6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      TAVI and Post Procedural Cardiac Conduction Abnormalities

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a worldwide accepted alternative for treating patients at intermediate or high risk for surgery. In recent years, the rate of complications has markedly decreased except for new-onset atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction block that remains the most common complication after TAVI. Although procedural, clinical, and electrocardiographic predisposing factors have been identified as predictors of conduction disturbances, new strategies are needed to avoid such complications, particularly in the current TAVI era that is moving quickly toward the percutaneous treatment of low-risk patients. In this article, we will review the incidence, predictive factors, and clinical implications of conduction disturbances after TAVI.

          Related collections

          Most cited references86

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.

          Dual-chamber (DDDR) pacing preserves AV synchrony and may reduce heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with ventricular (VVIR) pacing in sinus node dysfunction (SND). However, DDDR pacing often results in prolonged QRS durations (QRSd) as the result of right ventricular stimulation, and ventricular desynchronization may result. The effect of pacing-induced ventricular desynchronization in patients with normal baseline QRSd is unknown. Baseline QRSd was obtained from 12-lead ECGs before pacemaker implantation in MOST, a 2010-patient, 6-year, randomized trial of DDDR versus VVIR pacing in SND. Cumulative percent ventricular paced (Cum%VP) was determined from stored pacemaker data. Baseline QRSd 40%) and VVIR (HR 2.56 [95% CI, 1.48 to 4.43] for Cum%VP >80%). The risk of AF increased linearly with Cum%VP from 0% to 85% in both groups (DDDR, HR 1.36 [95% CI, 1.09, 1.69]; VVIR, HR 1.21 [95% CI 1.02, 1.43], for each 25% increase in Cum%VP). Model results were unaffected by adjustment for known baseline predictors of HF hospitalization and AF. Ventricular desynchronization imposed by ventricular pacing even when AV synchrony is preserved increases the risk of HF hospitalization and AF in SND with normal baseline QRSd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

            Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an option in certain high-risk surgical patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. It is unknown whether TAVR can be safely introduced to lower-risk patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR: a meta-analysis.

              Atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation may complicate transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Available evidence on predictors of PPM is sparse and derived from small studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Cardiovasc Med
                Front Cardiovasc Med
                Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
                Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-055X
                03 July 2018
                2018
                : 5
                : 85
                Affiliations
                [1] 1IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute , Milan, Italy
                [2] 2Department of Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato , Milan, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Crochan John O'Sullivan, Triemli Hospital, Switzerland

                Reviewed by: Moritz Seiffert, University Heart Center Hamburg GmbH, Germany; Gidon Yehuda Perlman, Hadassah Medical Center, Israel

                *Correspondence: Antonio Mangieri antonio.mangieri@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Structural Interventional Cardiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

                Article
                10.3389/fcvm.2018.00085
                6038729
                30018969
                3946af59-cead-4185-9c17-23e6c693460b
                Copyright © 2018 Mangieri, Montalto, Pagnesi, Lanzillo, Demir, Testa, Colombo and Latib.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 18 April 2018
                : 12 June 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 95, Pages: 12, Words: 8917
                Categories
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                Review

                transcatheter aortic valve implantation,pacemaker,left bundle branch block,right bundle branch block,aortic stenosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content148

                Cited by15

                Most referenced authors1,889