11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Treatment coverage rates for refractive error in the National Eye Health survey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To present treatment coverage rates and risk factors associated with uncorrected refractive error in Australia.

          Methods

          Thirty population clusters were randomly selected from all geographic remoteness strata in Australia to provide samples of 1738 Indigenous Australians aged 40 years and older and 3098 non-Indigenous Australians aged 50 years and older. Presenting visual acuity was measured and those with vision loss (worse than 6/12) underwent pinhole testing and hand-held auto-refraction. Participants whose corrected visual acuity improved to be 6/12 or better were assigned as having uncorrected refractive error as the main cause of vision loss. The treatment coverage rates of refractive error were calculated (proportion of participants with refractive error that had distance correction and presenting visual acuity better than 6/12), and risk factor analysis for refractive correction was performed.

          Results

          The refractive error treatment coverage rate in Indigenous Australians of 82.2% (95% CI 78.6–85.3) was significantly lower than in non-Indigenous Australians (93.5%, 92.0–94.8) (Odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 0.35–0.75). In Indigenous participants, remoteness (OR 0.41, 0.19–0.89 and OR 0.55, 0.35–0.85 in Outer Regional and Very Remote areas, respectively), having never undergone an eye examination (OR 0.08, 0.02–0.43) and having consulted a health worker other than an optometrist or ophthalmologist (OR 0.30, 0.11–0.84) were risk factors for low coverage. On the other hand, speaking English was a protective factor (OR 2.72, 1.13–6.45) for treatment of refractive error. Compared to non-Indigenous Australians who had an eye examination within one year, participants who had not undergone an eye examination within the past five years (OR 0.08, 0.03–0.21) or had never been examined (OR 0.05, 0.10–0.23) had lower coverage.

          Conclusion

          Interventions that increase integrated optometry services in regional and remote Indigenous communities may improve the treatment coverage rate of refractive error. Increasing refractive error treatment coverage rates in both Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians through at least five-yearly eye examinations and the provision of affordable spectacles will significantly reduce the national burden of vision loss in Australia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia.

          To estimate the prevalence of refractive errors in persons 40 years and older. Counts of persons with phakic eyes with and without spherical equivalent refractive error in the worse eye of +3 diopters (D) or greater, -1 D or less, and -5 D or less were obtained from population-based eye surveys in strata of gender, race/ethnicity, and 5-year age intervals. Pooled age-, gender-, and race/ethnicity-specific rates for each refractive error were applied to the corresponding stratum-specific US, Western European, and Australian populations (years 2000 and projected 2020). Six studies provided data from 29 281 persons. In the US, Western European, and Australian year 2000 populations 40 years or older, the estimated crude prevalence for hyperopia of +3 D or greater was 9.9%, 11.6%, and 5.8%, respectively (11.8 million, 21.6 million, and 0.47 million persons). For myopia of -1 D or less, the estimated crude prevalence was 25.4%, 26.6%, and 16.4% (30.4 million, 49.6 million, and 1.3 million persons), respectively, of whom 4.5%, 4.6%, and 2.8% (5.3 million, 8.5 million, and 0.23 million persons), respectively, had myopia of -5 D or less. Projected prevalence rates in 2020 were similar. Refractive errors affect approximately one third of persons 40 years or older in the United States and Western Europe, and one fifth of Australians in this age group.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence and risk factors of myopia in Victoria, Australia.

            To determine the prevalence and risk factors of myopia in urban and rural Victoria, Australia. The Visual Impairment Project is a population-based prevalence study of eye disease in which both urban and rural adult populations were examined. Refractive data on the participants were collected using logMAR visual acuity, corrective lens measurement, and subjective refraction. All refractive error data were converted into spherical equivalent and myopia was defined at 2 levels: worse than -0.5 diopters (D) and worse than -1.00 D. A total of 3271 (83%) urban and 1473 (91%) rural residents were examined. The overall prevalence of myopia worse than -0.50 D in the population was 17% (95% confidence limit = 15.8%, 18.0%). Prevalence of myopia decreased from 24% in those aged 40 to 49 years to 12% in those aged 70 to 79 years, and then increased to 17% in people older than 80 years. The younger age groups also had higher usage of myopic corrective lenses throughout their lives than the older age groups, indicating an increased use of myopic corrective lenses in recent times. Myopia was found to be significantly higher in people with higher education levels (chi2 = 119.20, P < .001), in clerks and professionals (chi2 = 132.53, P < .001), in people born in southeast Asia (chi2 = 77.62, P < .001), and in people with higher degrees of nuclear opacity (chi2 = 55.26, P < .001). Myopia rates in the Visual Impairment Project generally decrease with age and use of myopic correction has increased in recent times. Myopia was significantly related to education level, occupation, country of birth, and nuclear opacity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Utilisation of eye care services by urban and rural Australians.

