92
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    17
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What can individual differences reveal about face processing?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Faces are probably the most widely studied visual stimulus. Most research on face processing has used a group-mean approach that averages behavioral or neural responses to faces across individuals and treats variance between individuals as noise. However, individual differences in face processing can provide valuable information that complements and extends findings from group-mean studies. Here we demonstrate that studies employing an individual differences approach—examining associations and dissociations across individuals—can answer fundamental questions about the way face processing operates. In particular these studies allow us to associate and dissociate the mechanisms involved in face processing, tie behavioral face processing mechanisms to neural mechanisms, link face processing to broader capacities and quantify developmental influences on face processing. The individual differences approach we illustrate here is a powerful method that should be further explored within the domain of face processing as well as fruitfully applied across the cognitive sciences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The many faces of configural processing.

          Adults' expertise in recognizing faces has been attributed to configural processing. We distinguish three types of configural processing: detecting the first-order relations that define faces (i.e. two eyes above a nose and mouth), holistic processing (glueing the features together into a gestalt), and processing second-order relations (i.e. the spacing among features). We provide evidence for their separability based on behavioral marker tasks, their sensitivity to experimental manipulations, and their patterns of development. We note that inversion affects each type of configural processing, not just sensitivity to second-order relations, and we review evidence on whether configural processing is unique to faces.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Looking at upside-down faces.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front. Hum. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5161
                19 August 2014
                2014
                : 8
                : 562
                Affiliations
                [1] 1School of Psychological Sciences, Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel
                [2] 2Department of Psychology, Wellesley College Wellesley, MA, USA
                [3] 3Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College Hanover, NH, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Mark A. Williams, Macquarie University, Australia

                Reviewed by: Ruthger Righart, Technische Universität München, Germany; Cyril R. Pernet, University of Edinburgh, UK

                *Correspondence: Galit Yovel, School of Psychological Sciences, Sagol School of Neuroscience, Sharet Building, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel e-mail: gality@ 123456post.tau.ac.il

                This article was submitted to the journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

                Article
                10.3389/fnhum.2014.00562
                4137541
                25191241
                385593f8-d620-4f4d-bc98-72790851b0cc
                Copyright © 2014 Yovel, Wilmer and Duchaine.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 27 April 2014
                : 10 July 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 59, Pages: 9, Words: 6570
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Review Article

                Neurosciences
                face recognition,individual differences,holistic processing,fusiform face area,behavioral genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article