63
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perspectives on the Children’s Health Collection 2015

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          EHP’s sixth annual Children’s Health Collection, now online at http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/special-collections, compiles a year’s worth of research, commentary, and news published from October 2014 through September 2015. From the negative health effects of chemical, physical, and social hazards to the benefits of living in a healthy environment—both natural and built—the Collection tells the story of where we are today and points to the important work that lies ahead. It offers something for everyone concerned about children’s environmental health—researchers, regulators, advocates, health care providers, policy makers, educators, community developers, and parents—and we encourage you to download and share it. Reflecting upon the latest Collection, we are struck by how quickly the field of children’s environmental health is expanding and evolving, leading to a far more holistic understanding of how diverse environmental factors contribute to a child’s growth and development, from before birth through childhood and into adulthood. We are coming to appreciate the value of research designed to integrate children’s environmental exposures and health determinants across scales, starting with individual- and family-level factors (e.g., what we eat, the products we use, whether to breastfeed or rely on formula), and extending outward to consider community factors (e.g., proximity to pollution sources, access to fresh food and safe outdoor areas, local air and water quality in both urban and rural settings), and, finally, to national and global factors (e.g., climate change and its diverse ramifications for children’s health). We have long appreciated that the most vulnerable children are often those living in the communities most in need of environmental intervention, but we have lacked effective, coordinated means to fix the problem. Now, with increased attention on community factors that contribute to children’s health and well-being, we are realizing that effective environmental and public health intervention requires the collaborative efforts of decision makers across all sectors of society. Therefore, we need research to inform governmental sectors that act to prevent exposures and risks and to preserve natural environments, commercial sectors that design and repair the built environment and provide safe products, and public health sectors that create policy to prevent and treat childhood diseases. Recent articles focusing on multiple consequences of fracking, the complexity of indoor air pollution, the benefits of walkability in neighborhoods and access to green and blue spaces with respect to reducing obesity and improving neurobehavioral function in children, and how climate change may affect asthma risks illustrate the importance of decisions about the built and natural environments beyond those designed to reduce chemical exposures. This year’s Collection includes numerous reports based on cohort studies and surveys from around the globe. These involve pregnant women and children in Canada, Mexico, Costa Rica, Brazil, Korea, China, Taiwan, Bangladesh, Tanzania, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, France, Spain, Switzerland, England, Greece, and Yugoslavia, as well as in the United States. Some of these studies, including those under way in the Children’s Environmental and Disease Prevention Research Program funded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA 2015), are longitudinal in nature: They follow children from before birth through early childhood and into school age and adolescence. These and other longitudinal studies are finding associations between early-life exposures and a wide variety of adverse health outcomes, from birth defects and low birth weight to asthma, childhood cancer, neurodevelopmental problems (e.g., autism, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, impaired cognitive function), and metabolic problems associated with obesity (e.g., hypertension, diabetes). Comparing the latest EHP Children’s Health Collection with past Collections, we see a noteworthy transition from an emphasis on a single chemical as it relates to a single disease outcome, to a broader analysis of complex exposures (e.g., measuring multiple chemicals, evaluating both chemical and social stressors) in association with multiple disease outcomes. For example, recent research related to neurodevelopment continues existing lines of research on the adverse effects of metals while expanding to consider effects of cigarette smoke, air pollution, pesticides, phthalates, perfluorinated compounds, and/or organochlorines. Furthermore, given the growing problem of childhood obesity, recent papers have sought associations between a wide range of environmental contaminants and measures of body weight, growth, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes. We also see emerging interest in how placental function may modulate fetal exposures, and how social and behavioral factors (including diet), as well as the child’s microbiome, may influence childhood exposures and responses. As children in cohort studies age, researchers will be able to analyze how cumulative exposures to multiple chemicals and other stressors, both during critical windows of development and collectively, contribute to children’s health as it changes across the life course. Studies in the 2015 Collection, as in years past, evaluated biomarkers in pregnant women and children, not only in the context of identifying avenues for early-life exposures, but also for characterizing molecular initiating events operating on one or more critical developmental processes in the pathway toward disease. For example, several studies reported changes in DNA methylation of specific genes in association with exposures to metals and cigarette smoke during early development. In addition to increased attention on epigenetic mechanisms of disease causation, we see continued focus on endocrine-mediated developmental effects, and oxidative stress as a common pathway to childhood disease. Biomonitoring data from national surveys and cohort studies, combined with advances in analytical chemistry, continue to define the maternal and child exposome (the totality of environmental exposures over the life course). The plethora of biomonitoring data, in turn, requires more sophisticated approaches for interrogation and analysis. In response, the children’s environmental health community is calling for international cooperation to build human exposure databases and combine biomarker studies. The ESCAPE (European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects) (ESCAPE 2014) and NewGeneris (CREAL 2011) programs are combining birth cohorts from across Europe and working toward harmonized data collection and sample processing. This approach not only increases statistical power to detect associations, but also shows how exposures vary from country to country. Related efforts in the United States are under way in the Children’s Health Exposure Analysis Resource (CHEAR) program (NIEHS 2015), which is designed to provide tools for comprehensive children’s exposure assessment and data analysis, and through a new National Institutes of Health initiative called Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) (Schmidt 2015), which is designed to support longitudinal birth cohorts, build data and tissue repositories, and develop better analytical tools. Thus, the year ahead holds great promise for new research, and we invite you to submit your best manuscripts to EHP. Looking ahead to our preparations for the Children’s Health Collection 2016, we also welcome your suggestions for making its presentation ever more informative and useful.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Growing a New Study: Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes

