55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Best-worst scaling (BWS), also known as maximum-difference scaling, is a multiattribute approach to measuring preferences. BWS aims at the analysis of preferences regarding a set of attributes, their levels or alternatives. It is a stated-preference method based on the assumption that respondents are capable of making judgments regarding the best and the worst (or the most and least important, respectively) out of three or more elements of a choice-set. As is true of discrete choice experiments (DCE) generally, BWS avoids the known weaknesses of rating and ranking scales while holding the promise of generating additional information by making respondents choose twice, namely the best as well as the worst criteria. A systematic literature review found 53 BWS applications in health and healthcare. This article expounds possibilities of application, the underlying theoretical concepts and the implementation of BWS in its three variants: ‘object case’, ‘profile case’, ‘multiprofile case’. This paper contains a survey of BWS methods and revolves around study design, experimental design, and data analysis. Moreover the article discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the three types of BWS distinguished and offered an outlook. A companion paper focuses on special issues of theory and statistical inference confronting BWS in preference measurement.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mixed MNL models for discrete response

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Best--worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it.

            Statements like "quality of care is more highly valued than waiting time" can neither be supported nor refuted by comparisons of utility parameters from a traditional discrete choice experiment (DCE). Best--worst scaling can overcome this problem because it asks respondents to perform a different choice task. However, whilst the nature of the best--worst task is generally understood, there are a number of issues relating to the design and analysis of a best--worst choice experiment that require further exposition. This paper illustrates how to aggregate and analyse such data and using a quality of life pilot study demonstrates how richer insights can be drawn by the use of best--worst tasks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                muehlbacher@hs-nb.de
                kaczynski@hs-nb.de
                peter.zweifel@econ.uzh.ch
                reed.johnson@duke.edu
                Journal
                Health Econ Rev
                Health Econ Rev
                Health Economics Review
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                2191-1991
                8 January 2016
                8 January 2016
                2015
                : 6
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [ ]IGM Institute for Health Economics and Health Care Management, Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany
                [ ]Department of Economics, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
                [ ]Center for Clinical and Genetic Economics, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, USA
                Article
                79
                10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x
                4705077
                26743636
                389f51f3-2fbf-4671-9f50-9b0804ba2675
                © Mühlbacher et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 9 July 2015
                : 18 December 2015
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Economics of health & social care
                best-worst scaling,bws,experimental measurement,healthcare decision making,patient preferences

                Comments

                Comment on this article