32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A new user cohort study comparing the safety of long-acting inhaled bronchodilators in COPD

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 3
      BMJ Open
      BMJ Group

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To investigate a possible increased risk observed in tiotropium clinical trials of stroke and other adverse events.

          Design

          New users of long-acting anticholinergic therapy (tiotropium HandiHaler®) were compared with new users of long-acting β-agonist (LABA) monotherapy, and propensity scores were used to control confounding.

          Setting

          UK healthcare system general practitioner electronic medical record database.

          Participants

          10 840 patients newly prescribed tiotropium (n=4767) or LABA (n=6073), at least 40 years old, and not having asthma as their only respiratory illness.

          Primary and secondary outcome measures

          Incidence rates of total stroke, myocardial infarction, angina and other adverse events.

          Results

          Tiotropium was associated with increased rates of stroke (HR=1.49, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.45), angina (HR=1.38, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.16) and myocardial infarction (HR=1.26, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.21). Groups had similar rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (HR=0.95, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.12) and pneumonia (HR=0.96, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.58). Tiotropium was associated with a lower rate of total mortality (HR=0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.89) and asthma exacerbations (HR=0.46, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.57) than users of LABA.

          Conclusion

          Small increased risks of serious ischaemic cardiovascular events have been reported with inhaled anticholinergic medication from randomised and nonrandomized studies of ipratropium, tiotropium HandiHaler® and tiotropium Respimat®. Additional research is needed to understand the full extent of cardiovascular effects of inhaled anticholinergic medications and the patients who may be most susceptible.

          Article summary

          Article focus
          • This study investigated whether there are possible increased risks of stroke and other adverse events, including angina and myocardial infarction, with tiotropium use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

          • The authors compared new users of long-acting anticholinergic therapy (tiotropium HandiHaler®) with new users of LABA monotherapy.

          Key messages
          • Compared with LABA, tiotropium HandiHaler was associated with increased risks of angina, myocardial infarction and stroke and lower risk of total mortality.

          • The results of this study are similar to results from a recent clinical trial comparing tiotropium with salmeterol and support the hypothesis that tiotropium HandiHaler can be associated with an increased risk of ischaemic cardiovascular events.

          Strengths and limitations of this study
          • Strengths of this study are the new user design and use of propensity scores to control for available risk factors, including demographic factors, history of respirator, cardiovascular and other illness and respiratory, cardiovascular and other medications.

          • Limitations of this study are that routine lung function measures were unavailable, and composite end points of all-cause mortality and all strokes may attenuate associations for cardiovascular mortality and ischaemic stroke.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tiotropium versus salmeterol for the prevention of exacerbations of COPD.

            Treatment guidelines recommend the use of inhaled long-acting bronchodilators to alleviate symptoms and reduce the risk of exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-very-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but do not specify whether a long-acting anticholinergic drug or a β(2)-agonist is the preferred agent. We investigated whether the anticholinergic drug tiotropium is superior to the β(2)-agonist salmeterol in preventing exacerbations of COPD. In a 1-year, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial, we compared the effect of treatment with 18 μg of tiotropium once daily with that of 50 μg of salmeterol twice daily on the incidence of moderate or severe exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD and a history of exacerbations in the preceding year. A total of 7376 patients were randomly assigned to and treated with tiotropium (3707 patients) or salmeterol (3669 patients). Tiotropium, as compared with salmeterol, increased the time to the first exacerbation (187 days vs. 145 days), with a 17% reduction in risk (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 0.90; P<0.001). Tiotropium also increased the time to the first severe exacerbation (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.85; P<0.001), reduced the annual number of moderate or severe exacerbations (0.64 vs. 0.72; rate ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.96; P=0.002), and reduced the annual number of severe exacerbations (0.09 vs. 0.13; rate ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.82; P<0.001). Overall, the incidence of serious adverse events and of adverse events leading to the discontinuation of treatment was similar in the two study groups. There were 64 deaths (1.7%) in the tiotropium group and 78 (2.1%) in the salmeterol group. These results show that, in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD, tiotropium is more effective than salmeterol in preventing exacerbations. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00563381.).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2012
                22 May 2012
                22 May 2012
                : 2
                : 3
                : e000841
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Acorda Therapeutics, Hawthorne, New York, USA
                [2 ]Department of Epidemiology and Database Analytics, United BioSource Corp, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA
                [3 ]Department of Epidemiology and Database Analytics, United Biosource Corporation, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Dr Michele Jara; mjara@ 123456acorda.com
                Article
                bmjopen-2012-000841
                10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000841
                3364448
                22619266
                385a87b5-d686-4199-8f42-7e13bdee0cb1
                © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

                History
                : 26 January 2012
                : 16 April 2012
                Categories
                Pharmacology and Therapeutics
                Research
                1506
                1692
                1723
                1731

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article