9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Improving Cell Viability and Velocity in μ-Extrusion Bioprinting with a Novel Pre-Incubator Bioprinter and a Standard FDM 3D Printing Nozzle

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Bioprinting is a promising emerging technology. It has been widely studied by the scientific community for the possibility to create transplantable artificial tissues, with minimal risk to the patient. Although the biomaterials and cells to be used are being carefully studied, there is still a long way to go before a bioprinter can easily and quickly produce printings without harmful effects on the cells. In this sense, we have developed a new μ-extrusion bioprinter formed by an Atom Proton 3D printer, an atmospheric enclosure and a new extrusion-head capable to increment usual printing velocity. Hence, this work has two main objectives. First, to experimentally study the accuracy and precision. Secondly, to study the influence of flow rates on cellular viability using this novel μ-extrusion bioprinter in combination with a standard FDM 3D printing nozzle. Our results show an X, Y and Z axis movement accuracy under 17 μm with a precision around 12 μm while the extruder values are under 5 and 7 μm, respectively. Additionally, the cell viability obtained from different volumetric flow tests varies from 70 to 90%. So, the proposed bioprinter and nozzle can control the atmospheric conditions and increase the volumetric flow speeding up the bioprinting process without compromising the cell viability.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Biofabrication: A Guide to Technology and Terminology

          Biofabrication holds the potential to generate constructs that more closely recapitulate the complexity and heterogeneity of tissues and organs than do currently available regenerative medicine therapies. Such constructs can be applied for tissue regeneration or as in vitro 3D models. Biofabrication is maturing and growing, and scientists with different backgrounds are joining this field, underscoring the need for unity regarding the use of terminology. We therefore believe that there is a compelling need to clarify the relationship between the different concepts, technologies, and descriptions of biofabrication that are often used interchangeably or inconsistently in the current literature. Our objective is to provide a guide to the terminology for different technologies in the field which may serve as a reference for the biofabrication community.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            ‘Printability' of Candidate Biomaterials for Extrusion Based 3D Printing: State-of-the-Art

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Print Me An Organ! Why We Are Not There Yet

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Materials (Basel)
                Materials (Basel)
                materials
                Materials
                MDPI
                1996-1944
                05 June 2021
                June 2021
                : 14
                : 11
                : 3100
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, 10071 Cáceres, Spain; vpgalvan@ 123456ccmijesususon.com (V.G.-C.); dpatrocinio@ 123456ccmijesususon.com (D.P.); mduarte@ 123456ccmijesususon.com (M.D.-L.); fmarinaro@ 123456ccmijesususon.com (F.M.); msanchez@ 123456ccmijesususon.com (F.M.S.-M.)
                [2 ]School of Industrial Engineering, University of Extremadura, 06006 Badajoz, Spain; manuelmp@ 123456unex.es (M.M.); ajs@ 123456unex.es (Á.J.S.-O.); acmarcos@ 123456unex.es (A.C.M.)
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4354-5313
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1073-289X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3187-1728
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0882-4210
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5965-7718
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4382-5075
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2138-988X
                Article
                materials-14-03100
                10.3390/ma14113100
                8201198
                34198815
                383fdbc8-2964-40f4-b8a0-313db4f3ef70
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 28 April 2021
                : 02 June 2021
                Categories
                Article

                bioprinting,pre-incubator,atmospheric enclosure,3d printing,nozzle,conical tip,fluid flow,cell viability

                Comments

                Comment on this article