5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Clinical factors associated with peanut allergy in a high‐risk infant cohort

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Prognostication of peanut allergy (PNA) is relevant for early interventions. We aimed to determine baseline parameters associated with development of PNA in 3–15 month olds with likely egg and/or milk allergy, and/or moderate-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and a positive egg/milk skin prick test (SPT), but no known PNA. The primary endpoint was PNA [confirmed/convincing diagnosis or last classified as serologic PNA (<2 yrs, ≥5 kUA/L, otherwise ≥14 kUA/L, peanut-IgE)] among 511 participants (median follow-up, 7.3 years). Associations were explored with univariate logistic regression; factors with p<0.15 were analyzed by stepwise multiple logistic regression, using data stratified by PNA status and randomly assigned to development and validation datasets. 205/511 (40.1%) had PNA. Univariate factors associated with PNA (p<0.01) included: increased AD severity, larger egg and peanut SPT, greater egg, milk, peanut, Ara h1-h3 IgE, higher peanut IgG and IgG4, and increased pregnancy peanut consumption. P-values were between 0.01 and 0.05 for younger age, non-white race, lack of breastfeeding, and increased lactation peanut consumption. Using a development dataset, the multivariate model identified younger age at enrollment, greater peanut and Ara h2 IgE, and lack of breastfeeding as prognosticators. The final model predicted 79% in the development and 75% in the validation dataset (AUC=0.83 for both). Models using stricter or less strict PNA criteria both found Ara h2 as predictive. Key factors associated with PNA in this high risk population included lack of breastfeeding, age, and greater Ara h2 and peanut-specific IgE, which can be used to prognosticate outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Early-life gut microbiome composition and milk allergy resolution.

            Gut microbiota may play a role in the natural history of cow's milk allergy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Early oral immunotherapy in peanut-allergic preschool children is safe and highly effective

              Background Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an effective experimental food allergy treatment that is limited by treatment withdrawal and the frequent reversibility of desensitization if interrupted. Newly-diagnosed preschool children may have clinical and immunological characteristics more amenable to treatment. Objective To test the safety, effectiveness, and feasibility of early OIT (E-OIT) in the treatment of peanut allergy. Methods We enrolled 40 children aged 9–36 months with suspected or known peanut allergy. Qualifying subjects reacted to peanut during an entry food challenge and were block-randomized 1:1 to receive E-OIT at goal maintenance doses of 300 or 3000 mg/day in a double-blinded fashion. The primary endpoint, sustained unresponsiveness at four weeks after stopping E-OIT (4-SU), was assessed by DBPCFC either upon achieving four pre-specified criteria, or after three maintenance years. Peanut-specific immune responses were serially analyzed. Outcomes were compared to 154 matched standard-care controls. Results Of 40 consented subjects, three (7.5%) did not qualify. Overall, 29/37 (78%) in the intent-to-treat analysis achieved 4-SU (300 mg arm, 17/20 [85%]; 3000 mg, 12/17 [71%], p=0.43) over a median of 29 months. Per-protocol, the overall proportion achieving 4-SU was 29/32 (91%). Peanut-specific IgE levels significantly declined in E-OIT-treated children, who were 19 times more likely to successfully consume dietary peanut than matched standard-care controls, in whom peanut-specific IgEs significantly increased (RR 19.42 [95%CI 8.7 – 43.7], p<0.001). Allergic side effects during E-OIT were common but all were mild-moderate. Conclusion At both doses tested, E-OIT had an acceptable safety profile and was highly successful in rapidly suppressing allergic immune responses and achieving safe dietary reintroduction. This randomized clinical trial generates critical new evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of peanut OIT in newly-diagnosed young children, demonstrating superior outcomes after treatment as compared to matched standard-care controls.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Allergy
                Allergy
                Wiley
                0105-4538
                1398-9995
                July 15 2019
                July 15 2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pediatrics Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York
                [2 ]Department of Pediatrics Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland
                [3 ]Department of Pediatrics, Arkansas Children’s Hospital University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock Arkansas
                [4 ]Department of Pediatrics National Jewish Health Denver Colorado
                [5 ]The EMMES Company, LLC Rockville Maryland
                [6 ]Department of Pediatrics University of North Carolina Chapel Hill North Carolina
                Article
                10.1111/all.13920
                6817376
                31120555
                381cf396-5d6b-47d7-8bbf-1598e00b2bfa
                © 2019

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article