31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Brief Statement on Papers Published in “Iranian J Publ Health” During 2012

      editorial
      Iranian Journal of Public Health
      Tehran University of Medical Sciences

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Following indexing and citing the Iranian J Publ Health in ISI Thomson and PubMedCentral (PMC) and PubMed databases, the Journal has been faced with an increasing trend of receiving articles from different parts of the world. Considering this increasment and to fulfill the need of improving the level of scientific outcomes, the Journal authorities decided to release it monthly, instead of quarterly publishing of a 40 yr history. The total number of manuscripts received during 2012 was 850 from 40 countries. Obviously, Iran, the homeland of the Journal, has acquired the first rank of the list, followed by China and Turkey (Table I). Out of total submission of 850 articles during 2012, 11 manuscripts were rejected after initial screening or later checking for plagiarism. According to the policy of the Journal, authors of minor cases of plagiarism are given a chance to amend their articles totally and exactly but major cases are rejected. Considering that the Journal publishes more or less papers form non-native English countries, the issue of plagiarism sounds outstandingly in submitted articles to this Journal. Therefore, not mention of above-mentioned rates of rejected cases of plagiarism, many other authors received warning on plagiarism and were asked to revise their papers. The Journal follows a policy of in-house evaluation followed by double blind peer review system. As for foreigner authors we try to exert an open peer review system. Normally 2–3 referees evaluate a manuscript. The reasons for rejecting a manuscript during in-house evaluation are various but the most important cases are over flow of manuscripts, out of scope cases, poor outcome, local studies, clinical contents etc. According to Table 1, Turkey encompasses the highest rate of rejecting as 89%, followed by Pakistan as 85%. Altogether, manuscripts received from other countries than Iran, were 313 of which 233 cases (74%) were rejected. Cases reported as 100% rejection clearly are out of scientific conclusion. Total number of papers published during 2012 was 181 of which 123 cases belonged to Iran followed by 11 cases from China (Table 2). The types of articles published during 2012 are shown in Table 3. Accordingly, Original Articles with 74.5% rate show the highest rate of publication. As for corresponding authors’ organizations mentioned in articles published during 2012, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, where the Journal is affiliated and published, encompasses the highest rate of publishing as 31.1% (Table 4).

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Role: Editor-in-Chief
          Journal
          Iran J Public Health
          Iran. J. Public Health
          IJPH
          Iranian Journal of Public Health
          Tehran University of Medical Sciences
          2251-6085
          2251-6093
          2013
          1 January 2013
          : 42
          : 1
          : i-iii
          Article
          ijph-42-0
          3595635
          23513186
          3877fa39-3fa9-4382-9161-ddaa348d2886
          Copyright © Iranian Public Health Association & Tehran University of Medical Sciences

          This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License ((CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

          History
          Categories
          Editorial

          Public health
          Public health

          Comments

          Comment on this article