23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Diagnosis and management of Neuro-Behçet’s disease: international consensus recommendations

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Neuro-Behçet’s disease (NBD) is one of the more serious manifestations of Behçet’s disease (BD), which is a relapsing inflammatory multisystem disease with an interesting epidemiology. Though NBD is relatively uncommon, being potentially treatable, neurologists need to consider it in the differential diagnosis of inflammatory, infective, or demyelinating CNS disorders. Evidence-based information on key issues of NBD diagnosis and management is scarce, and planning for such studies is challenging. We therefore initiated this project to develop expert consensus recommendations that might be helpful to neurologists and other clinicians, created through an extensive literature review and wide consultations with an international advisory panel, followed by a Delphi exercise. We agreed on consensus criteria for the diagnosis of NBD with two levels of certainty in addition to recommendations on when to consider NBD in a neurological patient, and on the use of various paraclinical tests. The management recommendations included treatment of the parenchymal NBD and cerebral venous thrombosis, the use of disease modifying therapies, prognostic factors, outcome measures, and headache in BD. Future studies are needed to validate the proposed criteria and provide evidence-based treatments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references88

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cerebral venous thrombosis: an update.

          Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare type of cerebrovascular disease that can occur at any age, including in neonates, and it accounts for 0.5% of all stroke. The widespread use of neuroimaging now allows for early diagnosis and has completely modified our knowledge on this disorder. CVT is more common than previously thought and it is recognised as a non-septic disorder with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations, numerous causes, and usually a favourable outcome with a low mortality rate. MRI with T1, T2, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and T2* sequences combined with magnetic resonance angiography are the best diagnostic methods. D-dimer concentrations are raised in most patients but normal D-dimers do not rule out CVT, particularly in patients who present with isolated headache. Heparin is the first-line treatment, but in a few cases more aggressive treatments, such as local intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and decompressive hemicraniectomy, may be required.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis.

            J. Rankin (1957)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recovery of motor function after stroke.

              The natural history of recovery of motor function after stroke is described using data from a 1-year community-based study in Auckland, New Zealand. Of 680 patients, 88% presented with a hemiparesis; the proportion of survivors with a persisting deficit declined to 71% at 1 month and 62% at 6 months after the onset of the stroke. At onset, there were equal proportions of people with mild, moderate, and severe motor deficits, but the majority (76%) of those who survived 6 months had either no or only a mild deficit. Recovery of motor function was associated with the stroke severity but not with age or sex; patients with a mild motor deficit at onset were 10 times more likely to recover their motor function than those with a severe stroke. Our results confirm the reasonably optimistic outcome for survivors of stroke and further suggest that recovery of motor function is confined to patients whose motor deficit at onset is either mild or moderate.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                adnan.al-araji@uhns.nhs.uk
                Journal
                J Neurol
                J. Neurol
                Journal of Neurology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0340-5354
                1432-1459
                24 December 2013
                24 December 2013
                2014
                : 261
                : 9
                : 1662-1676
                Affiliations
                [ ]Neurology Research Department, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, England, UK
                [ ]Central Manchester University Hospital, Manchester, UK
                [ ]Neurology Department, Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkey
                [ ]Department of Neurosciences, Saudi Neurology Society, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [ ]Academic Division of Clinical Neurology, Queen’s Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
                [ ]Health Policy Research Center and Department of Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
                [ ]Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Hospital La Rabta, University el Manar 2 Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
                [ ]Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Saint-Louis, University Paris 7, René Diderot, Paris, France
                [ ]Rheumatology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera, IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Viale Risorgimento n 80, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
                [ ]First Department of Propedeutic Internal Medicine, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
                [ ]Neurology Department, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
                [ ]Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire UK
                Article
                7209
                10.1007/s00415-013-7209-3
                4155170
                24366648
                37c26847-5bab-4163-8d4c-8cfeeca95cb1
                © The Author(s) 2013

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

                History
                : 29 November 2013
                : 4 December 2013
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

                Neurology
                neuro-behçet’s disease,behçet’s disease,delphi method,consensus,diagnosis,management
                Neurology
                neuro-behçet’s disease, behçet’s disease, delphi method, consensus, diagnosis, management

                Comments

                Comment on this article