              To investigate factors related to the use of eye care services in Australia. Health, eye care service use, and sociodemographic data were collected in a structured interview of participants in a population based study. All participants had a standard eye examination. Men (OR 1.3 CL 1.02, 1.7), those who spoke Greek (OR 2.1 CL 1.1, 3.8) or Italian (OR 1.9 CL 1.0, 3.3), and those without private health insurance (OR 1.59 CL 1.22, 2.04) were more likely to have not used eye care services. Ophthalmology services were utilised at lower rates in rural areas (OR 0.14 CL 0.09, 0.2). Approximately 40% of participants with undercorrected refractive error, cataract, and undiagnosed glaucoma had seen either an ophthalmologist, optometrist, or both within the last year. Despite the similarity in prevalence of eye disease in urban and rural areas, significant differences exist in the utilisation of eye care services. Sex, private health insurance, urban residence, and the ability to converse in English were significant factors associated with eye healthcare service use. Many participants had undiagnosed eye disease despite having seen an eye care provider in the last year.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                13 April 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 4
                : e0175353
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
                [2 ]Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Melbourne, Australia
                [3 ]Indigenous Eye Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
                Soochow University Medical College, CHINA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The National Eye Health Survey received funding from a commercial source, Novartis Pharmaceuticals. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                • Conceptualization: JF JX SK HRT MD.

                • Data curation: JF JX SK MD.

                • Formal analysis: JF JX.

                • Funding acquisition: MD.

                • Investigation: JF SK MD.

                • Methodology: JF JX SK MD HRT.

                • Project administration: MD SK JF.

                • Supervision: MD HRT.

                • Visualization: JF JX.

                • Writing – original draft: JF JX SK MD HRT.

                • Writing – review & editing: JF JX SK MD HRT.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3685-4054
                Article
                PONE-D-16-51354
                10.1371/journal.pone.0175353
                5391052
                28407009
                3939b41f-db2a-4697-b3ed-63cfa34a161c
                © 2017 Foreman et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 29 December 2016
                : 8 March 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003921, Department of Health, Australian Government;
                Funded by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals
                The National Eye Health Survey received funding from the Australian Government Department of Health and Novartis Pharmaceuticals. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Sensory Perception
                Vision
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Sensory Perception
                Vision
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Sensory Perception
                Vision
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Head
                Eyes
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Head
                Eyes
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Ocular System
                Eyes
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Ocular System
                Eyes
                People and places
                Population groupings
                Ethnicities
                Indigenous Australians
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Sensory Perception
                Vision
                Visual Acuity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Sensory Perception
                Vision
                Visual Acuity
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Sensory Perception
                Vision
                Visual Acuity
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Oceania
                Australia
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Ocular System
                Ocular Anatomy
                Lens (Anatomy)
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Ocular System
                Ocular Anatomy
                Lens (Anatomy)
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Services Research
                Earth Sciences
                Geography
                Geographic Areas
                Remote Areas
                Custom metadata
                The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee and the numerous state-level Indigenous Ethics bodies have placed stringent ethical guidelines on the investigators of this study. Due to the risk of identifying participants, particularly in remote Indigenous communities, the authors are unable to make the dataset freely available. Interested researchers may contact the Principal Investigator, Dr. Mohamed Dirani, Head of Evaluative Research and Health Services, Centre for Eye Research Australia at mdirani@ 123456unimelb.edu.au to request access to the data.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article