          Prevalence rates for asthma, autism spectrum disorders, obesity, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and many other chronic childhood diseases remain stubbornly high in the United States. 1 It is also now widely understood that environmental exposures in early development and even preconception can adversely affect an individual’s health long after childhood. 2 Environmental factors in child development therefore affect the health not just of children themselves but of all society. Now the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is developing a large-scale long-term program to better understand these factors, dubbed Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO). A new program known as Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes will take advantage of existing birth cohorts, and possibly new cohorts, as well to study key areas of concern to children’s development and health. © Roy Scott NIH leaders envision building ECHO around four areas of public health interest: 1) upper- and lower-airway conditions, such as asthma and allergies; 2) obesity and related conditions such as diabetes and metabolic syndrome; 3) pre-, peri-, and postnatal outcomes, including birth defects; and 4) neurodevelopment and related conditions and outcomes such as autism, behavior, and cognition. Standardized core elements expected to be measured across each focus area will include demographics, growth, sleep, nutrition, and activity patterns, among others, plus newer parameters enabled by more recent scientific advances, including those pertaining to the microbiome and epigenetic influences on childhood development. In a Request for Information (RFI) issued 13 July 2015, the NIH solicited input on these plans. 3 Approximately 190 comments were received. As a general theme, the comments applauded the NIH’s effort to pull together a large, racially diverse study, while also raising concerns about how ECHO will integrate data sets derived from different sources and address the effects of early-life exposures, especially during gestation. Building on the National Children’s Study In a first foray into such broad-scale investigation of children’s environmental health, Congress in 2000 directed the NIH to carry out a prospective birth-cohort study that would follow 100,000 U.S. children from pregnancy to at least 21 years of age. In the National Children’s Study (NCS) researchers planned to measure chemical exposures in pregnancy and during early postnatal life, and to bank biological and environmental samples for later analysis. By 2014 more than $1.3 billion had been allocated to the NCS. 4 But NIH director Francis Collins cancelled the study in December of that year 5 after a review by the Institute of Medicine and recommendations from the Advisory Council to the Director concluded that the NCS was plagued by design flaws and feasibility issues. 6 Lawrence Tabak, deputy director of the NIH, emphasizes that ECHO won’t be just a new NCS, however. “We’re maintaining programmatic goals,” he says, “but the approach is totally different.” A critical difference between the NCS and ECHO concerns the use of birth cohorts. Where the NCS set out to enroll a large new cohort, ECHO will rely on existing cohorts and repositories of tissues—such as cord blood and placenta—that have been collected to measure environmental exposures and epigenetic changes across pregnancy and during childhood. “Making full use of available infrastructure by drawing on existing cohorts means we don’t have to reinvent the wheel and go through this costly process of recruitment,” Tabak says. “Existing cohorts will have done that already.” According to Dean Baker, a professor and director of the Center for Occupational and Environmental Health at the University of California, Irvine, the plan to recruit a new birth cohort was part of NCS’s downfall. Baker, a former investigator of a NCS study center who later served on the Institute of Medicine review committee, explains that study planners opted for household-based recruitment using a door-to-door strategy that would ideally enroll large numbers not only of pregnant women but also of women who were planning to become pregnant. This would enable the evaluation of environmental effects from the earliest stages of development onward. Field staff achieved initial recruitment goals during the NCS pilot phase. But follow-up of the nonpregnant women proved more problematic. “During the pilot, we were limited to traditional telephone communication, and the preconception population is highly mobile—many young women move and change phone numbers frequently,” Baker explains. He says investigators planned to follow the women for five years but had lost contact with 54% of them within a year and a half. Brenda Eskenazi, director of the Center for Environmental Research and Children’s Health at the University of California, Berkeley, points out that hospital or clinic-based recruitment improves on door-to-door sampling “because you’re working with women who are already in the medical system.” And indeed, based on additional pilot testing, the NCS program office did eventually propose a more practical strategy of provider-based and hospital prenatal recruitment specifically for pregnant women. “But by that time,” Baker says, “Congress had mandated the review of the NCS by the Institute of Medicine, which concluded in its 2014 report 6 that the NIH program responsible for NCS lacked sufficient in-house expertise and the NCS management structure was unlikely to produce a high-quality, cost-efficient study protocol.” Existing Cohorts, New Tools NIH officials have not yet selected any existing cohorts for ECHO research funding. But Tabak has made public reference 7 to the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be—or nuMoM2b for short—a cohort of racially, ethnically, and geographically diverse pregnant women recruited at eight clinical research sites and twelve subsites around the country. 8 Launched in 2010 by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and co-funded by NICHD and the NIH Office of Research on Women’s Health, nuMoM2b has recruited 9,000 women so far and ultimately aims to recruit 10,000 in all. The cohort was designed to characterize the genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors that predict adverse pregnancy outcomes among mothers and developing babies. NICHD principal investigators who direct the cohort did not respond to requests for comment. But several researchers interviewed for this story are concerned that many existing birth cohorts in the United States are irrelevant in some respect to the environmental exposures children face today. Eskenazi, for instance, directs the CHAMACOS (Center for the Health Assessment of Mothers and Children of Salinas) Study, which investigates environmental factors and child health in a population of Latino agricultural workers in California’s Salinas Valley. 