11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      No Mow May lawns have higher pollinator richness and abundances: An engaged community provides floral resources for pollinators

      research-article
      1 , , 2
      PeerJ
      PeerJ Inc.
      Urban biodiversity, Native bees, Lawn management, Bee biodiversity, Citizen science, Urban ecology

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          No Mow May is a community science initiative popularized in recent years that encourages property owners to limit their lawn mowing practices during the month of May. The goal of No Mow May is to provide early season foraging resources for pollinators that emerge in the spring, especially in urban landscapes when few floral resources are available. We worked with the city council of Appleton, Wisconsin, USA. to allow No Mow May to take place in May 2020. Four hundred and thirty-five property owners registered for No Mow May in Appleton. We measured floral and bee richness and abundance in the yards of a subset of homes ( N = 20) located near regularly mowed urban parks ( N = 15) at the end of the month. We found that homes that participated in No Mow May had more diverse and abundant flora than regularly mowed green spaces throughout the city. No Mow May homes had three times higher bee richness and five times higher bee abundances than frequently mowed greenspaces. Using generalized linear models, we found that the best predictor of bee richness was the size of the designated unmowed area, and the best predictors of bee abundances were the size of the unmowed area as well as floral richness. While our findings cannot conclusively attribute increases in bee abundances and richness to the No Mow May efforts, our data does show that bee pollinators make use of no mow spaces as key floral resources during early spring in the upper midwestern United States. A post-No Mow May survey revealed that the participants were keen to increase native floral resources in their yards, increase native bee nesting habitat, reduce mowing intensities, and limit herbicide, pesticide, and fertilizer applications to their lawns. The No Mow May initiative educated an engaged community on best practices to improve the conservation of urban pollinators in future years.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ggmap: Spatial Visualization with ggplot2

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Where is the UK's pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects

              Insect pollinators provide a crucial ecosystem service, but are under threat. Urban areas could be important for pollinators, though their value relative to other habitats is poorly known. We compared pollinator communities using quantified flower-visitation networks in 36 sites (each 1 km2) in three landscapes: urban, farmland and nature reserves. Overall, flower-visitor abundance and species richness did not differ significantly between the three landscape types. Bee abundance did not differ between landscapes, but bee species richness was higher in urban areas than farmland. Hoverfly abundance was higher in farmland and nature reserves than urban sites, but species richness did not differ significantly. While urban pollinator assemblages were more homogeneous across space than those in farmland or nature reserves, there was no significant difference in the numbers of rarer species between the three landscapes. Network-level specialization was higher in farmland than urban sites. Relative to other habitats, urban visitors foraged from a greater number of plant species (higher generality) but also visited a lower proportion of available plant species (higher specialization), both possibly driven by higher urban plant richness. Urban areas are growing, and improving their value for pollinators should be part of any national strategy to conserve and restore pollinators.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                peerj
                peerj
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Diego, USA )
                2167-8359
                22 September 2020
                2020
                : 8
                : e10021
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Biology, Lawrence University , Appleton, WI, United States of America
                [2 ]Geosciences, Lawrence University , Appleton, WI, United States of America
                Article
                10021
                10.7717/peerj.10021
                7518183
                33024642
                386a350e-fc70-46da-b0f1-aa421e1057b7
                ©2020 Del Toro and Ribbons

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 26 June 2020
                : 2 September 2020
                Funding
                The authors received no funding for this work.
                Categories
                Biodiversity
                Conservation Biology
                Ecology
                Entomology
                Coupled Natural and Human Systems

                urban biodiversity,native bees,lawn management,bee biodiversity,citizen science,urban ecology

                Comments

                Comment on this article