20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ambulatory monitoring demonstrates an acute association between cookstove-related carbon monoxide and blood pressure in a Ghanaian cohort

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Repeated exposure to household air pollution may intermittently raise blood pressure (BP) and affect cardiovascular outcomes. We investigated whether hourly carbon monoxide (CO) exposures were associated with acute increases in ambulatory blood pressure (ABP); and secondarily, if switching to an improved cookstove was associated with BP changes. We also evaluated the feasibility of using 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in a cohort of pregnant women in Ghana.

          Methods

          Participants were 44 women enrolled in the Ghana Randomized Air Pollution and Health Study (GRAPHS). For 27 of the women, BP was measured using 24-h ABPM; home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) was used to measure BP in the remaining 17 women. Personal CO exposure monitoring was conducted alongside the BP monitoring.

          Results

          ABPM revealed that peak CO exposure (defined as ≥4.1 ppm) in the 2 hours prior to BP measurement was associated with elevations in hourly systolic BP (4.3 mmHg [95% CI: 1.1, 7.4]) and diastolic BP (4.5 mmHg [95% CI: 1.9, 7.2]), as compared to BP following lower CO exposures. Women receiving improved cookstoves had lower post-intervention SBP (within-subject change in SBP of −2.1 mmHg [95% CI: -6.6, 2.4] as compared to control), though this result did not reach statistical significance. 98.1% of expected 24-h ABPM sessions were successfully completed, with 92.5% of them valid according to internationally defined criteria.

          Conclusions

          We demonstrate an association between acute exposure to carbon monoxide and transient increases in BP in a West African setting. ABPM shows promise as an outcome measure for assessing cardiovascular health benefits of cookstove interventions.

          Trial registration

          The GRAPHS trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov on 13 April 2011 with the identifier NCT01335490.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12940-017-0282-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

          The Lancet, 380(9859), 2224-2260
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Woodsmoke health effects: a review.

            The sentiment that woodsmoke, being a natural substance, must be benign to humans is still sometimes heard. It is now well established, however, that wood-burning stoves and fireplaces as well as wildland and agricultural fires emit significant quantities of known health-damaging pollutants, including several carcinogenic compounds. Two of the principal gaseous pollutants in woodsmoke, CO and NOx, add to the atmospheric levels of these regulated gases emitted by other combustion sources. Health impacts of exposures to these gases and some of the other woodsmoke constituents (e.g., benzene) are well characterized in thousands of publications. As these gases are indistinguishable no matter where they come from, there is no urgent need to examine their particular health implications in woodsmoke. With this as the backdrop, this review approaches the issue of why woodsmoke may be a special case requiring separate health evaluation through two questions. The first question we address is whether woodsmoke should be regulated and/or managed separately, even though some of its separate constituents are already regulated in many jurisdictions. The second question we address is whether woodsmoke particles pose different levels of risk than other ambient particles of similar size. To address these two key questions, we examine several topics: the chemical and physical nature of woodsmoke; the exposures and epidemiology of smoke from wildland fires and agricultural burning, and related controlled human laboratory exposures to biomass smoke; the epidemiology of outdoor and indoor woodsmoke exposures from residential woodburning in developed countries; and the toxicology of woodsmoke, based on animal exposures and laboratory tests. In addition, a short summary of the exposures and health effects of biomass smoke in developing countries is provided as an additional line of evidence. In the concluding section, we return to the two key issues above to summarize (1) what is currently known about the health effects of inhaled woodsmoke at exposure levels experienced in developed countries, and (2) whether there exists sufficient reason to believe that woodsmoke particles are sufficiently different to warrant separate treatment from other regulated particles. In addition, we provide recommendations for additional woodsmoke research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prognostic accuracy of day versus night ambulatory blood pressure: a cohort study.

