3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Impact of e-liquid flavors on nicotine intake and pharmacology of e-cigarettes

      , , , ,
      Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d6700756e164">Objectives</h5> <p id="P1">To describe the effect of e-liquid flavors on nicotine intake and pharmacology of e-cigarettes. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d6700756e169">Methods</h5> <p id="P2">11 males and 3 females participated in a 3-day inpatient crossover study with strawberry, tobacco, and their usual flavor e-liquid. Nicotine levels were nominally 18 mg/ml in the strawberry (pH 8.29) and tobacco (pH 9.10) e-liquids and ranged between 3–18 mg/ml in the usual brands (mean pH 6.80). Each day consisted of a 15-puff session followed by 4 hours of abstinence, then 90 minutes of <i>ad libitum</i> use. Subjects used a KangerTech mini ProTank 3. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d6700756e177">Results</h5> <p id="P3">After 15 puffs, the amount of nicotine inhaled and systemically retained were not significantly different between the strawberry and tobacco e-liquids but plasma AUC <sub>(0→180)</sub> was significantly higher with the strawberry e-liquid. While not significantly different, C <sub>max</sub> was 22% higher and various early time point AUCs to measure rate of rise of nicotine in blood ranged between 17–23% higher with the strawberry e-liquid compared to the tobacco e-liquid. During <i>ad libitum</i> use, systemic exposure to nicotine (AUC <sub>(0→90)</sub>) was the same for the tobacco and usual brand e-liquids but were both significantly lower than after using the strawberry e-liquid. The usual flavors were more liked and satisfying than the strawberry and tobacco e-liquids. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d6700756e194">Conclusion</h5> <p id="P4">Flavors influence nicotine exposure through flavor liking, may affect rate of nicotine absorption possibly through pH effects, and contribute to heart rate acceleration and subjective effects of e-cigarettes. E-cigarette users titrate their nicotine exposure but the extent of titration may vary across flavors. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Drug and Alcohol Dependence
          Drug and Alcohol Dependence
          Elsevier BV
          03768716
          September 2017
          September 2017
          : 178
          : 391-398
          Article
          10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.042
          5565733
          28704768
          388227a6-2957-436a-8193-43f79688cb81
          © 2017

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article