8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Factors associated with guideline-recommended KRAS testing in colorectal cancer patients: A population-based study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors is poorer among Stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with KRAS mutations, thus KRAS testing is recommended prior to treatment. KRAS testing was collected by Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries for 2010 CRC cases, and our goal was to provide the first population-based estimates of testing in the U.S.

          Methods

          SEER CRC cases diagnosed in 2010 were evaluated (n=30,351). Chi-square tests and logistic regression were conducted to determine patient characteristics associated with KRAS testing, stratified by Stages I-III vs. Stage IV. Log-rank tests were used to examine survival by testing status.

          Results

          KRAS testing among Stage IV cases ranged from 39% in New Mexico to 15% in Louisiana. In the model, younger age, being married, living in a metropolitan area, and having primary site surgery were associated with greater odds of receiving KRAS testing. Those who received testing had significantly better survival then those who did not (p<0.0001). Among those who received testing, there was no significant difference in survival by mutated vs. wild type KRAS. Five percent of Stage I-III cases received testing.

          Conclusions

          Wide variation in documented KRAS testing for Stage IV CRC patients exists among SEER registries. Age remained highly significant in multivariate models, suggesting it plays an independent role in the patient and/or provider decision to be tested. Further research is needed to determine drivers of variation in testing, as well as reasons for testing in Stage I-III cases where it is not recommended.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          8207754
          413
          Am J Clin Oncol
          Am. J. Clin. Oncol.
          American journal of clinical oncology
          0277-3732
          1537-453X
          6 March 2015
          October 2017
          01 October 2018
          : 40
          : 5
          : 498-506
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
          [2 ]Division of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana
          [3 ]Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
          Author notes
          Address for Correspondence and Reprints: Mary E. Charlton, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, 145 N. Riverside Drive, Room S453 CPHB, Iowa City, IA 52242, Phone: 319-384-1564, Fax: 319-384-4155, mary-charlton@ 123456uiowa.edu
          Article
          PMC4591083 PMC4591083 4591083 nihpa669043
          10.1097/COC.0000000000000191
          4591083
          25844824
          394beccb-4520-499d-a659-e17ca3b6cbda
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Surveillance,Epidemiology,and End Results Program,colorectal cancer,epidemiology,KRAS

          Comments

          Comment on this article