25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Transdiagnostic Self-management Web-Based App for Sleep Disturbance in Adolescents and Young Adults: Feasibility and Acceptability Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Sleep disturbance and its daytime sequelae, which comprise complex, transdiagnostic sleep problems, are pervasive problems in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) and are associated with negative outcomes. Effective interventions must be both evidence based and individually tailored. Some AYAs prefer self-management and digital approaches. Leveraging these preferences is helpful, given the dearth of AYA treatment providers trained in behavioral sleep medicine. We involved AYAs in the co-design of a behavioral, self-management, transdiagnostic sleep app called DOZE (Delivering Online Zzz’s with Empirical Support).

          Objective

          This study tests the feasibility and acceptability of DOZE in a community AYA sample aged 15-24 years. The secondary objective is to evaluate sleep and related outcomes in this nonclinical sample.

          Methods

          Participants used DOZE for 4 weeks (2 periods of 2 weeks). They completed sleep diaries, received feedback on their sleep, set goals in identified target areas, and accessed tips to help them achieve their goals. Measures of acceptability and credibility were completed at baseline and end point. Google Analytics was used to understand the patterns of app use to assess feasibility. Participants completed questionnaires assessing fatigue, sleepiness, chronotype, depression, anxiety, and quality of life at baseline and end point.

          Results

          In total, 83 participants created a DOZE account, and 51 completed the study. During the study, 2659 app sessions took place with an average duration of 3:02 minutes. AYAs tracked most days in period 1 (mean 10.52, SD 4.87) and period 2 (mean 9.81, SD 6.65), with a modal time of 9 AM (within 2 hours of waking). DOZE was appraised as highly acceptable (mode≥4) on the items “easy to use,” “easy to understand,” “time commitment,” and “overall satisfaction” and was rated as credible (mode≥4) at baseline and end point across all items (logic, confident it would work, confident recommending it to a friend, willingness to undergo, and perceived success in treating others). The most common goals set were decreasing schedule variability (34/83, 41% of participants), naps (17/83, 20%), and morning lingering in bed (16/83, 19%). AYAs accessed tips on difficulty winding down (24/83, 29% of participants), being a night owl (17/83, 20%), difficulty getting up (13/83, 16%), and fatigue (13/83, 16%). There were significant improvements in morning lingering in bed ( P=.03); total wake time ( P=.02); sleep efficiency ( P=.002); total sleep time ( P=.03); and self-reported insomnia severity ( P=.001), anxiety ( P=.002), depression ( P=.004), and energy ( P=.01).

          Conclusions

          Our results support the feasibility, acceptability, credibility, and preliminary efficacy of DOZE. AYAs are able to set and achieve goals based on tailored feedback on their sleep habits, which is consistent with research suggesting that AYAs prefer autonomy in their health care choices and produce good results when given tools that support their autonomy.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03960294; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03960294

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

          A 36-item short-form (SF-36) was constructed to survey health status in the Medical Outcomes Study. The SF-36 was designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations, and general population surveys. The SF-36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses eight health concepts: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems; 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; 7) vitality (energy and fatigue); and 8) general health perceptions. The survey was constructed for self-administration by persons 14 years of age and older, and for administration by a trained interviewer in person or by telephone. The history of the development of the SF-36, the origin of specific items, and the logic underlying their selection are summarized. The content and features of the SF-36 are compared with the 20-item Medical Outcomes Study short-form.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research.

            C. Bastien (2001)
            Background: Insomnia is a prevalent health complaint that is often difficult to evaluate reliably. There is an important need for brief and valid assessment tools to assist practitioners in the clinical evaluation of insomnia complaints.Objective: This paper reports on the clinical validation of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) as a brief screening measure of insomnia and as an outcome measure in treatment research. The psychometric properties (internal consistency, concurrent validity, factor structure) of the ISI were evaluated in two samples of insomnia patients.Methods: The first study examined the internal consistency and concurrent validity of the ISI in 145 patients evaluated for insomnia at a sleep disorders clinic. Data from the ISI were compared to those of a sleep diary measure. In the second study, the concurrent validity of the ISI was evaluated in a sample of 78 older patients who participated in a randomized-controlled trial of behavioral and pharmacological therapies for insomnia. Change scores on the ISI over time were compared with those obtained from sleep diaries and polysomnography. Comparisons were also made between ISI scores obtained from patients, significant others, and clinicians.Results: The results of Study 1 showed that the ISI has adequate internal consistency and is a reliable self-report measure to evaluate perceived sleep difficulties. The results from Study 2 also indicated that the ISI is a valid and sensitive measure to detect changes in perceived sleep difficulties with treatment. In addition, there is a close convergence between scores obtained from the ISI patient's version and those from the clinician's and significant other's versions.Conclusions: The present findings indicate that the ISI is a reliable and valid instrument to quantify perceived insomnia severity. The ISI is likely to be a clinically useful tool as a screening device or as an outcome measure in insomnia treatment research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Insomnia Severity Index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response.

