1
Introduction
It
was once widely held that nearly all reactions in biology were
catalyzed via mechanisms involving paired electron species. Beginning
approximately 40 years ago, this paradigm was repeatedly challenged
as examples of enzymatic reactions involving organic radical intermediates
began to emerge, and it is now well accepted that biochemical reactions
often involve organic radicals. Indeed, some of the most intensely
studied metalloenzymes, including cytochrome P450, methane monooxygenase,
ribonucleotide reductase, and the adenosylcobalamin (B12) enzymes, catalyze reactions
employing organic radical intermediates.
As a general rule, enzymes utilizing radical mechanisms catalyze reactions
that would be difficult or impossible to catalyze by polar mechanisms,
most often involving H-atom abstraction from an unactivated C–H
bond.
Among the more recent additions to the enzymes that catalyze
radical
reactions are the radical S-adenosylmethionine (radical
SAM) enzymes, which were first classified as a superfamily in 2001.
1
These enzymes utilize a [4Fe–4S] cluster
and SAM to initiate a diverse set of radical reactions, in most or
all cases via generation of a 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical (dAdo•) intermediate. Although
2001 marked the identification
of this superfamily largely through bioinformatics, the discovery
of iron metalloenzymes utilizing SAM to initiate radical reactions
precedes this date by more than a decade. For example, early studies
on the activation of pyruvate formate-lyase showed that it involved
the generation of a stable protein radical,
2
and was stimulated by the presence of iron, SAM, and an “activating
component” from the cell extract now known to be the pyruvate-formate
lyase activating enzyme (PFL-AE).
3
The
radical on PFL was ultimately shown to be located on a specific glycine
residue,
4
and was one of the first stable
protein radicals characterized. PFL-AE was ultimately shown to contain
a catalytically essential iron–sulfur cluster,
5
and to use SAM as an essential component of PFL activation.
6
The anaerobic ribonucleotide reductase, similar
to PFL, contains a stable glycyl radical that was shown in early work
to require an iron–sulfur cluster and SAM for activation.
7
Likewise, preliminary investigations on lysine
2,3-aminomutase (LAM) published in 1970 demonstrated activation by
ferrous ion and a strict requirement for SAM.
8
Like PFL-AE, LAM was ultimately found to contain a catalytically
essential iron–sulfur cluster.
9
Work
in Perry Frey’s lab showed that LAM used the adenosyl moiety
of SAM to mediate hydrogen transfer in a manner similar to adenosylcobalamin-dependent
rearrangements, implicating radical intermediates.
10
Biotin synthase was first reported to require iron and
SAM in 1995,
11
and was subsequently shown
to contain iron–sulfur clusters and to catalyze a radical reaction.
12
These four enzyme systems (PFL/PFL-AE,
aRNR, LAM, and biotin synthase)
provided early indications of a new type of biological cofactor consisting
of an iron–sulfur cluster and SAM, which initiate radical reactions
using a fundamental new mechanism of catalysis.
13
What none of us in the field in the early days probably
anticipated, however, was just how ubiquitous these enzymes would
turn out to be. The initial report of the superfamily by Sofia et
al. identified ∼600 members;
1
however,
now that number is ∼48 100 members.
14
These enzymes are found across the phylogenetic kingdom
and catalyze an amazingly diverse set of reactions, the vast majority
of which have yet to be characterized.
This Review will begin
by summarizing unifying features of radical
SAM enzymes, and in subsequent sections delve further into the biochemical,
spectroscopic, structural, and mechanistic details for those enzymes
that have been characterized. In most cases, these enzymes are grouped
by reaction type; however, in two cases (syntheses of modified tetrapyrroles
and complex metal cluster cofactors), we have chosen to group together
several radical SAM enzymes that catalyze different reaction types
but which act together in the same or related metabolic pathways.
2
Unifying Structural and Mechanistic Features
of the Radical SAM Enzymes
2.1
The Iron–Sulfur
Cluster and Its Interaction
with SAM
The members of the radical SAM superfamily exhibit
only limited sequence homology. The most characteristic sequence feature
is a CX3CX2C motif that is present in most of
the superfamily members, although a number have variations in this
motif. The three cysteine residues coordinate three of the four irons
of a [4Fe–4S] cluster at the active site of the enzyme (Figure 1). The remaining ligand
to the fourth iron in the
absence of SAM is not known; spectroscopic evidence is ambiguous,
although small-molecule thiols from the buffer likely coordinate in
some cases.
15
The lack of a protein ligand
on this fourth iron of the cluster renders it labile, and explains
why in many cases these proteins are found to contain [3Fe–4S]+ clusters in their
as-isolated or air-exposed states. Upon
reduction with a mild reducing agent such as dithiothreitol (DTT),
the [3Fe–4S]+ clusters in these enzymes can generally
be converted to the [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters, by scavenging
of adventitious iron or by cannibalization of a fraction of the clusters.
Upon treatment with a stronger reducing agent such as dithionite or
photoreduced 5-deazariboflavin, the clusters can generally be reduced
to the catalytically active [4Fe–4S]+ state. In
almost all cases, the iron–sulfur clusters of the radical SAM
enzymes are air sensitive, requiring anaerobic conditions for isolation
and handling of the enzyme. Brief exposure to oxygen can result in
significant degradation of the [4Fe–4S] clusters to the [3Fe–4S]
state, and prolonged exposure generally leads to further cluster destruction.
Because of the difficulties with air sensitivity and cluster lability,
radical SAM enzymes are often isolated as apo-enzymes, under aerobic
or anaerobic conditions, and subsequently chemically reconstituted
in vitro with iron and sulfide under anaerobic conditions to generate
the active enzymes.
Figure 1
The site-differentiated [4Fe–4S] cluster coordinated
by
the CX3CX2C radical SAM motif (PDB ID 3IIZ).
In the enzyme–SAM complex, the unique iron
of the [4Fe–4S]
cluster is coordinated by the amino and carboxylate moieties of SAM,
forming a classical five-member chelate ring (Figure 2).
16
While it is well-known that
amino acids can chelate metal ions, the [4Fe–4S]–SAM
complex was a novel structure in biology when it was first determined.
The identification of this novel structure was first made by detailed
ENDOR and Mössbauer spectroscopic studies of PFL-AE, which
will be described in detail in a later section of this Review (section 3.1.3).
16a,17
This unique structural
feature has since been found in every radical SAM enzyme examined
using X-ray crystallographic or ENDOR spectroscopic methods. The SAM–[4Fe–4S]
cluster coordination complex therefore appears to be a unifying structural
and catalytic feature of radical SAM enzymes.
Figure 2
The bidentate coordination
of S-adenosylmethionine
to the unique iron site of the [4Fe–4S] cluster in radical
SAM enzymes (PDB ID 3IIZ).
2.2
A 5′-Deoxyadenosyl
Radical Intermediate
It was determined from early studies
that radical SAM enzymes cleaved
SAM generating methionine and 5′-deoxyadenosine (dAdoH). Further,
in some cases, use of isotopically labeled substrate provided evidence
for H-atom transfer from substrate to dAdoH during catalysis. These
observations, together with the recognition that both LAM and the
anaerobic RNR catalyzed reactions that were directly analogous to
adenosylcobalamin (AdoCbl)-dependent reactions, led to the hypothesis
that the radical SAM enzymes generated the same intermediate, the
5′-deoxyadenosyl radical (dAdo•), which AdoCbl
enzymes generated (Figure 3).
18
While the dAdo• intermediate has not
yet been directly observed for any radical SAM or AdoCbl enzyme, a
stabilized allylic analogue of this radical has been observed and
characterized for both an AdoCbl and a radical SAM enzyme. 3′,4′-Anhydroadenosylcobalamin
was synthesized by Magnusson and Frey and shown to give rise to the
relatively stable allylic radical species, 5′-deoxy-3′,4′-anhydroadenosine-5′-yl
(anAdo•), upon reaction with the enzyme diol dehydrase.
19
Work in the same lab resulted in the synthesis
of S-3′,4′-anhydroadenosyl-l-methionine (anSAM), which upon reaction with reduced
LAM and substrate
gave rise to the same allylic radical species anAdo• (Figure 4).
20
Together,
these results support the involvement of SAM as a precursor of a dAdo• in the radical
SAM enzymes, with the dAdo• abstracting a H-atom from substrate during catalysis.
Figure 3
Structures of AdoCbl (left) and SAM (right).
Figure 4
Reductive cleavage of S-3′,4′-anhydroadenosyl-l-methionine (anSAM) results in generation
of the stable allylic
radical species 5′-deoxy-3′,4′-anhydroadenosine-5′-yl
(anAdo•).
The reductive cleavage of SAM to generate dAdo• and methionine requires the input
of one electron, now known to
come from the reduced site-differentiated [4Fe–4S] cluster
(Figure 5). The [4Fe–4S]+ state is the catalytically active oxidation state for the
iron–sulfur
cluster in the radical SAM enzymes. This was unequivocally demonstrated
for PFL-AE by controlled generation of defined quantities of the [4Fe–4S]+ state,
followed by the addition of the substrate PFL and
the observation using EPR that the quantity of glycyl radical generated
on PFL was equivalent to the quantity of [4Fe–4S]+ originally on the PFL-AE (Figure
6).
21
Further, it was shown that upon generation of
the glycyl radical, the [4Fe–4S]+ state was oxidized
to the EPR-silent [4Fe–4S]2+ state, indicating that
the [4Fe–4S]+ cluster provides the electron required
for the reductive cleavage of SAM. Concurrently, it was shown for
LAM that the [4Fe–4S]+ state was the active state
by correlating the quantity of [4Fe–4S]+ signal
with the activity, although direct stoichiometric conversion of reduced
cluster to product could not be shown because LAM utilizes SAM as
a cofactor and therefore the iron–sulfur cluster is rereduced
after each catalytic cycle.
22
These observations
for PFL-AE and LAM, together with the requirement of a strong reducing
agent in all radical SAM enzyme activity assays, have led to the general
acceptance of the [4Fe–4S]+ state being the catalytically
active oxidation state for these enzymes.
Figure 5
The cleavage of SAM to
generate methionine and the dAdo• is a reductive
cleavage event, requiring the input of one electron.
Figure 6
X-band EPR spectra of photoreduced PFL-AE before (A) and
after
addition of PFL (B), photoreduction time indicated in minutes. (C)
Spin quantitation of the EPR spectra in (A) for the amount of the
[4Fe–4S]+ cluster (+) and EPR spectra in (B) for
the amount of glycyl radical (■) as a function of illumination
time. Reprinted with permission from ref (21). Copyright 2000 American Chemical Society.
2.3
A Framework
Mechanism
Given the clues
provided in the preceding paragraphs, a framework mechanism for the
radical SAM enzymes has been proposed (Figure 7). This unifying preliminary mechanism
involves a site-differentiated
[4Fe–4S]2+ cluster with SAM chelating the unique
iron. The cluster is reduced by one electron to the [4Fe–4S]+ state; in vivo the reducing
system requires flavodoxin or
other single electron donors, while in vitro strong reductants such
as dithionite or photoreduced 5-deazariboflavin are employed. The
reduced [4Fe–4S]+ cluster can transfer one electron
to SAM to homolytically cleave the S–C(5′) bond, generating
methionine (still bound to the unique iron) and a dAdo•. This reductive cleavage of
SAM occurs in most radical SAM enzymes
in vitro even in the absence of substrate, producing as products methionine
and dAdoH, with the dAdoH presumably resulting from quenching of the
dAdo• with solvent or a protein moiety. In the presence
of substrate, however, the rate of the reductive cleavage reaction
is generally considerably enhanced; this rate enhancement in fact
has been used multiple times to identify unknown substrates of radical
SAM enzymes, as will be detailed further in later sections of this
Review. The dAdo• produced by reductive cleavage
in the presence of substrate abstracts a H-atom from substrate in
a regio- and stereospecific manner to generate a substrate radical.
In some cases, this substrate radical is the end product of the reaction,
such as in the case of PFL-AE where the end product is the glycyl
radical on PFL. In most cases, however, the substrate radical is an
intermediate, and undergoes simple or complex transformations and
may react with additional substrates prior to product formation. In
most radical SAM enzymes characterized to date, methionine and dAdoH
are produced in a 1:1:1 stoichiometry with product, indicating that
SAM is being used as a cosubstrate and is consumed during catalysis.
Several characterized radical SAM enzymes, however, use SAM catalytically;
in these cases, rearrangement of a substrate radical intermediate
produces a product radical intermediate, and this latter species abstracts
a H-atom from dAdoH to regenerate dAdo•, which recombines
with methionine to regenerate SAM.
Figure 7
Framework mechanism for radical SAM cleavage
(PDB ID 3IIZ).
2.4
Energetic
Considerations in the Mechanism
Longstanding questions in
the radical SAM mechanisms revolve around
the topic of energetics. For the unified mechanism described in the
previous section, a [4Fe–4S]+ cluster must reduce
SAM. While the reduction potential of SAM itself is not known, other
trialkylsulfonium compounds have been shown to have extremely negative
reduction potentials that approximate −1.8 V.
23
The 2+/+ redox couple for biological [4Fe–4S] clusters
is rarely more negative than −500 to −600 mV, with specific
potentials measured for LAM, BioB, and MiaB ranging from −479
to −505 mV.
15,24
Examining these potentials leads
to the conclusion that the cluster to SAM electron transfer depicted
in Figure 7 is, at face value, energetically
very unfavorable (Figure 8). Despite the mismatch
in potentials, the facile cleavage of sulfonium containing compounds
by synthetic site-differentiated [4Fe–4S] clusters has been
demonstrated.
25
While these synthetic clusters
have reduction potentials more negative (∼ –1
V) than those found in proteins, the energetic barrier is still large,
and yet the reactions occur. The reactions of the model compounds
differ from the enzyme-based chemistry in that the models generally
react in a 2-electron process with electrophilic attack of the sulfonium
on the coordinating thiolates; however, evidence for some reductive
cleavage of SAM was also provided, indicating the general feasibility
despite the mismatch in redox potentials.
25
Figure 8
Reduction
potentials for SAM and the [4Fe–4S] cluster based
on experimental measurements for LAM.
Given the demonstration that SAM binds in proximity to, and
even
coordinates, the [4Fe–4S] clusters of radical SAM enzymes,
it is clear that the redox potentials of the iron–sulfur cluster
and of SAM cannot be considered in isolation. Indeed, it is expected
that the close proximity of the positively charged sulfonium group,
as well as the coordination of one iron of the cluster by the hard,
charged atoms of the methionine moiety, would have significant effects
on the cluster reduction potential. Likewise, positioning SAM in close
proximity to the charged iron–sulfur cluster would be expected
to alter the SAM reduction potential. Perry Frey and co-workers have
explored these issues using the radical SAM enzyme LAM (Figure 8). The reduction potential
for the [4Fe–4S]2+/+ cluster in reconstituted LAM is −479 mV; addition
of SAM shifts the potential +49 mV.
15
On
the basis of measured reduction potentials for the active site of
LAM in the presence of SAM and alanine, S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine (SAH) and alanine,
and SAH and lysine, the reduction
potential of the cluster is estimated to drop to ∼ –600
mV in the Michaelis complex (SAM and lysine bound).
26
Conversely, the extremely negative potential of free SAM
(estimated to be −1800 mV) is elevated to a value of −990
mV upon its bidentate coordination to the [4Fe–4S]+ cluster in the Michaelis complex.
26
While
these measurements reveal how interactions in the active site decrease
the barrier for SAM cleavage by 1.4 V, the reduction of SAM by the
[4Fe–4S] cluster is still energetically unfavorable by ∼390
mV. One factor that may contribute to further closing the gap is that
the unique Fe ion is pentacoordinate in the SAM bound state, but following
cleavage is hexacoordinate with methionine bound;
26
an inner-sphere mechanism leading to Fe–S coordination
to methionine was originally published in 2003.
16b
It should be stated that the tight binding of methionine
in radical SAM enzymes appears to be favored only when SAM is utilized
as a cofactor;
27
enzymes that consume SAM
can be expected to bind methionine with less affinity, possibly indicating
that the hexacoordinate geometry of the unique iron does not occur
as readily in these cases (or more readily exchanges with another
molecule of SAM).
Recent findings have indicated that the polarity
of the active
site environment plays a significant role in tuning the barrier for
SAM cleavage; the reaction barrier is observed to increase with rising
polarity.
28
Importantly, the crystallographic
work with LAM supports this observation as the presence of lysine
in the active site would likely limit solvent exposure and thus decrease
the activation barrier, a result borne out by the midpoint potential
solution studies.
26
Similarly, the structure
of PFL-AE with SAM bound shows that the active site cavity, including
the sulfonium group, is exposed to solvent, but following binding
of the polypeptide substrate the active site is shielded from solvent.
28,29
These important observations suggest that the lowering of the dielectric
medium in the vicinity of the iron sulfur cluster upon substrate binding
could act to generally trigger SAM cleavage in these enzymes by significantly
lowering thermodynamic barriers of the catalytic reaction.
28
2.5
SAM: Mechanisms and Regioselectivity
of S–C
Bond Cleavage and Inner-Sphere Electron Transfer
Long before
the acceptance of SAM as a common precursor of 5′-deoxyadenosyl
radicals in biology, it was known as a common methyl donor in numerous
biochemical reactions. In its typical role as a methyl donor, the
bond between the sulfonium sulfur and the methyl carbon is cleaved
heterolytically via a nucleophilic mechanism, such that the transferred
unit is effectively CH3
+.
30
The other two S–C bonds of the SAM sulfonium group
can also undergo heterolytic cleavage in biochemical reactions, although
this is less common.
30
In the radical reactions
of SAM, it is primarily the S–C(5′) bond that is cleaved
to generate methionine and a dAdo• (Figure 9). In only one characterized radical SAM
enzyme,
the B12-independent glycerol dehydratase activating enzyme,
is an alternate S–C bond (S–C(γ)) cleaved.
31
Dph2, an enzyme not in the radical SAM superfamily,
uses SAM in radical chemistry and also cleaves the S–C(γ)
bond.
32
It is perhaps easy to rationalize
why no radical SAM enzymes have been found that cleave the S–C(methyl)
bond, because the resulting methyl radical species would be of very
high energy and lacking a distal handle by which the active site of
the enzyme can direct the radical. The discrimination between cleaving
the S–C(5′) and the S–C(γ) bonds is more
subtle, however, as both of these S–C bonds have comparable
bond energies and yield product radicals of comparable stability.
The most reasonable explanation as to why the vast majority of radical
SAM enzymes appear to catalyze S–C(5′) rather than S–C(γ)
bond cleavage seems to lie in the details of the cluster–SAM
interaction.
33
The electron required for
reductive cleavage of SAM arises from the reduced [4Fe–4S]+ cluster, and spectroscopic
studies have provided evidence
for direct orbital overlap between the sulfonium sulfur and the iron–sulfur
cluster.
5,17
Together, these findings suggest that an
electron transfers from the iron–sulfur cluster directly into
an antibonding orbital involving the sulfonium sulfur; whether the
antibonding orbital receiving the electron is S–C(5′)
or S–C(γ) in nature determines the bond cleaved. This
analysis would suggest that the S–C bond that is oriented trans
to the sulfonium S–cluster interaction, and thus the S–C
bond whose antibonding orbital has a lobe positioned to accept an
electron from the Fe–S cluster, is the bond that will undergo
homolytic cleavage.
33
Consistent with this
idea, most structurally characterized radical SAM enzymes appear to
bind SAM such that the S–C(5′) bond is in the trans
position.
34
Because there are currently
no structures available in the SAM-bound state S–C(γ)
bond-cleaving enzymes, it remains to be determined whether these enzymes
will exhibit an alternate configuration of SAM relative to the cluster.
Figure 9
Regioselective
cleavage of the S–C bonds of SAM. Bonds that
may undergo enzymatic-based homolytic cleavage are demarked in varying
colors with S–C(5′) in blue, S–C(γ) in
red, and the S–C(methyl) in magenta.
The intimate nature of SAM coordination to the [4Fe–4S]2+/+ cluster and positioning
within the active site clearly
underscores the role of both the coordination chemistry and the protein
environment in dictating cleavage of the S–C(5′) bond
and in controlling the reactivity of the dAdo• toward
product. This chemistry is initiated by the bidentate coordination
of SAM to the unique Fe ion, which causes electronic perturbations
in the [4Fe–4S] cluster and the antibonding S–C(5′)
orbital that are crucial to lowering the activation barrier for bond
cleavage; many of these effects have only recently been observed.
For example, spectroscopic evidence examining the affect of SAM binding
to the [4Fe–4S]2+/+ cluster in SPL indicates that
cofactor binding induces elongation of the Fe···Fe
distances both within the ferromagnetically coupled, 6MS = +9/2 [2Fe–2S] rhomb of
which the site-differentiated iron
ion resides and between the two antiferromagnetically coupled [2Fe–2S]
rhomb pairs.
35
Analysis of X-ray structures
of radical SAM enzymes with SAM coordinated in the active site (discussed
in greater detail in the following section) shows that the distance
between the SAM sulfonium ion and the unique Fe ion is slightly shorter
than the distance from the closest cluster sulfide to the sulfonium
by ∼0.3–0.7 Å for all available structures. In
the case of HydE, for which structures exist of the enzyme in both
SAM-bound and dAdoH/methionine-bound states, greater distortion of
the Fe–S cluster is observed in the latter case due to the
pseudooctahedral coordination of methionine to the unique iron ion.
27a
Computational studies based on the HydE
structures predict a large
energy barrier of 54 kJ/mol for SAM cleavage and provide a picture
of the transition state (TS) structure, which shows that the main
contributions to the TS HOMO are derived from the carbon-based radical
of dAdo•, the methionine-based Sδ, and the
site-differentiated iron.
27a
Calculations
using an active site model suggest that inner-sphere electron transfer
to the C5′ group of SAM involves a direct path between the
unique iron ion of the cluster and the p orbitals of the sulfonium
group (Figure 10).
27a
The bidentate coordination of SAM coupled with the close proximity
of the sulfonium moiety to the iron sulfur cluster causes a perturbation
in the electronic distribution of the cluster away from the standard
sulfur-centered
36
to more iron-centered
redox chemistry.
27a
The high similarity
in SAM orientation for known structures of radical SAM enzymes suggests
this cleavage mechanism may operate generally for all members of this
superfamily. Along these lines, XAS studies with PFL-AE show that
upon SAM binding, an increase in S K-edge intensity is observed that
derives from a backbonding interaction between the [4Fe–4S]
cluster and the antibonding S–C(5′) orbital; these results
also indicate that the electron transfer pathway involves the unique
Fe ion of the cluster.
28
However, the role
of iron in the inner-sphere mechanism is not conclusive, as recent
computational studies with BioB suggest that the electron transfer
step from the [4Fe–4S]+ cluster into the antibonding
S–C orbital likely occurs via a sulfide–sulfonium interaction;
the cluster sulfide nearest to the SAM sulfonium contributes to the
LUMO of the transition state complex, providing a direct pathway for
the reductive cleavage event.
37
Figure 10
The reductive
cleavage of SAM occurs through an inner-sphere mechanism
involving a direct path between the unique iron ion of the cluster
and the sulfonium group antibonding S–C(5′) orbital.
Upon reductive cleavage and generation
of the dAdo• intermediate, the critical question
becomes how the reactivity of
this species is controlled within the active site environment. ENDOR
studies probing intermediate catalytic states of LAM from the Frey
and Hoffman laboratories have provided insight into this question.
Initial measurements with LAM and different isotopically labeled SAM
(15N, 17O, 13C, and 2H)
probing coordination between the [4Fe–4S] cluster and the cofactor
set the groundwork for subsequent spectroscopic studies using both
SAM and lysine analogues that formed stabilized radicals upon reduction.
16b,38
Use of S-3′,4′-anhydroadenosyl-l-methionine (anSAM) in the presence of 13C and 2H
labeled lysine (at the β position) demonstrated that
the distance between anAdo• and the lysine β-carbon
is essentially identical to that from the 5′C of SAM and the
substrate in the crystal structure, showing that no structural perturbations
accompanied the reductive cleavage event.
38
Experiments using two different lysine analogues that formed stable l-α-lysine radicals
following H-atom abstraction by dAdo• provided the first pictures of the substrate
radical
catalytic intermediate species (discussed in greater detail in section 5.1.6). Importantly,
these results revealed a direct
orbital overlap between the substrate radical and the methyl group
of dAdoH, indicating these two species were in direct van der Waals
contact (Figure 11).
38
Comparison to the crystal structure suggests that the distance between
lysine and the 5′-carbon of dAdoH has decreased by ∼0.5–1
Å during the transition from the resting state to the trapped
substrate radical state;
38,39
the structural movement
does not appear to accompany SAM cleavage but instead seems to be
associated with the H-atom transfer step. The structural rearrangement
resulting in van der Waals contact between the reacting partners that
facilitates H-atom transfer is believed to persist throughout the
isomerization mechanism of LAM and act to minimize the potential for
undesired radical reactions.
Figure 11
Illustration of the results of the LAM ENDOR
studies using stabilized
substrate and product radical analogue intermediates (PDB ID 2A5H). In all cases,
van der Waals contacts are maintained between the 5′-methyl
of dAdoH (carbons shown in gray) and the substrate/product radicals.
Illustrations for the substrate radicals generated upon reaction with trans-4,5-dehydro-
l-lysine (DHLys, left), 4-thia-l-lysine (SLys, middle), and the product radical generated
upon
equilibration of the reduced state of the enzyme with SAM and l-α-lysine (right).
Adapted with permission from ref (38). Copyright 2006 American
Chemical Society.
2.6
A Common
Protein Architecture for Radical
SAM Catalysis
As of this writing, 14 radical SAM enzymes
have been structurally characterized by X-ray crystallography. All
of these enzymes exhibit a common fold composed of a full or partial
triose phosphate isomerase (TIM) barrel. A full TIM barrel consists
of eight alpha helices alternating with eight beta strands, which
form a barrel-like structure with the beta strands on the interior
and the alpha helices surrounding them on the protein surface. Biotin
synthase (BioB),
40
thiamine pyrimidine
biosynthetic enzyme ThiC,
41
the hydrogenase
biosynthetic enzyme HydE,
27a,42
and most recently PylB
43
have crystal structures solved with complete
(βα)8 TIM barrels. The remaining structurally
characterized radical SAM enzymes contain partial (βα)6 TIM barrels. The smallest
known radical SAM enzyme, the activating
component of the anaerobic ribonucleotide reductase (aRNR-AE), is
predicted to have a (βα)4 partial TIM barrel,
although it has yet to be structurally characterized. Half (βα)4 barrel structures
have been demonstrated to exist as soluble
monomers in solution, suggesting that formation of the hydrophobic
core is the driving force for the appearance of a stable structure
and that primitive (βα)8 barrels could have
evolved through the tandem duplication of a (βα)4 barrel.
44
The most primitive members
of the radical SAM family are PFL-AE and aRNR-AE, comprised of (βα)6 and (βα)4 folds,
respectively, possibly
indicating the evolution of this subunit fold from (βα)2 precursor units.
45
The TIM
barrels can vary from closed barrel structures to open, splayed barrels.
In general, the openness of the barrel positively correlates with
the size of the substrate; that is, radical SAM enzymes with larger
macromolecular substrates exhibit more open barrel structures.
34,45b
The openness of the partial barrel results in exposure of one face
of the β sheet known as the lateral opening, which houses the
active site located near the top of the barrel. The conserved cluster
binding CX3CX2C motif is found on the loop that
follows the first β strand, and the [4Fe–4S] cluster
itself is located 7–10 Å from the closest protein surface
(Figure 12). The positioning of the cluster
is such that it is buried by loop regions at the top of the barrel,
and additional protein elements and SAM act to sufficiently shield
the cluster and active site environment from bulk solvent. SAM coordination
to the cluster positions the molecule across the top of the barrel,
forming contacts with residues originating from each of the core β
strands. A conserved “GGE” motif forms H-bonds to the
amino portion of the methionyl group of SAM, acting to further position
this group for coordination to the unique iron of the cluster. Amino
acids that interact with the carboxylate functionality are more assorted,
with H-bonding interactions among the different structures originating
from either arginine, lysine, histidine, or serine and threonine.
H-bonding interactions with the ribose hydroxyl groups are accomplished
by charged or polar residues that originate mainly from strands β4
and β5, while the adenine moiety forms a multitude of interactions
that are hydrophobic, H-bonding, and π-stacking in nature. Importantly,
mutational studies on the two β4 strand residues N153 and D155
in BioB have implicated these amino acids as playing critical roles
in the binding and cleavage of SAM and positioning of the dAdo• for reaction with
substrate.
46
Several of the radical SAM enzymes exhibit additional C-terminal
associated structural features outside the core TIM barrel that may
confer substrate specificity. Because of the vast disparity in radical
SAM enzyme substrates, no common substrate binding motifs exist. That
said, substrates are consistently observed to bind within the TIM
barrel, representing how these enzymes utilize this tertiary fold
to help minimize the deleterious effects on radical chemistry of incidental
exposure to other cellular components.
Figure 12
Example of a radical
SAM partial TIM barrel structure (PDB ID 3CB8 for PFL-AE). N-terminal
domain colored in wheat, radical SAM domain in light blue, C-terminal
domain in light pink, [4Fe–4S] cluster in yellow and rust spheres,
and SAM in green sticks.
2.7
[4Fe–4S]/SAM and Adenosylcobalamin:
Parallels and Departures
The parallels between radical SAM
enzymes and those utilizing adenosylcobalamin (AdoCbl or B12) to catalyze radical
reactions are striking and have long been recognized.
This was first brought to light more than 40 years ago with the discovery
by Barker of lysine 2,3-aminomutase, an enzyme that catalyzes a novel
interconversion of l-α-lysine and l-β-lysine.
8
This reaction was recognized as being analogous
to B12-dependent rearrangement reactions, and yet it was
shown to not require B12 for activity. Instead, activity
was shown to be dependent on iron, PLP, SAM, and anaerobic conditions.
Perry Frey and co-workers subsequently used 5′-tritium labeled
SAM to provide evidence for the adenosyl moiety of SAM being directly
involved in hydrogen transfer, in much the same way as the adenosyl
moiety of AdoCbl is involved in B12-dependent rearrangement
reactions.
10
The parallels in reactivity
for these two disparate cofactors were intriguing, and led to the
labeling of SAM as “a poor man’s adenosylcobalamin”.
18a,47
Indeed, at the time, B12 was the classic example of a
cofactor used for H-atom abstraction in enzyme reactions, and SAM
was the simpler, less understood cousin. As of this writing, however,
it is quite clear that the use of SAM as a radical precursor in the
radical SAM reactions is much more widespread than that of B12: there are currently
48 100 radical SAM superfamily members
that span the entire phylogenetic kingdom and catalyze diverse reactions
as detailed elsewhere in this Review, while the number of identified
B12 enzymes stands at only 12,
48
and these are primarily bacterial in origin. The recognition of
the amazing breadth of radical SAM reactions led Frey to propose an
alternate adage, calling SAM “a rich man’s adenosylcobalamin”.
49
Prior to the discovery of radical SAM
enzymes, B12 was considered nature’s “reversible
free radical carrier”,
50
involved
in a variety of enzymatic reactions.
51
Considerable
evidence available at the time supported the intermediacy of a dAdo• intermediate
that abstracted an H-atom directly from
substrate, and then redelivered an H-atom to the product radical after
rearrangement. The dAdo• intermediate resulted from
homolytic cleavage of the Co–C bond of B12 (adenosylcobalamin,
Figures 3 and 13). Such
a reaction was predicted to require a weak Co–C bond, and Halpern
provided the first determination of this bond energy in B12 as a relatively weak 26
kcal/mol.
52
It
was proposed on the basis of model compound studies that enzyme binding
factors such as steric strain would sufficiently weaken the Co–C
bond so that homolysis would be a plausible step in B12 enzymatic reactions.
50
With the weak
Co–C bond of B12 a central feature of its role as
a reversible radical carrier, the observation that SAM seemed to be
playing an analogous role in certain enzymes was intriguing. B12 and SAM both contain
adenosyl moieties but have nothing
else in common. Further, SAM does not have a relatively weak Co–C
bond linking the adenosyl moiety to the rest of the cofactor, but
rather a considerably stronger S–C bond. The developing realization
that iron–sulfur clusters were involved in the SAM-dependent
radical enzymes led to speculation about a new type of organometallic
cofactor in biology, involving a cluster-adenosyl species with an
Fe–C bond;
53
although no such species
has yet been observed, the possibility cannot be entirely ruled out.
What is clear at this stage for radical SAM enzymatic reactions is
that SAM binds to the unique iron of the [4Fe–4S] cluster via
a classical chelate formation using the amino and carboxylate moieties;
16a
in this bound state, the sulfonium of SAM is
in close proximity to the cluster, with evidence for direct orbital
overlap between the two.
17
Inner-sphere
electron transfer from the cluster to SAM initiates S–C bond
cleavage to generate the dAdo• intermediate also
found in B12 radical reactions. As with the B12 radical reactions, radical SAM reactions
appear to be guided and
tuned by a variety of enzyme binding effects that alter the energetics
of individual steps.
Figure 13
Homolytic cleavage of the Co–C bond to generate
cob(II)alamin
and the 5′- deoxyadenosyl radical.
As Halpern has pointed out, the reversible Co–C bond
cleavage
in B12-dependent reactions (Figure 13) is formally an inner-sphere redox process analogous
to reactions
of reversible dioxygen carriers such as hemoglobin and myoglobin.
50
We can now add radical SAM-based radical generation
to this model, with the inner-sphere electron transfer occurring from
the site-differentiated [4Fe–4S] cluster to SAM coupled to
S–C bond cleavage to generate the dAdo• as
shown in Figure 7. As with the B12 enzymes, this reaction in radical SAM enzymes can
be reversible,
with the dAdo• regenerated after each reaction and
ultimately regenerating SAM; in these cases, SAM, like B12, is nature’s “reversible
free radical carrier”.
Unlike the B12 enzymes, however, many of the radical SAM
enzymes carry out this inner-sphere electron transfer process as irreversible,
where SAM is consumed as a cosubstrate and the dAdoH is a product.
In these latter cases, SAM is acting as a radical carrier; however,
the radical is ultimately an oxidant that is consumed, rather than
simply a mediator of rearrangement reactions that is ultimately regenerated.
In many ways, then, the radical SAM enzymes complete the analogy originally
drawn by Halpern in 1985: the “reversible free radical carrier”
role for adenosylcobalamin in B12 enzymes, and for SAM
in some of the radical SAM enzymes, is analogous to reversible O2 binding in proteins
such as hemoglobin and myoglobin, while
the “radical as oxidant” role for SAM in many of the
radical SAM enzymes is analogous to iron enzymes that utilize O2 as an oxidant. Such
an oxidant role for the dAdo• derived from B12 is not observed in biology, perhaps
because the biosynthetic complexity of B12 renders it evolutionarily
disadvantageous to use as a consumed cosubstrate rather than a catalytic
cofactor.