9 The study enrolled 601 pregnant women at six local clinics between 1999 and 2000. Some data collected years ago when the study was launched might still be valuable, Eskenazi says, but they may not reflect current environmental exposures, such as alternative chemicals used to replace known toxicants. Baker also questions how many existing cohorts collected high-quality data on environmental conditions, especially during critical periods of prenatal development. “That really isn’t clear,” he says, “although I think it’s a good idea to inventory what’s out there to see what we can merge together.” According to Baker, most of the prospective studies of environmental influences on child health during the last decade have been statistically underpowered—that is, limited by having too few participants for certain types of analysis. Therefore, he says, the total population drawn from existing cohorts in ECHO would need to be large enough to assess multiple exposures—and interactions between exposures and genes—with statistical confidence. Nigel Paneth is a professor of epidemiology, biostatistics, and pediatrics at Michigan State University and a former NCS principal investigator. He emphasizes that to identify preventable risk factors for childhood disease, especially the dominant causes of infant mortality—birth defects and preterm birth 10 —researchers must measure environmental exposures comprehensively in real time during pregnancy. “ECHO, by restricting itself to extant cohorts, will provide some information, but it’s not comparable to making a comprehensive assessment during the critical exposure window of pregnancy,” he says. Philip Landrigan, former director of the Children’s Environmental Health Center at New York’s Mount Sinai Hospital, recommends a hybrid approach: the judicious creation of new birth cohorts and/or the recruitment of new mother–infant pairs into selected existing cohorts. “This strategy will allow investigators to assess new environmental exposures that did not exist when some of the existing cohorts were first created a decade or more ago,” he says. Landrigan and Baker coauthored a perspectives article in early 2015 1 in which they argued for a “coordinated national confederation of regional, academically based, prospective birth-cohort studies” that could pursue the NCS’s initial research agenda. That confederation, they wrote, “would collect, analyze, store, and share common core data under standard protocols, but each institution could also collect data specific to its population, environment, and geographic region.” Baker says that ECHO appears to be “a meaningful alternative to the NCS,” but he argues the program will need a longer-term strategy for pooling and analyzing data from existing cohorts, adding new births to those cohorts, and initiating new birth cohorts. One of ECHO’s expected strong points will be that it can serve as a test for new tools used in environmental and pediatric monitoring. “The NCS didn’t make the investments needed for developing sensors and other types of sophisticated exposure technology,” Baker says. “We’re talking about chips that can measure a huge array of chemicals at very low concentrations. That might sounds like science fiction, but people are working on these tools, and they’re making progress.” The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences is supporting the development of many such sensors, says institute director Linda Birnbaum. “We provided leadership in the NIH Roadmap Epigenetics Program 11 and have continued this support through our regular grants programs,” she says. Indeed, the NIH just awarded nearly $144 million in new grants to develop new tools and approaches for studying pediatric diseases, which will help support ECHO. 12 Next Steps A long-term strategy for ECHO has not been decided, in part because it will depend on funding availability. “We anticipate five to seven years of funding and are planning with this timeline in mind,” Tabak says. According to a statement provided to EHP by the NIH press office, the President’s budget requests $165 million in support for ECHO for fiscal year 2016. The NIH is now reviewing the comments submitted in response to the RFI, and an analysis will be prepared and released in the coming months. Summaries are provided to the ECHO working group on a regular and ongoing basis, Tabak says, and key items will continue to be discussed and considered for implementation into the final ECHO plan. Tabak anticipates that fiscal year 2016 funding opportunity announcements will be released later this year, with the review process beginning next summer. Awards are expected to be made by September 2016.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Children’s Health Exposure Analysis Resource (CHEAR) [website].

            (2015)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              NIEHS/EPA Children’s Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research Centers [website].

              (2015)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Environ Health Perspect
                Environ. Health Perspect
                EHP
                Environmental Health Perspectives
                National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
                0091-6765
                1552-9924
                01 January 2016
                January 2016
                : 124
                : 1
                : A1-A2
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Editor-in-Chief and
                [2 ]Children’s Health Editor, Environmental Health Perspectives, , National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
                Author notes
                Article
                ehp.1511049
                10.1289/ehp.1511049
                4710614
                26720198
                37b096fa-1123-4fbb-abbf-da1c9f929616

                Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.

                History
                Categories
                Editorial

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article