14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Risk of tuberculosis in patients with solid cancers and haematological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is uncertainty regarding whether patients with cancer should be screened for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the relative incidence of tuberculosis (TB) in cancer.

          We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies published before December 21, 2016. We included studies that evaluated the incidence of TB in patients with solid cancers and haematological malignancies relative to a reference group (study control or general population). A pooled estimate of the incidence rate ratio (IRR) was obtained using standard meta-analysis methods.

          The search strategy identified 13 unique studies including 921 464 patients with cancer. The IRR of TB for adult patients with cancer was 2.61 (95% CI 2.12–3.22; I 2=91%). In haematological cancers, the IRR was 3.53 (95% CI 1.63–7.64; I 2=96%); and in solid cancers in adults, it was 2.25 (95% CI 1.96–2.58; I 2=91%). The highest IRR was found in children with haematological malignancies or solid cancers (IRR 16.82, 95% CI 8.81–32.12; I 2=79%).

          Considering the limited duration of maximum immunosuppression in cancer and reduced cumulative lifetime risk of TB because of reduced life expectancy, children, but not adults, appear to be at a sufficient level of risk to warrant systematic screening for LTBI.

          Abstract

          Screening and treatment for latent tuberculosis infection should be considered in children with cancer http://ow.ly/lpSQ30dxyam

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: risks, consequences, and new directions for its management.

          Cytotoxic chemotherapy suppresses the hematopoietic system, impairing host protective mechanisms and limiting the doses of chemotherapy that can be tolerated. Neutropenia, the most serious hematologic toxicity, is associated with the risk of life-threatening infections as well as chemotherapy dose reductions and delays that may compromise treatment outcomes. The authors reviewed the recent literature to provide an update on research in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and its complications and impact, and they discuss the implications of this work for improving the management of patients with cancer who are treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Despite its importance as the primary dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy, much concerning neutropenia and its consequences and impact remains unknown. Recent surveys indicate that neutropenia remains a prevalent problem associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs. Much research has sought to identify risk factors that may predispose patients to neutropenic complications, including febrile neutropenia, in an effort to predict better which patients are at risk and to use preventive strategies, such as prophylactic colony-stimulating factors, more cost-effectively. Neutropenic complications associated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, possibly compromised treatment outcomes, and excess healthcare costs. Research in quantifying the risk of neutropenic complications may make it possible in the near future to target patients at greater risk with appropriate preventive strategies, thereby maximizing the benefits and minimizing the costs. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. This is a Joint Statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This statement was endorsed by the Council of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. (IDSA), September 1999, and the sections of this statement.

            (2000)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Facts and fiction of the relationship between preexisting tuberculosis and lung cancer risk: a systematic review.

              There has been conflicting evidence concerning the possible association between tuberculosis (TB) and subsequent risk of lung cancer. To investigate whether currently published epidemiological studies can clarify this association, we performed a systematic review of 37 case-control and 4 cohort studies (published between January 1966 and January 2009) and a meta-analysis of risk estimates, with particular attention to the role of smoking, passive smoking and the timing of diagnosis of TB on this relationship. Data for the review show a significantly increased lung cancer risk associated with preexisting TB. Importantly, the association was not due to confounding by the effects of tobacco use (RR=1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.4-2.2, among never smoking individuals), lifetime environmental tobacco smoke exposure (RR=2.9, 95%CI=1.6-5.3, after controlling) or the timing of diagnosis of TB (the increased lung cancer risk remained 2-fold elevated for more than 20 years after TB diagnosis). Interestingly, the association was significant with adenocarcinoma (RR=1.6, 95%CI=1.2-2.1), but no significant associations with squamous and small cell type of lung cancer were observed. Although no causal mechanism has been demonstrated for such an association, present study supports a direct relation between TB and lung cancer, especially adenocarcinomas. Copyright (c) 2009 UICC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Respir J
                Eur. Respir. J
                ERJ
                erj
                The European Respiratory Journal
                European Respiratory Society
                0903-1936
                1399-3003
                August 2017
                24 August 2017
                : 50
                : 2
                : 1700157
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Respiratory Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool (Sydney), NSW, Australia
                [2 ]South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [3 ]Clinical Management Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [4 ]NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
                Author notes
                Claudia C. Dobler, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Elizabeth Street, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia. E-mail: c.dobler@ 123456unsw.edu.au
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5460-0189
                Article
                ERJ-00157-2017
                10.1183/13993003.00157-2017
                5593389
                28838977
                3837aec9-6dbf-4780-a157-dd46f67ef989
                Copyright ©ERS 2017
                History
                : 23 January 2017
                : 26 May 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: National Health and Medical Research Council http://doi.org/10.13039/501100000925
                Award ID: APP1090198
                Categories
                Original Articles
                Tuberculosis
                4

                Respiratory medicine
                Respiratory medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article