With the remarkable similarities in biochemical reactions
mediated
by such radically different cofactors as B12 and SAM, it
is of interest to compare the protein context in which these two reactions
are carried out. As discussed in section 2.6, most radical SAM enzymes possess a full
or partial TIM barrel fold
housing both the substrate binding site and the radical SAM [4Fe–4S]
cluster. The radical chemistry thus occurs within this barrel’s
microenvironment, largely protected from the surroundings by the barrel
and often the bound substrate itself. Structurally characterized B12 enzymes also
contain a TIM barrel that harbors the substrate
binding site; however, the B12 cofactor that serves as
the radical precursor is bound not to this barrel but to a separate
domain. Thus in the B12 enzymes, the two domains must come
together for catalysis to occur. Ultimately, the use of the TIM barrel
fold by B12 and radical SAM systems speaks toward the evolutionary
development of these enzymes and the requirement for a protein architecture
that was inherently not complex and in regards to radical SAM proteins
allowed for the diversification of chemical reactions through the
acquisition of additional modular protein domains.
54
Early suspicions indicated that radical SAM enzymes may
have predated AdoCbl enzymes in view of the simpler structure and
biosynthesis of SAM relative to B12.
55
Given the utilization of an ancient, highly conserved protein
fold and the presence of a CX3CX2C Fe–S-based
motif used to chelate an organic molecule, it is plausible that SAM
radical-based chemical transformations were some of the first functions
associated with early protein-based biocatalysts.
3
Glycyl Radical Enzyme Activating Enzymes
The glycyl radical
enzymes (GREs) are a family of enzymes that
house a stable, catalytically essential glycyl radical in their active
state.
56
Examples include PFL, anaerobic
ribonucleotide reductase, benzylsuccinate synthase, 4-hydroxyphenylacetate
decarboxylase, and glycerol dehydratase, among others. These oxygen-sensitive
enzymes play key roles in microbial anaerobic metabolism.
57
The glycyl radicals are generated by glycyl
radical enzyme activating enzymes (GRE-AEs), which are radical SAM
enzymes. The GRE-AEs function either as distinct enzymatic entities
or as subunits of the GREs that they activate. In either case, the
GRE-AEs represent the simplest chemistries catalyzed by radical SAM
enzymes, because the species generated upon H-atom abstraction by
the deoxyadenosyl radical is the product of the reaction.
3.1
Pyruvate Formate-Lyase Activating Enzyme
Pyruvate formate-lyase
activating enzyme (PFL-AE) catalyzes the
activation of pyruvate formate lyase (PFL), a central enzyme in anaerobic
glucose metabolism in microbes. The activation of PFL by PFL-AE involves
the stereospecific (pro-S) H-atom abstraction from
PFL G734 (E. coli numbering) by a SAM-derived
5′-deoxyadenosyl radical generated by PFL-AE (Figure 14). PFL-AE was among the earliest
enzymes identified
to utilize SAM and iron to catalyze a radical reaction.
Figure 14
PFL-AE reaction
scheme catalyzing the activation of PFL by stereospecific
(pro-S) hydrogen atom abstraction
from PFL G734 (in E. coli).
3.1.1
Early Studies on Pyruvate Formate-Lyase
and Its Activation
The enzyme-catalyzed reversible cleavage
of pyruvate to formate and acetyl-CoA was first described by the Werkman
and Lipmann laboratories in the 1940s and 1950s;
58
in 1968 Chase and Rabinowitz proposed the name pyruvate
formate-lyase for the enzyme catalyzing this reaction.
59
Characterization of this enzyme was hampered
by its oxygen sensitivity, and by the loss of other required but unknown
factors during cell fractionation. Joachim Knappe and co-workers first
reported in 1965 that SAM was a cofactor,
60
and over the succeeding 35 years the Knappe laboratory led the way
in unraveling the key mysteries of this extremely challenging and
intriguing enzyme. They showed in 1969 that in addition to the pyruvate
formate-lyase (PFL, which they also referred to as Enzyme I), a second
enzyme (referred to as Enzyme II) was required for the reaction and
was activated by Fe(II) and dithiols.
3
Enzyme
II was ultimately shown to be responsible for catalyzing the activation
of pyruvate formate-lyase itself, in a reaction linked to the reductive
cleavage of SAM. Knappe’s predicted Enzyme II is now known
as the radical SAM enzyme pyruvate formate-lyase activating enzyme
(PFL-AE). In a seminal paper published in 1984, Knappe and co-workers
reported that activation of PFL by the Fe(II)- and SAM-dependent PFL-AE
resulted in the introduction of an unprecedented organic free radical
localized on a PFL residue.
2
Four years
later the same group reported the primary structures of PFL and PFL-AE,
and noted “a cluster of three cysteines...which may be significant
for the putative Fe-binding and redox-functional properties of this
enzyme.”
61
This cysteine “cluster”
was, of course, the canonical radical SAM superfamily CX3CX2C motif.
The amino acid radical present in activated
PFL was eventually shown to reside on glycine 734,
4
and to be generated by stereospecific abstraction of the
α-C pro-S H-atom of G734.
62
The nature of the PFL-AE however remained somewhat more
mysterious. PFL-AE was reported to contain an unidentified covalent
chromophore (λmax = 388 nm) and strictly require
Fe(II) for activity.
63
Subsequent work
in the Kozarich laboratory using recombinant PFL-AE homologously overexpressed
in Escherichia coli and purified from
inclusion bodies by denaturation demonstrated that no covalent chromophore
was present in this case, and yet the enzyme was still active under
reducing conditions in the presence of Fe(II) and SAM.
64
Kozarich and co-workers also reported that PFL-AE
binds one Fe(II) per protein upon reconstitution, and that the protein
could alternatively be reconstituted with similar ratios of Co(II)
or Cu(II). Further, Cu(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) were found to inhibit
enzyme activity.
64
3.1.2
The Iron–Sulfur Cluster of PFL-AE
and Its Role in Catalysis
Despite this mounting evidence
for a mononuclear iron site in PFL-AE, it was demonstrated in 1997
that PFL-AE was, in fact, an iron–sulfur cluster containing
enzyme.
5
Careful anaerobic purification
of PFL-AE from overexpressing E. coli cells without denaturation yielded protein with
a reddish-brown
color and a UV–vis spectrum characteristic of iron–sulfur
clusters (Table 2).
5
Quantitative analysis of the isolated enzyme revealed the presence
of 1.5 irons and 1.7 acid-labile sulfides per protein monomer.
5
Resonance Raman spectroscopy revealed the presence
of both [4Fe–4S]2+ and [2Fe–2S]2+ clusters in the enzyme as-isolated, with only [4Fe–4S]2+
clusters present upon dithionite reduction.
5
EPR spectroscopy revealed that the cluster could be reduced
to the [4Fe–4S]+ state in the presence of SAM (Table 2).
5
While the iron and
sulfide to protein stoichiometry and cluster lability led at the time
to a proposal that PFL-AE contained subunit-bridging [4Fe–4S]
clusters, further investigations concluded that PFL-AE is monomeric
and binds a [4Fe–4S] cluster. It was also noted in this paper
that PFL-AE, the activase subunit of the anaerobic ribonucleotide
reductase, and biotin synthase all contained the same CX3CX2C motif likely responsible
for cluster coordination;
together with the common requirement for SAM, this suggested “a
commonality of mechanism that may represent a new paradigm for radical
generation in biological systems.”
5
Modification of growth and purification conditions for PFL-AE
ultimately led to isolation of enzyme containing primarily [3Fe–4S]+ clusters,
65
which could be converted
to [4Fe–4S] clusters upon reduction.
66
Further optimization of expression and purification conditions led
to purified protein containing primarily [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters, with stoichiometry close
to one [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster per protein monomer.
67
Enzyme
activity was correlated with cluster content, showing that the cluster
was catalytically essential.
5,65
EPR spectroscopy was
used to demonstrate clearly for the first time that (1) the [4Fe–4S]+ state is the
catalytically active state of the cluster, and
(2) the [4Fe–4S]+ cluster is oxidized to the [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster concomitant with substrate
turnover.
21
These experiments were carried out by reducing
PFL-AE with photoreduced 5-deazariboflavin; the reduction requires
exposure to an intense halogen lamp, and removal of excess reductant
is as simple as putting the sample in the dark.
21
The PFL-AE samples were reduced for a range of times to
produce enzyme with varying [4Fe–4S]+ content (as
confirmed by quantitative EPR spectroscopy).
21
Each sample was then placed in the dark, which effectively removes
the reductant, and SAM and PFL were added. These samples then were
analyzed using quantitative EPR spectroscopy, as the enzyme product
in this case is the paramagnetic PFL glycyl radical. Because the glycyl
radical has distinct EPR spectral properties relative to the [4Fe–4S]+ cluster, it
was possible to identify and quantify each paramagnetic
species individually. What the data set revealed was a 1:1 correlation
between the amount of [4Fe–4S]+ in the reduced PFL-AE
sample and the amount of glycyl radical generated upon addition of
PFL (Figure 6).
21
Further, the results showed that the [4Fe–4S]+ cluster was converted to an EPR silent
state upon reaction with
PFL; this EPR silent state was ultimately shown to be the [4Fe–4S]2+ state.
21,67
These results revealed
a key feature of radical SAM chemistry:
radical SAM reactions utilize a reduced [4Fe–4S]+ for cluster to transfer an electron
to SAM, reductively cleaving
it to generate methionine and a dAdo•, with the
dAdo• abstracting a H-atom from substrate. These
and other kinetics studies demonstrated that PFL-AE could undergo
multiple turnover events, with the 150 PFL activations per PFL-AE
reported in Table 1not
the upper limit, but rather a number limited by the PFL:PFL-AE ratio
in the steady-state kinetics assays. As can be seen from the data
summarized in Table 1, PFL-AE is one of the
few radical SAM enzymes demonstrated to be truly catalytic. Many of
the enzymes studied to date undergo very few turnover events in vitro,
reflecting both the difficulties in preparing and assaying active
radical SAM enzymes and the challenging issues related to product
stability/quantitation.
Table 1
Kinetic Parameters
Associated with
Radical SAM Enzymes
enzyme
substrate/Analogue
rate constant (min–1)
K
M
no. of turnover eventsa
role of SAMb
BioB
68
dethiobiotin
0.12 ± 0.03
10 ± 5 μM (SAM)
3
S
LipA
69
octanoyl derivative of the H-protein
0.175 ± 0.01
0.378
S
ThiC
70
5-aminoimidazole ribonucleotide
(AIR)
0.14 ± 0.03
17 ± 3 μM (SAM)
5.2
S
NocL
71
tryptophan
0.0416
∼1.75
S
PFL-AE
64,65
PFL
0.12
1.2 ± 0.4 μM (PFL)
150
S
2.8 ± 0.3 μM (SAM)
LAM
8,72
lysine
∼2000
4.3 ± 0.5 mM (lysine)
>1000
C
2.8 × 10–8 M (SAM)
EAM
73
glutamate
366 ± 12
2.3 ± 0.2 mM
C
SPL
74
DNA spore photoproduct
0.021 ± 0.004 (dinucleoside)
C
0.30 ± 0.01 (dinucleotide)
∼10
Hpd-AE
75
4-hydroxyphenyl
acetate decarboxylase (Hpd)
0.25 ± 0.007
0.44 ± 0.04 mM (SAM)
S
BtrN
76
2-deoxy-scyllo-inosamine (DOIA)
1.2 ± 0.1
0.022 ± 0.004 mM (DOIA)
S
0.46 ± 0.10 mM (SAM)
ThiH and ThiGH complex
77
tyrosine
0.192 ± 0.048 (p-cresol) (ThiH)
∼3
S
0.318 ± 0.036 (p-cresol) (ThiGH)
2.3
HydG
78
tyrosine
0.108 ± 0.012 (p-cresol)
0.3 ± 0.03 mM (tyrosine)
3
S
0.036 ± 0.001 (CN–)
2.6 ± 1.1 μM (SAM)
AtsB
serine on target
sulfatase
0.32 ± 0.01 (Ser peptide)
S
anSMEkp
79
(18-mer Ser
or Cys peptide)
1.14 ± 0.12 (Cys peptide)
anSMEcpe
80
cysteine
on target sulfatase
17-mer (Cys peptide)
- (FGly) 0.0185
∼3.5
S
(17- or 18-mer Ser or Cys peptides)
Kp18mer (Cys peptide) - (FGly) 2.3 ± 0.1
∼80
Kp18mer (Ser
peptide) - (FGly) 0.85 ± 0.001
∼28
BlsE
81
cytosylglucuronic acid (CGA)
1.62 ± 0.30
1.93 ± 2.4 μM (CGA)
S
MoaA
82
GTP
0.045 ± 0.003 (GTP)
1.4 ± 0.2 μM (GTP)
0.5
S
4.1 ± 1.3 μM (SAM)
MiaB
83
i6A37 containing 17 base tRNA oligonucleotide
0.018
1.2
S
RimO
83
ribosomal S12-aspartyl 89
0.019
1.7
S
(13-mer)
13-mer (Asp peptide)
GenK
84
gentamicin X2
0.018
22
S
HemN
85
coproporphyrinogen III
5–8
S
AlbA
86
precursor peptide SboA
0.075
S
DesII
87
TDP-4-amino-4,6-dideoxy-d-glucose
1.0 ± 0.1
50 ± 1.2 μM
E
QueE
88
6-carboxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterin
5.4 ± 1.2
20 ± 7 μM (CPH4)
C
45 ± 1 μM (SAM)
TsrM
89
tryptophan
0.26
∼50
N
a
Reported as total
moles product
per mole enzyme.
b
Role of
SAM during catalysis. S
= substrate, C = cofactor, E = either, N = neither.
Table 2
Spectroscopic Properties
of the Radical
SAM [4Fe–4S] FeS Cluster
enzyme
organism
λmax (nm)a
sample
type
EPR (g-values)b
[4Fe–4S] cluster Mössbauer parameters (mm/s)c
ref
Radical SAM Enzymes Without Auxiliary
Fe–S Clusters
LAM
Clostridium subterminale SB4
420f
,
h
as-isolatedf
,
h
2.03, 2.00, 1.99
(8, 22, 90)
oxidizedf
,
h
2.03, 2.01
reducedf
,
h
–j
reduced + SAMf
,
h
2.00, 1.90, 1.85
RNR-AEp
Escherichia coli
420e
as-isolatede
2.03, 2.00
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂
= 0.43; ΔE
Q = 1.0 (82%)e
(7a, 91)
reducede
2.03, 1.93; 2.02, 1.92
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.46; ΔE
Q1 = 1.04 (30%)e
[4Fe–4S]+: (∂1 = 0.53;
ΔE
Q1 = 0.92, ∂2 = 0.59; ΔE
Q2 = 1.61) (50%)e
reduced + SAMe
2.00, 1.91
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ =
0.47; ΔE
Q = 1.00 (49%)
[4Fe–4S]+: (∂1 = 0.62;
ΔE
Q1 = 1.70, ∂2 = 0.53; ΔE
Q2 = 0.73) (40%)e
Lactococcus lactis
as-isolatede
2.03, 2.01, 2.00
(92)
reducede
,
o
2.02, 1.93; 2.04, 1.94o
reduced + SAMe
2.00, 1.92,
1.86; 2.00, 1.92, 1.86o
PFL-AE
Escherichia coli
420f
reducedf
,
o
2.02, 1.94, 1.88o
(5, 16a, 17)
reduced +
SAMf
,
o
2.01, 1.89, 1.88; 2.01, 1.88, 1.87o
as-isolatedf
[4Fe–4S]2+: (∂1 = 0.45;
ΔE
Q1 = 1.15, ∂2 = 0.45; ΔE
Q2 = 1.10) (8%)f
(66, 93)
reducedf
,
o
[4Fe–4S]2+: (∂1 = 0.45;
ΔE
Q1 = 1.15, ∂2 = 0.45; ΔE
Q2 = 1.10) (66%)f
[4Fe–4S]+: (∂1 = 0.50;
ΔE
Q1 = 1.32, ∂2 = 0.58; ΔE
Q2 = 1.89) (12%)f
as-isolated + SAMf
,
q
[4Fe–4S]2+: (∂ = 0.72; ΔE
Q = 1.15) (32%)f
,
q
as-isolated + dAdoHf
[4Fe–4S]2+: (∂ = 0.44;
ΔE
Q = 1.20) (19%) (∂1 = 0.39;
ΔE
Q1 = 0.52), (∂2 = 1.00; ΔE
Q2 = 2.07) (77%)
whole cells
[4Fe–4S]2+: (∂1 = 0.43;
ΔE
Q1 = 1.20), (∂2 = 0.45; ΔE
Q2 = 0.71), (∂3 = 0.97; ΔE
Q3 = 2.08) (75%)
420e
as-isolatede
2.01
(94)
reducede
2.03, 1.93
reduced
+ SAMe
,
m
2.01, 1.92, 1.89
reduced
+ SAHe
,
m
2.04, 1.93, 1.90
SPL
Bacillus subtilis
400, 472d
as-isolatedd
(95)
420e
as-isolatede
2.03
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.44; ΔE
Q = 1.06 (40%)e
(96)
reducede
2.03, 1.93
reduced + SAMe
2.02, 1.93
420f
as-isolatedf
2.02
(97)
reducedf
2.03, 1.93, 1.89; 2.04, 1.94, 1.89
reduced + SAMf
2.03, 1.93, 1.92
Clostridium acetobutylicum
420e
as-isolatede
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.43; ΔE
Q =
1.09 (42%)e
(98)
as-isolatedf
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.45; ΔE
Q =
1.22 (27%)f
reducede
2.04, 1.94
413f
as-isolatedf
1.99
(74b)
reducedf
2.03, 1.93, 1.92
reduced + SAMf
2.03, 1.92, 1.82
Geobacillus stearothermophilus
420e
reducede
2.04, 1.93, 1.89
(99)
reduced + SAMe
2.04, 1.93, 1.89
HemN
Escherichia coli
410f
as-isolatedf
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂1 = 0.43,
ΔE
Q1 = 1.17 (67%); ∂2 = 0.57; ΔE
Q2 = 1.23 (22%)f
(85, 100)
as-isolated + SAMf
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂1 = 0.43,
ΔE
Q1 = 1.10 (67%); ∂2 = 0.68; ΔE
Q2 = 1.04 (22%)f
reducedf
2.06, 1.94, 1.89
reduced
+ SAMf
–j
ThiGH
Escherichia coli
390,g 410g
as-isolatedg
2.01
(101)
reducedg
2.03, 1.92
reduced + SAMg
2.00, 1.87
DesII
Streptomyces venezuelae
420e
as-isolatedd
2.01
(87, 102)
reducede
2.01, 1.96, 1.87
Elp3
Methanocaldococcus jannaschi
420e
as-isolatede
2.00, 1.96
(103)
reducede
2.03, 1.93
reduced
+ SAMe
2.02, 1.93
AviX12
Streptomyces viridochromogenes
450d
oxidizedd
2.03, 2.02, 2.00
(104)
reducedd
–j
ThiC
Arabidopsis thaliana
410d
,
f
,
l
as-isolatedd
,
l
(105)
Salmonella
enterica
410f
as-isolatedf
(106)
reducedf
1.92
Caulobacter crescentus
415g
as-isolatedf
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.46; ΔE
Q =
1.11 (53%)f
(41)
as-isolatedg
2.00
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.45; ΔE
Q =
1.12 (43%)g
reducedg
2.02, 1.93
Bss-AEp
Thauera aromatica T1
420,e 390g
as-isolatede
,
f
,
g
2.02
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.43; ΔE
Q = 1.09 (92%)f
,
z
(107)
reducede
,
g
2.04, 1.94;e 2.06, 1.94g
Dph2
Pyrococcus
horikoshii
400f
as-isolatedf
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.43; ΔE
Q = 1.13 (73%)f
(32, 108)
reducedf
2.03, 1.92, 1.86
HcgA
Methanococcus maripaludis S2
410g
as-isolatedg
(109)
reducedg
2.04, 1.93
reduced
+ SAMg
2.03, 1.92
NirJ
Paracoccus pantotrophus
as-isolatedf
–j
(110)
reducedf
2.02, 1.93
reduced
+ SAMf
2.00, 1.89
RlmN
Escherichia coli
410g
as-isolatedf
,
g
,
aa
N.R.i
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.44; ΔE
Q =
1.14 (93%);f (95%)g
(111)
Cfr
Staphylococcus
aureus
400,g 410g
as-isolatedf
,
g
,
aa
N.R.i
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.44; ΔE
Q = 1.10 (86%);f (98%)g
(111, 112)
reducedg
2.04, 1.93, 1.89
reduced + SAMg
–j
reduced + SAHg
2.00, 1.93, 1.82
Viperin
Homo sapiens
415,e
,
g 410d
as-isolatedg
2.01
(113)
reducedg
2.02, 1.92, 1.91
reduced + SAMg
2.03, 1.95, 1.88
GD-AE
Clostridium butyricum
reducedg
N.R.i
(31)
NocL
Nocardia sp. ATCC
202099
393g
as-isolatedg
–j
(71)
reducedg
2.02,
1.91
reduced + SAMg
2.01, 1.89, 1.80m
reduced + Trpg
2.02, 1.89, 1.85
NosL
Streptomyces actuosus
400g
as-isolatedg
(114)
reducedg
2.02, 1.91
PhnJ
Escherichia coli
403,e 410g
reducedg
2.01,
1.92, 1.87
(115)
PhpK
Kitasatospora phosalacinea
420g
as-isolatedg
2.00
(116)
reducedg
1.93
CofH
Nostoc
punctiforme
405f
as-isolatedf
(117)
CofG
Methanocaldococcus jannaschii
420f
as-isolatedf
(117)
QueE
Bacillus subtilis
410g
as-isolatedg
,
aa
2.00
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.44;
ΔE
Q = 1.13 (80%)g
(88)
reducedg
–j
reduced + SAMg
2.00, 1.91, 1.86
TsrM
Streptomyces
laurentii
420e
as-isolatede
(89)
YtkT
Streptomyces sp. TP-A0356
410g
as-isolatedg
(118)
GenK
Micromonospora echinospora
420e
as-isolatede
(84)
BlsE
Streptomyces griseochromogenes
420g
as-isolatedg
2.01
(81)
reducedg
2.02, 1.93
reduced + SAMg
2.00, 1.96,
1.87
MqnE
Thermus thermophilus
415f
as-isolatedf
(119)
Radical SAM
Enzymes Coordinating
Auxiliary Fe–S Clusters
BioB
Escherichia coli
410d
,
k
as-isolatedd
,
k
(120)
420e
,
k
as-isolatede
,
k
[4Fe–4S]2+: (∂1 = 0.44;
ΔE
Q1 = 1.13 (72%), ∂2 = 0.85; ΔE
Q2 = 0.51 (8%))e
,
k
,
t
(121)
reducede
,
k
2.04, 1.93e
,
k
,
t
[4Fe–4S]+: ∂ = 0.85;
ΔE
Q = 0.51 (80%)e
,
k
,
t
as-isolatede
,
k
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂1 = 0.45;
ΔE
Q1 = 1.16e
,
k
,
x
(122)
as-isolated + SAMe
,
k
[4Fe–4S]2+: (∂1 = 0.45;
ΔE
Q1 = 1.16; ∂2 = 0.40; ΔE
Q2 = 0.86; ∂3 = 0.64; ΔE
Q3 = 1.26)e
,
k
,
x
reducede
,
k
,
u
∼2.00, 1.94, 1.94
reduced + SAMe
,
k
,
u
∼2.00, 1.93, 1.85
LipA
Escherichia coli
420e
,
k
as-isolatede
,
k
–j
∂ = 0.44; ΔE
Q = 1.20
(50%)e
,
k
(121b, 123)
420e
,
k
reducede
,
k
2.04, 1.93
413f
,
k
reducedf
,
k
2.06, 1.95, 1.92
(124)
400f
,
g
,
k
,
n
as-isolatedf
,
g
,
k
[4Fe–4S]2+: (∂1 = 0.45,
ΔE
Q1 = 0.98; ∂2 = 0.46, ΔE
Q2 = 1.30) (95%),f
,
k (64%)g
,
k
(125)
as-isolatedf
,
g
,
n
[4Fe–4S]2+: (∂1 = 0.46,
ΔE
Q1 = 0.92; ∂2 = 0.45, ΔE
Q2 = 1.22) (95%),f
,
n (64%)g
,
n
reducedf
,
g
,
k
2.03, 1.93
reducedf,n
2.03, 1.93
MiaB
Escherichia coli
(416, 460, 560)d
,
e
,
k
as-isolatedd
,
e
,
k
2.01
(126)
reducedd
,
e
,
k
2.06, 1.93
Thermotoga maritima
420e
,
k
as-isolatede
,
k
2.01
[4Fe–4S]2+: (∂1 = 0.46,
ΔE
Q1= 1.27; ∂2 = 0.44, ΔE
Q2 = 1.03) (71%) [4Fe–4S]+: (∂1 = 0.50, ΔE
Q1 = 1.32; ∂2 = 0.58, ΔE
Q2 = 1.89) (29%)e
,
k
(24b, 127)
reducede
,
k
2.05, 1.93
MoaA
Homo sapiens
415d
,
k
as-isolatedg
,
k
2.00
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.48,
ΔE = 1.26; (40%)g
,
k
,
n
(128)
410f
,
g
,
k
reducedg
,
k
2.03, 1.92, 1.89
HydE
Thermotoga maritima
400e
,
k
as-isolatede
,
k
(129)
reducede
,
k
2.04, 1.93
HydG
Thermotoga maritima
400e
,
k
reducede
,
k
N.R.i
(129)
Clostridium acetobutylicum
400,e
,
k 395g
,
k
as-isolatedg
,
k
(78b, 130)
reducedg
,
n
,
o
2.03, 1.91, 1.89
reduced + SAMg
,
n
,
o
2.03,
1.92, 1.91; 1.99, 1.88, 1.84
Shewanella oneidensis
N.R.i
reducedg
,
m
,
n
2.05, 1.94, 1.91
(131)
reduced + SAMg
,
n
2.01, 1.88, 1.84
NifB
Azotobacter
vinelandii
400g
,
k
as-isolatedg
,
k
(132)
NifEN-B
Azotobacter vinelandii
N.R.f
,
i
,
k
oxidizedf
,
k
(133)
reducedf
,
k
2.02, 1.95, 1.94
reduced
+ SAMf
1.94j
,
v
Hpd-AEp
Clostridium scatologenes
420g
as-isolatedg
,
r
2.02
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.44;
ΔE
Q = 1.22 (82%)g
,
z
(75, 134)
reducedg
,
r
2.04, 1.94
reduced + SAMg
,
r
2.04, 1.94
390f
as-isolatedf
,
s
–j
reducedf
,
s
2.04, 1.94
reduced + SAMf
,
s
2.04, 1.94
Clostridium difficile
385f
as-isolateds
–j
reduceds
2.04, 1.94
reduced + SAMs
2.04, 1.94
anSME
Clostridium perifringens
420,e
,
k 400g
,
k
as-isolatede
,
f
,
g
,
k
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.44; ΔE
qQ = 1.14
(95%);f
,
k (75%)g
,
k
(80b, 135)
reducede
,
k
2.05, 1.94
reduced + SAMe
,
k
1.99, 1.90
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron
400e
,
k
reducede
,
k
2.05, 1.92
(135b, 136)
reduced + SAMe
,
k
1.98, 1.90, 1.84
BtrN
Bacillus
circulans
420f
,
g
,
k
as-isolatedf
,
g
,
k
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.44;
ΔE
qQ = 1.13 (87%),f
,
k (98%)g
,
k
(76, 137)
reducedg
,
k
2.04, 1.92
reduced + SAMg
,
k
1.99, 1.83
reduced + SAM + substrateg
,
k
,
w
2.05, 1.96, 1.87
AtsB
Klebsiella pneumoniae
395f
,
g
,
k
,
aa
as-isolatedg
N.R.i
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.44; ΔE
Q =
1.17 (94%)f
,
g
(79, 80b)
RimO
Escherichia coli
410f
,
g
,
k
as-isolatedf
,
k
2.01
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.43,
ΔE
Q = 1.07 (90%)f
,
k
(138)
as-isolated + SAMf
,
k
[4Fe–4S]2+: (∂1 = 0.43,
ΔE
Q1 = 1.07 (58%); ∂2 = 0.70, ΔE
Q2 = 1.24 (16%);
∂3 = 0.37, ΔE
Q3 = 0.81 (16%))f
,
k
as-isolatedg
,
k
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.43, ΔE
Q =
1.12 (62%)g
,
k
as-isolated + SAMg
,
k
[4Fe–4S]2+: (∂1 = 0.43,
ΔE
Q1 = 1.12 (44%); ∂2 = 0.70, ΔE
Q2 = 1.24 (9%);
∂3 = 0.37, ΔE
Q3 = 0.81 (9%))g
,
k
reducedf
,
k
2.06, 1.98, 1.94
reducedg
,
k
2.04, 1.93
reduced
+ SAMg
,
k
2.04, 1.93
Thermotoga maritima
420e
,
f
,
g
,
k
as-isolatede
,
f
,
g
,
k
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂1 = 0.45,
ΔE
Q1 = 1.15 (56%); (∂2 = 0.48, ΔE
Q2 = 1.24; ∂3 = 0.60, ΔE
Q3 = 2.07; ∂4 = 0.30, ΔE
Q4 = 0.90) (32%)e
,
k
(83, 139)
reducede
,
k
2.03, 1.93, 1.90; 2.04, 1.94, 1.88
reducede
,
k
,
aa
2.03, 1.93, 1.90; 2.05, 1.94,
1.88
[4Fe–4S]+: (∂1 = 0.55,
ΔE
Q1 = 1.90; ∂2 = 0.50, ΔE
Q2 = 1.30)e
,
k
PqqE
Klebsiella pneumoniae
420e
,
k
as-isolatede
,
k
2.05, 1.94
(140)
420g
,
k
as-isolatedg
,
k
2.01
reducedg
,
k
2.06, 1.96, 1.91
reduced + SAMg
,
k
2.00, 1.94, 1.90m
YqeVy
Bacillus subtilis
420e
,
k
reducede
,
k
N.R.i
(141)
TYW1
Pyrococcus abyssi
410e
,
k
as-isolatede
,
k
(142)
as-isolated +
SAMe
,
k
[4Fe–4S]2+: ∂ = 0.44;
ΔE
Q = 1.13 (78%)e
,
k
reducede
,
k
,
o
2.02, 1.90, 1.86
reduced + SAMe
,
k
,
o
1.98, 1.86, 1.83
AlbA
Bacillus subtilis
410e
,
k
as-isolatede
,
k
–j
(86)
reducede
,
k
2.03, 1.92
430e
,
n
as-isolatede
,
n
2.01
reducede
,
n
2.03, 1.92
FbiC
Thermobifida fusca
420e
as-isolatede
(117)
SkfB
Bacillus subtilis
410e
,
k
as-isolatede
,
k
2.01
(143)
reducede
,
k
2.04, 1.93
410e
,
n
as-isolatede
,
n
2.01
reducede
,
n
2.03, 1.93
a
Represents nonreduced λmax with as-reconstituted enzyme. Exceptions are marked as
indicated.
b
Represents spectral g-values for the radical SAM [4Fe–4S] cluster; however,
overlapping
[4Fe–4S] cluster signals may be reflected in the cited g-values. Spectral values where
radical SAM [4Fe–4S]
signal discrimination has been performed is indicated. Unless otherwise
indicated, samples that underwent reduction were reduced with dithionite.
c
Represents selected (simulated)
Mössbauer
parameters consistent with the radical SAM [4Fe–4S] cluster.
Unless otherwise indicated, spectral values reported at 4.2 K.
d
Aerobic purification, no Fe–S
reconstitution.
e
Aerobic purification,
anaerobic Fe–S
reconstitution.
f
Anaerobic
purification, no Fe–S
reconstitution
g
Anaerobic
purification and Fe−S
reconstitution.
h
Enzyme not
Fe–S reconstituted,
but undergoes activation with Fe.
i
N.R. = data available, but was not
reported.
j
Diamagnetic.
k
Intact enzyme.
l
Truncated enzyme.
m
Additional spectral features observed;
please see reference.
n
Site-directed
mutagenesis performed
on non-radical SAM Fe–S cluster.
o
5-Deazariboflavin reduction data
available.
p
Radical SAM Fe–S
cluster
part of a larger oligomeric structure with subunits that coordinate
Fe–S clusters.
q
Represents
a mixed 56Fe/57Fe [4Fe–4S] cluster.
r
Enzyme purified with a hexahistidine
tag.
s
Enzyme purified with
a streptavidin
tag.
t
Spectrum from Ollagnier
2000 Biochemistry.
121b
Cited references
have slightly different but
comparable Mössbauer parameters.
u
Samples underwent cryoreduction.
v
SAM serves as a substrate, causing
Fe–S cluster to become diamagnetic.
w
Assignment was made before discovery
of an auxiliary cluster on the enzyme.
x
% Fe not reported.
y
Reference uses YqeV and MtaB interchangeably.
z
Experiment performed at 80 K.
aa
EPR or UV–vis spectral data
available on 57Fe-enriched (reconstituted) samples.
3.1.3
Defining
the Unique SAM–Cluster Interaction
in Radical SAM Enzymes
The CX3CX2C
motif in PFL-AE, together with the evidence that the catalytically
relevant cluster was a [4Fe–4S] cluster, suggested the possibility
of a site-differentiated [4Fe–4S] cluster in which three irons
are coordinated by cysteinyl residues and the fourth iron has a noncysteine
ligand. The first direct evidence for a site-differentiated cluster
in the radical SAM enzymes was provided by an EPR spectroscopic study
of LAM.
90
In this study, Frey and co-workers
showed that oxidation of the [4Fe–4S] state of LAM with air
or ferricyanide generated an EPR signal characteristic of [3Fe–4S]
clusters, and similar to that previously reported for aconitase.
90,144
The observation that this [3Fe–4S] state could be converted
back to the [4Fe–4S] state upon addition of iron and reductant
(also similar to aconitase) strongly suggested that LAM, like aconitase,
contains a site-differentiated [4Fe–4S] cluster in which one
iron is rendered labile due to its lack of protein ligation. Similarly,
anaerobically purified PFL-AE containing [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters were found to readily
convert to the [3Fe–4S]+ state by air oxidation.
