1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Revisiting the ecology and evolution of burying beetle behavior (Staphylinidae: Silphinae)

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Investigating fundamental processes in biology requires the ability to ground broad questions in species‐specific natural history. This is particularly true in the study of behavior because an organism's experience of the environment will influence the expression of behavior and the opportunity for selection. Here, we provide a review of the natural history and behavior of burying beetles of the genus Nicrophorus to provide the groundwork for comparative work that showcases their remarkable behavioral and ecological diversity. Burying beetles have long fascinated scientists because of their well‐developed parenting behavior, exhibiting extended post‐hatching care of offspring that varies extensively within and across taxa. Despite the burgeoning success of burying beetles as a model system for the study of behavioral evolution, there has not been a review of their behavior, ecology, and evolution in over 25 years. To address this gap, we leverage a developing community of researchers who have contributed to a detailed knowledge of burying beetles to highlight the utility of Nicrophorus for investigating the causes and consequences of social and behavioral evolution.

          Abstract

          Burying beetles of the genus Nicrophorus are becoming a model system for the evolution of parental care. Investigating fundamental processes in biology requires the ability to ground broad questions in species‐specific natural history. Here, we leverage a developing community of researchers who have contributed to a detailed knowledge of burying beetles to highlight the ecology and evolution of Nicrophorus, and the utility of this genus for investigating the causes and consequences of social and behavioral evolution.

          Related collections

          Most cited references362

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms.

          Multicellular organisms live, by and large, harmoniously with microbes. The cornea of the eye of an animal is almost always free of signs of infection. The insect flourishes without lymphocytes or antibodies. A plant seed germinates successfully in the midst of soil microbes. How is this accomplished? Both animals and plants possess potent, broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides, which they use to fend off a wide range of microbes, including bacteria, fungi, viruses and protozoa. What sorts of molecules are they? How are they employed by animals in their defence? As our need for new antibiotics becomes more pressing, could we design anti-infective drugs based on the design principles these molecules teach us?
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY.

            The problem of complex adaptations is studied in two largely disconnected research traditions: evolutionary biology and evolutionary computer science. This paper summarizes the results from both areas and compares their implications. In evolutionary computer science it was found that the Darwinian process of mutation, recombination and selection is not universally effective in improving complex systems like computer programs or chip designs. For adaptation to occur, these systems must possess "evolvability," i.e., the ability of random variations to sometimes produce improvement. It was found that evolvability critically depends on the way genetic variation maps onto phenotypic variation, an issue known as the representation problem. The genotype-phenotype map determines the variability of characters, which is the propensity to vary. Variability needs to be distinguished from variations, which are the actually realized differences between individuals. The genotype-phenotype map is the common theme underlying such varied biological phenomena as genetic canalization, developmental constraints, biological versatility, developmental dissociability, and morphological integration. For evolutionary biology the representation problem has important implications: how is it that extant species acquired a genotype-phenotype map which allows improvement by mutation and selection? Is the genotype-phenotype map able to change in evolution? What are the selective forces, if any, that shape the genotype-phenotype map? We propose that the genotype-phenotype map can evolve by two main routes: epistatic mutations, or the creation of new genes. A common result for organismic design is modularity. By modularity we mean a genotype-phenotype map in which there are few pleiotropic effects among characters serving different functions, with pleiotropic effects falling mainly among characters that are part of a single functional complex. Such a design is expected to improve evolvability by limiting the interference between the adaptation of different functions. Several population genetic models are reviewed that are intended to explain the evolutionary origin of a modular design. While our current knowledge is insufficient to assess the plausibility of these models, they form the beginning of a framework for understanding the evolution of the genotype-phenotype map.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects.

              Alexander Skutch hypothesized that increased parental activity can increase the risk of nest predation. We tested this hypothesis using ten open-nesting bird species in Arizona, USA. Parental activity was greater during the nestling than incubation stage because parents visited the nest frequently to feed their young during the nestling stage. However, nest predation did not generally increase with parental activity between nesting stages across the ten study species. Previous investigators have found similar results. We tested whether nest site effects might yield higher predation during incubation because the most obvious sites are depredated most rapidly. We conducted experiments using nest sites from the previous year to remove parental activity. Our results showed that nest sites have highly repeatable effects on nest predation risk; poor nest sites incurred rapid predation and caused predation rates to be greater during the incubation than nestling stage. This pattern also was exhibited in a bird species with similar (i.e. controlled) parental activity between nesting stages. Once nest site effects are taken into account, nest predation shows a strong proximate increase with parental activity during the nestling stage within and across species. Parental activity and nest sites exert antagonistic influences on current estimates of nest predation between nesting stages and both must be considered in order to understand current patterns of nest predation, which is an important source of natural selection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                apottica@nmu.edu
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                20 August 2024
                August 2024
                : 14
                : 8 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.v14.8 )
                : e70175
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Biology Northern Michigan University Marquette Michigan USA
                [ 2 ] Department of Entomology University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Biology Brigham Young University Provo Utah USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Biological Sciences Purdue University Northwest Hammond Indiana USA
                [ 5 ] Department of Environmental Science Toho University Funabashi Chiba Japan
                [ 6 ] Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
                [ 7 ] Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
                [ 8 ] Centre for Ecology and Conservation, Faculty of Environment, Science & the Economy University of Exeter Cornwall UK
                [ 9 ] Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology Columbia University New York City New York USA
                [ 10 ] Department of Biology Sewanee, The University of the South Sewanee Tennessee USA
                [ 11 ] Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica Taipei Taiwan
                [ 12 ] University of Alaska Museum and Department of Biology and Wildlife University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks Alaska USA
                [ 13 ] Institute of Ecology and Evolution The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
                [ 14 ] Department of Biological Sciences Idaho State University Pocatello Idaho USA
                [ 15 ] Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory Crested Butte Colorado USA
                [ 16 ] Department of Evolutionary Animal Ecology University of Bayreuth Bayreuth Germany
                [ 17 ] Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut Waterbury Connecticut USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Ahva L. Potticary, Department of Biology, Northern Michigan University, 1401 Presque Isle Avenue, Marquette, MI 49855, USA.

                Email: apottica@ 123456nmu.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1157-5315
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-0717
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8032-7318
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2451-624X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1159-0758
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9241-0124
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1617-3884
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4999-3723
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5432-6696
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0631-6343
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4336-2365
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6896-1332
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4776-0982
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9714-5665
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4455-4211
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1498-3322
                Article
                ECE370175 ECE-2024-05-01073.R1
                10.1002/ece3.70175
                11336061
                39170054
                390d1f1f-3968-47cc-9fa0-5a14db4ae9a3
                © 2024 The Author(s). Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 July 2024
                : 31 May 2024
                : 29 July 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Pages: 28, Words: 25200
                Funding
                Funded by: U.S. Department of Agriculture , doi 10.13039/100000199;
                Categories
                Behavioural Ecology
                Review Article
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                August 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.6 mode:remove_FC converted:21.08.2024

                Evolutionary Biology
                behavioral precursors,life history,nicrophorini,nicrophorus,parental care ecology

                Comments

                Comment on this article