              Although insomnia is a prevalent complaint with significant morbidity, it often remains unrecognized and untreated. Brief and valid instruments are needed both for screening and outcome assessment. This study examined psychometric indices of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) to detect cases of insomnia in a population-based sample and to evaluate treatment response in a clinical sample. Participants were 959 individuals selected from the community for an epidemiological study of insomnia (Community sample) and 183 individuals evaluated for insomnia treatment and 62 controls without insomnia (Clinical sample). They completed the ISI and several measures of sleep quality, fatigue, psychological symptoms, and quality of life; those in the Clinical sample also completed sleep diaries, polysomnography, and interviews to validate their insomnia/good sleep status and assess treatment response. In addition to standard psychometric indices of reliability and validity, item response theory analyses were computed to examine ISI item response patterns. Receiver operating curves were used to derive optimal cutoff scores for case identification and to quantify the minimally important changes in relation to global improvement ratings obtained by an independent assessor. ISI internal consistency was excellent for both samples (Cronbach α of 0.90 and 0.91). Item response analyses revealed adequate discriminatory capacity for 5 of the 7 items. Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations between total ISI score and measures of fatigue, quality of life, anxiety, and depression. A cutoff score of 10 was optimal (86.1% sensitivity and 87.7% specificity) for detecting insomnia cases in the community sample. In the clinical sample, a change score of -8.4 points (95% CI: -7.1, -9.4) was associated with moderate improvement as rated by an independent assessor after treatment. These findings provide further evidence that the ISI is a reliable and valid instrument to detect cases of insomnia in the population and is sensitive to treatment response in clinical patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Form Res
                JMIR Form Res
                JFR
                JMIR Formative Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2561-326X
                November 2021
                1 November 2021
                : 5
                : 11
                : e25392
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Psychology Ryerson University Toronto, ON Canada
                [2 ] Department of Psychology Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John's, NL Canada
                [3 ] Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Dalhousie University Halifax, NS Canada
                [4 ] Department of Psychiatry Dalhousie University Halifax, NS Canada
                [5 ] Department of Psychiatry University of Toronto Toronto, ON Canada
                [6 ] Margaret and Wallace McCain Centre for Child, Youth and Family Mental Health Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Toronto, ON Canada
                [7 ] Human Resource Management and Organizational Behaviour Ted Rogers School of Management Ryerson University Toronto, ON Canada
                [8 ] Department of Ophthamology University of Toronto Toronto, ON Canada
                [9 ] Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing Ryerson University Toronto, ON Canada
                [10 ] Chronic Pain Program Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto, ON Canada
                [11 ] Child Health Evaluative Sciences Research Institute The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto, ON Canada
                [12 ] Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing University of Toronto Toronto, ON Canada
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Colleen E Carney ccarney@ 123456ryerson.ca
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3387-8234
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3020-6646
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8126-3264
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2552-4973
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9387-5193
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3597-2996
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4523-2169
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9115-2389
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9969-8052
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1942-2049
                Article
                v5i11e25392
                10.2196/25392
                8694239
                34723820
                38037632-e6a4-4b19-8506-8d0e49b6bfb7
                ©Nicole E Carmona, Aleksandra Usyatynsky, Samlau Kutana, Penny Corkum, Joanna Henderson, Kelly McShane, Colin Shapiro, Souraya Sidani, Jennifer Stinson, Colleen E Carney. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 01.11.2021.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 30 October 2020
                : 18 November 2020
                : 6 January 2021
                : 13 September 2021
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                youth,sleep,technology,mhealth,self-management,adolescents,young adults,mobile phone

                Comments

                Comment on this article