93a
Removal
of the released iron by gel filtration followed by addition of 1 equiv
of 57Fe produced enzyme whose Mössbauer spectroscopic
parameters were typical of [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters.
Upon addition of SAM to this protein, a significant change in the
Mössbauer isomer shift, from 0.45 to 0.7, occurred (Figure 15) (Table 2).
93a
This shift is indicative of a change in coordination
of the 57Fe to a harder, more ionic environment, and provided
the first evidence that SAM binds to the [4Fe–4S] cluster of
PFL-AE. In a complementary set of experiments, PFL-AE was overexpressed
in 57Fe enriched medium, generating protein containing
[4Fe–4S] clusters isotopically enriched in 57Fe.
93a
This protein was oxidized in air to generate
the [3Fe–4S]+ cluster, and then 1 equiv of natural
abundance Fe(II) was added to rebuild the [4Fe–4S] cluster.
Again, the protein exhibited Mössbauer spectral parameters
consistent with the presence of [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters
(Table 2).
93a
In
this case, however, addition of SAM did not perturb these parameters.
Together, the interpretation of these two results was that when Fe
was added to rebuild a [4Fe–4S] cluster from a [3Fe–4S]
cluster, the supplementary Fe entered primarily or exclusively the
unique iron site that was not coordinated by the CX3CX2C motif; further, only this
unique site was perturbed by the
addition of SAM.
93a
Thus, these results
provided the first evidence that SAM interacts directly with the [4Fe–4S]
cluster of PFL-AE by coordinating the unique iron of the cluster.
93a
Figure 15
Left: Mössbauer spectra of 56Fe PFL-AE reconstituted
with 57Fe for incorporation into the unique iron site in
the absence (A) and presence (B) of SAM. The solid line in (A) is
the experimental spectrum of [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters
in PFL-AE normalized to 70% of the total Fe absorption of (A). The
solid line in (B) is the spectrum of the control sample containing
only the reconstitution ingredients and SAM but without PFL-AE and
is normalized to 15% of the total Fe absorption of (B). A difference
spectrum of (B) minus (A) is shown in (C). Spectrum (D) is a difference
spectrum of the samples (A) and (B) recorded in a parallel field of
8 T. Reprinted with permission from ref (93a). Copyright 2002 American chemical Society.
Right: Illustration of the PFL-AE [4Fe–4S] cluster with 57Fe (purple sphere) in the
unique site bound by SAM, with
the other sites occupied by natural abundance iron (56Fe,
green spheres) (PDB ID 3CB8).
The finer details of
the SAM–cluster interaction were illuminated
by electron–nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) spectroscopic
studies of PFL-AE in complex with specifically isotopically labeled
SAMs. By examining the coupling between the electron spin on the [4Fe–4S]+ and the
nuclear spins on [methyl-13C]-SAM and
[methyl-D3]-SAM, it was demonstrated that the sulfonium
sulfur of SAM was in orbital overlap with the [4Fe–4S] cluster
in the PFL-AE/SAM complex.
17
These results
provided the first indication that the reduction of SAM by the [4Fe–4S]
cluster occurred by an inner-sphere mechanism through direct orbital
overlap.
17
Subsequent ENDOR studies of
the PFL-AE/SAM complex using SAM isotopically labeled with 13C at the carboxyl carbon,
with 17O at the carboxyl oxygen,
and with 15N at the amino nitrogen of SAM, unequivocally
demonstrated for the first time that SAM chelates the unique iron
of the [4Fe–4S] cluster via the amino and carboxyl moieties
of the methionine portion of SAM (Figure 16).
16a,67
Remarkably, the same SAM chelate structure
has now been observed in every radical SAM crystal structure in which
SAM is present; it seems clear that the coordination of SAM to the
unique iron of the [4Fe–4S] cluster is a unifying feature of
radical SAM catalysis, playing a critical role in mediating the subsequent
catalytic chemistry.
Figure 16
35-GHz pulsed ENDOR spectra of PFL-AE with 17O (A) and 13C (B) carboxylato-labeled
and 15N-amino-labeled
(C) SAM as compared to data from an unlabeled sample, at g
⊥. Reprinted with permission from ref (67). Copyright 2005 American
Chemical Society.
Insight into the behavior
of the iron–sulfur cluster of
PFL-AE in vivo was obtained by Mössbauer spectroscopic studies
of whole E. coli cells overexpressing
PFL-AE.
93b
The results demonstrate that
in aerobic culture, the PFL-AE contains a mixture of [4Fe–4S]
and [2Fe–2S] clusters; however, upon equilibrating the culture
under anaerobic conditions, all of the iron–sulfur clusters
converted to the [4Fe–4S] state, indicating that under anaerobic
conditions the [2Fe–2S]2+ clusters undergo reductive
coupling to form [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters, or alternatively
that the [2Fe–2S] clusters are scavenged under anaerobic conditions
building the more reduced [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters.
93b
Only the diamagnetic [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters were observed in the anaerobic cultures,
indicating that
even under anaerobic conditions in vivo, the amounts of the catalytically
active [4Fe–4S]+ state are too small to observe.
This may indicate that the catalytically active [4Fe–4S]+ oxidation state is achieved
only immediately prior to catalysis,
after the PFL-AE is complexed with its substrate PFL and poised for
H-atom abstraction. The most intriguing observation from these studies,
however, was that the [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster contained
a pair of valence-localized irons. While the vast majority of biological
[4Fe–4S]2+ clusters, including the [4Fe–4S]2+ in purified PFL-AE, contain two pairs
of valence-delocalized
irons (Fe2.5+–Fe2.5+ pairs), the [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster in PFL-AE in whole cells contains
one valence delocalized
(Fe2.5+–Fe2.5+), and one valence localized
(Fe3+–Fe2+) pair (Figure 17).
93b
The Fe2+ of this
localized pair is assigned to the distinct peak at +1.9 mm/s in the
Mössbauer spectrum, which is the high-energy half of the quadrupole
doublet assigned to a high-spin Fe2+ (δ = 0.97 mm/s
and ΔE
Q = 2.08 mm/s) (Table 2). A valence-localized [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster has only been described
for one other protein, ferredoxin:thioredoxin
reductase, which has a very unusual redox-active disulfide in close
proximity to the cluster that appears to influence the valence localization.
145
In PFL-AE, it remains unclear what causes the
valence localization in vivo. Amazingly, 100% of the PFL-AE [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters are
valence localized in vivo, while 100% are valence
delocalized in the purified enzyme. It is clear that SAM does not
induce valence localization of the [4Fe–4S] cluster of PFL-AE,
93
but the observed valence localization in vivo
is almost certainly a result of something coordinating to the unique
iron. To explore the possibilities, a range of small molecules were
added to purified PFL-AE in the [4Fe–4S]2+ state,
and the valence localization/delocalization was examined by Mössbauer
spectroscopy.
93b
Several of these small
molecules, including AMP and adenosine, were found to induce valence
localization. Whether one or more of these small molecules are responsible
for the valence localization observed in vivo has not yet been determined.
Figure 17
Representative
valence delocalization of biological [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters
containing two Fe2.5+–Fe2.5+ pairs (left,
top and bottom). Representative valence localization
of [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters in PFL-AE isolated from whole
cells containing one Fe2.5+–Fe2.5+ pair
and one Fe3+–Fe2+ pair (right, top and
bottom) (PDB ID 3CB8).
3.1.4
X-ray
Crystal Structure of PFL-AE
PFL-AE was the first glycyl radical
enzyme activating enzyme to be
structurally characterized, and remains one of the smallest radical
SAM enzyme for which a structure has been solved.
29
The enzyme is composed of a (βα)6 partial TIM barrel, with essentially no additional
secondary structural
elements, unlike other structurally characterized radical SAM enzymes
(Figure 18).
29
The
[4Fe–4S] cluster resides at the top of the barrel, coordinated
by the cysteines of the radical SAM CX3CX2C
motif. A conserved patch of amino acids near the [4Fe–4S] cluster
was proposed to be the site of interaction with the in vivo electron
donor flavodoxin,
29
and recent studies
have shown that flavodoxin binds PFL-AE with low micromolar affinity.
146
Structures were solved of the enzyme crystallized
in the presence of SAM (2.25 Å), and in the presence of SAM plus
a 7-mer peptide (RVSG734YAV) analogue of the Gly734 region
of PFL (2.8 Å), although ordered SAM binding is observed only
in the latter structure, suggesting that substrate binding helps to
order SAM in the active site. SAM binds to the unique iron of the
[4Fe–4S] cluster as had been previously demonstrated via ENDOR
spectroscopy, and it packs close to the peptide substrate such that
the C5′ of SAM is only 4.1 Å from the α-C of Gly734
where the H-atom is abstracted during PFL activation. Contacts between
the PFL-AE side chains and the peptide backbone appear to orient the
Gly734 in the active site and control the peptide conformation. The
stereospecificity of H-atom abstraction from PFL by PFL-AE is consistent
with the resulting orientation of Gly734 relative to the C5′
of SAM. A loop containing a conserved GRE-AE motif (DGXGXR) moves
toward the active site in the peptide-bound structure, with this motif
making several contacts with the bound peptide. A docking model using
the “radical domain” of PFL (residues 712–759)
revealed that this portion of PFL could fit in the splayed active
site barrel of PFL-AE, with the Gly734 α-C positioned 4.6 Å
from the 5′C of SAM, poised for H-atom abstraction (Figure 19).
29
Figure 18
PFL-AE crystal structure
(PDB ID 3CB8). Left: N-terminal domain colored in
wheat, radical SAM domain in light blue, C-terminal domain in light
pink, [4Fe–4S] cluster in yellow and rust spheres, SAM in green
sticks, 7-mer peptide in dark gray sticks. Right: Active site of PFL-AE
where [4Fe–4S] cluster (yellow and rust), SAM (green carbons),
and 7-mer peptide (gray carbons) are depicted in sticks with oxygens
colored red and nitrogens colored blue. Cysteines (light blue carbons)
involved in ligating cluster are depicted in lines.
Figure 19
Docking model of PFL-AE (PDB ID 3CB8). Best dock as produced
by ZDOCK, with
Cα of G734 in spacefill and radical domain of PFL (residues
712–759) in magenta. PFL-AE helices in cyan, strands in yellow,
and loops in gray. The [4Fe–4S] cluster (yellow and rust) and
SAM (green carbons) are depicted in sticks with oxygens colored red
and nitrogens colored blue. Reprinted with permission from ref (29). Copyright 2008
National
Academy of Sciences.
3.1.5
PFL-AE Mechanism and the Interaction with
PFL
The [4Fe–4S] cluster of PFL-AE binds SAM in the
oxidized [4Fe–4S]2+ or the reduced and catalytically
active [4Fe–4S]+ state.
16a,17,67,93a
Similar to
all other radical SAM enzymes, the reduced cluster can transfer an
electron via an inner-sphere process to the bound SAM, promoting homolytic
S–C5′ bond cleavage generating methionine and a dAdo• intermediate. The methionine
presumably is initially
bound to the unique iron of the cluster, although spectroscopic studies
have not yet provided evidence for this methionine-bound state in
PFL-AE. The dAdo• intermediate abstracts the pro-S H-atom from Gly734 to generate
dAdoH and the active glycyl
radical form of PFL.
62
Subsequent turnovers
of PFL-AE require methionine and dAdoH replacement with SAM, substrate
PFL binding, and the PFL-AE cluster reduction to the 1+ state.
The PFL crystal structure published in 1999 revealed that the Gly734
resides in a buried location within the structure, ∼8 Å
from the surface of the protein (Figure 20).
147
Gly734, together with two conserved cysteine
residues (Cys418 and Cys419), define the active site of PFL, where
the C–C bond of pyruvate is cleaved in a radical-mediated process
to produce formate and the acetyl group transferred to CoA.
147
Evidence supports a mechanism in which the
Gly734 radical abstracts a H-atom from Cys419 to generate a thiyl
radical, and it is this thiyl radical that interacts directly with
substrate pyruvate to mediate the chemical reaction. Thus, the close
proximity of Gly734, Cys419, and Cys418 in an active site buried in
the protein, where radical mechanisms are able to occur in a relatively
protected fashion, is not surprising. The protected location of the
Gly734 radical likely gives rise to its remarkable stability, with
a half-life measured at >24 h.
148
However,
the buried location of Gly734, together with the biochemical evidence
for direct H-atom abstraction from this residue by a dAdo• generated in the PFL-AE
active site,
62
and the structural studies of PFL-AE providing evidence that Gly734
bound in close proximity to the cluster-bound SAM in the active site
of PFL-AE,
29
pointed to significant conformational
changes for PFL during the activation process. Biochemical and biophysical
studies utilizing enzyme activity assays, fluorescence, CD, and EPR
spectroscopy have provided evidence that, while the PFL crystal structure
revealed a protein in a “closed” state, with Gly734
buried in the active site, the presence of PFL-AE promoted conversion
to an alternate “open” conformation in which Gly734
is more solvent-exposed.
149
It is presumably
in this open conformation that the radical domain of PFL binds to
the active site of PFL-AE, allowing formation of the radical at Gly734
(Figure 20). Consistent with these proposed
large conformational changes in PFL during activation by PFL-AE, recent
surface plasmon resonance studies indicate that the PFL/PFL-AE binding
is slow, with the rate limited by large conformational changes.
150
Upon generation of the Gly734·, the radical domain presumably reinserts Gly734 into
the core of
the PFL structure, thereby conferring the remarkable stability of
Gly734·. Interestingly, combining binding affinity
data with information on the cellular abundance of PFL, PFL-AE, and
SAM leads to the conclusion that these three species exist primarily
in a ternary complex in vivo.
150
Figure 20
Schematic
representation of PFL: left, crystal structure of closed
conformation (PDB ID 2PFL); and right, model for the open conformation. Radical domain
shown
in red where Gly734 is a red sphere and active site residues Cys418
and Cys419 are yellow spheres. Reprinted with permission from ref (149). Copyright
2010 American
Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
3.2
The Anaerobic Ribonucleotide Reductase Activating
Enzyme
The anaerobic ribonucleotide reductase activating
enzyme, like PFL-AE, activates its target protein by the abstraction
of a specific H-atom to generate the catalytically essential glycyl
radical.
3.2.1
Identification of an Anaerobic Ribonucleotide
Reductase Containing a Glycyl Radical
While the “aerobic”
ribonucleotide reductase (Type 1, found widely in mammals and aerobic
bacteria) had been known since the 1970s to contain a tyrosyl radical
cofactor implicated in catalysis,
18b,151
the existence
of an alternative ribonucleotide reductase present in anaerobic E. coli was first
reported in 1988 by Barlow.
152
In 1989, Reichard and co-workers showed that
this enzyme reduced CTP to dCTP, thereby differentiating its activity
from the aerobic E. coli enzyme that
reduced nucleotide diphosphates.
153
This
anaerobic RNR (aRNR) requires strictly anaerobic conditions for optimal
activity.
153
Hydroxyurea, which is known
to potently scavenge the tyrosyl radical present in the aerobic RNR,
only weakly inhibits the anaerobic RNR.
153
A year later, work in the Reichard laboratory demonstrated that
the anaerobic RNR was dependent on SAM for activity.
154
The authors concluded that the anaerobic RNR used SAM and
“a loosely bound metal” to generate the radical required
for reduction at the 2′ position of CTP.
154
The sequence of the nrdD gene, encoding
the anaerobic ribonucleotide reductase, was published in 1993, and
Reichard and co-workers noted the presence of a pentapeptide on the
aRNR, RVCGY, that showed a strong resemblance to the pentapeptide
of PFL, RVSGY, that had recently been shown to harbor a catalytically
essential glycyl radical.
7b
Reichard and
co-workers postulated that Gly681 of this peptide harbored a glycyl
radical required for ribonucleotide reduction by aRNR,
7b
a hypothesis subsequently confirmed by specific
isotopic labeling and site-directed mutagenesis of the aRNR coupled
with analysis by EPR spectroscopy.
155
Reichard
and co-workers also showed in 1993 that the aRNR bound an iron–sulfur
cluster with EPR properties characteristic of a [3Fe–4S]+ cluster, with the enzyme
activity correlating with iron content.
7a
The cluster signal went away upon reductive
activation of the enzyme, and a new EPR signal appeared that they
assigned to an organic radical on Gly681. Although the iron–sulfur
cluster was attributed at the time to the aRNR, we now know that the
cluster is associated specifically with the aRNR activating enzyme
as is discussed in the next section.
3.2.2
A [4Fe–4S]
Cluster in the Activating
Enzyme for the aRNR
In 1995 an open reading frame downstream
of the nrdD gene was identified; this ORF encoded
the 17.5 kDa iron-dependent protein (NrdG) eventually identified as
the activating protein for the anaerobic RNR.
156
It was subsequently shown that this small activase protein
(designated β) formed a tight complex with the anaerobic RNR
protein (designated α), with α2β2 stoichiometry.
157
As was also
incorrectly originally proposed for PFL-AE, the [4Fe–4S] cluster
was thought to bridge the β2 dimer.
91a,157a
This hypothesis was supported by the observation of [2Fe–2S]2+ clusters bound to the
α2β2 enzyme, which, upon reductive activation, converted to a mixture
of [4Fe–4S]+ and [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters
(Table 2).
158
It
was shown shortly thereafter, however, that each β peptide bound
four irons and four sulfides, and that the aRNR activating enzyme
was a [4Fe–4S]2+ and not a [2Fe–2S]2+ enzyme, with the observation of the latter clusters
being due to
air degradation of the former.
91b
Site-directed
mutagenesis studies demonstrated that the three cysteines in the CX3CX2C motif, and
no other cysteine residues, were
required for cluster coordination and catalytic activity.
159
Like PFL-AE, the aRNR activase was found
to undergo reductive cluster conversion from [3Fe–4S] to [4Fe–4S]
without addition of exogenous iron and sulfide.
92b
Subsequent studies showed that the presence of SAM perturbed
the EPR spectrum of the [4Fe–4S]+ cluster,
160
and that in the presence of DTT, the [4Fe–4S]+ cluster was converted to an EPR silent
state concomitant
with formation of the glycyl radical (Table 2).
91c
These results were important in
establishing a redox catalytic role for the [4Fe–4S] cluster
in the activation of the anaerobic RNR exploiting SAM as a cofactor.
This paper provided further insight into the relationship between
the aRNR and its activase, demonstrating the activase alone could
bind SAM and catalyze its reductive cleavage, but the activity was
enhanced in the presence of the α2 RNR.
91c
A similar study on the enzyme from Lactobacillus
lactis reached the same conclusion: that NrdD is the
ribonucleotide reductase that is activated by its activase NrdG.
157b
While β2 forms a tight complex
with α2, and was thus viewed for some time as a subunit
of the aRNR holoenzyme, β2 was ultimately demonstrated
to activate multiple α2, and thus, like PFL-AE, β2 is a true activating enzyme.
91b
The physiological reducing system for the aRNR-AE, flavodoxin and
flavodoxin reductase in the presence of NADPH, was shown to be incapable
of reducing the iron–sulfur cluster of the aRNR-AE to the catalytically
active state, consistent with the redox potential of the aRNR-AE [4Fe–4S]2+/+ couple
being more negative than the relevant couples of
the flavodoxin system.
160
In the presence
of SAM and the aRNR (α2), however, the flavodoxin/flavodoxin
reductase system was capable of generating the glycyl radical on α2, suggesting that
electron transfer from the flavodoxin system
to the aRNR-AE is coupled to, and driven by, the reductive cleavage
of SAM and the subsequent generation of the glycyl radical on aRNR.
160
The strict requirement for the presence of
all of the players in this high-cost, high-stakes chemistry is testament
to the complexity of these enzyme systems.
3.3
The B12-Independent Glycerol Dehydratase
Activating Enzyme
A B12-independent glycerol dehydratase
(GD) has been discovered that has significant sequence homology to
PFL and is activated by a protein (GD-AE) with homology to PFL-AE.
161
The X-ray crystal structure of GD
162
reveals a tertiary fold similar to that of
PFL
147a
and the aRNR,
163
and the C-terminal domain of GD aligns well (rmsd ∼0.7
Å) with the radical domain of PFL that is the site of interaction
with PFL-AE (Figure 21).
162
The purified inactive GD can be activated under anaerobic
conditions in the presence of SAM by GD-AE that had been subjected
to iron–sulfur cluster reconstitution conditions, providing
further evidence for similarity to the PFL/PFL-AE system.
162
The reduced form of GD-AE exhibits EPR spectral
features consistent with the presence of one or more [4Fe–4S]+ clusters that are perturbed
upon addition of SAM.
31
When GD is added to the GD-AE/SAM complex, a
glycyl radical is formed as detected by EPR spectroscopy.
31
Therefore, in many significant ways, the GD/GD-AE
and PFL/PFL-AE systems are analogous. However, while PFL-AE has been
shown to cleave the S–C(5′) bond of SAM generating dAdoH
and methionine (via a dAdo• intermediate), GD-AE
has been found to cleave the S–C(γ) bond of SAM to generate
methylthioadenosine (MTA) and 2-aminobutyrate as products.
31
Presumably, a 2-aminobutyryl radical intermediate
is utilized in the GD-AE-catalyzed activation of GD, although this
has yet to be directly demonstrated. This was an important observation
as it demonstrated the potential for radical SAM enzymes to cleave
alternate S–C bonds during radical catalysis.
Figure 21
The X-ray crystal structures
of the activating enzyme substrates
from left to right: GD, PFL, and aRNR (PDB IDs: 1R8W, 2PFL, and 1HK8, respectively).
All structures possess a core 10-stranded β-barrel motif assembled
in a manner antiparallel to two parallel five-stranded β-sheets.
The β-barrel core is surrounded by α-helices forming the
β/α-barrel. Radical domains, highlighted in magenta, for
GD, PFL, and aRNR are composed of the amino acids 731–782,
702–754, and 540–586 (where aRNR possesses a mostly
disordered C-terminal domain), respectively.
3.4
Other Glycyl Radical Enzyme Activating Enzymes
Benzylsuccinate synthase (BSS) is a central enzyme in anaerobic
toluene catabolism, catalyzing the conversion of toluene + fumarate
→ benzylsuccinate. BSS is a glycyl radical enzyme with an α2β2γ2 oligomeric structure,
with the large α subunits exhibiting similarity to PFL and harboring
the glycyl radical.
164
The BSS also contains
Fe–S clusters putatively residing on the β and γ
subunits that are of unknown function (Table 2).
107
The BSS is activated by a specific
activating enzyme that has not yet been characterized but is presumably
similar to PFL-AE.
4-Hydroxyphenylacetate decarboxylase (HPD),
which catalyzes the formation of p-cresol, is another
glycyl radical enzyme that, like BSS, contains additional subunits.
165
A mechanism for this enzyme has recently been
proposed on the basis of QC/MM calculations, which invokes a Cys503
radical as an oxidant, abstracting an electron from substrate, while
Glu637 abstracts a proton.
166
Like BSS,
HPD contains auxiliary iron–sulfur clusters in addition to
a glycyl radical; the clusters bind to small subunits in β4γ4 octamers and may be
involved in quenching
the radicals of activated enzymes when substrate is absent.
134,167
The HPD activating enzyme (HPD-AE) is monomeric and contains approximately
eight iron atoms and eight acid-labile sulfides per monomer, with
an extinction coefficient consistent with the presence of two clusters
per protein.
134
EPR spectra of the dithionite-reduced
HPD-AE indicate the presence of [4Fe–4S]+ clusters
(Table 2). The amino acid sequence of HPD-AE
contains, in addition to the radical SAM CX3CX2C motif, eight additional cysteines
present in the two motifs CX5CX2CX3C and CX2CX4CX3C, suggesting that this protein
could bind up to three
[4Fe–4S] clusters.
134
It is interesting
to note that all GRE-AEs with the exception of PFL-AE and aRNR-AE
contain similar auxiliary cluster motifs.
134
Although it had been proposed on the basis of the results with GD-AE
that the GRE-AEs containing auxiliary Fe–S clusters might catalyze
cleavage of alternate S–C bonds of SAM,
31
it has been recently reported that HPD-AE cleaves the S–C(5′)
bond of SAM.
75
The “classical”
SAM cleavage exhibited by HPD-AE thus calls into question the proposed
correlation between additional clusters and alternate mechanisms of
SAM cleavage.
A glycyl radical enzyme was recently found to
catalyze the C–N
bond cleavage involved in the conversion of choline to trimethylamine.
168
There are currently no published studies on
the activating system for this glycyl radical enzyme.
4
Enzymes Catalyzing Sulfur Insertion
Among the earliest
recognized radical SAM enzymes were two that
catalyzed sulfur insertion into C–H bonds; these were biotin
synthase, catalyzing thiazole ring formation in the final step of
biotin biosynthesis, and lipoyl synthase, which catalyzes the insertion
of two sulfur atoms into C–H bonds of an octanoyl moiety to
generate the lipoyl cofactor.
4.1
Biotin Synthase
4.1.1
Initial Identification of Fe–S Cluster
and SAM Dependence
The product of the bioB gene, now commonly referred to as biotin synthase (BioB),
was first
characterized in a cell-free extract by Ifuku and co-workers in 1992
(for the E. coli enzyme)
169
and Ohshiro et al. in 1994 (for the enzyme
from Bacillus subtilis).
170
It also demonstrated that the bioB gene product was capable of converting dethiobiotin
to biotin in
a reaction that was dependent on Fe2+ and SAM, in addition
to a few other components including an unidentified protein partner
(Figure 22). In 1994, Flint and co-workers
reported the first purification of E. coli BioB.
12a
The enzyme behaved as a dimer,
and iron and sulfide analysis together with EPR spectroscopic evidence
supported the presence of one redox-active [2Fe–2S] cluster
per monomer. The iron–sulfur cluster was EPR silent in the
isolated state, and became EPR active (g = 2.00,
1.95, 1.90) upon reduction with dithionite, although the EPR spin
quantitation accounted for only 10–15% of the expected iron–sulfur
clusters.
12a
Regardless, the data indicated
that a [2Fe–2S]2+ cluster in the isolated protein
could be reduced to a [2Fe–2S]+ cluster by dithionite.
Flint and co-workers also demonstrated in vitro that the purified bioB gene product
was active in converting dethiobiotin
to biotin in the presence of NADPH, SAM, Fe3+ or Fe2+, and additional cofactors that
were subsequently identified
as flavodoxin, flavodoxin reductase, fructose 1,2-bisphosphate, cysteine,
and DTT, although it was observed at most only 3 biotin produced per
protein dimer, and a turnover number of 1 per hour.
171
This low number of turnovers and slow rate of catalysis
is something that continues to beleaguer BioB research to the current
day (Table 1), as will be addressed again later
in this section.
Figure 22
The conversion of dethiobiotin to biotin catalyzed by
biotin synthase
(BioB).
Importantly, Flint and co-workers
pointed out the similarity of
biotin synthase to isopenicillin N synthase (IPNS), which also inserts
sulfur into an unactivated C–H bond and also depends on loosely
bound iron, but then noted that while IPNS required O2 for
its reaction, biotin synthase did not.
171
They also pointed out the dual presence of the CX3CX2C motif in both BioB and lipoate
synthase, which also catalyzes
insertion of sulfur into unactivated C–H bonds. They also noted
the apparent similarities in reaction between biotin synthase, lysine
2,3-aminomutase, and the anaerobic ribonucleotide reductase, including
the involvement of an Fe–S cluster and SAM, and the mechanism
involving abstraction of a H-atom from an unactivated carbon. Because
LAM and the aRNR-AE appeared to utilize radical chemistry, Flint and
co-workers suggested that biotin synthase would also operate via radical
chemistry.
171
These authors also alluded
to the “remote possibility” that the unstable iron–sulfur
cluster in biotin synthase might serve as the sulfur donor in biotin
biosynthesis;
12a
this role for the [2Fe–2S]
cluster in biotin synthase is now widely accepted, as will be discussed
further below. Thus, in this very first report of the characterization
of purified biotin synthase, a number of key ideas were put forth
that placed biotin synthase hypothetically with the other early iron–sulfur
cluster and SAM dependent enzymes. Shortly thereafter, Andree Marquet
and co-workers demonstrated that highly purified BioB was active in
the absence of any other protein if photoreduced deazaflavin was present.
172
Further, they showed that during the BioB reaction,
SAM was cleaved to produce dAdoH and methionine, in a ratio of approximately
three per biotin produced. They surmised that two SAM cleavage events
were required to cleave two C–H bonds in dethiobiotin, while
the third equivalent was attributed to an abortive process.
172
4.1.2
The Iron–Sulfur
Clusters of Biotin
Synthase
A thorough spectroscopic characterization of biotin
synthase by Michael Johnson and co-workers provided the first detailed
picture of the Fe–S clusters in this enzyme.
120
They used UV–vis, VTMCD, EPR, and resonance Raman
spectroscopies of biotin synthase in its as-isolated state and after
reduction with dithionite. The as-isolated enzyme appeared to contain
[2Fe–2S]2+ clusters at a stoichiometry of one [2Fe–2S]
cluster per subunit. Resonance Raman spectroscopy indicated the presence
of at least one noncysteine ligand to this cluster. Prolonged reduction
with dithionite resulted in the formation of [4Fe–4S] clusters,
which were either entirely in the diamagnetic 2+ oxidation state or
partially in the paramagnetic 1+ state depending on the details of
the reduction (Table 2).
120
Resonance Raman spectroscopy pointed to complete cysteinal
ligation for this [4Fe–4S] cluster, and EPR spectroscopy showed
that the 1+ state existed as a mixture of spin states, with both S = 1/2 (g = 2.044,
1.944, 1.914) and S = 3/2 (g = 5.6) states observed (Table 2).
120
The authors proposed
that the [4Fe–4S]2+/+ cluster was formed by reductive
coupling of two [2Fe–2S] clusters at the subunit interface,
and that the [4Fe–4S] cluster played a role in the reductive
cleavage of SAM to initiate radical chemistry. It was also proposed
that oxidative conversion of the [4Fe–4S] cluster to [2Fe–2S]
clusters might play a physiological role in regulating enzyme activity
in response to oxidative stress.
120
Subsequent studies by Fontecave and co-workers
121b
and Jarrett and co-workers,
173
however, demonstrated that biotin synthase could be reconstituted
to contain one [4Fe–4S] cluster per subunit, or two per dimer.
Oxidative degradation resulted in conversion of the [4Fe–4S]
clusters to [2Fe–2S] clusters, and rereduction regenerated
the [4Fe–4S] clusters. Jarrett and co-workers further demonstrated
that reductive conversion of [2Fe–2S] to [4Fe–4S] clusters
involved rapid dissociation of iron followed by rate-limiting reassociation
to produce the [4Fe–4S] clusters; this observation is also
inconsistent with the previously proposed reductive coupling of [2Fe–2S]
clusters to form [4Fe–4S] clusters.
173
It also showed that biotin synthase containing two [4Fe–4S]
clusters per dimer could undergo rapid and reversible oxidation and
reduction, supporting that the [4Fe–4S] cluster was the catalytically
essential state of the enzyme. Further, it was shown that mutagenesis
of the three cysteines that comprise the radical SAM motif yields
inactive enzyme,
174
which was incompetent
for reductive cleavage of SAM.
121c
Two
additional cysteines were also found to be required for activity.
175
Taken together, these results argued against
the previously proposed subunit-bridging [4Fe–4S] clusters.
In an important series of papers, Jarrett and co-workers and Johnson
and co-workers provided the first clear evidence that both [2Fe–2S]
and [4Fe–4S] clusters were playing a critical role in biotin
synthase activity. Ugulava et al. used electrochemistry coupled with
UV–vis spectroscopy to show that reduction of the [2Fe–2S]
clusters to generate [4Fe–4S] clusters occurred at widely separated
potentials of −140 and −430 mV, while reduction of the
[4Fe–4S]2+ to the [4Fe–4S]+ state
occurred at lower potentials between −440 and −505 mV
(Figure 23).
24a
A
subsequent Mössbauer study provided evidence that the [2Fe–2S]
and [4Fe–4S] clusters in biotin synthase occupy distinct sites
in the enzyme.
176
Detailed UV–visible,
resonance Raman, and Mössbauer spectroscopic studies by Cosper
et al. showed that the −140 mV potential was likely due to
residual [2Fe–2S] cluster residing in the radical SAM cluster
site, with the lower potential −430 mV cluster assigned to
the catalytic [2Fe–2S] cluster.
177
Given the differing potentials of the radical SAM and [2Fe–2S]
clusters, Ugulava et al. were able to isolate BioB containing one
[2Fe–2S] and one [4Fe–4S] cluster per monomer after
incubation under assay conditions,
24a
and
to show that this mixed cluster state of biotin synthase gave rise
to optimal enzyme activity.
178
Spectroscopic
evidence indicated that the [2Fe–2S] cluster was degraded and
the [4Fe–4S] cluster retained during turnover, affording the
first results supporting the proposal that the [2Fe–2S] cluster
of biotin synthase was the source of sulfur in the synthesis of biotin,
as is discussed in the following section.
24a,178
Figure 23
Reduction of BioB containing [2Fe–2S]2+ clusters.
(A) UV/visible spectra of BioB were recorded as the cell potential
was lowered by titration with dithionite. (Inset) Difference spectra
associated with the first wave of reduction (solid curve) and the
second wave of reduction (dashed curve) having maxima at 460 nm. (B)
The absorbance change at 452 nm was followed as a function of the
measured cell potential. Reprinted with permission from ref (24a). Copyright 2001
American
Chemical Society.
Ollagnier-de Choudens
et al. used EPR and Mössbauer spectroscopic
studies coupled to analysis of SAM cleavage products to demonstrate
that the [4Fe–4S]+ cluster of biotin synthase provides
an electron to SAM, promoting its reductive cleavage to dAdoH and
Met while leaving the cluster in the diamagnetic [4Fe–4S]2+ state (Table 2).
121c
They also demonstrated that only three of the eight cysteines
in biotin synthase (residues 53, 57, and 60, in a CX3CX2C motif) were required for
the SAM cleavage activity, indicating
that these three cysteines coordinate the [4Fe–4S] cluster.
Johnson and co-workers subsequently used resonance Raman, Mössbauer,
and EPR spectroscopies to demonstrate that SAM binds to a unique iron
site of the [4Fe–4S] cluster of biotin synthase, supporting
an inner-sphere electron transfer mechanism for reduction of SAM by
the [4Fe–4S]+ cluster.
122
Johnson, Huynh, and co-workers provided further support for
distinct
roles for two different iron–sulfur clusters in biotin synthase.