              Few studies have formally compared the predictive value of the blood pressure at night over and beyond the daytime value. We investigated the prognostic significance of the ambulatory blood pressure during night and day and of the night-to-day blood pressure ratio. We did 24-h blood pressure monitoring in 7458 people (mean age 56.8 years [SD 13.9]) enrolled in prospective population studies in Denmark, Belgium, Japan, Sweden, Uruguay, and China. We calculated multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios for daytime and night-time blood pressure and the systolic night-to-day ratio, while adjusting for cohort and cardiovascular risk factors. Median follow-up was 9.6 years (5th to 95th percentile 2.5-13.7). Adjusted for daytime blood pressure, night-time blood pressure predicted total (n=983; p or =0.07). Adjusted for the 24-h blood pressure, night-to-day ratio predicted mortality, but not fatal combined with non-fatal events. Antihypertensive drug treatment removed the significant association between cardiovascular events and the daytime blood pressure. Participants with systolic night-to-day ratio value of 1 or more were older, at higher risk of death, and died at an older age than those whose night-to-day ratio was normal (> or =0.80 to <0.90). In contrast to commonly held views, daytime blood pressure adjusted for night-time blood pressure predicts fatal combined with non-fatal cardiovascular events, except in treated patients, in whom antihypertensive drugs might reduce blood pressure during the day, but not at night. The increased mortality in patients with higher night-time than daytime blood pressure probably indicates reverse causality. Our findings support recording the ambulatory blood pressure during the whole day.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ashlinn.quinn@nih.gov
                kenneth.asayah@kintampo-hrc.org
                pkinney@bu.edu
                kaali.seyram@kintampo-hrc.org
                bwylie@mgh.harvard.edu
                ellen.boamah@kintampo-hrc.org
                ds2231@cumc.columbia.edu
                oscar.agyei@kintampo-hrc.org
                chilli@ldeo.columbia.edu
                mohammed.mujtaba@kintampo-hrc.org
                Joseph.Schwartz@stonybrookmedicine.edu
                ma2947@cumc.columbia.edu
                seth.owusu-agyei@kintampo-hrc.org
                212-305-1692 , dj2183@cumc.columbia.edu
                kwakupoku.asante@kintampo-hrc.org
                Journal
                Environ Health
                Environ Health
                Environmental Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1476-069X
                21 July 2017
                21 July 2017
                2017
                : 16
                : 76
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000419368729, GRID grid.21729.3f, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, , Columbia University, ; 722 West 168th St, 11th floor, New York, 10032 NY USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0546 2044, GRID grid.415375.1, , Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, ; Brong Ahafo Region, Kintampo, Ghana
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7558, GRID grid.189504.1, Department of Environmental Health, , Boston University School of Public Health, ; Boston, MA USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0386 9924, GRID grid.32224.35, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, , Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, ; Boston, MA USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2285 2675, GRID grid.239585.0, Department of Medicine, , Columbia University Medical Center, ; New York, NY USA
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9175 9928, GRID grid.473157.3, , Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, ; Palisades, NY USA
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2216 9681, GRID grid.36425.36, Institute for Applied Behavioral Medicine Research, , Stony Brook University, ; Stony Brook, NY USA
                [8 ]ISNI 0000000419368729, GRID grid.21729.3f, Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, , Columbia University, ; New York, NY USA
                Article
                282
                10.1186/s12940-017-0282-9
                5521137
                28732501
                38598688-bf7e-44ed-b23d-b13214c539d4
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 24 January 2017
                : 26 June 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000066, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences;
                Award ID: R01ES019547
                Award ID: T32 ES023770
                Award ID: P30 ES009089
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000050, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute;
                Award ID: K24HL125704
                Award ID: HL117323-02S2
                Award ID: P01-HL047540
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005627, Thrasher Research Fund;
                Funded by: Mailman School of Public Health Global Health Initiative, Columbia University (US)
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Public health
                household air pollution,carbon monoxide,blood pressure,ambulatory blood pressure monitoring,cookstoves,biomass

                Comments

                Comment on this article