16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Missed opportunities in full immunization coverage: findings from low- and lower-middle-income countries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          An estimated 23 million infants are still not being benefitted from routine immunization services. We assessed how many children failed to be fully immunized even though they or their mothers were in contact with health services to receive other interventions.

          Design

          Fourteen countries with Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys carried out after 2000 and with coverage for DPT (Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis) vaccine below 70% were selected. We defined full immunization coverage (FIC) as having received one dose of BCG (bacille Calmette-Guérin), one dose of measles, three doses of polio, and three doses of DPT vaccines. We tabulated FIC against: antenatal care (ANC), skilled birth attendance (SBA), postnatal care for the mother (PNC), vitamin A supplementation (VitA) for the child, and sleeping under an insecticide-treated bed-net (ITN). Missed opportunities were defined as the percentage of children who failed to be fully immunized among those receiving one or more other interventions.

          Results

          Children who received other health interventions were also more likely to be fully immunized. In nearly all countries, FIC was lowest among children born to mothers who failed to attend ANC, and highest when the mother had four or more ANC visits Côte d'Ivoire presented the largest difference in FIC: 54 percentage points (pp) between having four or more ANC visits and lack of ANC. SBA was also related with higher FIC. For instance, the coverage in children without SBA was 36 pp lower than for those with SBA in Nigeria. The largest absolute difference on FIC in relation to PNC was observed for Ethiopia: 31 pp between those without and with PNC. FIC was also positively related with having received VitA. The largest absolute difference was observed in DR Congo: 41 pp. The differences in FIC among whether or not children slept under ITN were much smaller than for other interventions. Haiti presented the largest absolute difference: 16 pp.

          Conclusions

          Our results show the need to develop and implement strategies to vaccinate all children who contact health services in order to receive other interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Co-coverage of preventive interventions and implications for child-survival strategies: evidence from national surveys.

          In most low-income countries, several child-survival interventions are being implemented. We assessed how these interventions are clustered at the level of the individual child. We analysed data from Bangladesh, Benin, Brazil, Cambodia, Eritrea, Haiti, Malawi, Nepal, and Nicaragua. A co-coverage score was obtained by adding the number of interventions received by each child (including BCG, diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus, and measles vaccines), tetanus toxoid for the mother, vitamin A supplementation, antenatal care, skilled delivery, and safe water. Socioeconomic status was assessed through principal components analysis of household assets, and concentration indices were calculated. The percentage of children who did not receive a single intervention ranged from 0.3% (14/5495) in Nicaragua to 18.8% (1154/6144) in Cambodia. The proportions receiving all available interventions varied from 0.8% (48/6144) in Cambodia to 13.3% (733/5495) in Nicaragua. There were substantial inequities within all countries. In the poorest wealth quintile, 31% of Cambodian children received no interventions and 17% only one intervention; in Haiti, these figures were 15% and 17%, respectively. Inequities were inversely related to coverage levels. Countries with higher coverage rates tended to show bottom inequity patterns, with the poorest lagging behind all other groups, whereas low-coverage countries showed top inequities with the rich substantially above the rest. The inequitable clustering of interventions at the level of the child raises the possibility that the introduction of new technologies might primarily benefit children who are already covered by existing interventions. Packaging several interventions through a single delivery strategy, while making economic sense, could contribute to increased inequities unless population coverage is very high. Co-coverage analyses of child-health surveys provide a way to assess these issues.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A study on determinants of immunization coverage among 12-23 months old children in urban slums of Lucknow district, India.

            To find out the suitable factors for raising the coverage of immunization. To determine the coverage and to identify the various factors of primary immunization. Urban slums of Lucknow district. WHO 30-cluster sampling technique was used for the selection of the subjects. Mother, father or relative of a total of 510 children with 17 children per cluster were interviewed in the study. Chi-square test, binary logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression analysis were done to test the statistical significance of the association. About 44% of the children studied were fully immunized. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that an illiterate mother (OR=4.0), Muslim religion (OR=2.5), scheduled caste or tribes (OR=2.3) and higher birth order (OR approximately 2) were significant independent predictors of the partial immunized status of the child; while those associated with the unimmunized status of the child were low socioeconomic status (OR=10.8), Muslim religion (OR=4.3), higher birth order (OR=4.3), home delivery (OR=3.6) and belonging to a joint family (OR=2.1). The status of complete immunization is about half of what was proposed to be achieved under the Universal Immunization Program. This emphasizes the imperative need for urgent intervention to address the issues of both dropout and lack of access, which are mainly responsible for partial immunization and nonimmunization respectively.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Global Vaccine Action Plan 2011–2020

              (2013)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Glob Health Action
                Glob Health Action
                GHA
                Global Health Action
                Co-Action Publishing
                1654-9716
                1654-9880
                03 May 2016
                2016
                : 9
                : 10.3402/gha.v9.30963
                Affiliations
                [1 ]International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
                [2 ]International Center for Equity in Health, Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
                [3 ]Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland
                [4 ]Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: María Clara Restrepo-Méndez, International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Rua Marechal Deodoro, 1160 3° Piso, CEP: 96020-220, Pelotas, Brazil, Email: mcrestrepo@ 123456equidade.org

                Responsible Editor: Stig Wall, Umeå University, Sweden.

                Article
                30963
                10.3402/gha.v9.30963
                4856841
                27146444
                392b4dbe-fbcb-49b3-ab9d-1eed39276a4f
                © 2016 María Clara Restrepo-Méndez et al.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

                History
                : 12 January 2016
                : 19 March 2016
                : 06 April 2016
                Categories
                Original Article

                Health & Social care
                vaccines,vaccination,immunization,child health,health services
                Health & Social care
                vaccines, vaccination, immunization, child health, health services

                Comments

                Comment on this article