179
Like Jarrett and co-workers, they showed that
as-isolated biotin synthase containing [2Fe–2S] clusters could
be reconstituted with iron and sulfide to a form that contained one
[2Fe–2S] and one [4Fe–4S] cluster per monomer. They
also used EPR and Mössbauer spectroscopies to demonstrate that
while the [4Fe–4S] cluster was stable and was bound by SAM
during catalysis, most of the [2Fe–2S] cluster was degraded
during turnover, thus further supporting the Jarrett proposal that
the [2Fe–2S] cluster served as the source of sulfur in biotin
biosynthesis (Figure 24).
178,179
Johnson and co-workers found, however, that the rate of decay of
the [2Fe–2S] cluster was significantly faster than the initial
rate of formation of biotin. They interpreted these results as indicating
that if the [2Fe–2S] cluster is the sulfur donor in biotin
biosynthesis, then S insertion must not be rate-limiting. Alternatively,
they suggested that [2Fe–2S] cluster degradation could lead
to formation of an intermediate protein-bound polysulfide or persulfide
that served as the sulfur donor.
179
Figure 24
UV–visible
spectrum of BioB under assay conditions reveals
features characteristic of both [4Fe–4S]2+ and [2Fe–2S]2+ clusters. Reprinted with
permission from ref (24a). Copyright 2001 American
Chemical Society.
4.1.3
X-ray
Crystal Structure of Biotin Synthase
Biotin synthase, along
with HemN, were the first radical SAM enzymes
to be crystallographically characterized. The structure, solved to
3.4 Å resolution, revealed the presence of both a radical SAM
[4Fe–4S] cluster coordinated by the CX3CX2C motif with SAM coordinated to the unique
iron and a [2Fe–2S]
cluster (Figure 25).
40
The [2Fe–2S] cluster was found to be coordinated by four
conserved residues (Cys97, Cys128, Cys188, and Arg260); the arginine
ligand was unprecedented at the time in biology and was quite unexpected,
although it was consistent with the early spectroscopic work indicating
incomplete cysteinal ligation of the [2Fe–2S] cluster.
120
Interestingly, although it is completely conserved
and a highly unusual ligand for an iron–sulfur cluster, the
Arg260 is not essential for BioB activity in vitro or in vivo, as
demonstrated by Broach and Jarrett.
180
Dethiobiotin
was observed to be bound between SAM and the [2Fe-2S] cluster, with
the C9 atom ∼3.9 Å, and C6–4.1 Å, from the
5′-C of SAM, and thus in an appropriate position for H-atom
abstraction upon reductive cleavage of SAM to generate the dAdo• intermediate.
40
The closest
bridging sulfide of the [2Fe–2S] cluster was found to be only
4.6 Å from C9, supporting a mechanism whereby a carbon radical
generated at C9 could react with this bridging sulfide to form one
of the new C–S bonds in biotin. The two iron–sulfur
clusters and the enzyme active site were all found within a TIM barrel
fold, and the authors pointed out the intriguing similarity between
the biotin synthase structure and those of AdoCbl radical enzymes
(section 2.7).
40
Figure 25
BioB crystal structure (PDB ID 1R30). Left: N-terminal domain colored in
wheat, radical SAM domain in light blue, C-terminal domain in light
pink, [4Fe–4S] and [2Fe–2S] clusters in yellow and rust
spheres, SAM in green sticks, dethiobiotin in dark gray sticks. Right:
Active site of BioB where [4Fe–4S] and [2Fe–2S] clusters
(yellow and rust), SAM (green carbons), and dethiobiotin (gray carbons)
are depicted in sticks with oxygens colored red and nitrogens colored
blue. Cysteines (light blue carbons) involved in ligating clusters
are depicted in lines.
4.1.4
Source of the Sulfur in Biotin Biosynthesis
The origin of the sulfur inserted into dethiobiotin in the last
step of biotin biosynthesis has been a longstanding question. Dennis
Flint first brought up the “remote possibility” that
the [2Fe–2S] cluster of biotin synthase was the source of this
sulfur atom.
12a
In a subsequent paper utilizing
cell-free extracts, Shaw and co-workers demonstrated label transfer
into biotin from 35S-cysteine, but not from 35S-labeled methionine, indicating that
cysteine and not methionine
or SAM served as the sulfur source in biotin biosynthesis.
11
Marquet and co-workers provided further insight
into the source of sulfur by removing iron and sulfide from purified
biotin synthase, and then reconstituting with Fe2+ and 34S2–.
181
The
reconstituted enzyme was catalytically active, and the resulting biotin
product was approximately 65% 34S-labeled.
The coupled
spectroscopic and biochemical studies of Jarrett and co-workers provided
the first clear evidence that both [4Fe–4S] and [2Fe–2S]
clusters were present in active forms of biotin synthase, and that
while the [2Fe–2S] cluster was degraded during turnover, the
[4Fe–4S] was stable (Figures 23 and 24) (section 4.1.2).
24a,176,178
This latter observation was
subsequently confirmed by Johnson and co-workers
179
and by Marquet and co-workers.
182
The presence of two different clusters in the active enzyme, as
well as the observation of [2Fe–2S] cluster degradation during
turnover, led to the proposal that the [2Fe–2S] cluster was
the source of sulfur in biotin biosynthesis. This proposal is consistent
with the earlier evidence that cysteine is the source of sulfur, considering
that the iron sulfur cluster assembly pathways utilize cysteine desulfurase
enzymes to liberate sulfur from cysteine. The X-ray crystal structure
of biotin synthase provided support for this hypothesis, showing dethiobiotin
bound between the [4Fe–4S] and the [2Fe–2S] clusters
and with C9 of dethiobiotin only 4.6 Å away from the closest
bridging sulfide of the [2Fe–2S] cluster (Figure 25) (section 4.1.3).
40
With this structure, one could visualize the
abstraction of an H-atom from C9 of dethiobiotin, followed by some
modest structural changes that would allow the radical at C9 to capture
a bridging sulfide of the [2Fe–2S] cluster. A mechanism for
such a C–S bond-forming step is shown in Figure 26.
Figure 26
The mechanism of biotin formation from dethiobiotin as catalyzed
by BioB.
Another hypothesis advanced around
the same time was that biotin
synthase was a PLP-dependent enzyme that exhibited cysteine desulfurase
activity, and that it was this activity that provided the sulfur from
cysteine for biotin biosynthesis.
183
Subsequent
studies from other laboratories, however, found no evidence for PLP-dependent
cysteine desulfurase activity with biotin synthase.
177
Marquet and co-workers showed in 2006 that biotin synthase
reconstituted with iron and selenide synthesized selenobiotin, lending
further credence to the [2Fe–2S] cluster acting as the sulfur
source.
184
It is generally now accepted
that biotin synthase is not a PLP-dependent cysteine desulfurase,
and it is conceivable that the erroneous reports of this activity
may have resulted from contamination of the biotin synthase preparations
with a cysteine desulfurase such as IscS, utilized in iron–sulfur
cluster assembly.
4.1.5
Biotin Synthase Mechanism
A consensus
mechanism for biotin synthase is provided in Figure 26 and is supported by numerous
experimental findings. Using
specifically deuterated dethiobiotin substrates, Marquet and co-workers
were able to demonstrate deuterium transfer from both C6 and C9 of
dethiobiotin into product dAdoD, providing evidence that a SAM-derived
deoxyadenosyl radical intermediate abstracts an H-atom from each of
these positions during biotin biosynthesis;
12c
this result suggested the need for two moles of SAM for each mole
of biotin synthesized, an implication that was subsequently confirmed
experimentally.
185
Biotin synthase, like
other radical SAM enzymes, is presumed to utilize a reduced [4Fe–4S]+ cluster to reductively
cleave SAM, generating the 5′-deoxyadenosyl
radical intermediate that abstracts an H-atom from dethiobiotin. The
H-atom abstraction events from dethiobiotin, and the subsequent insertion
of sulfur, have been shown to occur in a stepwise fashion.
185
Initial H-atom abstraction and sulfur insertion
occurs at C9,
12c
producing a C9-dethiobiotinyl
radical that reacts with a bridging sulfide of the [2Fe–2S]2+ cluster to produce a
stable 9-mercaptodethiobiotin (MDTB)
intermediate.
185
Such a reaction of a carbon
radical with a bridging sulfide of a cluster to generate an intermediate
in the thiol oxidation state necessitates concomitant reduction of
the [2Fe–2S]2+ cluster to the 1+ state, as shown
in Figure 26; thus it follows that, after this
first sulfur insertion step, the [2Fe–2S] cluster should be
EPR active. In support of this proposed [2Fe–2S] cluster reduction
during the first half of the biotin synthase reaction, an EPR signal
has been observed to form and decay during turnover in a manner that
quantitatively correlates with the formation and decay of MDTB.
179,186
Remarkably, HYSCORE spectroscopic studies have demonstrated that
the MDTB intermediate is a ligand to the [2Fe–2S]+ cluster of biotin synthase in this
EPR-active intermediate state,
providing strong support for the mechanism shown in Figure 26.
187
To complete the
synthesis of biotin, the dAdoH and methionine products must be released
and a second molecule of SAM bound, and the radical SAM [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster must be
rereduced to the [4Fe–4S]+ state. A second reductive cleavage of SAM to generate a
dAdo• occurs, and a H-atom is abstracted from C6 to generate
a C6-MDTB radical that reacts with the same sulfide to close the thiphane
ring and generate biotin.
The roles of individual amino acids
in the active site of biotin synthase have been probed in a number
of studies. Mutation of a set of conserved residues (YNHNLD) individually
to alanine produced inactive variants in all cases except for the
H152A, which showed low activity.
188
These
residues are all in the vicinity of the active site; however, all
variants appeared to assemble proper iron–sulfur clusters;
it was proposed that this conserved sequence was important for interactions
with SAM and dethiobiotin. The roles of these residues were further
clarified when a more extensive series of variants in which Asn153
and Asp155 were changed to other residues, including some capable
of retaining hydrogen-bonding interactions.
46
Most of the variants exhibited some catalytic activity, although
altered products of SAM cleavage were observed, leading to the conclusion
that these residues are important for retaining and controlling intermediates
in the active site.
46
4.2
Lipoyl Synthase
4.2.1
Octanoic Acid as a Precursor
for Lipoic
Acid
An abstract published in 1964 reported that octanoic
acid served as the precursor for lipoic acid.
189
Ronald Parry provided the first published experimental
verification of this transformation by showing that [1-14C]-octanoic acid was specifically
incorporated into lipoic acid in
vivo.
190
Further, by use of specifically
tritiated octanoic acids, Parry was able to show that the introduction
of sulfur at C6 and C8 of octanoic acid occurred without loss of tritium
from C5 or C7; these results were taken to indicate that the mechanism
of sulfur insertion was unlikely to involve unsaturation at C5 or
C7.
190
Parry also noted the similarity
of these results to those he had previously reported for biotin biosynthesis,
191
and suggested that the biosyntheses of these
two important cofactors might proceed via comparable mechanisms. Parry
further elucidated the stereochemistry of sulfur insertion at C6 of
octanoic acid.
192
White examined lipoic
acid production in E. coli growing
on [methyl-2H3]-acetate and demonstrated that
the synthesis of lipoic acid from octanoic acid occurred with loss
of only a single deuterium at C8.
193
They
were able to infer from their results, together with the knowledge
of the stereochemistry of fatty acid biosynthesis and the known conformation
of lipoic acid at C6, that sulfur insertion at this position occurs
with inversion of configuration. Further studies by White showed that
hydroxylated octanoic acids were not likely intermediates in lipoic
acid biosynthesis, thereby suggesting that sulfur is inserted directly
at the saturated C6 and C8 carbons of octanoic acid.
194
Further, they showed that 8-thiooctanic acid served as
a precursor for lipoic acid, indicating that this species was likely
an intermediate in lipoic acid biosynthesis.
4.2.2
Similarity
to Biotin Synthase
The lip locus of E. coli was
cloned and characterized by Cronan and co-workers in 1991 and by Ashley
and co-workers in 1992.
195
The latter group
reported that the lip locus encoded a protein of
approximately 36 kDa that had sequence similarity to BioB.
195b
The lipA gene was subsequently
implicated in the sulfur insertion step(s) of lipoate biosynthesis,
196
and most specifically in the insertion of the
first sulfur into octanoic acid (Figure 27).
196b
The product of the lipB gene
was subsequently shown to be responsible for ligation of lipoyl groups
to proteins, and to be redundant with the product of the lplA gene.
197
Figure 27
LipA reaction scheme
catalyzing the conversion of octanoyl-acyl
carrier protein to lipoyl-acyl carrier protein.
4.2.3
In Vitro Activity Requires an Iron–Sulfur
Cluster, SAM, and Preattachment of the Octanoyl Substrate
Sequencing of the lipA gene showed that it would
encode a protein with a CX3CX2C motif, the same
motif that at the time was known to be present in biotin synthase,
PFL-AE, and ARR-AE.
196b
Like these proteins,
LipA was shown to be an Fe–S protein.
123,124
Initial work by Fontecave and co-workers identified a [2Fe–2S]
cluster in the protein after purification, refolding, and reconstitution
with iron and sulfide. As had been observed with biotin synthase,
the [2Fe–2S] clusters converted to [4Fe–4S] clusters
upon reduction (Table 2) (sections 4.1.1, 4.1.2),
123
and air exposure of the [4Fe–4S] state
converted these to [2Fe–2S] clusters.
121b
A major breakthrough in lipoate synthase research came
the following year, when Marletta and co-workers isolated and characterized E. coli
LipA that had been expressed in a soluble
form.
124b
Their purified LipA contained
approximately four irons and four sulfides per protein, and exhibited
electronic absorption and EPR spectral properties consistent with
the presence of [3Fe–4S]+ and [4Fe–4S] clusters
in the as-isolated state, and a mixture of [4Fe–4S]+ and [4Fe–4S]2+ in the reduced
state (Table 2). More importantly, Marletta and co-workers were
able to demonstrate for the first time the in vitro enzymatic activity
of LipA.
124b
The assays were carried out
under anaerobic reducing conditions in the presence of SAM, octanoyl-ACP,
LipB (lipoyl-ACP-protein-N-lipoyltransferase), and
apo-PDC (pyruvate dehydrogenase complex); the requirement for SAM
together with the presence of iron–sulfur clusters in LipA
placed this enzyme in the growing radical SAM enzyme class. Further,
their LipA assays clearly demonstrated that, contrary to previous
thinking, octanoic acid was not a substrate for LipA. Rather, LipA
utilized octanoyl-acyl carrier protein (octanoyl-ACP) as a substrate
for sulfur insertion to form the lipoyl-ACP, which then lipoylated
the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex.
124b
Thus, LipA was found to not be a lipoate synthase, but rather a
lipoyl synthase, requiring preattachment of the octanoyl group to
a carrier protein before sulfur insertion could be catalyzed (Figure 27). Cronan and
co-workers subsequently demonstrated
that lipoyl synthase would also use the octanoylated E2 subunit of PDC as a substrate,
198
while
Booker and co-workers showed that the octanoylated H-protein of the
glycine cleavage system could also serve as a LipA substrate.
69
4.2.4
A Mechanism for LipA
Involving Two [4Fe–4S]
Clusters
It is now established that the E.
coli lipoyl synthase binds two distinct [4Fe–4S]
clusters
125
and requires 2 equiv of SAM
to synthesize 1 equiv of lipoyl cofactor.
69
The higher iron content of this protein as compared to earlier reports
was due in part to the coexpression of the isc biosynthetic
operon responsible for the synthesis of iron–sulfur clusters,
as described by Roach and co-workers
124c
and Booker and co-workers.
125
Using site-directed
mutagenesis combined with iron and sulfur analysis and spectroscopy,
this latter group demonstrated that one of the [4Fe–4S] clusters
bound the CX3CX2C radical SAM motif, while the
second bound a CX4CX5C motif conserved only
among lipoyl synthases; these clusters were spectroscopically distinguishable
by EPR of the reduced state of the protein.
125
Removing either cluster by site-directed mutagenesis eliminated
production of both dAdoH and lipoyl cofactor. Booker and co-workers
also provided evidence for direct H-atom abstraction from the octanoyl
group by the dAdo•, by showing that deuterium is
transferred from [octanoyl-d15]H-protein to the dAdo• to generate the monodeuterated
dAdoD product.
69
Further, they demonstrated that two dAdoH are
produced per lipoyl cofactor synthesized. Roach and co-workers subsequently
demonstrated that the sulfur insertions catalyzed by LipA occur in
a stepwise manner, with thiolation at the C6 position occurring first.
199
This observation, together with the previously
reported isotope effect for sulfur insertion at C8,
190
leads to a mechanism such as that shown in Figure 28, with the second sulfur insertion
step being rate
determining.
Figure 28
The mechanism of lipoyl-acyl carrier protein from octanoyl-acyl
carrier protein as catalyzed by LipA.
5
Radical SAM Mutases
The radical SAM mutases catalyze rearrangement reactions classically
viewed as B12-type rearrangement reactions (section 2.7). Indeed, it was the recognition
that lysine
2,3-aminomutase catalyzed a reaction directly analogous to a B12-dependent reaction,
and yet utilized SAM, that initially
suggested a similarity between B12 and SAM radical reactions.
10
Lysine 2,3-aminomutase remains one of the best
understood radical SAM enzymes, with extensive spectroscopic, biochemical,
and structural information in the literature. It is also the best
understood radical SAM enzyme that uses SAM catalytically, and thus
most closely mimics the role for B12 in the adenosylcobalamin-dependent
radical reactions (section 2.7).
5.1
Lysine 2,3-Aminomutase
Lysine 2,3-aminomutase
(LAM) catalyzes the interconversion of l-α-lysine to l-β-lysine (Figure 29), a reaction
directly analogous to B12-dependent aminomutases.
Figure 29
LAM reaction
scheme catalyzing the conversion of l-α-lysine
to l-β-lysine.
5.1.1
Early Characterization of a B12-Independent
Aminomutase
Barker and co-workers published
the first purification and characterization of lysine 2,3-aminomutase
(LAM) in 1970.
8
In this seminal paper,
they demonstrated that LAM was a pyridoxal phosphate (PLP) enzyme
activated by SAM and ferrous ion. They noted that the enzyme was quite
air-sensitive, but could be activated by anaerobic incubation in the
presence of sulfhydryls. Quite surprisingly, given the dependence
of all other aminomutases known at the time on coenzyme B12, LAM activity was not
dependent on B12.
8
Further, the observation that neither hydrogen nor nitrogen
from lysine exchange with the medium during the reaction indicated
that the reaction occurred via intramolecular transfer. Aberhart et
al. showed that this migration, like those of B12-dependent
aminomutases, occurred with inversion of configuration at both carbons
involved.
200
Specifically, they demonstrated
that the 3-pro-R hydrogen of α-lysine was transferred
to the 2-pro-R position of β-lysine, while
the 3-pro-S hydrogen of α-lysine was retained
at C3 and the C2 hydrogen of α-lysine was retained at the 2-pro-S position in β-lysine.
201
They also demonstrated that amino group transfer took place intramolecularly,
but that hydrogen transfer appeared to be primarily intermolecular.
201
5.1.2
SAM as a dAdo• Precursor
in LAM
Moss and Frey provided the first evidence that the
5′-deoxyadenosyl moiety of SAM was involved in the hydrogen
transfer.
10
They utilized S-[2,8,5′-3H]-adenosylmethionine, and found that tritium was incorporated
into both l-α-lysine and l-β-lysine.
By quantifying the tritium content in both isomers, they were able
to determine an equilibrium constant (5.3 ± 0.3 in the forward
direction at pH 7.7 and 30 °C). Because they saw no tritium incorporation
into lysine when using S-[2,8-3H]-adenosylmethionine
or S-[methyl-3H]-adenosylmethionine, they
concluded that the tritium incorporation occurs from the 5′-position
of SAM. They proposed that the dAdoH moiety of SAM played a role analogous
to that of the dAdoH moiety of adenosylcobalamin in B12-dependent rearrangements.
Although there were contradictory reports
subsequently published,
202
these initial
results from the Frey lab have been substantiated by numerous additional
studies.
Further support for this role for SAM in the LAM-catalyzed
reaction was provided by utilizing S-[5′-3H]-adenosylmethionine
in the presence of excess LAM, which resulted in all of the tritium
ending up in lysine or β-lysine.
203
The tritium transfer from the 5′-position of SAM into the
reactant/product of LAM, together with further label transfer experiments
utilizing [3,3-2H2]-lysine
203
or [3-3H]-lysine,
204
provided evidence that SAM served as a precursor of a dAdo• during LAM catalysis,
and that this radical intermediate mediated
hydrogen transfer from C3 to C2 of lysine. Using SAM labeled with 14C at either the
carboxyl carbon of the methionine moiety
or the 8-position of the adenine ring, Moss and Frey demonstrated
the conversion of SAM to methionine and dAdoH during LAM catalysis.
205
They postulated at the time that the dAdoH
moiety of SAM was transferred to another species associated with the
enzyme, perhaps another cofactor, to generate the adenosyl species
responsible for H-atom abstraction.
5.1.3
The
Role of PLP in LAM
Han and
Frey provided the first chemical model for the role of PLP in 1,2-amino
migrations such as that catalyzed by LAM.
206
They provided the first demonstration of a 1,2-imino rearrangement
via a radical mechanism, and their results provided support for the
hypothesis that PLP could facilitate such migrations via formation
of an amino acid–PLP aldimine radical. The PLP binds to a lysine
of LAM (Lys346 in the enzyme from B. subtilis) present in a PGGGGK motif that is conserved
among LAMs from Bacillus and Clostridium species, and serves as a site of covalent
attachment of the lysine
substrate.
207
5.1.4
The
Iron–Sulfur Cluster in LAM and
Its Interaction with SAM
It was reported in 1991 that purified
LAM contained iron and sulfide in a 1:1 ratio, providing the first
indication that this enzyme contained an iron–sulfur cluster.
9
The purified enzyme was also found to contain
cobalt, zinc, and copper, with the cobalt appearing to be important
for activity; the apparent involvement of cobalt was intriguing given
the mechanistic similarity to B12 enzymes, but subsequent
studies showed that cobalt was not in fact required for activity.
22
EPR spectroscopy indicated that the iron–sulfur
clusters in the anaerobically purified enzyme were [4Fe–4S]+ clusters (Table 2), which
upon oxidation
converted to [3Fe–4S]+ clusters.
90
Reduction to the [4Fe–4S]+ state was
found to be dependent on the presence of SAM or SAH and a strong reducing
agent. The [4Fe–4S]+/SAM state was found to exhibit
full activity in the absence of any additional reducing agent.
22
The SAM analogue azaSAM also binds to LAM and
allows reduction to the [4Fe–4S]+ state, exhibiting
EPR spectral features similar to those observed with SAH; interestingly,
the protonation state of the azaSAM did not affect the ability to
reduce the [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster.
208
Selenium K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy of LAM in
various states of turnover with S-adenosyl-l-selenomethionine (SeSAM) revealed that
SeSAM is cleaved by LAM to
generate SeMet, and that this SeMet is positioned near one of the
irons of the [4Fe–4S] cluster at a distance of approximately
2.7 Å;
209
these results implicated
a unique iron site in the [4Fe–4S] cluster, as well as the
direct involvement of the cluster in catalysis.
Significant
insight into the SAM–[4Fe–4S] cluster interaction was
provided by electron–nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) spectroscopic
studies of LAM in complex with isotopically labeled SAM (Figure 11).
16b
These experiments
were similar to those carried out with PFL-AE as described earlier
in this Review, and examined ENDOR spectra of LAM in the [4Fe–4S]+ state in complex
with labeled SAM (individually labeled either
at the carboxylate with 17O, at the amino nitrogen with 15N, or at the methyl with
either 13C or 2H). The LAM was reduced with dithionite under ambient conditions
to probe the geometry of the [4Fe–4S]+ state, or
frozen in the [4Fe–4S]2+ state in the presence of
SAM and then cryoreduced, to probe the geometry of the 2+ state. The
results reveal the direct coordination of the [4Fe–4S]2+/+ clusters by SAM via the
amino and carboxylate groups,
and the close proximity of the methyl of SAM to the [4Fe–4S]
cluster. The results also suggested some differences in binding geometry
of SAM in LAM versus PFL-AE that could be important mechanistically.
5.1.5
The Structure of LAM
Lysine 2,3-aminomutase
was originally characterized as a hexamer with one active site per
subunit.
210
The heterologous expression
of LAM from Clostridium subterminale SB4 in E. coli(211) ultimately led to an X-ray
crystal structure of LAM (2.1
Å resolution, Figure 30)
39
in which the protein crystallized as a tetramer composed
of two domain-swapped dimers linked by zinc coordination. Each subunit
consisted of an (βα)6 partial TIM barrel, with
the [4Fe–4S] cluster, SAM, and PLP occupying the barrel. SAM
was found coordinated to the unique iron of the [4Fe–4S] cluster
via the amino and carboxylate moieties, as had previously been elucidated
by using ENDOR spectroscopy.
16b
Further,
the selenium of SeSAM appeared poised to coordinate the unique iron
as well upon S–C(5′) bond cleavage, corroborating previous
selenium XAS experiments showing a close Fe–Se distance upon
reductive cleavage of SAM.
209
PLP and l-α-lysine were held in position by a series of H-bond
and ionic contacts; the position of lysine was such that it was poised
for abstraction of the 3-pro-R hydrogen of lysine
by the dAdo• intermediate.
Figure 30
LAM crystal structure
(PDB ID 2A5H). Left: N-terminal domain colored in
wheat, radical SAM domain in light blue, C-terminal domain in light
pink, [4Fe–4S] cluster in yellow and rust spheres, SAM in green
sticks, PLP in dark gray sticks. Right: Active site of LAM where [4Fe–4S]
cluster (yellow and rust), SAM (green carbons), and PLP (gray carbons)
are depicted in sticks with oxygens colored red, nitrogens colored
blue, and phosphorus in orange. The cysteine residues (light blue
carbons) involved in ligating cluster are depicted in lines.
5.1.6
The
Mechanism of LAM
A consensus
mechanism for LAM is provided in Figure 31.
Lysine binds in the active site as an aldimine adduct of PLP. SAM
was shown using ENDOR to bind to both the [4Fe–4S]2+ and the [4Fe–4S]+ oxidation states
via coordination
of the amino and carboxylate groups of SAM to the unique iron of the
cluster. One-electron reduction of the 2+ cluster puts it in the catalytically
active state, whereby it can transfer an electron to SAM to initiate
the reductive cleavage to methionine and dAdo•.
The dAdo• then abstracts the 3-pro-R H-atom of bound lysine substrate to yield a substrate
radical intermediate
with the unpaired electron at C3, the β-carbon. Use of the alternative
substrate 4-thia-l-lysine allowed observation of the C3-radical
of 4-thialysine, an analogue of the substrate C3 radical shown in
the mechanism (species 2 in Figure 11).
72,212
Further support for the involvement of a C3 radical in the mechanism
was provided by another alternative substrate, trans-4,5-dehydrolysine, which resulted
in formation of the observable
allylic 4,5-dehydrolysyl radical by abstraction of an H-atom from
C3.
213
Cyclization of the substrate radical
shown in Figure 31 to the azacyclopropylcarbinyl
radical followed by ring-opening generates the product radical intermediate.
This product radical intermediate was detected in LAM during turnover
214
and was shown, using isotopically labeled lysine
substrate, to be a lysine-based π-radical centered at C2 of
β-lysine, with coupling to the α-C proton, the nitrogen
on the β-C, and the β-C proton giving rise to hyperfine
structure.
215
The hyperfine couplings allowed
these authors to determine dihedral angles and ultimately the structure
of the radical intermediate. Electron spin–echo envelope modulation
(ESEEM) experiments were used to examine the coupling of this radical
intermediate to a deuteron introduced at the 4′-position of
PLP; the results supported the presence of an aldimine linkage between
PLP and the β-nitrogen of β-lysine (species 3 in Figure 11).
216
This radical intermediate
was also shown to be kinetically competent.
217
Figure 31
The conversion of l-α-lysine to l-β-lysine
as catalyzed by lysine 2,3-aminomutase.
Studies on the mechanism of LAM have provided the most direct
evidence
to date for the involvement of a 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical intermediate
in the radical SAM enzymes. Magnusson et al. synthesized the SAM analogue S-3′,4′-anhydroadenosyl-l-methionine
(anSAM) and demonstrated that upon reaction with LAM under assay conditions,
a new steady-state radical species was observed.
20a
By using deuterated lysine and/or anSAM deuterated at the
5′ position or at all five carbons of the ribose moiety, they
were able to demonstrate that this was an allylically stabilized radical
with the spin distributed equally between the C5′ and C3′
carbons of the ribosyl moiety.
20
They further
showed that this radical was kinetically competent, supporting the
involvement of the dAdo• in the mechanism of LAM,
and, by extension, in the radical SAM enzymes in general.
20b
5.1.7
LAM and LAM-like Enzymes
from Other Organisms
The studies described in the preceding
sections were carried out
primarily on the LAM from C. subterminale SB4. The enzyme has also been isolated from
B. subtilis, and a number of the structural and mechanistic features seen in
the Clostridial enzyme are also observed
in the enzyme from B. subtilis, including
the presence of a [4Fe–4S] cluster, the requirement of a strong
reducing agent and SAM for enzyme activity, and the ability to observe
substrate radicals during steady-state turnover.
218
Interestingly, the LAM from B. subtilis is stable in air, unlike the enzyme from C.
subterminale SB4 (and unlike most other radical SAM enzymes) that require handling
under strictly anaerobic conditions. The E. coli gene P39280 shares 30% sequence identity
with those for LAM from C. subterminale SB4 and from B. subtilis; however, the conserved
lysine that serves as the site of attachment
for PLP is not present. This gene is located adjacent to efp, encoding for elongation
factor P, and downstream from groES and groEL; its function at present is not known.
218
It should be noted that although several homologues
of LAM have been identified,
219
their putative
function may be to catalyze a mutase reaction other than that of lysine.
For example, the identified glutamate-2,3-aminomutase from Clostridium difficile is
similar to LAM, but lacks
Lys-binding residues Asp 293 and Asp 330.
73
5.2
Pyrrolysine Biosynthesis: Carbon Backbone
Rearrangement Catalyzed by the Lysine Mutase PylB
Pyrrolysine
is the 22nd amino acid encoded by the genetic code and in Archaea
is known to only occur in the Methanosarcinaceae family.
220
Members of this family can
utilize trimethylamine, dimethylamine, or monomethylamine as precursors
to methane by the actions of MttB, MtbB, or MtmB.
221
These methyltransferase proteins methylate the Co(I) states
of the corrinoid cofactors bound to either MttC, MtbC, or MtmC, forming
Co(III)–CH3 moieties. The Co(III)–CH3 bound proteins then act as substrates for MtbA
where the
thiol group of coenzyme M is subsequently methylated, which then serves
to directly generate methane, or to enter subsequent pathways resulting
in release of either CO2 or cellular carbon.
222
Mass spectral analysis and X-ray crystallography
were used to confirm that the in frame UAG amber codon present in mttb, mtbb, and
mtmb sequences
was encoded as pyrrolysine.
220b,223
In the crystal structure
of methylornithine synthase, pyrrolysine was found to bind ammonia
at the carbon of the imine bond, leading to the hypothesis that the
role of this amino acid was to bind and activate methylammonium species
toward nucleophilic attack by the Co(I) corrinoid groups of MttC,
MtbC, or MtmC.
220b,222c
Pyrrolysine is synthesed
from two molecules of lysine via reactions catalyzed by the pylBCD gene products (Figure
32).
222c
PylB contains the CX3CX2C motif, identifying it as a member of the radical SAM superfamily
of enzymes, while PylC shows sequence similarity with amino acid ligases
and carbamoyl phosphate synthetase, and PylD is proposed to be a dehydrogenase
given its similarity to leucine and 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenases.
222c
Insight into pyrrolysine biosynthesis was
provided by two independent studies that showed E.
coli could not synthesize pyrrolysine in the absence
of pylB, but could make desmethylpyrrolysine (a pyrrolysine
analog that lacks the ring methyl group) when supplemented with exogenous d-ornithine.
222c,224
Desmethylpyrrolysine biosynthesis
required only pylC and pylD, and
indirectly suggested that PylB’s activity was directed toward
the synthesis of (2R,3R)-3-methyl-d-ornithine from lysine as a first step in pyrrolysine
synthesis.
Cells transformed with pylC produced d-ornithyl-N
ε-l-lysine when doped with d-ornithine, indicating that PylC forms an amide bond between
d-ornithine (or (2R,3R)-3-methyl-d-ornithine) and the ε-amine of a second lysine molecule
to yield a dipeptide product in a reaction that hydrolyzes ATP.
222c,224,225
The final biosynthetic step
is catalyzed by PylD, which oxidizes the terminal amine of d-ornithyl-N
ε-l-lysine
(or (2R,3R)-3-methyl-d-ornithinyl-N
ε-l-lysine) in a reaction that
produces ammonia and a semialdehyde derivative; a spontaneous condensation-heterocyclization
step then yields either desmethylpyrrolysine or pyrrolysine.
222c,224,226
Figure 32
The synthesis of 3-methyl-d-ornithine from l-α-lysine
as catalyzed by PylB in the first step of pyrrolysine biosynthesis.
The reaction catalyzed by PylB
places this enzyme in the mutase
subclass of radical SAM enzymes, and is the first example of a radical
SAM enzyme catalyzing a mutase reaction involving carbon backbone
rearrangement reactions similar to those carried out by coenzyme B12 enzymes.
48,227
The X-ray crystal structure
of PylB from Methanosarcina barkeri at 1.5 Å resolution shows the monomeric protein
is comprised
of single domain that houses the site-differentiated [4Fe–4S]
cluster and SAM (Figure 33).
43
Sequence analysis reveals that PylB is most similar to
HydE and BioB (sections 12.2.5 and 4.1), and superimposition shows that PylB overlays
with the available structures (PylB PDB ID 3T7V, HydE PDB ID 3CIW, BioB PDB ID 1R30)
with minimal differences in root-mean-square
deviation values (≤1.8 Å). Remarkably, the PylB structure
revealed the presence of both SAM and methylornithine despite the
fact that neither SAM nor lysine were exogenously added to the protein,
suggesting that the (2R,3R)-3-methyl-d-ornithine product was synthesized in vivo and
along with SAM
remained tightly bound within the active site during the purification
process; a complex network of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions
within the active site appears to bind and stabilize both SAM and
methylornithine, respectively.
43
The existence
of methylornithine bound in close proximity to the SAM bound [4Fe–4S]
cluster allowed for the modeling of lysine in the active site and
a proposition for its conversion to product to be put forth. The proposed
reaction mechanism invokes H-atom abstraction from the C4 position
of lysine by the 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical that is generated
upon SAM cleavage. Resulting Cα–Cβ bond homolysis
of the lysine radical species would generate a glycyl radical and
4-aminobutene; recombination of the glycyl radical with the 2 position
of 4-aminobutene (formerly the 4 position of lysine) would yield a
(3R)-3-methyl-d-ornithine radical intermediate
that could then abstract an H-atom from an unknown source to form
(3R)-3-methyl-d-ornithine.
