of applied psychology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Task conflict is usually associated with effective decisions, and relationship conflict is associated with poor decisions. The 2 conflict types are typically correlated in ongoing groups, however, which creates a prescriptive dilemma. Three explanations might account for this relationship--misattribution of task conflict as relationship conflict, harsh task conflict tactics triggering relationship conflict, and misattribution of relationship conflict as task conflict. The authors found that intragroup trust moderates the relationship between task conflict and relationship conflict in 70 top management teams. This result supports the "misattribution of task conflict" explanation. The authors also found a weak effect that is consistent with the argument that tactical choices drive the association between the 2 conflict types. We infer that trust is a key to gaining the benefits of task conflict without suffering the costs of relationship conflict.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Appl Psychol
          The Journal of applied psychology
          0021-9010
          0021-9010
          Feb 2000
          : 85
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] School of Hotel Administration, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-6902, USA. tony.simons@cornell.edu
          Article
          10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
          10740960
          3799db79-8a92-4808-83b9-bd7186bcce3b
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article