43,228
Theoretical QM/MM analysis has suggested that either the Cα–Cβ
homolytic cleavage event or the recombination of the glycyl radical
with aminobutene could be rate limiting due to the considerable energy
barriers associated with these steps.
229
While it is unknown what molecule may serve as the source of the
H-atom that is abstracted by the proposed (3R)-3-methyl-d-ornithine radical intermediate,
it is certainly plausible
that it could be dAdoH, and the apparent tight binding of SAM within
the active site cavity certainly may suggest that PylB uses SAM as
a cofactor and not a cosubstrate (sections 2.3, 2.5). While direct experimental evidence
for the copurification and/or tight binding of SAM is lacking, making
it difficult to assign the role of SAM as cofactor, it has been postulated
that the apparent high affinity of methylornithine to the active site
may act to govern pyrrolysine biosynthesis through the controlled
release of product, an event possibly triggered by PylC binding to
PylB.
228
Future work should help resolve
these issues, as well as the details of the fragmentation–recombination
reaction, especially the mechanism whereby the presumed glycyl radical
is directed toward the 2 position of 4-aminobutene; computational
work has indicated that this may be directed by the aminobutene fragment
undergoing an intramolecular rotation that alters the dihedral angle
of the carbon backbone.
229
Figure 33
PylB crystal structure
(PDB ID 3T7V). Left: N-terminal domain colored in
wheat, radical SAM domain in light blue, C-terminal domain in light
pink, [4Fe–4S] cluster in yellow and rust spheres, SAM in green
sticks, methylornithine in dark gray sticks. Right: Active site of
PylB where [4Fe–4S] cluster (yellow and rust), SAM (green carbons),
and methylornithine (gray carbons) are depicted in sticks with oxygens
colored red and nitrogens colored blue. Cysteines (light blue carbons)
involved in ligating cluster are depicted in lines.
6
Enzymes Catalyzing Complex
Rearrangements and
Cyclizations
6.1
MoaA
All molybdenum-containing metalloenzymes
except for the Mo-nitrogenase utilize the molybdopterin cofactor (Moco)
at their active sites to catalyze a diverse series of redox reactions
in the global carbon, sulfur, and nitrogen cycles. The coordination
complex of Moco is composed of a molybdenum ion coordinated to a low
molecular weight tricyclic pterin scaffold ligand via dithiolene coordination
(Figure 34).
230
Figure 34
The
molybdopterin cofactor (Moco) is composed of a molybdenum ion
coordinated by a low molecular weight tricyclic pterin ligand via
dithiolene coordination.
6.1.1
Molybdopterin Cofactor Biosynthesis
The
Moco cofactor biosynthetic pathway is a five-step process involving
radical SAM-based biochemistry as an essential step. A model of Moco
biosynthesis in E. coli was proposed
in 1992
230b
to involve eight Moco-specific
genes (moaABCDE, mobAB, moeB), based on early investigations of phenotype suppression
and of chl mutants defective in molybdate uptake
and processing.
230b,231
In this model, MoaA–MoaC
was responsible for molybdopterin precursor Z biosynthesis, while
the MoaD and MoaE were responsible for converting the precursor into
molybopterin. Precursor Z (now termed 1,1′-dihydroxy-2′,4′-cyclic
pyranopterin monophosphate (cPMP))
232
was
found to originate from a guanosine derivative,
233
where GTP was identified as a likely source, given its
identity as a common starting material in the biosynthesis of pterins
and pteridines as part of GTP cyclohydrolase I-type chemistry (Figure 35).
233a
Interestingly,
early comparison of the amino acid-encoded gene sequence of moaA(234) from E.
coli was found to be similar to the NifB protein from K. pnemoniae,
235
the FixZ
protein from Rhizobium leguminosarum (homologue to NifB),
236
as well as to
PQQ synthesis protein III from A. calcoaceticus.
237
In retrospect, all of these proteins
contain the radical SAM CX3CX2C motif, linking
MoaA to radical-initiated catalysis.
Figure 35
The observed rearrangement of carbon
atoms in the MoaA/MoaC reaction.
6.1.2
Identification of Two [4Fe–4S] Clusters
in MoaA
Early spectroscopic and biochemical characterization
of the Fe–S clusters of MoaA has served as a foundational example
in understanding the role of multiple Fe–S clusters in radical
SAM enzymology. The discovery that MoaA binds Fe–S clusters
at two tricysteine motifs (CX3CX2C and CX2CX13C)
238
led Hänzelmann
and co-workers to perform the first thorough functional characterization
of the MoaA and MoaC proteins.
239
Human
MOCS1A and MOCS1B, which derive from biscistronic cDNA, serve as homologues
to bacterial genes moaA and moaC (cnx2 and cnx3 in plants), respectively.
239
Complementary UV–vis, MCD, and Mössbauer
spectroscopy showed that human MoaA (MOCS1A) contained oxygen-sensitive
Fe–S clusters at the N-terminal and C-terminal regions that
were predominantly [4Fe–4S] cluster in character (Table 2).
128
Comparison of
Mössbauer spectra between wild-type and the C80/84/87S triple
mutant provided different signal contributions that could be assigned
as a discrete, site-differentiated Fe–S cluster at the C-terminus.
128
6.1.3
The X-ray Crystal Structure
of MoaA
The MoaA enzyme was the first radical SAM enzyme
with two discrete
[4Fe–4S] clusters to be characterized crystallographically
(Figure 36).
240
Its
structure has provided a substantive model for structural comparisons
for radical SAM enzymes involving multiple [4Fe–4S] clusters.
MoaA has a partial (βα)6 TIM barrel, with the
N- and C-terminal [4Fe–4S] clusters found on opposite ends
of the hydrophilic channel of the TIM barrel at a distance of approximately
17 Å.
240,241
The N-terminal cluster is coordinated
as part of a 31-residue loop extending from β-strand 1 to α-helix
1 of the TIM barrel, and is similar to HemN and BioB (sections 11.1.2 and 4.1.3).
240
The C-terminal cluster is coordinated between
two loops that lead to the C-terminus of the enzyme. Because precursor
Z synthesis requires the activity of the MoaC enzyme in addition to
MoaA, it may be that the incompleteness of the MoaA TIM barrel accommodates
a complex with MoaC.
240
Figure 36
MoaA crystal structure
(PDB ID 2FB3). Left: N-terminal domain colored in
wheat, radical SAM domain in light blue, C-terminal domain in light
pink, [4Fe–4S] clusters in yellow and rust spheres, dAdoH and
Met in green sticks, GTP in dark gray sticks. Right: Active site of
MoaA where [4Fe–4S] cluster (yellow and rust), dAdoH and Met
(green carbons), and GTP (gray carbons) are depicted in sticks with
oxygens colored red, nitrogens colored blue, and phosphates in orange.
Cysteines (light blue carbons) involved in ligating clusters are depicted
in lines.
In the substrate-bound structures
of MoaA, SAM was found coordinated
to the N-terminal cluster as an N/O chelate to the N-terminal site-differentiated
Fe, while the sulfonium sulfur was 3.3 Å from the site-differentiated
Fe and 3.6 Å from the nearest sulfide (Figure 36).
240
SAM was found extended across
the top of the barrel, but the binding of SAM in the active site resulted
in no significant protein and cluster conformational changes relative
to its absence. In addition to the Fe–S cluster binding motifs,
five conserved arginine residues and two lysine residues line the
inside of the TIM barrel, likely to stabilize the negative charge
of the triphosphate group of 5′-GTP.
240
Structures with GTP bound have shown that the ribose and base are
relatively flexible, with the triphosphate part tightly anchored within
the hydrophilic channel (Figure 36).
242
A basis for specific nucleotide hydrogen bonding
by GTP over ATP can be rationalized, complementing equilibrium dialysis
experiments that showed 40%, 60%, and 100% residual binding by 5′-ATP,
5′-ITP, and 5′-XTP, respectively.
242
Equilibrium dialysis experiments have shown that GTP binding
is not dependent on SAM binding, and that the position 6 oxo group
and the amino group at position 2 are important for guanine recognition
by MoaA.
242
While crystallographic studies
indicate that no active site closure is apparent upon substrate binding,
the multiple electrostatic interactions between triphosphate and protein
arginine and lysine residues tightly confine the generation of radical
intermediates from the dAdo•. Structure elucidation
of the triple arginine mutant R17/266/268A has shown distinct conformational
changes in 5′-GTP binding, resulting in a more open active
site.
242
6.1.4
A Role
for the C-Terminal Cluster in MoaA
The precise role that
the C-terminal site-differentiated Fe–S
cluster serves has been proposed to be that of a Lewis acid, in a
manner similar to that of the [4Fe–4S] cluster of aconitase.
240,243
Crystal structures of MoaA with GTP bound (with the radical SAM
tricysteine motif substituted as trialanine) have shown that the guanine
base N1 nitrogen and exocyclic amine closely interact with the C-terminal
cluster at distances of 2.8 and 2.4 Å, respectively; however,
these distances are too long to be considered bonds.
242
Elucidation of the interaction of GTP with the C-terminal
cluster of MoaA resulted from elegant ENDOR studies of the C24/28/31S
MoaA complexed with [14N or 15N]-5′-GTP
and [14N]-5′-ITP (Figure 37).
244
It was clear from the ENDOR studies
of [14N or 15N]-5′-GTP complexed with
the MoaA variant that at least one nitrogen coordinated to the unique
iron of the C-terminal cluster; but was it the purine ring nitrogen
N1 or the amino nitrogen N2? By using natural abundance [14N]-ITP, which lacks the
amino group of GTP, Hoffman and co-workers
demonstrated that the coordinated nitrogen was, in fact, the purine
ring nitrogen N1 (Figure 37).
244
The ENDOR-determined distance of the GTP substrate to the
Fe–S cluster has been shown to be consistent with guanine binding
to the cluster as the enol tautomer, which may be significant in substrate
activation and/or ring cyclization.
244
Figure 37
Top
panel: 15N ENDOR evidence of 5′-GTP interaction
with C-terminal [4Fe–4S], using 14N and 15N 5′-GTP substrate and C24S/C28S/C31S MoaA.
Bottom panel:
Comparison of 14N ENDOR of substrate analogue 5′-ITP
with 5′-GTP that have equivalent 14N hyperfine interaction
with the C-terminal [4Fe–4S] cluster. Reprinted with permission
from ref (38). Copyright
2006 American Chemical Society.
6.1.5
Mechanism of a Complex Rearrangement Initiated
by H-Atom Abstraction
MoaA and MoaC together perform the
synthesis of cPMP (Figure 38), but assignment
of specific roles has been difficult, given the historic instability
of detected pterin products. As noted by Hänzelmann and Schindelin,
the most difficult step in the precursor Z synthesis is fragmentation
of the GTP C2′–C3′ bond and insertion of the
C8 atom;
242
recent studies indicate that
MoaA is responsible for this remarkable reaction, which is initiated
by H-atom abstraction from the C3′ position.
245
Using a library of 2H isotopologues of 5′-GTP,
single deuterium label transfer to dAdoH was found to occur with 3′-2H-GTP, and detection
of an oxygen-sensitive pterin product
was detected by LC–MS
245
but was
difficult to confirm using other characterization methods. However,
the unique MoaA product, (8S)-3′,8-cyclo-7,8-dihydroguanosine 5′-triphosphate (3′,8-cH2GTP),
was identified, isolated, and characterized by chemical
derivatization, MS, and NMR spectroscopy by separate laboratories
(Figure 38).
82,246
This product
was shown to serve as the substrate for MoaC, producing cyclic pyranopterin
monophosphate.
82
Figure 38
Proposed specific transformations
that are catalyzed by enzymes
MoaA and MoaC.
The accumulated crystallographic,
spectroscopic, and biochemical
data result in a proposed mechanism for MoaA catalysis, shown in Figure 39. H-atom
abstraction at the C3′-carbon results
in generation of a radical on the ribose ring that in turn cyclizes
with the C8 guanine base carbon atom.
82,245
This results
in generation of an aminyl radical that becomes oxidized to make the
3′,8-cH2GTP product that is proposed to undergo
general acid/base catalysis with MoaC to make cPMP.
82
Considering that the abstraction site on GTP is 5.3 Å
from the C5′ carbon atom of SAM, that the guanine ring nitrogen
atom interacts with the C-terminal cluster as an enol tautomer (in
the absence of SAM), and that the ribose and base are rotationally
flexible in the crystal structure, the differential anchoring of the
ribose and base with the C-terminal cluster prior to substrate H-atom
abstraction is likely significant in cyclization reaction performed
by MoaA. Further work investigating the interaction between the guanine
N1 nitrogen and the Fe–S cluster with substrate and SAM, as
well as with the product 3′,8-cH2GTP, will provide
additional details to this remarkable transformation.
Figure 39
Proposed mechanism of
formation of 3′,8-cH2GTP
by radical SAM enzyme MoaA.
6.2
ThiC
ThiC is one of two radical SAM
enzymes required in the pathway for thiamin biosynthesis. While ThiC
catalyzes a complex rearrangement, ThiH, described in section 10.1, catalyzes cleavage
of the Cα–Cβ bond of tyrosine (Figure 40).
Figure 40
The biosynthesis of thiamine pyrophosphate. 4-Amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine
pyrophosphate (HMP-PP) (left) is ultimately coupled with 4-methyl-5-(β-hydroxyethyl)thiazole
phosphate carboxylate (thiazole-P carboxylate) (right) to form thiamine
pyrophosphate. The radical SAM enzymes ThiC and ThiH are highlighted
in red. The generation of dehydroglycine differs between aerobes and
anaerobes, which is highlighted as well.
6.2.1
Radical SAM Chemistry in the Synthesis of
Thiamine Pyrophosphate
Thiamine pyrophosphate (Vitamin B1)
was discovered in 1932, its structure was elucidated in 1936, and
it was the first such compound to be recognized as an essential metabolic
cofactor.
247
It is an essential vitamin
used by enzymes in central metabolism such as pyruvate dehydrogenase
and α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase to stabilize acyl carbanions.
248
It consists of 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine
(HMP) and 4-methyl-5-(β-hydroxyethyl)thiazole phosphate carboxylate
(THZ-P) moieties, which are independently synthesized and then ultimately
combined by the actions of ThiE and ThiL to form TPP (Figure 40).
249
In all bacteria
characterized to date, the syntheses of the HMP-PP and THZ-P carboxylate
moieties both require the activity of radical SAM enzymes.
250
ThiC, the radical SAM enzyme involved in the
synthesis of HMP-PP, catalyzes a complex rearrangement and is described
in this section, while ThiH, which catalyzes a C–C bond cleavage
required for synthesis of THZ-P, is described in section 10.1.
6.2.2
Conversion of 4-Aminoimidazole
Ribonucleotide
(AIR) to HMP-P by ThiC
In vivo thiamine biosynthesis is integrated
with purine biosynthesis, where common metabolites serve as precursors
in respective pathways.
251
Involvement
of purine precursor 4-aminoimidazole ribonucleotide (AIR) has been
known for several decades,
252
and description
of its metabolic context is well documented.
253
Cumulative in vivo isotopic labeling studies that have spanned several
decades have shown that all carbon and nitrogen atoms of HMP originate
from AIR (Figure 41),
251,254
with only a single gene thiC required for AIR to
HMP conversion in E. coli and B. subtilis.
255
Anaerobic
handling of a cell-free extract containing overexpressed ThiC was
shown to convert AIR to HMP, requiring SAM.
256
Because ThiC possesses a nontraditional CX2CX4C motif, its association as a radical
SAM enzyme was not made initially.
However, discovery of a plant-encoded ThiC protein that appeared to
contain bound [Fe–S] clusters implicated ThiC as a Fe–S
containing protein that could cleave SAM anoxically.
105a
In turn, collective data from the Downs and
Begley laboratories demonstrated that anaerobically purified ThiC,
in the presence of reductant, SAM, AIR, ATP, and MgCl2,
stimulated dAdoH and HMP production.
41,106
Characterization
of the anaerobically prepared enzyme (by UV–vis, EPR, and Mössbauer
spectroscopy) revealed the presence of one [4Fe–4S] cluster
(Table 2).
41
Recently,
a significant improvement of in vitro catalytic activity of ThiC has
been reported, which involves multiple turnovers of AIR (Table 1).
70
Similar to radical
SAM enzymes that have been kinetically characterized (Table 1), ThiC is inhibited
by SAM-derived metabolites S-adenosylhomocysteine, dAdoH, methionine, homocysteine,
as well as S-methyl-5′-thioadenosine and adenosine.
70
Figure 41
Carbon and nitrogen isotopic label studies in the ThiC
conversion
of AIR to HMP-P. All carbon and nitrogen atoms originate from AIR,
and the two carbon atoms (from the C-1′ and C-3′ positions)
not incorporated into HMP-P produce formic acid and carbon monoxide,
respectively.
6.2.3
Mechanistic
Insight into the Complex Rearrangement
Catalyzed by ThiC
ThiC catalyzes a remarkable complex rearrangement
involving the opening of the imidazole C4–C5 bond, and inserting
the C4′ and C5′ carbons to make a pyrimidine ring (Figure 41). Interestingly, recent
deuterium labeling studies
with AIR have identified the site of H-atom abstraction by ThiC.
257
Characterization of the dAdoH product (by LC–MS
and NMR) has shown that substrate labeled at both the C4′ and
the C5′ positions resulted in a mixture of mono- and bis-labeled
dAdoH products with a 1:1 stoichiometry. However, individual labels
at C4′ or C5′ positions of AIR result in a single deuterium
transfer to dAdoH.
257
Such a pattern implicates
H-atom abstraction at both positions, because multiple deuterium labels
in dAdoH product can only occur if product or substrate radical recombines
with dAdoH.
257
Corroborative data that
support this hypothesis include recent trapping of a carbon-based
radical generated by ThiC.
258
While the
radical was tentatively assigned as protein-associated, in principle
it could represent a substrate radical intermediate of the reaction
following abstraction at either the C4′ or the C5′ positions.
While substrate radical initiation has been defined, its propagation
is clearly less understood. The observation of multiple deuterium
labels in dAdoH product requires abstraction at the C4′ and
C5′ positions.
257
While abstraction
at the C4′ position would confer a direct transfer of carbon
atoms to the imidazole ring, it would leave final abstraction difficult
in the net fragmentation of the ribose ring at the C-5′ position.
The AIR C1′ and C3′ carbon atoms are ultimately expelled
as formic acid and carbon monoxide, respectively (Figure 41), requiring likely radical
propagation to the
substrate C1′ and C3′ positions.
257
To this end, isolation of product intermediates and characterization
of product radicals likely will provide critical insight to the nature
of radical rearrangement.
6.2.4
The Structure of ThiC
Structural
characterization has uncovered potentially significant insights to
the chemical reaction catalyzed by ThiC and further expanded our understanding
of the radical SAM superfamily (Figure 42).
41
The enzyme has been structurally characterized
from bacterial (Caulobacter crescentus) and eukaryotic (Arabidopsis thaliana) organisms.
41,105b
Like other characterized radical
SAM enzymes, ThiC has an aromatic residue within the tricysteine motif;
this aromatic residue likely interacts with the adenine moiety of
SAM, while the characteristic glycine-rich “GGE” and
“GxIxGxxE” motifs implicate similar protein–SAM
interactions.
41
Like BioB and HydE (sections 4.1.3 and 12.2.5.2), ThiC
contains a complete (βα)8 TIM barrel. While
BioB, HydE, and other radical SAM enzymes house the tricysteine motif
in a single loop as part of the N-terminal region of the TIM barrel
that also houses the substrate binding site, the ThiC structure is
unique, as has been described in detail elsewhere.
259
In ThiC, the tricysteine motif that binds the radical SAM
cluster is in a domain distinct from the TIM barrel, which contains
the substrate binding site.
41
ThiC is in
fact structurally similar to adenosylcobalamin-dependent enzymes including
glutamate mutase, methylmalonyl-CoA mutase, lysine 5,6-aminomutase,
and ornithine 4,5-aminomutase, by housing the radical precursor cofactor
adenosylcobalamin in a separate domain from the TIM barrel domain
that encloses the substrate binding site.
259
In the ThiC structure, a segment of conserved sequence residues
in the TIM barrel constitutes a broad surface that likely define the
interface across which the Fe–S cluster domain and the TIM
barrel interact, an attribute that is more similar to characterized
AdoCbl-dependent structures than to characterized radical SAM structures.
Figure 42
ThiC
crystal structure (PDB ID 3EPO). N-terminal domain colored in wheat,
radical SAM domain in light blue, C-terminal domain in light pink,
HMP-P in dark gray sticks.
6.2.5
Pathways Utilizing Multiple Radical SAM
Enzymes
ThiC is part of a biosynthetic machinery that applies
multiple and discrete sets of radical SAM enzymes to facilitate complex
rearrangements in their products. As more members of the radical SAM
enzyme superfamily are characterized, the number of multiple radical
SAM enzymes involved in discrete steps of biosynthetic reactions is
expected to increase. In the case of thiamine biosynthesis, an additional
radical SAM enzyme ThiH is employed to ultimately synthesize the thiazole-P
carboxylate moiety of thiamine phosphate (section 10.1). While no crystal structure
has been obtained to date for
ThiH, its amino acid sequence is expected to form the canonical SAM
tertiary fold (section 2.6). That a biosynthesis
employs multiple radical SAM enzymes with different protein architectures
poses some intriguing evolutionary questions with respect to relationships
between the radical SAM enzymes, as they relate to radical AdoCbl
enzymes. The similarity of the radical SAM enzyme ThiC to radical
AdoCbl enzymes appears to be a potential link between two distinct
enzyme classes, where a structural basis has been defined (section 2.7). While other
examples of biosynthetic pathways
that employ multiple, yet discrete, sets of radical SAM enzymes are
documented (HydE and HydG in [FeFe]-hydrogenase biosynthesis (sections 12.2.4 and
12.2.5) as well
as CofH/CofG in the F420 biosynthesis (section 6.4)), discovery and characterization
(coupled with
structural characterization) of new members of the superfamily will
better delineate the evolutionary link they have within the radical
SAM superfamily, and by extension, to radical AdoCbl enzymes.
6.3
Synthesis of Pyrrolopyrimidines: QueE and
ToyC
Pyrrolopyrimidines, or 7-deazapurine-containing molecules,
are a structurally diverse family of nucleotide analogues that are
ubiquitous in nature.
260
Those identified
from Streptomyces (such as toyocamycin
discovered in 1956)
261
have demonstrated
antibiotic and antineoplastic activities, while other pyrrolopyrimidines,
such as quesosine, have been found as modified bases in tRNA.
262
Biosynthetically, pyrrolopyrimidine compounds
are synthesized in three steps via a common set of biotransformations
starting from the precursor GTP, supported by early radiotracer studies
with tubercidin and more recently with characterization of the biosynthetic
gene structure of toyocamycin.
263
Using
the biosynthesis of quesosine as a model, GTP is first converted to
7,8-dihydroneopterin triphosphate by GTP cyclohydrolase I. Next, it
is converted to 6-carboxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterin by its associated
synthase QueD or ToyB. Finally, it undergoes a rearrangement with
another enzyme (QueE or ToyC) to make 7-carboxy-7-deazaguanine (CDG).
263a
QueE (ToyC) was identified as a radical
SAM enzyme, because it contained the CX3CX2C
motif, and was consistent with earlier genetic and experimental evidence
suggesting the involvement of an Fe-containing protein with an encoded
amino acid sequence similar to the nrdG gene (section 3.2).
263g,264
QueD was shown to
produce 6-carboxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterin, and activity of QueC was
found to produce 7-cyano-7-deazaguanine (preQ0).
260c,263c
This provided evidence that QueE performs the reaction shown in
Figure 43, effectively a radical ring contraction
reaction with loss of NH4
+.
260c
Recent characterization of QueE has confirmed that it serves
as a radical SAM enzyme, where it coordinates a [4Fe–4S] cluster
and it catalyzes the reductive cleavage of SAM.
88
An EPR spectrum of QueE was obtainable only in the presence
of reductant and SAM; this characteristic is similar to LAM where
coordination of SAM to the site-differentiated cluster increases the
reduction potential of the cluster (Table 2 and sections 2.4, 2.5, 5.1.4).
88
For
QueE, SAM was shown to function catalytically; 2H atom
transfer experiments using [6-2H]-6-carboxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterin
substrate have confirmed this, with multiple 2H labels
observed in dAdoH, consistent with a SAM cofactor undergoing several
turnovers.
88
In contrast, no label transfer
to dAdoH was observed with substrate labeled at the 7R or 7S locations, and consistent
with previous radiotracer
studies, the 7S deuterium label was retained in the
product.
88,263f
Figure 43
Reaction of the heterocyclic
rearrangement catalyzed by radical
SAM enzyme QueE.
A working chemical mechanism
is depicted in Figure 44.
88
Insertion of a substrate radical
at the C6 position of 6-carboxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterin is expected
to result in either homolytic C–N bond cleavage resulting in
a ring-opening mechanism (forming an imine and a radical at the C4a
position), or an azacyclopropylcarbinyl radical (as has been proposed
for LAM, section 5.1.6). In either step, a
nitrogen-centered radical is proposed to occur, and H-atom abstraction
from dAdoH would regenerate the dAdo• and subsequently
SAM.
88
The following steps (aromatization
of the five-membered ring and loss of ammonia) are currently unresolved
questions in the chemical mechanism; however, it is noted that Mg2+ plays an important,
yet unidentified role in the reaction.
The addition of Mg2+ results in 11-fold more product formed
relative to its absence.
88
The recently
published structure of QueE reveals a specific binding of Mg2+ near the substrate,
as well as a modified (β6/α3) TIM barrel structure.
477
Figure 44
Proposed
mechanism in the QueE heterocyclic rearrangement.
6.4
Biosynthesis of the F420 Cofactor:
FbiC/CofH and CofG
The hydride transfer F420 cofactor
is a deazaflavin derivative used as an essential cofactor by enzymes
involved in a variety of processes, including energy metabolism, antiobiotic
biosynthesis, and DNA repair.
265
As a naturally
occurring compound, it was first discovered in mycobacteria
266
and later purified from methanogenic bacteria.
267
Its structure was discovered
268
to contain a 8-hydroxy-7-desmethyl-5-deazariboflavin chromophore
(factor F0) responsible for a 420 nm absorbance when oxidized.
267
The biosynthesis of the 5-deazaflavin
ring has been a subject of considerable interest spanning several
decades that is outside the scope of this Review. Discovery of putative
involvement of radical SAM chemistry in the biosynthesis of F0 has been more recent,
following complete genome sequencing
for an expanding library of organisms.
269
Gene knockouts in the F420-producing bacterium Mycobacterium bovis BCG identified
that knockouts
of fbiC abolished F0 and F420 production.
270
Genome sequencing of Methanocaldococcus jannaschii revealed paralogues
to the fbiC gene (cofG (MJ0446)
and cofH (MJ1431))
269
homologous
to the N-terminal and C-terminal regions of protein encoded by fbiC, with each containing
a CX3CX2C motif.
271
For the enzymes from M. jannaschii, both CofG and CofH together were required
for F0 production, although the bifunctional polypeptide
FbiC from Mycobacterium smegmatis was
shown to produce more F0 overall.
271,272
Additionally, partially purified M. smegmatis FbiC in cell-free extracts was shown
to produce F0 when
incubated with 5-amino-6-ribitylamino-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione, SAM, reductant,
and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate.
271
Recent biochemical and functional studies
of purified and reconstituted
FbiC as well as CofG and CofH have provided considerable insights
into the role of radical SAM chemistry in the synthesis of the F0 cofactor.
117
The purified FbiC
containing approximately 1 Fe/protein could be reconstituted to contain
9.5 ± 1.2 Fe/protein, consistent with the presence of two [4Fe–4S]
clusters.
117
The purified enzyme catalyzes
the uncoupled reductive cleavage of SAM in the absence of substrate,
as has been observed for other radical SAM enzymes (section 2.3). Previous studies
using enzyme in vivo or in
cell-free extracts had been unable to differentiate between 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate
and tyrosine as substrates due to the activity of tyrosine transaminase,
so both molecules were tested with the purified enzyme.
117,271
While small amounts of F0 were observed with 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate,
these same small amounts of product were observed without any added
substrate, presumably due to the presence of substrate bound to the
purified enzyme. When tyrosine was examined as a potential substrate,
the F0 levels increased 77-fold over the background level,
indicating that tyrosine is the true substrate.
117
When the assay was repeated with [U–13C]-tyrosine, the F0 product exhibited a 7 Da
mass shift,
reflecting the incorporation of the p-cresolate ring
of tyrosine into F0. Together, the cumulative data indicate
that FbiC alone, or the combination of CofH and CofG (see below),
catalyzes the reaction (Figure 45).
117
While use of dithionite as a reductant resulted
in the production of nearly four dAdoH molecules per F0, use of the physiological
reductant flavodoxin/flavodoxin reductase
resulted in just over two dAdoH molecules per F0, suggesting
that two SAM molecules are required and cleaved during F0 synthesis, presumably one
at each of the radical SAM clusters in
the enzyme.
117
Figure 45
F0 synthase reaction
catalyzed by bifunctional enzyme FbiC. The
monofunctional units of FbiC can be isolated separately and, in vitro,
catalyze the same reaction, with tyrosine and 5-amino-6-ribitylamino-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione
to make the 8-hydroxy-7-desmethyl-5-deazariboflavin
chromophore F0.
Additional insight into the roles of each of the radical
SAM [4Fe–4S]
clusters has been provided by studies of the purified CofG and CofH
proteins. Both enzymes were successfully overexpressed and purified
with an iron content of just under two Fe per protein, but with UV–vis
absorption features consistent with the presence of [4Fe–4S]
clusters (Table 2); CofH required coexpression
of the E. coli
suf operon to obtain significant soluble protein.
117
Both enzymes reductively cleaved SAM when incubated with
dithionite as a reductant. Incubation of CofG, CofH, SAM, dithionite,
tyrosine, and 5-amino-6-ribitylamino-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione resulted in production
of F0. Interestingly, production of F0 was found to not require
5-amino-6-ribitylamino-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione, and subsequently 5-amino-6-ribitylamino-2,4(1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione
was found to copurify
with CofH but not CofG, supporting the hypothesis that CofH acts first,
in the early steps of F0 biosynthesis.
117
Further experiments in which CofH and CofG were incubated
separately with SAM and substrates under reducing conditions, and
then the small molecule products (if any) of these separate reactions
were incubated with the other enzyme, demonstrated clearly that CofH
functions first in F0 biosynthesis, and produces a stable
product that is then used by CofG to synthesize F0 (Figure 46).
Figure 46
Proposed mechanism of radical initiation and probable
involvement
of CofH. Tyrosine homolytic Cα–Cβ bond cleavage
products are depicted in black, while heterolytic bond cleavage products
are depicted in aqua.
Because CofH acts first in F0 biosynthesis, it
presumably
uses tyrosine as a substrate; like ThiH and HydG, which also utilize
tyrosine, CofH is proposed to catalyze Cα–Cβ bond cleavage (sections 10.1, 12.2);
CofG is expected to have a unique
reaction mechanism that likely involves H-atom abstraction of the p-cresol product
or initiation by a product radical produced
from CofH.
117
CofH likely facilitates a
Cα–Cβ bond cleavage at a
single, site-differentiated Fe–S cluster, similar to ThiH.
Considering that the FbiC radical SAM domains are discrete, the site-differentiated
clusters are expected to be distant from one another, catalyzing separate
reactions where the domains are linked together resulting in a more
efficient biotransformation (by analogy similar to NifEN-B in FeMoco
biosynthesis, section 12.1). Characterization
of a bifunctional radical SAM enzyme with discrete CX3CX2C motifs in a single enzyme
is unique with respect to the
enzyme superfamily, and that likely can serve as a template for understanding
other complex biotransformations that employ multiple radical SAM
enzymes involved in discrete steps of biosynthesis (e.g., HydE and
HydG in [FeFe]-hydrogenase H-cluster maturation, section 12.2).
6.5
Synthesis of Menaquinone:
MqnC and MqnE
Menaquinone (Vitamin K2) serves
as an electron shuttle
between membrane-bound proteins in the respiratory chain.
273
In E. coli,
its biosynthesis starts from chorismate, and is understood to involve
eight enzymes encoded by the men operon.
274
Analysis of whole genome sequences from Heliobacter pylori, Campylobacter
jejuni, and Streptomyces coelicolor, however, has indicated that these organisms do
not have orthologues
to the men genes found in E. coli despite their ability to synthesize menaquinone.
275
For these other organisms, an alternative futalosine pathway
synthesizes menaquinone from chorismate. Following a proposed outline
of the alternative pathway put forth by Hiratsuka et al., the conversion
of dehypoxanthine futalosine to cyclic dehypoxyanthine futalosine
was associated with a gene SCO4550 that encodes MqnC,
a protein that contains the canonical radical SAM CX3CX2C motif.
276
Successful reconstitution
of the radical SAM enzyme MqnC has revealed that it is involved in
the cyclase reaction (Figure 47).
277
Deuterium labeling of the dehypoxanthine futalosine
substrate has determined that the C4 hydrogen is abstracted by the
dAdo•.
277
The resulting
C4 radical is proposed to cyclize with the aromatic ring at the position para to the
attached carboxylate, and subsequent deprotonation
is proposed to result in the cyclic structure (Figure 48). That SAM appears to serve
as a cosubstrate in the reaction
at a single, site-differentiated [4Fe–4S] cluster is similar
to other identified radical SAM enzymes that facilitate C–C
bond formation.
277
Figure 47
Transformation catalyzed
by radical SAM enzyme MqnC.
Figure 48
Ring cyclization mechanism catalyzed by radical SAM enzyme MqnC.
In addition to MqnC, further radical
SAM enzyme involvement in
the biosynthetic precursor to dehypoxyanthine futalosine has been
recently discovered.
119
The futalosine-dependent
menaquinone biosynthetic pathway was identified on the basis of the
observation of futalosine as an intermediate through MS and NMR techniques,
276
following a series of bioinformatic, gene deletion,
labeling, and biochemical characterization studies.
278
The first step in this pathway was initially proposed to
involve chorismate, pyruvate, an adenosine precursor, and the gene SCO4506 that encodes
the enzyme MqnA.
276
The MqnA orthologue TTHA0803 (T. thermophilus) was shown to catalyze the formation
of 3-[(1-carboxyvinyl)oxy]benzoic acid, and required an additional
enzyme to catalyze formation of futalosine.
276
Subsequent bioinformatic analysis of menaquinone biosynthetic genes
encoding putative ketoacid decarboxylases or radical SAM enzymes identified
a possible candidate SCO4494 (now annotated as mqnE) that contained a sequence encoding
a CX3CX2C motif.
119
Overexpression
of the T. thermophilus orthologue of
the mqnE gene (TTHA0804) produced
an oxygen-sensitive Fe–S containing enzyme that exhibited an
absorbance maximum at 415 nm (Table 2).
119
Interestingly, incubation of MqnE with 3-[(1-carboxyvinyl)oxy]benzoic
acid, SAM, and reductant resulted in production of aminofutalosine,
bicarbonate, and presumably methionine (Figure 49). Conversion of aminofutalosine
to dehypoxyanthine futalosine was
attained when assay mixtures were incubated with purified MqnB enzyme.
119
Figure 49
Transformation catalyzed by radical SAM enzyme
MqnE.
The reaction catalyzed by MqnE
is unique in the radical SAM superfamily
in that the dAdo• is added to a substrate vinylic
enol ether double bond (Figure 50).
119
While the radical is generated and serves as
a cosubstrate, the product 5′-dAdoH is not produced in the
reaction. Addition of dAdo• to the substrate has
been proposed to result in the formation of a captodatively stabilized
substrate radical similar to Gly734 in PFL (section 3.1.5). Radical rearrangement
generating an alkoxy radical would
result in decarboxylation, while electron transfer to the oxidized
[4Fe–4S]2+ would terminate the product radical,
forming the product keto group (Figure 50).
119
Figure 50
Mechanism of dAdo• addition
to a vinylic ether
double bond, catalyzed by radical SAM enzyme MqnE.
The proposed mechanism and observed products in
the MqnE reaction
are suggestive of a novel biochemical transformation different from
all other radical SAM enzymes characterized to date that cleave the
SAM S–C(5′) bond.
119
While
most of the enzymes in the superfamily perform H-atom abstraction,
MqnE utilizes dAdo• to carry out C–C bond
formation at the C-5′ position. Such chemical distinctions
between H-atom abstraction and radical addition might be expected
to correlate with active site structural differences; however, amino
acid sequence comparison shows that MqnE is predicted to have a complete
(βα)8 TIM barrel with analogous SAM binding
motifs as observed in other superfamily members (Figure 51) (section 2.6).
34,279
These similarities suggest that the mechanism of dAdo• generation and substrate radical
propagation in MqnE is comparable
to radical SAM enzymes that perform H-atom abstraction reactions.
Alternatively, differences in the fate of the generated dAdo• species could be rationalized
by variances in substrate proximity
to the SAM-bound Fe–S cluster. While the basis for the unusual
chemistry catalyzed by MqnE remains unclear, future structural and
spectroscopic characterization in the presence of substrate and SAM
will likely provide new insights into the subtle active site characteristics
that control dAdo• reactivity.
Figure 51
Structure homology model
of the amino acid sequence of MqnE (T. thermophilus) (blue), aligned to the HydE crystal
structure (PDB ID 3CIX) (pink) (section 12.2.5.2). Radical SAM motif
is colored in yellow, cysteines involved in ligating the [4Fe–4S]
are shown as yellow sticks, while the [4Fe–4S] cluster is depicted
as yellow and rust sticks. For clarity, the [2Fe–2S] cluster
of HydE has been omitted. MqnE structural model was generated using
the protein structure prediction server Phyre2,
279
where the HydE template model yielded the top hit.
6.6
Synthesis
of Modified Side Chain Rings of
Thiopeptides: NosL or NocL
Thiopeptides represent a class
of polythiazolyl antibiotics that have clinical interest against drug-resistant
bacterial pathogens.
280
They are comprised
of a macrocyclic core, consisting of a nitrogen-containing six membered
ring with variable side chains and rings. Thiopeptide formation is
facilitated through conserved post-translational modifications on
a ribosomally produced precursor peptide, including cyclodehydrations,
dehydrations, and intramolecular cyclizations to synthesize the nitrogen
heterocycle product.
Thiopeptides such as nosiheptide and thiostrepton
have side chain rings (indolic acid and quinalic acid, respectively)
that are synthesized independently of the precursor peptide. The nosiheptide
side chain ring 3-methyl-2-indolic acid (MIA) is synthesized by genes nosL and nosN,
which were identified as
putative SAM-dependent enzymes.
281
Homologous nocL and nocN genes were discovered as
important in the nocathiacin I biosynthesis.
282
The NosN protein was found to have a high amino acid sequence similarity
to Tlm-Orf11 in tallysomycin biosynthesis (section 7.3),
283
while NosL was similar to
radical SAM enzyme ThiH.
281
Mutant strain
SL4006 (lacking the NosN protein) produced a side ring-opened NOS
analogue containing a 3-methylindolyl group linked to the thiopeptide
by a single thioester linkage.
281
Collectively,
the ordering of these radical SAM-dependent enzymes suggested NosL
acts first to make MIA from tryptophan, and NosN later performs a
methyltransferase reaction (Figure 52).
Figure 52
Radical fragmentation–recombination
reaction catalyzed by
radical SAM enzymes NosL and NocL.
Biochemical characterization of the NosL and NocL (NosL homologue
in nocathiacin I biosynthesis) together has provided an understanding
of this novel radical SAM biotransformation.
71,114
NosL and NocL were purified and reconstituted anaerobically from
recombinant strains SL4101 and SL4151 respectively, where the enzyme
was found to bind a single [4Fe–4S] cluster that upon incubation
with tryptophan, SAM, and dithionite resulted in formation of MIA.
71,114
The EPR signal of reduced NosL and NocL was found to be axial (g = 2.02 and 1.91).
Interestingly, reduction of NocL in
the presence of tryptophan resulted in the formation of a new signal
(g = 2.02, 1.89, 1.85) (Table 2). Feeding of the NosL SL4101 strain with either [1-13C]
or [3-13C]-labeled tryptophan resulted in label incorporation
in the 2-carboxylate and 3-methyl group of MIA, respectively.
114
Incubation with the purified NosL with [2H8]-tryptophan resulted in production of
[2H6]-MIA without observable deuterium transfer to
dAdoH; formaldehyde was detected as a byproduct, as well as 3-methylindole
and glyoxylate.
114
HPLC–MS analysis
of turnover samples revealed the production of glycine, suggestive
of a glycyl radical intermediate.
114
Further
evidence for a free glycyl radical is supported by EPR spectra performed
at 77 K, where low-level formation of carbon-based free radical was
detected in the NocL protein.
71
A
preliminary mechanism for the NosL/NocL biotransformation can
be found in Figure 53. H-atom abstraction at
the ring indole nitrogen atom generates a tryptophanyl substrate radical,
which undergoes Cα–Cβ bond
cleavage to form a glycyl radical and a 3-methyleneindole-based radical.
Because glyoxylate and low levels of glycine were identified as reaction
products, an oxidized glycine intermediate (either a glycyl radical
or a dehydroglycine) is produced from the initial substrate radical
and can be quenched to make the glycine-based product.
114
From here, it is proposed that the product
radicals terminate at the indole C2 position, resulting in formation
of a new C–C bond between the Trp C1 carboxylate and the methylindole.
Oxidation and subsequent fragmentation of the original Trp C-2 carbon
atom results in formation of product and formaldehyde.
114
Interestingly, the mechanism is similar to
the ThiH/HydG proteins, in that substrate initiation occurs at a solvent
exchangeable position, that Cα–Cβ bond cleavage occurs, culminating in oxidation of
the glycine backbone,
and that glyoxylate is detected as a product under certain conditions
(sections 10.1 and 12.2.4).
71,78,114,284
Mechanistic insight to the final step of the reaction
(loss of the C2 carboxylate) will require further investigation, but
the observed radical fragmentation–recombination has merit
to be a general mechanism within the subclass of radical SAM enzymes
that perform amino acid Cα–Cβ bond cleavage events.
Figure 53
Proposed fragmentation–recombination
mechanism in the conversion
of l-Trp to MIA catalyzed by NosL and NocL.
7
Enzymes Catalyzing Methylation
and Methylthiolation
Reactions
As was discussed in section 2.5, homolytic
cleavage of the S–C(methyl) bond of SAM has not been well established
in the radical SAM superfamily; however, numorous enzymes use radical
SAM chemistry to transfer methyl groups, or methylthio groups, to
substrates, as detailed in this section. Radical SAM methyltransferases
(RSMTs) can be divided into three classes on the basis of their domain
structure, and these classes most likely also delineate mechanistic
differences (Figure 54).
285
The class A RSMTs have a single radical SAM domain and
utilize a conserved cysteine as a key component of the methylation
reaction, with one SAM transferring a methyl group by an SN2 reaction to the cysteinyl
residue, and the second SAM serving as
a precursor of a dAdo• that abstracts an H-atom
from the methyl cysteine prior to methyl group transfer to substrate.
The class B RSMTs contain both a radical SAM domain and a cobalamin-binding
domain; for these enzymes it is thought that one SAM serves to methylate
the cobalamin cofactor, while the second serves as a precursor of
a dAdo• that abstracts an H-atom from the substrate
prior to methyl group transfer to substrate. The class C RSMTs contain
a radical SAM domain, as well as a C-terminal domain similar to that
found in HemN. These RSMTs do not have conserved cysteines beyond
the radical SAM motif, and do not bind cobalamin, and therefore presumably
utilize a mechanism distinct from the class A and B RSMTs.
Figure 54
Representative
radical SAM methyltransferase enzymes (RMSTs). Enzymes
are organized by their class, which are differentiated by the top
panel. Members of each class are differentiated by the type of methyl
transfer catalyzed.
7.1
Class
A Radical SAM Methyltransferases Methylate
the 23S rRNA at A2503
7.1.1
A Novel rRNA Methylation
The staphylococcal
Cfr (chloramphenicol-florfenicol resistance) protein was first identified
in 2000 and later noted in 2004 for the similarity of its N-terminal
cysteine-rich region to Fe–S cluster binding radical SAM proteins.
286
Cfr is a methyltransferase that modifies the
adenosine 2503 position in 23S RNA of the bacterial large ribosomal
subunit via methylation of C8 (Figure 55).
287
Methylation of aromatic sp2-hybridized
carbons is unusual among methyltransferases, which typically methylate
at the nucleophilic O or N atoms of the nucleotide moiety.
Figure 55
The modification
of adenosine 2503 in 23S RNA of the bacterial
large ribosomal subunit via methylation of the C2 or C8 position as
catalyzed by RlmN or Cfr (two representative members of the class
A RSMTs), respectively. The proposed mechanism for methylation of
C2 by RlmN is depicted along the left side as shown using green arrows.
The proposed mechanism for methylation of C8 by Cfr is depicted along
the right side as shown using magenta arrows.
Because of earlier work showing high sequence homology, especially
within the C-terminal region, of RlmN from E. coli with Cfr from Staphylococci aureus,
54a,286,288
Toh and co-workers
set out to determine if RlmN was indeed the E. coli counterpart of the staphylococcal
methyltransferase.
289
Their results show that RlmN functions to methylate
the C2 position on A2503 in 23S RNA (denoted m2A, Figure 55). However, unlike Cfr,
which confers resistance
against a variety of antibiotics that target A2503 for modification
thereby inhibiting peptidyl transferase activity of the ribosome,
290
RlmN is innate and possibly important for ribosomal
activity in bacteria.
289
7.1.2
Mechanistic Studies
Published work
on the first in vitro characterization of MTases demonstrated that
RlmN and Cfr posttranslationally methylate A2503 at the C2 and C8
positions, respectively; although Cfr can act upon C2 as well, it
is not the preferred site of methylation.
111a
Both of the enzymes bind only one [4Fe–4S] cluster and require
two SAM molecules.
111c
Akin to MiaB, which
also requires two SAMs (section 7.4.1), it
was believed that one SAM gets reductively cleaved to form the dAdo• and the other
donates the necessary methyl group.
111a,127
Activity assays on these enzymes detected Met, dAdoH, and
SAH as byproducts of the reaction to form the methylated A2503 product.
111a
Use of S-adenosyl-l-[methyl-3H]methionine resulted in incorporation of the
tritium into A2503, suggesting that the methyl group came from SAM.
It was believed that the first SAM molecule was cleaved to generate
a dAdo•, which carried out an H-atom abstraction
at C2 of the adenosine substrate generating a substrate radical that
was methylated by the second SAM molecule. This proposed mechanism,
however, required homolytic cleavage of C–H aromatic carbon
bond and generation of energetically unfavorable σ-radical.
111a
In 2011,
291
Yan et al. modified their
earlier proposal based on results using [2-2H]-adenosine.
On the basis of previous findings, one would expect formation of [5′-2H]-dAdoH due
to abstraction of the deuterium from substrate;
however, no [5′-2H]-dAdoH was observed via MS, indicating
that H-atom abstraction does not occur directly from C2 of substrate.
291
When [methyl-2H3]-SAM
was used in activity assays with either RlmN or Cfr, however, singly
deuterated dAdoH and doubly deuterated A2503 were observed as products.
It was therefore postulated that the one SAM molecule donates the
methyl group while one H-atom is abstracted from that methyl during
catalysis. It was proposed that the dAdo• generated
by radical SAM chemistry abstracted a hydrogen from the second SAM
molecule to form SAM methyl radical that then combines with the substrate;
a resulting hydride shift in the adenosine ring would then lead to
expulsion of SAH and generation of final product.
Grove et al.
provided data supporting an alternate mechanism in
which RlmN and Cfr do not use SAM for direct transfer of the methyl
group to substrate but rather for methylation of a conserved cysteine
residue (Figure 55).
111b
Under single turnover conditions including methyl-d
3-SAM, a 7-mer rRNA (2500–2506), and either RlmN
or Cfr, there was no MS evidence for the transfer of d
3-methyl from SAM to the 7-mer substrate; the substrate
was indeed methylated but no deuterium was incorporated. Upon further
investigation after growing up and isolating RlmN and Cfr from an E. coli methionine
auxotroph in the presence of d
3-methionine, single turnover assay conditions
produced a doubly deuterated adenosine product, suggesting that d
3-methyl is initially incorporated into the
proteins during growth and then transferred to the C2 of the adenosine.
Additionally, incorporation of a deuterium into dAdoH was observed;
therefore, the dAdo• must abstract an H-atom from
the methylated amino acid of protein generating a protein-based radical.
111b
Tryptic digestions and MS identified the labeled
amino acid in RlmN as Cys355 (Cys338 in Cfr).
111c
These results are consistent with previous mutagenesis
studies, which revealed that Cys to Ala changes in the CX3CX2C motif completely eliminate
catalytic activity in
RlmN,
111a,287
while mutation of two other conserved cysteines
in Cfr makes the protein unable to methylate C8 on A2503.
292
Moreover, Grove et al. demonstrated the apoRlmN
is catalytically inactive, however, upon reconstitution of the cluster
and in the presence of SAM, there is rapid release of SAH along with
the methylated adenosine.
111c
RlmN and
Cfr thus appear to possess a dual-purpose for the [4Fe–4S]
cluster: the common need to generate a dAdo• but
also the unique need to methylate substrate.
111c
The current mechanism involves an initial SN2 reaction
transferring the methyl group from one SAM molecule to Cys355 on RlmN
and releasing SAH (Figure 55).
111b
Next, reductive cleavage of the second SAM
molecule generates a dAdo• that abstracts an H-atom
from methylated Cys355 forming a carbon radical and dAdoH. The methylcysteinyl
radical attacks the sp2-hybridized C2 of A2503, resulting
in carbon–carbon bond formation and a resonance-delocalized
radical on the neighboring base of the nucleotide. Direct evidence
for such a covalent intermediate has been provided by Fujimori and
co-workers, who generated variants in which Cys118 of RlmN was changed
to either alanine or serine; they found that these variants were unable
to “resolve” the proposed covalent intermediate to form
methylated product.
293
Further, they demonstrated
using tandem mass spectrometry that the Cys118 variants of RlmN contained
a covalently bound, methylene-linked adenosyl modification at Cys355.
293
The remainder of the mechanism involves loss
of an electron to an Fe–S cluster and removal of a proton from
C2 to give rise to an alkylated product linked to Cys355 of the protein.
Intramolecular attack by Cys118 thiolate on Cys355 results in disulfide
bond formation and an enamine intermediate, and final methylated product
formation occurs through tautomerization and acquiring a proton from
solvent. A similar mechanism is postulated for Cfr; however, differences
are most likely present in the Cfr active site due to its preferential
methylation of C8 over C2 of the substrate.
111b
Most recently, data were presented to help elucidate the ability
for Cfr to carry out two separate reactions with SAM in its active
site.
112b
Wild-type (WT) Cfr was found
to catalyze the uncoupled reductive cleavage of SAM, while C388A Cfr,
which lacks the cysteine that accepts the methyl group from SAM, did
not.
112b
These results suggested that Cys388,
and/or methylated Cys388, is essential for the reductive SAM cleavage
that is not coupled to substrate turnover. This difference in reactivity
was not due to differences in SAM binding, because both WT and mutant
Cfr were shown to bind SAM with similar affinity; EPR spectroscopy,
however, established that oxidation of the reduced [4Fe–4S]1+ cluster upon addition
of SAM occurred only in the WT enzyme
(Table 2).
112b
Together,
these results suggest that methylated Cys338 properly positions SAM
for reductive cleavage.
7.1.3
Insights from the Structure
of RlmN
While in vitro studies have provided substantive
insight into methylation
transfer, a structural understanding of dAdo• interaction
with substrate has helped to elucidate the observed differences between
RlmN and Cfr described in section 7.1.2. The
RlmN structure (representing the first structurally characterized
radical SAM methyltransferase) (Figure 56)
contains a (βα)6 partial TIM barrel similar
to PFL-AE, as well as an N-terminal accessory domain that is similar
to the nucleic acid recognition helix-hairpin-helix fold found in
the MraW methyltransferase family.
294
Similar
to other structurally characterized radical SAM enzymes, the SAM sulfonium
sulfur atom is oriented 3.2 Å from the unique Fe of [4Fe–4S]
cluster.
34,295
Interestingly, the structure contains a
methylated Cys355 (part of the β7 extension) at a distance of
6 Å from the bound SAM methionine methyl group, which would require
a second equivalent of SAM capable of specific coordination to the
site-differentiated Fe site. This observation is consistent with the
multiple equivalents of SAM used, as well as with the mechanism proposed
by Grove et al. (noted in section 7.1.2).
Figure 56
RlmN
crystal structure (PDB ID 3RFA). Left: N-terminal domain colored in
wheat, radical SAM domain in light blue, C-terminal domain in light
pink, [4Fe–4S] cluster in yellow and rust spheres, and SAM
in green sticks. Right: Active site of RlmN where [4Fe–4S]
cluster (yellow and rust) and SAM (green carbons) are depicted in
sticks with oxygens colored red and nitrogens colored blue. Cysteines
(light blue carbons) involved in ligating cluster are depicted in
lines.
RlmN and Cfr catalyze similar
methyltransfer events that differ
in the specific site of transfer, yet both share a comparable affinity
for SAM in the presence and absence of substrate.
112b
Such an observation has suggested that methylation of Cfr
Cys338 influences structural changes in the active site mimicking
substrate binding in the active site of other radical SAM enzymes.
112b
Interestingly, the RlmN structure possesses
distinct structural elements lacking in Cfr that confer its specificity
in reaction. Structural sequence mapping of Cfr on the RlmN structure
showed strict sequence conservation within the active site cleft,
which can be interpreted to represent a common radical initiation
event.
295
Structural elements lacking in
the Cfr sequence include the loss of conformationally flexible regions
present in RlmN, such as the extended α1/β2 loop. Such
observations are consistent with the in vitro experiments described
in section 7.1.2, where differences in SAM
cleavage were observed between the C355A RlmN and C338A Cfr enzymes.
It appears here that slight differences in SAM and/or substrate binding
in the active site lead to the enhanced functionality observed with
Cfr to act on both positions C2 and C8 of A2508 as compared to the
singly active RlmN at site C2.
112b
7.2
Class B RSMTs: Cobalamin–Radical SAM
Partnership
An emerging subclass among the MTases merges
the unique features of radical SAM- and cobalamin-binding domains
and has been recently reviewed and classified as Class B radical SAM
methyltransferases (RSMTs).
285
Class B
RSMTs potentially utilize two molecules of SAM, as seen with Class
A RSMTs, in conjunction with cobalamin-mediated methyl transfer to
carry out catalytic activity as illustrated in Figure 57. Included in this section
is discussion of a few of the recently
characterized class B RSMTs, including PhpK, TsrM, GenK, and HpnP.
Figure 57
Proposed
reaction scheme for class B RSMTs.
PhpK, isolated from Kitasatospora phosalacinea, is a P-methyltransferase that carries
out methyl
transfer from methylcobalamin to 2-acetylamino-4-hydroxyphosphinylbutanoate
(N-acetyldemethylphosphinothricin, NAcDMPT) to form
the only known carbon–phosphorus–carbon linkage to occur
in nature, 2-acetylamino-4-hydroxymethylphosphinylbutanoate (N-acetylphosphinothricin,
NAcPT).
116
Assay conditions of reconstituted PhpK including SAM, dithionite,
NAcDMPT, CH3Cbl(III), and 5′-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine nucleosidase
(MTAN) (to prevent product
inhibition), in conjunction with NMR spectroscopy enabled observation
of the conversion of NAcDMPT to NAcPT. Two-dimensional 1H–31P gradient heteronuclear
single-quantum correlation
(gHSQC) spectroscopy to observe H–P cross-peaks in response
to passive couplings from 13C (from 13CH3Cbl(III)) to 1H and 31P nuclei demonstated
that 13CH3Cbl(III), in the presence of PhpK,
serves as the sole methyl donor to NAcDMPT.
116
It is speculated that a dAdo•, resulting from
SAM cleavage, abstracts an H-atom from substrate generating a phosphinate
radical, which then interacts with CH3Cbl(III) resulting
in transfer of the methyl group and release of Cbl(II) (Figure 58). Although it is
unclear whether Cbl acts as a
cosubstrate or cofactor, perhaps in accordance with similar CH3Cbl chemistry such
as Cbl-dependent methionine synthase, SAM
is required to replenish the methyl group bound to Cbl enabling further
turnover.
296
Figure 58
PhpK reaction scheme
catalyzing the conversion of N-acetyldemethylphosphinothricin,
NAcDMPT, to N-acetylphosphinothricin,
NAcPT.
The first known tryptophan methyltransferase,
TsrM isolated from Streptomyces laurentii, was found to be responsible
for the initial step of the complex transformation of tryptophan to
thiostrepton A.
89,280a,297
Thiostrepton A is an antibiotic isolated more than 50 years ago
298
and is known for its activity against various
pathogens, malaria, and possibly even cancer.
299
Initial in vitro activity assays of reconstituted TsrM
including tryptophan, SAM, and dithionite demonstrated neither generation
of any methylated products nor any nonproductive cleavage of dAdoH.
However, due to the observed presence of a potential cobalamin-binding
domain, addition of CH3Cbl(III) to the assay mixture generated
SAH, indicating SAM to be a potential methyl donor, as well as an
unidentified compound that exhibited UV–vis and emission spectra
characteristic of tryptophan.
89
Analysis
via LC–MS determined this product to be methyltryptophan, and
subsequent labeling experiments along with NMR spectroscopy revealed
that the methyl was transferred to the C2 position of the indole ring.
One exceptional finding was that in the absence of dithionite as the
reductant, TsrM continued to generate SAH, thereby indicating that
radical SAM chemistry was not a required precursor to methyl group
transfer. Instead, it was concluded that SAM functions solely as methyl
donor to Cbl, forming methylcobalamin and expelling SAH. The final
step in methyltryptophan formation necessitates generation and transfer
of a methyl radical species from methylcobalamin to the C2 position
of tryptophan, activated through possible ligation to a radical SAM
[4Fe–4S] cluster (Figure 59).
89
The accumulated data on TsrM thus suggest that,
while it is a member of the radical SAM superfamily and catalyzes
methyl transfer, it does not, in fact, catalyze SAM-based radical
chemistry.
Figure 59
TsrM reaction scheme catalyzing the conversion of tryptophan
to
2-methyltrytophan.
Initial characterization
of GenK, an enzyme involved in gentamicin
biosynthesis, as a Cbl-dependent radical SAM MTase from gene knockout
studies was further substantiated through in vitro activity assays
with purified and reconstituted GenK from Micromonospora
echinospora.
84,300
GenK, SAM, and Cbl/MeCbl
all functioned to convert GenX2 to the antibiotic Geneticin
or G418, a precursor to gentamicin; in addition, the reaction produced
dAdoH and SAH in a 1:1 ratio (Figure 60). Isotope
labeling studies with 13CD3-methyl-SAM detected 13CD3 bound to both G418 and Cbl indicating
SAM
is the preliminary methyl donor to Cbl, followed by secondary transfer
of the methyl group to GenX2.
84
A possible mechanism includes homolytic cleavage of a SAM molecule
giving rise to the dAdo• followed by H-atom abstraction
from GenX2 forming the substrate radical and dAdoH. Quenching
of the GenX2 radical via transfer of a methyl radical from
methylcobalalmin gives rise to Cbl(II) and G418. Conceivably, Co(II)
is further reduced to Cbl(I), thereby enabling remethylation to occur
from an incoming SAM molecule.
84
Figure 60
GenK reaction
scheme catalyzing the conversion of Gentamicin X2 to G418.
Another protein recently added
to the growing list of radical SAM
enzymes, HpnP, is believed to act as a methyltransferase as it appears
to be involved in the methylation of the C2 in hopanoids (Figure 61). Hopanoids, so
named after a natural resin used
in varnish for paintings that was derived from the genus Hopea, are functionalized
pentacyclic hydrocarbon
compounds produced in many cyanobacteria, as well as in α-proteobacteria
and acidobacteria and function in plasma membrane rigidity much like
the function of sterols in eukaryotes.
301
Classification of hpnP from the Rhodopseudomonas palustris TIE-1 genome as a putative
radical SAM enzyme was due to the presence of the CX3CX2C motif among the ORF 4269.
302
Because
of earlier work showing that R. palustris cells fed with labeled methionine generate
2-methylhopanoids with
the methyl group labeled at the C2 position,
303
it was speculated that the hpnP gene product may
be responsible for such a methylation reaction. Analysis of an ORF
4269 gene deletion strain demonstrated an inability for methylation
to occur in any one of the six known C2 methylated triterpenoids;
however, insertion of the hpnP gene back into the
ORF restored production of the methylated products.
302
Figure 61
HpnP reaction scheme catalyzing the methylation of the
C2 position
in bacterial hopanoids. A few representative hopanoids are shown here.
7.3
Class
C Radical SAM Methyltransferases: Similar
to HemN
The third class of radical SAM-dependent methyltransferases
is a subcategory that has amino acid sequence similarities to radical
SAM enzyme HemN.
285
As described in section 11.1.2, the HemN crystal structure comprises an incomplete
(βα)6 TIM barrel motif in addition to a unique
C-terminal domain that is putatively involved in substrate binding.
The N-terminal “trip-wire” domain assigned to be important
in substrate recognition in HemN is absent, however, in the Class
C methyltransferase family.
241
As noted
in section 11.1.2, a defining feature of the
HemN reaction is the likely involvement of two SAM molecules at the
active site.
85,241
While the class C enzymes are
methyltransferases, they are thought to utilize a different mechanism
than the class A or B enzymes, given that they contain neither a conserved
cysteine nor a cobalamin-binding domain that could be used in methyl
transfer.
285
Interestingly, this subfamily
has several notable bioinformatic markers that differentiate it from
the rest of the enzyme superfamily. It has been suggested that many
of the identified, HemN-like oxygen-independent coproporphyrinogen
III oxidases may actually be Class C radical SAM methyltransferase
enzymes.
285
Mechanistic information
on the involvement of the HemN-like domain remains limited due to
lack of enzyme characterization. Thiazole heterocycle methylation
enzymes (TpdI, TpdL, and TpdU)
304
as well
as pyrimidine ring methylation enzymes (Blm-Orf8, Tlm-Orf11, and Zbm-Orf26)
283,305
involved in bleomycin antibiotic biosyntheses are identified as
class C members.
285
As this enzyme subfamily
is involved in the biosynthesis of several important thiopeptides
and antibiotics, advances are likely to be significant in differentiating
the role that the cobalamin serves in Class B methyltransferases to
the role served by the HemN-like domain. However, as has been seen
with other members of the radical SAM superfamily, the tasks of enzyme
isolation and substrate identification often remain as the most significant
hurdles in mechanistic characterization.
7.3.1
NocN:
Methyltransferase in Nosiheptide and
Nocathiacin Biosynthesis
As described in the section of NosL/NocL
(section 6.6), thiopeptides represent a class
of polythiazolyl antibiotics that have clinical interest against drug-resistant
bacterial pathogens.
280
The nosiheptide
and nocathiacin side chain ring 3-methyl-2-indolic acid (MIA) is synthesized
by genes nosL and nosN (nocL and nocN, respectively), where each
was identified as putative radical SAM-dependent enzymes.
281,282
The encoded NosL and NocL enzymes catalyze the conversion of tryptophan
to make MIA, via H-atom abstraction at the tryptophan indole nitrogen
atom (Figure 52).
71,114
The nosN and nocN genes were identified
as SAM-dependent methyltransferase enzymes putatively involved in
the synthesis of the C4-hydroxymethyl group, because feeding studies
showed that the substituent originated from the methyl group of SAM.
281,282,306
To confirm this hypothesis,
a mutant strain SL4006 (lacking the NosN protein) produced a side
ring-opened NOS analogue containing a 3-methylindolyl group linked
to the thiopeptide by a single thioester linkage, lacking a 4-methyl
substituent.
281
Thus, the NosN/NocN activity
has been proposed to follow the fragmentation/recombination event
performed by NocL/NosL.
The accumulated data above, along with
characterization of NosL, provide a working mechanism of activity
for NosN. Provided that MIA serves as the substrate of NosN, the generated
dAdo• may be anticipated to abstract a methyl H-atom
from a second equivalent of SAM bound to the enzyme in a fashion similar
to that proposed for RlmN
291
as would be
potentially consistent with a HemN-like structure (section 7.1.2).
241
Such a mechanism
would generate a methyl carbon-centered radical that would undergo
addition to C4 of MIA. Because the substrate MIA represents a reduced
species, methyl radical addition would result in an oxidized intermediate
similar to those proposed in NosL/NocL MIA synthesis (section 6.6).
71,114
Hydride shift to the sulfonium
sulfur atom, followed by one-electron reduction, would result in the
generation of SAH and the 3,4-dimethylindolic acid product.
NosN is a class C methyltransferase that by analogy to HemN likely
employs multiple equivalents of SAM as part of the catalytic mechanism
(section 11.1.3). However, to date an in vitro
investigation of the enzyme remains lacking; thus confirmation that
MIA serves as the substrate has not been shown yet. Nonetheless, it
is noteworthy that mutant strain SL4006 can produce a side ring-opened
NOS analogue with a 3-methylindolyl group, meaning that the NosN enzyme
might be expected to act on the MIA moiety on the thiopeptide framework,
rather than MIA.
281
In addition to the
above, structural insight into the exact role that the HemN-like C-terminal
region serves (as a defining characteristic of the subclass) remains
limited, aside from putative involvement in substrate.
285
Because the HemN crystal structure was solved
in the absence of substrate, limited structural information relating
to substrate binding has been obtained. However, as more class C methytransferases
are characterized, structural studies in the presence of substrate
should be informative in defining the enzyme subclass.
7.3.2
Methylation during the Synthesis of the
Natural Product Yatakemycin: YtkT
Yatakemycin (YTM) is a
naturally occurring antitumor agent in the family of CC1065 and the
duocarmycins antibiotics and also exhibits certain antifungal properties.
Exploring the Yatakemycin gene cluster led to identification of the ytkT gene; inactivation
of ytkT via gene
replacement curbed generation of the final product, YTM.
118
HPLC and LC–MS analysis showed buildup
of YTM-T (Figure 62), demonstrating YtkT is
necessary for YTM biosynthesis via C-methyltransferase activity. YtkT
is highly homologous to HemN, and reconstitution of the purified YtkT
along with reduction with dithionite displayed typical UV–vis
absorption features common among many other radical SAM enzymes. Activity
assays involving YTM-T, YtkT, SAM (as the methyl donor) under anaerobic
reducing conditions yielded YTM (Figure 62).
118
When compared to cyclopropane fatty acid synthase,
the mechanism for the YtkT-catalyzed reaction has been proposed to
proceed via the SN2 transfer of the methyl group of SAM
to the double bond of a cyclopropane ring followed by proton transfer
and ring closing.
118
Figure 62
YtkT reaction scheme
catalyzing the methylation of a yatakemycin
(YTM) intermediate prior to cyclopropane ring formation.
7.4
Radical SAM Methylthiotransferases
Posttranslational modifications, evident in all organisms, can
range
from simple functional group additions to complex multienzyme modifications.
Of the five naturally occurring methylthio modifications, one takes
place on the strictly conserved aspartic acid residue (Asp89) of ribosomal
protein S12, while the other four alter the adenosine base (A-37)
residing adjacent to the 3′-end of the anticodon in tRNA that
reads codons beginning with U (except the tRNAI,V Ser)
(Figure 63).
307
Both
modifications, either to the tRNA or to the ribosomal S12, could lead
to alteration of functions potentially important for carrying out
efficient and accurate ribosomal translation,
308
whereas prevention of such modifications in organisms such
as bacteria could lead to antibiotic resistance.
309
Figure 63
Methylthiolations of nucleic acid and protein residues.
Left: Methylthiolations
as catalyzed by MiaB (E. coli and T. maritima) and YmcB (B. subtilis) where the tRNA
adenosine base is modified from i6A (when
X = H) to ms2i6A (when X = SCH3).
Middle: Methylthiolations as catalyzed by YqeV (B.
subtilis) and CDKAL1 (mammalian tRNALys UUU) where the tRNA adenosine base is modified
from t6A (when Y = H) to ms2t6A (when Y = SCH3). Right: Methylthiolation as catalyzed
by RimO (E. coli ribosomal S12) where Asp89 (when Z = H) is
modified to β-methylthio Asp89 (when Z = SCH3).
7.4.1
Modification of tRNAPhe A-37
by MiaB
Modification of the adenosine site, A-37, to 2-methylthio-N-6-isopentenyl adenosine
(ms2i6A-37)
of tRNAPhe is known to be initialized by MiaA in E. coli, which catalyzes the transfer
of a dimethylallyl
group of to the N-6 nitrogen of adenosine to generate i6A-37.
310
The next step(s) of the modification
consists of sulfur insertion and methylation at position 2 of the
adenine moiety resulting in conversion of i6A-37 to ms2i6A-37 and requires the input
of SAM, iron, and
cysteine.
311
Transcriptional studies of
the mia operon identified the protein product MiaB
as possessing the common CX3CX2C Fe–S
cluster binding motif but lacking conserved SAM binding motifs; this
led to the conclusion that MiaB likely catalyzes the thiolation of
i6A-37 but not the methylation step, and therefore necessitated
a third enzyme to carry out the final methylation event.
312
Pierrel and co-workers successfully isolated
and characterized MiaB as the first known Fe–S cluster-containing
tRNA modifying enzyme. Reconstitution incorporated a single [4Fe–4S]
cluster into MiaB (Table 2), and replacement
of Cys with Ala of the CX3CX2C motif abolished
formation of the ms2i6A-37 product.
24b,126
Further work by Pierrel and co-workers aimed to answer two important
questions: does MiaB function as a radical SAM enzyme, and is MiaB
sufficient for modification of i6A to ms2i6A or is a third protein required? They
demonstrated the bifunctional
nature of MiaB, showing it carried out both the thiolation and the
methylation of i6A-37 using two molecules of SAM, one for
reductive cleavage to generate a dAdo• and the other
as a methyl donor. Assays with [3H]-methyl-SAM, reducing
agent, MiaB, and the i6A oligoribonucleotide led to incorporation
of the labeled methyl group into ms2i6A, as
well as formation of dAdoH.
127a
The next
question to be answered was the source of the sulfur for donation
to i6A. While it was determined that neither dithionite
nor SAM were the source of the sulfur, selenium reconstituted MiaB
produced Se-modified substrate, suggesting that sulfur added during
the process of reconstitution was the ultimate sulfur source. This
observation led to the hypothesis that a dAdo• abstracts
an H-atom directly from position 2 of the adenosine ring, thereby
preparing it for sulfur insertion to generate a s2i6A intermediate. Cleavage of the
second SAM molecule allows
for methylation of s2i6A to give the final product,
ms2i6A, and SAH.
127a
Removal of the radical SAM cluster by mutation of the CX3CX2C cysteines revealed the
presence of second
[4Fe–4S]
cluster coordinated by three N-terminal cysteines; this cluster had
UV–vis absorption, resonance Raman, and Mössbauer spectral
features similar to those of the radical SAM bound [4Fe–4S]
cluster (Table 2), yet with differing redox
and EPR signatures.
127b
X-band EPR of WT
versus mutant MiaB displays an additional feature at g = 5, suggesting weak interactions
between two paramagnetic clusters
that are separated by approximately 12–20 Å.
127b
As both clusters are required for one turnover
event of ms2i6A formation, it was suggested
that the N-terminal cluster, as seen with BioB and suggested with
LipA (sections 4.1.4, 4.2.4), possibly functions as the S-donor for the conversion
of
i6A to s2i6A.
127b
7.4.2
Methylthiolation of Ribosomal
Protein S12
Like MiaB, a highly homologous gene from E. coli, yliG, whose protein product
was later termed RimO
(for ribosomal modification), is capable of carrying out methylthio
posttranslational modifications. Unlike MiaB that modifies tRNA, however,
RimO acts on an amino acid, specifically Asp89 of the ribosomal protein
S12 from E. coli.
313
Incubation of the modified S12 with Raney nickel catalyst
demonstrated the added group to be a thioether (−SCH3) not a methylthiol (−CH2SH)
and further verified
the final product to be β-methylthio-aspartic acid, termed ms-Asp
or ms-D89.
313
Additional similarities of
RimO to MiaB include: (1) the need for two molecules of SAM to carry
out catalytic activity (one for generation of the dAdo• and one for methyl donation)
(Table 1), (2)
the presence of two [4Fe–4S] clusters, where one cluster acts
to reductively cleave one molecule of SAM and the second possibly
functions as the sulfur donor as implicated for MiaB, BioB, and LipA,
and (3) the dual role of carrying out both thiolation and methylation
of the target substrate.
138,139,313a,314
Sequence alignments of
MiaB and its homologues, as well as the Thermotoga
maritima RimO crystal structure, reveal three structural
domains in these enzymes: an N-term UPF0004 domain, a radical SAM
domain, and a C-terminal TRAM domain.
139,313a,315
In MiaB, the N-terminal domain contains three conserved
cysteines found to bind one [4Fe–4S] cluster. The central radical
SAM domain binds a second [4Fe–4S] cluster (Table 2).
127b
As observed with
the methyltransferase RumA, where the RNA substrate is bound by the
TRAM domain, it is reasonable to infer that the TRAM domain for MTTases
is also likely responsible for substrate binding and recognition.
315,316
Differences in the MiaB and RimO TRAM domains could help elucidate
specificity to tRNA or to ribosomal protein S12, respectively. For
MiaB, the mainly positively charged TRAM domain is poised to attract
negatively charged tRNA substrates, whereas in RimO, the negatively
charged TRAM domain makes it possible for interaction with the positively
charged S12 protein.
317
The recently
solved reconstituted TmRimO crystal
structure (Figure 64) provides the first evidence
for a potential source of the sulfur needed for the thiolation step
of catalysis.
318
While reconstitution of
the protein afforded two [4Fe–4S] clusters, it also led to
exogenously bound sulfide. In this structure, the TRAM domain binds
at the surface of the TIM barrel that contains the radical SAM domain
but lies at the opposite end of the barrel from the radical SAM cluster.
The UPF0004 domain binds at the opposite edge of the TRAM domain in
the barrel and in very close proximity to the radical SAM cluster.
The second cluster lies at the innermost point of the C-terminal region
near the interface of the UPF0004 domain and the radical SAM domain,
placing it at only 8 Å away from and bound to the radical SAM
cluster through a pentasulfide moiety. This structure demonstrates
an iron-accessible site of the second cluster capable of ligating
a sulfur moiety without creating steric hindrance for the binding
of SAM to the radical SAM cluster in a typical geometric fashion observed
with other radial SAMs.
40,240
It was also observed
that docking of the S12 substrate effectively closes off the active
site.
318
Figure 64
RimO crystal structure (PDB ID 4JC0). Left: N-terminal
UPF0004 domain colored
in light orange, radical SAM domain in light blue, C-terminal TRAM
domain in light pink, [4Fe–4S] clusters in yellow and rust
spheres, and SAM in green sticks. Right: Active site of RimO where
the [4Fe–4S] clusters (yellow and rust) and pentasulfide moiety
(yellow) are depicted in sticks. Cysteines (light blue carbons) involved
in ligating clusters are depicted in lines.
Additional studies investigating the function of the second
cluster
along with the relevance of exogenously bound sulfur in the RimO crystal
structure utilized HYSCORE and EPR of MiaB lacking the radical SAM
cluster binding motif. The ligands CH3S–, CH3Se–, or CH3
77Se– were found to coordinate the unique iron of
the second cluster of MiaB, and to be utilized as cosubstrates capable
of multiple turnovers for thiomethyl transfer to tRNA in activity
assays. These results were repeated for RimO, showing that S (or Se
in these studies) bound to the unique iron of the second cluster is
the target of SAM methylation.
318
Recently, Landgraf and co-workers have provided experimental evidence
for RimO and MiaB mechanisms wherein the SAM-methyl is first donated
to a persulfide-bound moiety of the auxiliary [4Fe–4S] cluster.
83
Feeding of unlabeled SAM to either RimO or MiaB,
in the absence of product and reductant, generated ∼1 equiv
of SAH; moreover, early doping of unlabeled SAM to either RimO or
MiaB followed by the addition of d
3-SAM,
product, and reductant into the assay mixture resulted in an initial
surge of unlabeled product prior to a slower formation of labeled
product.
83
These results indicate that
the initial step of SN2 methyl transfer from SAM to the
sulfane sulfur site at the auxiliary [4Fe–4S] cluster is rate-limiting
in comparison to the ensuing more rapid radical-dependent methylthio
transfer from cluster to substrate.
83
Interestingly,
the presence of a persulfide moiety also enables for multiple turnovers
per enzyme because when one sulfur is enlisted for methylthio transfer
to substrate, another sulfur is then present and ready for methylation
and subsequent relocation. A similar “ping pong” mechanism
is proposed for the MTases, Cfr and RlmN, where product methylation
proceeds first through donation of a methyl group from SAM onto an
intermediate labile acceptor prior to radical-initiated methyl transfer
to substrate (section 7.1.2).
These results
lead to a model distinct from other sulfur insertion
enzymes, in which MiaB and RimO do not cannibalize the second Fe–S
cluster for sulfur donation but instead bind a sulfur ligand to the
second cluster, allowing for the binding of SAM to the first cluster
and, therefore, repeated turnover via activation and donation of a
sulfur cosubstrate without degradation of secondary Fe–S cluster
(Figure 65).
318
It
remains to be determined how transfer of cluster-bound −SCH3 ligand takes place as
well as what differences exist between
RimO and MiaB to account for substrate attack at an sp3-hybridized carbon or an aromatic
carbon, respectively.
Figure 65
Proposed
RimO mechanism catalyzing the methylthiolation of Asp89
of the ribosomal S12 protein.
7.4.3
Classification of MTTases
The growing
family of MTTases has been subdivided into five clades using bioinformatics
analysis:
141
,
315
(1) the MiaB family and its homologues, found exclusively
in bacteria and eukaryotic organelles; (2) the RimO family, found
only in bacteria; (3) the MtaB family, found in eubacteria (named
for methylthio-threonylcarbamoyl-adenosine transferase B), includes
YqeV from B. subtillis; (4) the e-MtaB
family, found in archaea and eukarya (named for eukaryotic methylthio-threonylcarbamoyl-adenosine
B), includes CDKAL1; and (5) MTL1, found only in ε-proteobacateria
(named for methylthiotransferase-like family-1).
As MiaB has
been shown to carry out the i6A to ms2i6A modification, it is hypothesized that additional
members
of these clades exist that carry out the same or similar methylthio
modifications. One example of yet to be identified MTTases within
the MiaB clade are enzymes catalyzing an alternate modification at
A-37 of tRNA; it is known that E. coli YrdC (and the related yeast Sua5) act in the
initial base modification
from A-37 to t6A-37 in which a threonylcarbamoyl group
is added onto the nitrogen-N
6 of the adenosine
ring.
319
The second step of conversion
must therefore involve sulfur insertion and methylation of t6A into 2-methylthio-N
6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine
(ms2t6A), although the enzymes involved in methylthio
transfer remain to be elucidated. Moving on to enzymes within the
MtaB clade, protein products of both ymcB, an orthologue
of miaB, and yqeV, both from B. subtilis, effect transfer of a methylthiolate
moiety to modified i6A and t6A adenosine bases
of tRNA to generate ms2i6A and ms2t6A, respectively. Using chimeric proteins for YmcB/YqeV
followed by LC–MS analysis, they identified five conserved
cysteine residues within the radical SAM domain, separate from those
in the Fe–S cluster binding motif, which might be involved
in substrate specificity for either the i6 or the t6 modified bases.
320
Around
the same time of the published work by Anton et al. on members
of the MtaB family, results from Arragain and co-workers characterized
a member of the e-MtaB family, human CDKAL1, showing it capable of
converting t6A-37 into ms2t6A-37
in tRNA.
141
Mutational analysis of triple
Cys to Ala mutant of the radical SAM motif revealed that it lacked
the desired adenine modification, indicating that the Fe–S
cluster was necessary for methylthiotransferase activity. Upon reconstitution,
CDKAL1 appears to bind two [4Fe–4S] clusters with UV–vis
and EPR features characteristic of other radical SAM enzymes.
141
Using CDKAL1 pancreatic β-cell knockout
mice, Wei et al. demonstrated that CDKAL1 carries out its MTTase activity
on tRNALys (UUU) with no base modification present in the
knockout mice.
321
Structural studies of
the ms2i6A modified base in bacterial tRNAPhe show the methylthiol group functions
to stabilize codon–anticodon
interactions through cross-strand stacking with the base of the first
nucleotide of the mRNA codon; such interactions improve translational
fidelity by preventing frame shifting and misreading during translation.
322
While it was determined that CDKAL1 is required
for precise translation of AAA and AAG codons, mistranslation of one
of the two lysine codons present in the human insulin gene could be
responsible for improper synthesis and/or folding of proinsulin (i.e.,
immature insulin), therefore leading to onset of type 2 diabetes as
seen in mice.
321
Development of treatments
aiming to improve the quality of proinsulin may be of benefit to humans
carrying CDKAL1 that is not fully functional.
323
8
Dehydrogenation Reactions
by Radical SAM Enzymes
Radical SAM chemistry serves as a
powerful anaerobic means to catalyze
oxidation of different substrates. Radical SAM dehydrogenases are
a growing class of enzymes that utilize reductive SAM cleavage to
initiate two electron oxidations of organic substrates. Two types
of radical SAM-dependent dehydrogenation reactions have been studied
to date, and despite the different cellular processes in which the
enzymes themselves are involved, the dehydrogenation reactions of
the substrates are likely mechanistically similar. The following section
details the biochemical characterization of members from these two
classes of dehydrogenases, wherein the first type invokes the oxidation
of a protein bound cysteine or serine residue to an aldehyde, while
the second involves the oxidation of a secondary alcohol to a ketone.
8.1
Formylglycine Generation during Sulfatase
Maturation: The anSMEs
Arylsulfatases utilize a protein-derived
formylglycine (FGly) as a cofactor in the cleavage of sulfate monoesters
from a variety of substrates like sulfated polysaccharides, sulfolipids,
and steroid sulfates.
324
Two classes of
sulfatase enzymes exist, and while both utilize FGly generating enzymes
(FGEs) to form FGly, the first class carries out the oxidation reaction
of a cysteine residue on the target sulfatase with O2,
whereas the second class catalyzes the anaerobic oxidation reactions
of either cysteine or serine residues using radical SAM chemistry,
and these enzymes are referred to as anaerobic sulfatase maturating
enzymes (anSMEs).
325
8.1.1
AnSMEs
as Radical SAM Enzymes
AtsA
is an arylsulfatase in K. pneumonia that is activated by the anSME AtsB, which catalyzes
formylglycine
generation from a conserved serine residue.
326
AtsB was identified as an iron–sulfur protein with three
conserved cysteine motifs,
326b
and was
predicted to belong to the radical SAM superfamily.
1
AtsB from Klebsiella pneumonia (anSMEkp) was subsequently shown to require SAM for
its activity
and to be inhibited by metal chelators.
327
An anSME from C. perfringens, anSMEcpe
was the subject of a study that provided the first demonstration of
in vitro maturation, with a conserved cysteine residue on the sulfatase
as the substrate.
135a
This study also showed
that this anSME catalyzed the reductive cleavage of SAM generating
dAdoH.
135a
8.1.2
The
Fe–S Clusters and Enzymatic Activities
of AnSMEs
The first detailed characterization of the iron–sulfur
clusters of an anSME was published in 2008.
79
In this study, Grove et al. demonstrated that by coexpressing AtsB
(from K. pneumonia) with the iron–sulfur
cluster assembly machinery encoded by the isc operon,
they could produce a soluble AtsB that bound 8.7 ± 0.4 Fe and
12.2 ± 2.6 sulfides in the as-isolated state, with most of the
iron present in [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters as determined
by Mössbauer spectroscopy (Table 2).
79
Reconstitution with iron and sulfide yielded
protein with 12.3 ± 0.2 Fe and 9.9 ± 0.4 sulfides per protein,
with essentially all of the iron located in [4Fe–4S] clusters.
This provided confirmation of the earlier inferences based on the
presence of three cysteine motifs that AtsB bound three [4Fe–4S]
clusters. When the cysteine residues of the radical SAM motif were
changed to alanines by site-directed mutagenesis, the protein was
found to bind approximately eight irons and sulfides, consistent with
the presence of two remaining [4Fe–4S] clusters. Kinetic studies
demonstrated multiple turnovers of a peptide substrate (Table 1), with production
of a 1:1 ratio of formylglycine
to dAdoH, thereby indicating that SAM is consumed as a substrate in
the reaction. They also demonstrated that AtsB, previously considered
to be a “Ser-type” sulfatase maturation enzyme that
oxidizes a serine residue on the substrate sulfatase, could also oxidize
a cysteine residue in the substrate peptide, and with 4-fold greater
activity.
Around the same time, another study published by Benjdia
et al. arrived at the same conclusion: the anSMEs were dual substrate
enzymes that could act on either cysteine or serine residues in their
substrate proteins.
135b
Benjdia et al.
purified and characterized both a Cys-type anSME (from C. perfringens, referred to
as anSMEcpe), which matures
Cys-type sulfatases in vivo, and a Ser-type anSME from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicrometer,
which catalyzes
the maturation of only Ser-type sulfatases in vivo. The purified reconstituted
enzymes from both organisms were characterized using UV–vis
spectroscopy, and anSMEcpe was further studied using EPR and resonance
Raman spectroscopies. The results provide evidence for primarily [4Fe–4S]2+/+ cluster
content bound to the radical SAM motif in these
enzymes (Table 2). No conclusive evidence
was obtained at the time for cluster binding to the other two cysteine
motifs in these proteins,
135b
although
a subsequent study confirmed the presence of two additional [4Fe–4S]
clusters.
136
Interestingly, Benjdia and
co-workers found that peptide substrates corresponding to their target
sulfatase in vivo could contain either cysteine or serine at the target
residue position, and still function as substrates for formylglycine
generation.
8.1.3
Mechanistic Studies of
AnSMEs
Initially
it was presumed that the mechanism of the anSMEs would involve coordination
of the substrate cysteine or serine residue to one of the auxiliary
iron–sulfur clusters, followed by an H-atom abstraction on
the substrate’s β-C to generate a substrate radical.
79
Electrons transfer from the bound substrate
radical to the [4Fe–4S]2+ to which it is bound,
accompanied by radical combination to generate a C=O double
bond, or a C=S double bond that hydrolyzes to C=O, yielding
formylglycine (Figure 66).
79
Importantly, MS analysis of assay mixtures consisting of
a deuterated 17-mer peptide that comprised the sulfatase consensus
motif and the [β,β-2H] cysteine residue at
the target position showed production of a new peptide with a mass
loss of 19 Da, consistent with oxidation of the cysteinyl residue
to FGly.
80a
Moreover, an apparent KIE of
5.6 suggested that Cβ–H/D bond cleavage serves as a rate-determining
step in the reaction. HPLC coupled to MS and NMR analysis also demonstrated
that substrate derived deuterium was incorporated into 20–30%
of the dAdoH produced, confirming that the 5′-deoxyadenosyl
radical abstracted the β-C H-atom during the oxidation of cysteine
to FGly.
80a
Importantly, assays performed
with threonyl and allo-threonyl containing peptides
located at the target position respectively show ketone product formation
with varying efficiency, suggesting that the 5′-deoxyadenosyl
radical stereospecifically abstracts the pro-S H-atom
from the cysteine substrate.
80b
Figure 66
Mechanism
of formylglycine generation for cysteine (anSMEcpe) and
serine type (AtsB/anSMEkp) sulfatase maturating enzymes. The order
of H-atom abstraction and proton abstraction events has not yet been
established.
The role of the auxiliary
clusters during catalysis has been somewhat
a matter of debate. Evidence in support of their role in binding substrate
is lacking, and in fact recent site-directed mutagenesis experiments
have shown that individual substitutions of the conserved cysteine
residues in AtsB typically result in expression of insoluble proteins,
implicating these cysteines in coordination of accessory Fe–S
clusters that play a role in stabilizing the protein architecture.
80b
Berteau and co-workers demonstrated that the
two auxiliary [4Fe–4S] clusters were both necessary to obtain
efficient cleavage of SAM, suggesting that the accessory clusters
may be involved in shuttling electrons to and/or from the radical
SAM active site during catalysis.
136
By
monitoring flavodoxin semiquinone levels during anSMEcpe turnover,
Grove and co-workers have now shown that the electron generated from
substrate oxidation is ultimately transferred back to oxidized flavodoxin,
and the authors indicate that this probably occurs via the movement
of the electron through the auxiliary [4Fe–4S] clusters.
80b
This observation opens the possibility for
the enzyme to recycle electrons over multiple catalytic events, assuming
the external electron acceptor species (like flavodoxin) can in turn
then rereduce the radical SAM [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster.
Along these lines, recent X-ray crystallographic results of the anSMEcpe
protein (which are detailed below) have unequivocally demonstrated
that the accessory clusters are not involved in substrate coordination
and appear to confirm the role of these clusters in acting as conduits
for inter- and intramolecular electron flow.
8.1.4
Structure
of anSME and Clarification of
the Role of the Auxiliary Clusters
Structures of anSMEcpe
with SAM bound with and without peptide substrate show the (βα)6 partial TIM barrel
with an N-terminal radical SAM [4Fe–4S]
cluster coordinated by SAM in the same configuration commonly observed
(Figure 67).
328
Importantly,
each structure shows two C-terminal [4Fe–4S] clusters fully
ligated by protein derived cysteine residues. The distance from the
SAM cluster to the auxiliary cluster is 16.9 Å while the distance
to the auxiliary II cluster is 26.7 Å away; the two auxiliary
clusters are bound at a distance of 12.9 Å from one another.
The structures with two separate peptide substrates bound reveal that
the Cβ target cysteine residue is positioned at a distance of
4.1 Å from the 5′-carbon of SAM, thus nicely orienting
the pro-S H-atom for abstraction. Importantly, the
target cysteine residues of the peptides do not ligate either auxiliary
cluster, and, when bound, the cysteine to be modified is located 8.9
Å from the radical SAM cluster, 8.6 Å from cluster I, and
20.8 Å from cluster II. Given the available biochemical data
summarized above and the distances observed in the peptide bound structures,
the authors suggest that auxiliary cluster I is the immediate electron
acceptor accompanying oxidation of the cysteinyl radical to FGly,
with auxiliary cluster II serving as a redox center for the subsequent
oxidation of cluster I (Figure 66). The general
base responsible for deprotonation of the cysteine side chain during
catalysis was assigned to Asp277, and activity assays performed with
an D277N mutant retained ≤1% of the ability to generate FGly.
328
Figure 67
anSME crystal structure (PDB ID 4K39). Left: N-terminal/radical
SAM domain
colored in light blue, SPASM domain in light pink, remaining two α-helices
in light green, [4Fe–4S] clusters in yellow and rust spheres,
SAM in green, and peptide in gray sticks. Right: Active site of anSME
where the [4Fe–4S] clusters (yellow and rust), SAM (green carbons),
and peptide (gray carbons) depicted in sticks with oxygens colored
red and nitrogens colored blue. D277 (magenta carbons, depicted in
sticks) has been identified as the catalytic base (see Figure 66). Cysteines (light
blue carbons) involved in ligating
clusters are depicted in lines.
The anSME active site is buried in a cleft created by the
radical
SAM and the C-terminal SPASM domains requiring the target peptide
to adopt a tight turn upon binding. Similar to the PFL-AE Gly-peptide
structure, the substrate analogue bound anSME structure shows that
this system also relies on activase derived backbone hydrogen-bonding
interactions to bind and stabilize the peptide substrate, which potentially
may act as a generic binding mode for radical SAM enzymes that act
on other proteins as their substrates (section 3.1 and Figure 18). The anSME structure
is the first for an enzyme harboring the SPASM domain, which is representative
of a subfamily of radical SAM comprising ∼1400 members each
containing a 7-cysteine motif (CX9–15GX4C-gap-CX2CX5CX3C-gap-C), which coordinates
additional Fe–S clusters in these enzymes.
328
The first part of the SPASM domain containing two cysteines
has been previously visualized in the MoaA structure (MoaA lacks a
full SPASM domain as its sequence terminates shortly after the two
cysteine residues, thus providing a site for substrate binding to
the auxiliary cluster) (section 6.1).
240,242
Goldman and co-workers note that these two cysteines flank a beta
hairpin region (referred to as a twitch subdomain) that extends the
β sheet of the radical SAM core domain and in both enzymes is
associated with Fe–S cluster coordination; the auxiliary cluster
I in anSME superimposes over the position of the accessory cluster
in MoaA.
328
Intriguingly, additional parallels
to non-SPASM harboring radical SAM enzymes certainly appear to exist
as the twitch subdomain shares high sequence homology with the BtrN
dehydrogenase enzyme (see below).
328
BtrN
binds a single accessory [4Fe–4S] cluster, and the link between
anSME and MoaA suggests that the SPASM/twitch subfamily may be a structural
motif utilized more generally by approximately 16% of uncharacterized
radical SAM enzymes that coordinate auxiliary Fe–S clusters.
328
8.2
Dehydrogenation in Antibiotic
Synthesis: BtrN
and the Synthesis of Butirosin
The gene cluster encoding
for the biosynthesis of butirosin, a 2-deoxystreptamine containing
aminoglycoside antibiotic, includes an open reading frame encoding
the protein, BtrN, containing the canonical radical SAM cysteine motif
(CX3CX2C). Eguchi and co-workers demonstrated
that BtrN catalyzes the oxidation of the secondary alcohol 2-deoxy-scyllo-inosamine
(DOIA) to the ketone 3-amino-2,3-dideoxy-scyllo-inosose (amino-DOI) under anaerobic
conditions in
a SAM-dependent reaction, with one SAM cleaved producing one dAdoH
and one methionine per DOIA oxidized (Figure 68).
76a
Assays carried out with [3-2H]-DOIA result in the production of a mixture of unlabeled,
monodeuterated, and dideuterated dAdoH, demonstrating that the dehydrogenation
reaction is initiated by abstraction of an H-atom from the C3 position
of DOIA.
76a
The observation of multiply
deuterated dAdoH further indicates that the H-atom abstraction step
is reversible and can occur multiple times prior to reaction with
substrate.
76a
EPR spectroscopic studies
carried out at 50 K under steady-state turnover conditions using either
unlabeled DOIA or [2,2-2H2]-DOIA have provided
evidence for a radical intermediate at C3 of DOIA.
76b
When EPR measurements were carried out at 10 K during steady-state
turnover, multiple [4Fe–4S] species were observed, and by comparison
to samples of enzyme with and without SAM, two of these species were
assigned as the unbound (g = 1.92, 2.04) and bound
(g = 1.83, 1.99) forms of the [4Fe–4S]+ state of the enzyme (Table 2).
76b
The third EPR-active species (g = 1.87, 1.96, 2.05) was assigned as the BtrN/SAM/DOIA
ternary complex
by comparison to the EPR spectra of enzyme–substrate and enzyme–product
complexes (Table 2).
76b
Figure 68
The dehydrogenation reaction catalyzed by BtrN during butirosin
biosynthesis. The order of H-atom abstraction and proton abstraction
events has not yet been definitively established, and along these
lines it has only recently been suggested that formation of the α-hydroxyalkyl
radical by H-atom abstraction may activate the C3-hydroxyl functional
group by decreasing its pK
a. Goldman et
al. have identified the putative base involved in catalysis as being
Arg152.
328
Through mutagenesis studies, BtrN was subsequently shown
to contain
not one, but two [4Fe–4S] clusters after reconstitution.
137
Upon generation of a BtrN variant in which
the three cysteines of the radical SAM motif were changed to alanine
residues, the enzyme only bound a single [4Fe–4S] cluster based
on quantitative elemental analyses and Mössbauer characterization
(Table 2).
137
Outside
of the radical SAM cysteine motif in BtrN, there are five additional
cysteine residues. Generation of variants in which each of these cysteinyl
residues are changed to alanines revealed that while variant C69A
behaved like wild-type protein, the C235A variant produced less soluble
protein with bound Fe–S clusters but displayed turnover activity
≤10% of wild type; the remaining mutations at positions Cys169,
Cys187, and Cys232 yielded insoluble proteins.
137
These results suggest that these residues serve as ligands
to the second [4Fe–4S] cluster, which was initially thought
to be site differentiated and coordinate substrate at its unique iron
site.
137
Coordination of the C3 hydroxyl
of DOIA would facilitate deprotonation of this group, as well as H-atom
abstraction by the dAdo•. Electron transfer from
the resulting substrate radical to the coordinated [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster could occur
via an inner-sphere mechanism yielding
the oxidized product. This electron added to the auxiliary [4Fe–4S]
cluster could then be transferred back to the radical SAM cluster,
regenerating the enzyme for catalysis. Interestingly, Grove et al.
observed an axial EPR signal (g = 1.83, 1.99) during
enzyme turnover similar to that reported by Yokoyama; while Yokoyama
assigned this to the BtrN–SAM complex, Grove et al. ultimately
assigned this signal to the reduced auxiliary cluster as the signal
is unlike that of any radical SAM protein (Table 2).
76b,137
This auxiliary cluster could
not be reduced by chemical means, likely due to its exceptionally
low redox potential or inaccessibility to reducing agents, results
that future work will hopefully clarify.
137
Several aspects of the mechanism and role of the auxiliary
cluster
in BtrN have been clarified by the recent determination of the X-ray
structure of this enzyme in substrate free and bound states (Figure 69).
328
First, the structures
reveal that the auxiliary cluster is fully protein ligated both in
the presence and in the absence of DOIA, clearly ruling out that the
possibility that the cluster coordinates substrate and is involved
in its deprotonation; the DOIA substrate is instead bound in a hydrophilic
pocket located between the radical SAM and auxiliary FeS clusters.
Moreover, the BtrN structure reveals that the enzyme is designed to
avoid a DesII-like elimination reaction (section 10.3), given the existence of hydrogen-bonding
interactions with
the functional group of substrate and the observation that DOIA binds
in an equatorial chair conformation. These observations coupled with
those made by Grove et al.
80b
suggest that
the auxiliary cluster in BtrN functions as an electron acceptor during
the dehydrogenation reaction, possibly driving the oxidation of the
intermediate radical species. While the order of H-atom abstraction
and proton abstraction events are not yet resolved (Figure 68), it has only recently
been suggested that formation
of the α-hydroxyalkyl radical by H-atom abstraction may activate
the C3-hydroxyl functional group by decreasing its pK
a.
328
Furthermore, Goldman
et al. have identified the putative base involved in catalysis as
being Arg152, although experimental confirmation of this is still
needed.
328
Figure 69
BtrN crystal structure
(PDB ID 4M7T). Left: Radical SAM domain colored in
light blue, C-terminal domain in light pink, linker regions in light
green, [4Fe–4S] clusters in yellow and rust spheres, SAM in
green, and DOIA in gray sticks. Right: Active site of BtrN where the
[4Fe–4S] clusters (yellow and rust), SAM (green carbons), and
DOIA (gray carbons) depicted in sticks with oxygens colored red and
nitrogens colored blue. Cysteines (light blue carbons) involved in
ligating clusters are depicted in lines.
9
Formation of New C–C, C–N, and
C–S Bonds
9.1
The Synthesis of Pyrroloquinoline
Quinone:
PqqE
Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) is a prokaryotic cofactor
derived from the post-translational modification of and then excision
from a peptide. The biosynthesis of PQQ requires the pqq operon, which encodes six
gene products designated PqqA-F.
237,329
PqqA is a 23-residue peptide that is thought to be the substrate
for PQQ biosynthesis.
329b
A key step in
the biosynthesis of PQQ involves the fusion of glutamate and tyrosine,
which are strictly conserved in PqqA, to form the intermediate AHQQ
(3a-(2-amino-2-carboxyethyl)-4,5-dioxo-4,5,6,7,8,9-hexahydroquinoline-7,9-dicarboxylic
acid) (Figure 70);
330
in vivo experiments indicate both PqqA and PqqE are required for
this initial biosynthetic step,
329b
although
the details remain elusive. AHQQ is subsequently converted to PQQ
in an 8-electron oxidation and cyclization catalyzed by PqqC.
331
The functions of PqqD, PqqB, and PqqF have
not been experimentally determined, although the latter two are thought
to function as proteases based on sequence alignments.
Figure 70
Involvement
of radical SAM enzyme PqqE in pyrroloquinoline quinone
(PQQ) biosynthesis. PqqE is proposed to be involved in the condensation
of peptide residues Glu and Tyr, but its specific substrate is unknown.
PqqE contains the canonical radical
SAM cysteine motif CX3CX2C in its N-terminal
region as well as a second C-terminal
cysteine motif.
332
When PqqE from Klebsiella pneumonia was heterologously overexpressed
in E. coli and purified under strictly
anaerobic conditions, it was found to be a dark red-brown protein
with 10.4 ± 0.9 Fe and 7.0 ± 1.0 inorganic sulfide per protein.
140a
The UV–vis spectrum showed features
at 390, 420, and 550 nm, and EPR spectroscopy revealed a small isotropic
signal at g = 2.01 attributed to a [3Fe–4S]+ cluster accounting for 0.01 spin/protein
(Table 2). Reduction of this purified protein with dithionite
results in bleaching of the visible absorption features and appearance
of a rhombic EPR signal with g = 2.06, 1.96, and
1.91 attributed to a [4Fe–4S]+ cluster (0.17 spin/protein)
(Table 2).
140a
Addition
of SAM results in modest changes in the EPR spectral features. PqqE
has also been shown to cleave SAM in the presence of the reducing
agent dithionite with multiple turnovers observed in the presence
of excess reductant. This reductive cleavage of SAM appears to be
an uncoupled reaction, because no substrate was provided and there
was no evidence for PqqE itself serving as the substrate. Interestingly,
when the PqqE-catalyzed reductive cleavage of SAM is carried out in
D2O, deuterium is found to be incorporated into the product
dAdoH, indicating that the dAdo• intermediate abstracts
a H-atom from an exchangeable site, or is reduced and then abstracts
a proton from an exchangeable site. When assays of PqqE were carried
out in the presence of the putative substrate PqqA, however, no modification
of the PqqA peptide was observed. It was postulated that perhaps one
of the other gene products of the pqq operon was
required, in addition to PqqE, to catalyze the initial reaction in
PQQ biosynthesis.
140a
A possible link between
PqqE and PqqD was suggested by BLAST searching that revealed a number
of putative radical SAM proteins with a fused PqqD domain, including
AlbA (section 9.3.1).
140b
Hydrogen/deuterium exchange experiments provided evidence
for interaction between PqqE and PqqD, as the presence of PqqE provided
partial protection of PqqD to H/D exchange.
140b
Further, the addition of PqqD to reduced PqqE significantly altered
the EPR spectral features associated with the [4Fe–4S]+ cluster of the latter. Additional
evidence for interaction
of the two proteins was provided by far-UV CD data. PqqE and PqqD
therefore appear to interact; however, even with both proteins present,
no modifications in PqqA were observed under conditions where SAM
is reductively cleaved.
140b
It may be that
PqqA requires initial modification, for example, hydroxylation of
the conserved tyrosine, prior to the radical SAM reaction catalyzed
by PqqE.
140b
9.2
Modification
of tRNA at G37 To Generate Wybutosine:
TYW1
Another radical SAM involved in the post-translational
modification of nucleosides is one that acts in the complex tricyclic
base modification of a guanosine at position 37 in tRNA. Generation
of the modified residue to wybutosine (yW) is potentially important
in stabilizing codon–anticodon interactions through base-stacking,
as well as in reinforcing the reading frame. To determine the genes
responsible for yW biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ribonucleome analysis
was employed and resulted in the identification
of four new genes, tyw1–4, as those involved
in the multistep modification pathway.
333
Sequence alignments of various TYW1 homologues established the presence
of the Fe–S cluster-binding CX3CX2C motif
as well as the SAM-coordinating GGE motif; mutation of any one of
the cysteines or the glutamate completely abolished yW synthesis.
333
It was shown that a Δtyw1 strain accumulated N-methylguanosine (m1G), which is the
product of the first step of the modification of
guanosine known to be catalyzed by TRM5; this therefore indicated
that TYW1 was responsible for the second step of the reaction, condensation
of m1G with an unknown 2-carbon fragment to form 4-demethylwyosine
(imG-14) (Figure 71).
334
Figure 71
The biosynthesis of yW. G at position 37 is transformed to imG-14
through the actions of TRM5 and TYW1, which is subsequently converted
to yW through the actions of TYW2, TYW3, and TYW4.
The second substrate required for conversion of
m1G
to imG-14 was identified by Young and Bandarian, who assayed TYW1
under anaerobic reducing conditions in the presence of SAM, tRNAPhe, and TRM5 (to
convert G to m1G), along with
each one of four potential carbon donors: acetyl-CoA, acetyl phosphate,
phosphoenolpyruvate, and pyruvate.
335
Only
pyruvate led to successful conversion from m1G to imG-14.
Further, assays carried out with [1-13C]-, [2-13C]-, and [3-13C]-pyruvate revealed
that both C2 and C3
of pyruvate are incorporated into the tricyclic ring of yW.
In addition to the radical SAM cluster bound to the CX3CX2C motif, TYW1 binds a second
[4Fe–4S] cluster,
and thus falls into a subgroup of radical SAM enzymes (including BioB,
LipA, MoaA, and MiaB) that bind a second iron–sulfur cluster
(sections 4.1, 4.2, 6.1, and 7.4.1).
142
The second cluster in TYW1, however, is bound
to a CX12CX12C motif in the N-terminal region
of the protein in a domain that is not homologous to the region binding
the second cluster in these other proteins.
142
UV–visible, EPR, and Mössbauer spectroscopic studies
have been carried out on the reconstituted enzyme from Pyrococcus abyssi, showing
that in the as-reconstituted
state it binds primarily [4Fe–4S]2+ clusters (Table 2), with a total of two [4Fe–4S]
clusters
per protein.
142
While addition of SAM did
not perturb the spectroscopic features, addition of pyruvate was found
to introduce a shoulder in the Mössbauer spectrum at high velocity,
indicative of an iron becoming more ferrous in nature presumably due
to pyruvate coordination to a unique site.
142
Reduction of the protein produces a complex EPR spectrum that is
interpreted as resulting from the superposition of two [4Fe–4S]+
S = 1/2 signals (Table 2). Addition of SAM significantly perturbs one cluster signal
while leaving the other essentially unchanged, consistent with coordination
of SAM to one cluster. HYSCORE data for this reduced enzyme–SAM
complex provide evidence for nitrogen coordination to the cluster.
Interestingly, addition of pyruvate to the reduced enzyme–SAM
complex leaves the SAM-cluster signal unchanged but causes the second
cluster signal to disappear; the loss of the second cluster EPR signal
was shown, using Mössbauer spectroscopy, to be a result of
cluster oxidation to the [4Fe–4S]+ state.
142
The crystal structure of TYW1 in its
apo-state (Figure 72) was solved several years
before the spectroscopic
characterization of the clusters just described. As with other radical
SAM enzymes, it adopts a partial (βα)6 TIM
barrel; although no clusters could be resolved in the solved structure,
the presence of two sets of three cysteine residues suggested the
possibility of two iron–sulfur cluster binding sites. The radical
SAM cluster site is within the partial TIM barrel and to one side
of a positively charged cleft.
336
The second
cluster binding site is located opposite the cleft from the radical
SAM cluster binding site and near the putative tRNA substrate binding
site. A conserved Lys41 known to be required for in vivo activity
was found to lie next to the second Fe–S cluster binding site.
336
Figure 72
phTYW1 crystal structure (PDB ID 2YX0). N-terminal domain
colored in wheat,
radical SAM domain in light blue, and C-term domain in light pink.
Two different mechanistic proposals
for TYW1 catalysis have been
put forth recently, and these are summarized nicely in a recent review.
337
One of these mechanistic proposals, illustrated
in Figure 73, involves covalent catalysis whereby
pyruvate forms a Schiff base with Lys41. Radical SAM-based H-atom
abstraction from m1G generates a substrate radical that
then reacts with pyruvate. The second cluster is proposed to play
a redox role, donating or accepting an electron to/from pyruvate to
form formate or CO2, respectively. Subsequent transimination
and deprotonation generates imG-14.
Figure 73
Proposed mechanism for the conversion
of N-methylguanosine
(m1G) to 4-demethylwyosine (img-14) catalyzed by TYW1.
9.3
Catalysis
of Thioether Cross-Link Formation
in Antimicrobial Peptides
A growing number of ribosomally
synthesized antimicrobials containing post-translational modifications
involving a Cys-to-α-C thioether linkage are being discovered,
collectively known as sactipeptides.
338
In several known cases, biosynthesis of these sactipeptides requires
a radical SAM enzyme, as described in the following sections.
9.3.1
AlbA and the Synthesis of Subtilosin A
Subtilosin A
is a ribosomally synthesized natural product produced
by B. subtilis with demonstrated antimicrobial
and spermicidal activity.
339
It is a head-to-tail
cyclized 35-residue peptide with three thioether bonds linking three
cysteine residues to the α-carbons of two phenylalanines and
one threonine (Figure 74).
340
These sulfur to α-carbon linkages have so far been
found in four other bacterial natural products.
338
Biosynthesis of subtilosin A requires the sbo-alb operon, with sboA and sboX encoding
precursor peptides and albA-G encoding proteins required
for processing and export of, as well as immunity to, subtilosin A.
341
AlbA and AlbF have been implicated in the cyclization
and cross-linking of the peptide precursor.
341b
AlbA contains the canonical CX3CX2C motif
of the radical SAM enzymes, and recent biochemical and spectroscopic
characterization confirms that is a member of this diverse superfamily.
86
Purified AlbA reconstituted with iron and sulfide
contains 7.6 ± 0.3 Fe and 7.7 ± 0.4 sulfide per protein,
and exhibits UV–vis spectroscopic features characteristic of
an iron–sulfur protein. The EPR spectrum of the as-reconstituted
enzyme is nearly featureless; however, upon reduction with dithionite
an EPR signal (g = 2.03, 1.92) appears that is characteristic
of a [4Fe–4S]+ cluster (Table 2).
86
Mutation of the cysteines
of the CX3CX2C motif to alanines resulted in
protein that contained less iron (∼5 per protein) but still
had characteristic UV–vis and EPR spectroscopic features of
[4Fe–4S] clusters, supporting the hypothesis that AlbA binds
a second [4Fe–4S] cluster in addition to the radical SAM cluster.
AlbA was also found to catalyze the reductive cleavage of SAM to produce
dAdoH and methionine; however, this activity was abolished in the
triple Cys to Ala variant of the radical SAM cysteine motif. AlbA
was shown to catalyze the maturation of subtilosin A from the precursor
peptide in vitro, and the second iron–sulfur cluster was found
to be required for formation of all three thiether linkages.
86
A proposed mechanism for AlbA is shown in Figure 75.
Figure 74
Solution NMR structure of Subtilosin A (PDB ID 1PXQ).
Figure 75
Proposed hydrogen atom abstraction mechanism in thioether
bond
formation observed for radical SAM enzymes AlbA and SkfB.
9.3.2
Biosynthesis of Thuricin
CD
Thuricin
CD is a two-component bacteriocin active against C.
difficile recently isolated from human fecal matter.
342
Thuricin CD, like subtilosin A, contains three
thioether cross-links between cysteine residues and the α-carbons
of the modified amino acids, which are two threonines and a serine
in Trnα and one tyrosine, one alanine, and one threonine in
Trnβ (Figure 76).
342,343
Sequencing of the thuricin CD operon revealed that
two gene products, TrnC and TrnD, belong to the radical SAM protein
superfamily.
342
Genome mining based on
the TrnC and TrnD radical SAM proteins has revealed 15 additional
thuricin CD-like gene clusters in a variety of environments.
344
Figure 76
Thuricin CD, like subtilosin A, contains three
thioether cross-links
between cysteine residues and the α-carbons of the modified
amino acids, which are two threonines and a serine in Trnα and
one tyrosine, one alanine, and one threonine in Trnβ.
9.3.3
Biosynthesis
of Thurincin H
Thurincin
H is a bacteriocin produced by Bacillus thuringiensis SF361 that is derived from a
31 amino acid peptide. Thurincin H
has recently been shown to contain four cysteine-to-α-carbon
thioether cross-links, with each cross-link appearing to have the d configuration
at the α-carbon.
345
The operon for thurincin H production includes 10 open-reading frames,
three of which are tandem repeats of the gene encoding the precursor
peptide.
346
One of the seven remaining
open-reading frames, designated ThnB, has sequence characteristics
of the radical SAM superfamily.
346
Although
ThnB has not yet been biochemically characterized, the similarity
between its putative reaction and those catalyzed by TrnC, TrnD, SkfB,
and AlbA suggests that its properties will be similar to these enzymes.
345
9.3.4
SkfB and the Maturation
of Sporulation Killing
Factor
Sporulation killing factor (SKF, Figure 77),
347
like subtilosin
A and thuricin CD, is a head-to-tail cyclic peptide.
348
SKF contains a single thioether cross-link between a cysteine
residue and the α-carbon of a methionine residue.
348
The skf operon includes four
genes required for generation of SKF; these include skfA, encoding the 55 residue
precursor peptide, and skfB, with sequence features of a radical SAM enzyme.
347
Two additional genes in the operon are required for export
and immunity, while a seventh gene is of unknown function.
347
Purified SkfB can be reconstituted with iron
and sulfide to yield a protein containing 8.29 ± 0.07 Fe and
8.36 ± 0.14 S per protein, and UV–vis and EPR spectroscopic
data are consistent with the presence of at least one [4Fe–4S]
cluster (Table 2).
143
When the cysteines in the CX3CX2C radical
SAM motif are changed to alanines by site-directed mutagenesis, the
reconstituted enzyme contains 4.5 ± 0.2 Fe per protein and has
UV–vis and EPR spectral features that are consistent with the
presence of a [4Fe–4S] cluster.
143
Thus, the wild-type SkfB appears to have two [4Fe–4S] clusters.
The reconstituted enzyme is capable of catalyzing the reductive cleavage
of SAM under reducing conditions.
143
Further,
HPLC–MS analysis was used to demonstrate that SkfB catalyzes
the formation of a single thioether bond in the precursor peptide
SkfA.
143
A C4S substitution in SkfA abolished
cross-link formation, indicating that SkfB was not capable of ether
bond formation. Further, switching the position of the cysteine and
the methionine involved in the cross-link also abolished thioether
bond formation, demonstrating specificity of SkfB for the directionality
of the thioether linkage. Interestingly, the methionine involved in
the thioether linkage could be changed to a number of hydrophobic
or aromatic amino acids while retaining full ability to form the thioether
linkage, while replacing the methionine with hydrophilic amino acids
reduced or eliminated thioether bond formation; these results suggest
the presence of a hydrophobic pocket at the acceptor site of thioether
bond formation that is critical for catalysis.
143
An SkfB variant in which the cysteines of the second cluster
were changed to alanines was able to bind a [4Fe–4S] cluster
(Table 2) and to reductively cleave SAM; however,
the ability to catalyze thioether bond formation was abolished, demonstrating
the importance of the second [4Fe–4S] cluster in the enzymatic
mechanism.
143
A mechanism for SkfB that
is similar to that for AlbA has been proposed (Figure 75).
Figure 77
Structure of sporulation killing factor (SKF). The thioether
bond
is highlighted in blue, while the cysteine disulfide bond is highlighted
in red.
10
Using
Radical SAM Chemistry To Cleave C–X
(X = C, N, P) Bonds
10.1
Cleavage of the α–β
Bond
of Amino Acids: ThiH
Thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP) biosynthesis
follows distinct pathways in anaerobic and aerobic organisms, given
the presence of ThiH in anaerobes and ThiO in aerobes. However, these
two pathways converge in the synthesis of the common intermediate
dehydroglycine (DHG), which in anaerobes is formed via tyrosine cleavage
and in aerobes is formed through the oxidation of glycine (Figure 40 and section 6.2).
284b,349
Following its production, dehydroglycine is ultimately incorporated
into 4-methyl-5-(β-hydroxyethyl)-thiazole phosphate carboxylate
on the pathway to formation of thiamine pyrophosphate in a multistep
process involving ThiG, ThiF, ThiI, IscS, and 1-deoxyxyulose-5-phosphate.
255a
Early genetic studies revealed a connection
between thiamine synthesis and Fe–S cluster metabolism in Salmonella enterica and
suggested a role for ThiH
in this process.
350
It was soon discovered
that ThiH likely belonged to the radical SAM superfamily, and subsequent
mutational analysis of Salmonella enterica
thiH demonstrated the conserved site-differentiated
[4Fe–4S] cluster and SAM binding motifs were required for the
in vivo function of the enzyme.
1,351
Initial characterization
of ThiH showed that it purified with nearly 1:1 stoichiometry with
ThiG.
101a
Spectroscopic analysis of ThiGH
samples demonstrated the purified sample’s [3Fe–4S]+ EPR signal could be converted
to an axial [4Fe–4S]+ signal upon treatment with dithionite (Table 2). Importantly,
thiazole synthase activity in E. coli lysate mixtures was stimulated upon addition
of purified ThiGH, SAM, and a reducing agent and depended upon addition
of tyrosine, leading to the proposal that the deoxyadenosyl radical
was responsible for initiating tyrosyl radical formation.
352
Reconstitution of purified ThiGH resulted in
a significant increase in [4Fe–4S]2+/+ content (Table 2). Subsequent addition of SAM
to reduced samples
resulted in a concomitant perturbation of the reduced cluster’s
axial signal, providing direct evidence that ThiH coordinated a site-differentiated
cluster capable of interacting with SAM.
284b
Conversely, spectral analysis of reduced samples exposed to both
SAM and tyrosine showed a significant decrease in the amount of [4Fe–4S]+ signal present,
suggesting that tyrosine triggered the reduced
[4Fe–4S]+ cluster to cleave SAM, generating the
diamagnetic [4Fe–4S]2+ state.
Turnover experiments
performed with l-[U-14C]-tyrosine and S-adenosyl-l-[methyl-14C]-methionine
showed the concurrent consumption of these
molecules, and ∼1 equiv of 4-methyl-5-(β-hydroxyethyl)
thiazole phosphate was formed per mole of ThiGH.
284b
By radiographically monitoring product separation by thin
layer chromatography, Kriek and co-workers found initiating with l-[U-14C]-tyrosine
produced the formation of two
radiolabeled products. These molecules with distinct polarities in
conjunction with GC–MS and 13C NMR techniques were
identified as p-cresol and glyoxylate.
284b
Kinetics experiments further demonstrated
the reaction stoichiometry proceeded with formation of 1.3 equiv of
dAdoH to 1 equiv each of p-cresol and glyoxylate.
Efforts to improve turnover number led to the finding that ThiGH is
susceptible to product inhibition by dAdoH with methionine; the cooperative
inhibition is overcome through the addition of 5′-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine
nucleosidase (MTAN), which hydrolyzes
dAdoH.
27b,77
Subsequent kinetic analysis of both ThiGH
and monomeric ThiH under saturating tyrosine, SAM, and reductant conditions
offered improvements in activity and allowed for the determination
of rate constants for ThiH’s tyrosine lyase activity.
77
Kinetics for both ThiGH and ThiH were observed
to be biphasic in nature, with a burst preceding a slower steady-state
phase of 53 ± 6 × 10–4 and 1.6 ±
0.2 × 10–4 s–1, respectively,
for ThiGH formation of p-cresol, suggesting product
release was rate limiting (Table 1). During
the burst phase, efficient coupling of dAdoH production to tyrosine
cleavage occurs, but during the steady-state phase the uncoupled cleavage
of SAM increases dramatically as the tyrosine kinetics become more
strongly influenced by the accumulation of products. Moreover, addition
of exogenous glyoxylate and ammonia to assay mixtures inhibits tyrosine
turnover, possibly as a consequence of glyoxylate (or dehydroglycine)
binding in the active site.
77
Glyoxylate
formation occurs following the hydrolysis of dehydroglycine,
the latter of which is the common intermediate linking thiamine biosynthesis
in aerobes and anaerobes (Figure 40). Dehydroglycine
formation has been proposed to occur through two mechanisms, both
initiated by an H-atom abstraction from the hydroxyl group on the
phenol moiety of tyrosine by the 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical.
Assays performed with several tyrosine analogues have shown a strict
dependence on the phenol group for SAM cleavage.
77
The resulting tyrosyl radical then undergoes Cα–Cβ bond cleavage through a heterolytic
process
forming dehydroglycine directly or a homolytic process forming a glycyl
radical, which may oxidize to dehydroglycine (Figure 78). The reactivity of dehydroglycine
poses an intriguing issue,
as the intermediate is readily hydrolyzed to glyoxylate upon exposure
to aqueous environments yet must be transferred from ThiH to ThiG
during biosynthesis. The copurification and characterization of the
ThiGH complex undoubtedly speaks to the intimate relationship these
protein partners have in vivo. Challand et al. observed the addition
of glyoxylate to assays limits Cα–Cβ tyrosine bond cleavage, suggesting dehydroglycine
might modulate
uncoupled cleavage of SAM as a mechanism ensuring dehydroglycine production
and incorporation into the thiazole carboxylate is a coordinated event
between ThiH and ThiG.
77
Figure 78
The mechanism of Cα–Cβ
tyrosine bond cleavage
as catalyzed by ThiH. Bond breakage may either occur through a heterolytic
process forming dehydroglycine directly or through a homolytic process
forming a glycyl radical.
It should be noted that several other radical SAM enzymes,
most
notably HydG (section 12.2.4) and NosL/NocL
(section 6.6), also catalyze the cleavage of
the Cα–Cβ bonds of the amino
acids tyrosine or tryptophan, apparently by initial abstraction of
a solvent-exchangeable H-atom from the aromatic ring.
10.2
Repair of Thymine Dimers in DNA: Spore Photoproduct
Lyase
Spore photoproduct lyase (SPL) is a DNA repair enzyme
first identified in B. subtilis that
catalyzes the monomerization of the UV-induced thymine dimer spore
photoproduct (SP, 5-thyminyl-5,6-dihydrothymine) to two thymines (Figure 79).
353
Unlike the better
known DNA photolyase system,
354
however,
SPL is catalytically active in the absence of light.
353c
Sequencing of the gene encoding SPL revealed
some sequence homology between SPL and DNA photolyase in their C-terminal
regions, suggesting an evolutionary relationship and perhaps mechanistic
similarities.
355
It was demonstrated, however,
that SPL specifically bound to and repaired SP, and was incapable
of binding or repairing cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers such as those
repaired by DNA photolyase.
356
Figure 79
SPL reaction
scheme catalyzing the conversion of SP to TpT.
10.2.1
Identification of SPL as a Radical SAM
Enzyme
Limited sequence similarity of the genes encoding
spore photoproduct lyase to both aRNR-AE and PFL-AE was first recognized
in 1997, suggesting that SPL might also be an iron–sulfur protein.
357
Indeed, the first characterization of aerobically
purified SPL showed each enzyme contained about 1 iron and approximately
1.5 sulfides.
95
The UV–visible spectrum
of this purified protein also revealed spectral features consistent
with protein-bound iron–sulfur clusters, which vanished after
reduction with dithionite.
95
Subsequent
studies using SPL anaerobically reconstituted with exogenous iron
and sulfide revealed the presence of a [3Fe–4S]+ EPR signal, which converted to a
[4Fe–4S]+ signal
upon reduction with dithionite.
96a
Addition
of SAM to reduced SPL resulted in a decreased intensity of the [4Fe–4S]+ signal, interpreted
as resulting from an electron transfer
from the cluster to SAM.
96a
Further evidence
for such an electron transfer was provided by SAM cleavage assays,
which demonstrated that under reducing conditions, SPL produced dAdoH
upon incubation with SAM.
96a
SPL was ultimately
demonstrated to catalyze radical SAM chemistry when a 3H label at C6 of SP was traced
to dAdoH after repair by SPL in the
presence of SAM, demonstrating that SP repair was initiated by abstraction
of an H-atom from the C6 position of SP by a dAdo• (Figure 79).
358
10.2.2
The Iron–Sulfur Cluster of Spore
Photoproduct Lyase and Its Interaction with SAM
When purified
under anaerobic conditions, SPL from B. subtilis or Clostridium acetobutylicum is
reddish-brown in color and contains approximately three irons and
three acid-labile sulfides per protein.
74b,97a
The protein’s UV–vis spectrum is consistent with the
presence of iron–sulfur clusters, and the EPR spectrum of the
purified protein shows a signal at g = 2.02 (Table 2), indicating a small amount of
[3Fe–4S]+ clusters. Reduction of purified protein with dithionite yielded
an EPR signal (g = 2.03, 1.93, 1.89) characteristic
of a [4Fe–4S]+ cluster (Table 2). Similar spectroscopic properties are observed for
the enzyme
aerobically purified followed by anaerobic reconstitution.
96b
Reconstituted protein characterized by Mössauer
spectroscopy revealed inhomogeneity of the iron species, with four
different quadrupole doublets modeled, including a [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster accounting for
approximately 40% of the total iron,
and a [2Fe–2S]2+ cluster accounting for 27% of total
iron (Table 2). Similar spectroscopic properties
were observed for the reconstituted enzymes from Geobacillus
stearothermophilus(99) and C. acetobutylicum.
98
HYSCORE
spectroscopy provided evidence for the coordination of the amino group
of SAM to the iron–sulfur cluster, further confirming the intimate
interaction of the [4Fe–4S] cluster and SAM required for catalysis.
98
10.2.3
Defining the Substrate
for Spore Photoproduct
Lyase
Obtaining a model substrate SP for SPL biochemical
and mechanistic investigations has been a longstanding challenge.
Early investigations utilized DNA irradiated under a variety of conditions
including low hydration levels, presence of dipicolinic acid, and/or
presence of small acid-soluble proteins (SASPs).
359
The SASPs bind to DNA in spores and modify the conformation
of DNA from B-form to more of an A-like structure, which may alter
the photochemistry of SASP-bound DNA such that SP is formed at the
expense of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers.
360
However, despite the presence of SASPs or buffer conditions that
enhance production of SP, UV irradiation of DNA is unlikely to ever
produce a precise spore photoproduct without production of other photoproducts.
Considerable effort has been made to synthesize a model dinucleotide
spore photoproduct allowing for more defined mechanistic studies.
An initial report of the synthesis of two diastereomers of the dinucleotide
spore photoproduct was provided by Begley and co-workers; use of 2-D
ROESY allowed them to assign one of these products as the 5R-SP, with the other presumably
the 5S.
361
It was noted in this paper that constraints
of double helical DNA would favor the 5R configuration
for the natural spore photoproduct.
361
An SPL assay with a defined dinucleotide substrate was first reported
in 2006. The defined SP substrate was generated by UV irradiation
of dry DNA, followed by acid hydrolysis and HPLC purification of the
SP dinucleotide, or by UV irradiation of dry films of TpT and dipicolinic
acid.
96b
Repair reactions of the dinucleotide
SP substrate demonstrated that SPL from Bacillus subtilis(96b) and C. acetobutylicum(98)
were capable of catalyzing its repair
to TpT. These results validated their model compound and demonstrated
that SPL could catalyze repair of this minimal dinucleotide substrate
in the absence of the DNA double helical structure. Further, their
results supported the notion that SPL specifically binds and cleaves
SP, and is incapable of catalyzing repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine
dimers or 6,4-photoproducts.
96b,356
Another approach to
generating a defined SP substrate was irradiation of an oligonucleotide
containing a TT sequence in a dry film containing picolinic acid,
followed by HPLC purification and enzymatic excision of the damaged
oligonucleotide.
99
This defined SP substrate
was assayed with SPL from G. stearothermophilus, producing thymidine.
99
Pieck and co-workers
also showed the purified SP-lesion-containing oligo served as a substrate
for SPL, and was cleanly converted to the undamaged oligo without
formation of side products, indicating a tightly controlled reaction
of a radical in the vicinity of DNA.
99
Defining the stereochemistry of the SP substrate, specifically
the stereochemistry at the C5 involved in the T–T cross-link,
has been of considerable interest over the years (Figure 80). While both 5R and 5S
diastereomers of SP are possible in principle, Begley
argued that the natural SP would be of the 5R configuration
only, due to the steric constraints imposed by the native DNA structure.
361
However, in 2006 two independent groups reported
that SPL repairs the 5S and not the 5R configured SP.
99,362
Their syntheses of the 5R and 5S dinucleoside spore photoproducts,
lacking the phosphodiester bridge, were based on modifications of
Begley’s earlier reported syntheses.
361,362b,363
Quantitative NOESY experiments
were used to assign the stereochemistry at C5 for both the dinucleoside
SPs and the derivatives containing a C3–C5 diester bridge.
362
Assays of the dinucleoside SPs using the SPL
from B. subtilis and from G. stearothermophilus showed that the 5S-SP was repaired,
while the 5R-SP was not.
99,362
Two subsequent studies, however, reached the opposite conclusion:
SPL repairs only the 5R-configured spore photoproduct. One of these
studies used SPTpT prepared by irradiation of TpT in the presence
of dipicolinic acid; 2D NOESY and ROESY experiments together with
DFT calculations were used to unambiguously determine the absolute
stereochemistry for this natural substrate as 5R.
364
The second study utilized 2D NOESY and ROESY
experiments to unambiguously define the stereochemistry of synthetic
5R and 5S-SP dinucleosides lacking
a phosphodiester bridge.
74a
Further, this
latter study assayed each diastereomer with SPL and showed that SPL
repairs only the 5R, and not the 5S-SP.
74a
A follow-up study by the same
group showed that complete repair could be achieved for the 5R SPTpT containing a
phosphodiester backbone.
74b
The discrepancy between these latter two studies
regarding 5R-SP as the substrate and the earlier
studies naming 5S-SP as the substrate was elucidated
by Heil et al., who demonstrated that “5S”,
thought to be a model substrate, was in fact the 3′→5′
5S-SP, while the 5R substrate was
the 5′→3′ SP.
365
In
other words, the directionality of the methylene bridge of SP, whether
it originates from the methyl group of the 5′-T (giving rise
to the 3′→5′ SP) or from the methyl group of
the 3′-T (giving rise to the 5′→3′ SP),
was quite relevant to the stereochemical determination as well as
to the SPL repair activity. Heil et al. revealed that the earlier
studies indicating that SPL repairs only the 5S-SP
were carried out on 3′→5′ SP (prepared synthetically),
while the studies indicating SPL repairs only the 5R-SP were carried out on 5′→3′
SP. Heil et al.
clarified and unified these earlier studies by incorporating the 5′→3′
5R and 5S-SP, both lacking a phosphodiester
backbone, into DNA oligonucleotides.
365
The 5′→3′ 5R- and 5S-SP incorporated into oligonucleotides were then crystallized
in complex with the DNA polymerase from G. stearothermophilicus, and the absolute
stereochemistry was determined on the basis of
the crystal structures. They found that the 5R lesion
fit well in the DNA duplex, nearly overlaying a structure of the same
enzyme with undamaged DNA. In contrast, the 5′→3′
5S-SP oligo complexed to DNA polymerase reveals a
considerable distortion relative to undamaged DNA, to such an extent
that it is not possible to model a phosphodiester backbone between
the two ribose thymidines involved in the SP lesion. They further
assayed these SP-containing oligos and found that only the 5R was repaired. They concluded
that the work showing repair
of the 5S-SP was carried out on the 3′→5′,
and not the 5′→3′, forms of SP. The identity
of the substrate of SPL as the 5′→3′ 5R-SP was further supported by studies by Lin
et al. who
synthesized, structurally characterized, and assayed an SP analogue
containing a formacetal linker in place of the phosphodiester bridge.
366
Figure 80
Depiction of the two possible spore photoproducts
with either 5R or 5S configuration.
10.2.4
SAM:
Substrate or Cofactor in the SPL-Catalyzed
Reaction?
While the role of SAM as cosubstrate or cofactor
has been straightforward for most radical SAM enzymes, this deceptively
simple question is the subject of continuing debate for SPL. The mechanism
originally proposed by Mehl and Begley
367
and supported experimentally by Cheek and Broderick
358
implicates a role for SAM as a catalytic cofactor
during SP repair, because the product thyminyl radical abstracts a
hydrogen from dAdoH to regenerate dAdo• and ultimately
SAM. The SPL-catalyzed SAM cleavage to produce dAdoH was however reported
by Rebeil and Nicholson; they found that SP-containing DNA stimulated
the cleavage of SAM, implicating SAM as a cosubstrate.
96a
When Cheek and Broderick carried out experiments
with C6-tritiated SP-containing DNA, however, tritium was observed
to be transferred into SAM and not into dAdoH, supporting SAM’s
role as a catalytic cofactor.
358
This catalytic
role for SAM was further supported by Buis et al. who demonstrated
that one SAM molecule can mediate the repair of hundreds of SP lesions.
97a
These last two results seem to be unequivocal
in supporting the idea that SAM is a catalytic cofactor, because there
is no way to envision hundreds of substrate turnovers using one SAM
molecule in any other way. Reports of SAM conversion to Met and dAdoH
during the SPL reaction, implicating SAM as a substrate, continued
to accrue, however. When assaying SPL using a synthetic SP substrate,
Friedel et al. reported that dAdoH was produced in excess over the
repaired thymidine; the authors concluded that one SAM was cleaved
per SP repaired, and that the additional dAdoH produced in excess
of this amount was due to uncoupled SAM cleavage, an observation common
among radical SAM enzymes in vitro that employ SAM as a cosubstrate.
362a
Pieck et al. also observed considerable uncoupled
cleavage of SAM, which was enhanced in the presence of substrate.
99
Using dinucleotide SPTpT as a substrate, Chandor-Proust
et al. observed approximately 1 equiv of dAdoH per SP repaired, supporting
a role for SAM as a cosubstrate.
368
Later
studies by Yang et al. showed that prereduced SPL could catalyze at
least 10 turnovers of SP to repaired product, supporting a catalytic
role for SAM.
97b
These workers proposed
that dAdoH observed during the reaction, which appeared in small quantities
and then decreased during reaction, was actually an intermediate species,
97b
although that proposal was later retracted
when they discovered that an enzyme contaminant in their SPL preparations
was converting/hydrolyzing the dAdoH produced during catalysis.
97c
In 2012, Yang et al. suggested a “partially
catalytic” role for SAM based on their quantitation of dAdoH
and TpT produced during turnover.
97c
One
observation we have made in analyzing these differing reports regarding
the role of SAM in the SPL-catalyzed reaction is that many of the
reports of SAM behaving as a cosubstrate have utilized synthetic dinucleoside
or dinucleotide SP substrates, rather than SP contained within a DNA
strand; our interpretation is that the dinucleoside and dinucleotide
substrates are not optimal substrates, and allow more uncoupled SAM
cleavage than is the case with the natural substrate. It therefore
appears that SAM is a catalytic cofactor in the SPL-catalyzed reaction;
however, it has a propensity to catalyze uncoupled reductive cleavage
of SAM, particularly in the presence of poor substrates.
10.2.5
Structural Characterization of SPL
Structures of SPL
from G. thermodenitrificans with and
without the dinucleotide SP substrate have been solved.
369
Like most other radical SAM enzymes with solved
structures, SPL contains a partial (βα)6 TIM
barrel, with a [4Fe–4S] cluster coordinated at the top of the
barrel by the three cysteines of the radical SAM motif (Figure 81). SAM coordinates
the cluster’s unique
iron via the amino and carboxyl moieties with the sulfonium sulfur
3.6 Å from the unique iron. The 5R-SP substrate
lacking a phosphodiester linker binds to the active site near SAM,
and is correctly oriented by a series of hydrogen-bonding interactions.
The configuration of the 5R-SP in the crystal structure
can accommodate a phosphodiester bridge, and soaking the crystals
in pyrophosphate produced residual electron density in the vicinity
of the absent bridge. Binding of the 5R-SP results
in structural perturbations in the active site, most significantly
movement of the Tyr98 containing side chain. Further, the orientation
of the 5R-SP in the SPL active site points to a base-flipping
mechanism during binding and repair, similarly proposed for DNA photolyase.
A β-hairpin turn from SPL including Arg304 and Tyr305 is similar
to β-hairpins found in other DNA repair enzymes, and likely
involved in comparable substrate recognition and base flipping. The
crystal structures provide support for a role for Cys141 (Cys140 in G. thermodenitrificans)
in the hydrogen atom transfer
during the SPL-catalyzed reaction. The C6 of the 5′-dihydrothymine
of SP is 3.9 Å from the 5′-C of SAM, and perfectly positioned
for the initial H-atom abstraction that initiates catalysis. The methylene
carbon of SP, the site of the product radical after C–C bond
cleavage, is further (5.3 Å) from the 5′-C of SAM than
it is from the Cys140 (4.5 Å), supporting a mechanism in which
a hydrogen atom is transferred from Cys140 to the product thyminyl
radical to produce the repaired TpT. The presence of the conserved
Tyr98 in the active site in close proximity to Cys140 also raised
the intriguing question of a role for Tyr98 in a proton-coupled electron
transfer pathway to quench the thiyl radical. While the crystal structures
depict the structural effects on SP upon substrate binding, another
group has investigated SPL’s effect on the DNA structure. DNase
I footprinting experiments revealed that SPL binds to an SP-containing
oligonucleotide, protecting a region of approximately nine nucleotides
surrounding the SP lesion.
356
Interestingly,
within this protected region were two hypersensitive sites, suggesting
that SPL binding to the lesion resulted in a distortion of the surrounding
DNA.
356
The emerging picture in the field
of SPL depicts a very dynamic interaction between enzyme and substrates.
Likely, these interactions are tuned to maximize catalytic turnover
while limiting deleterious enzyme–product complexes.
Figure 81
SPL crystal
structure (PDB ID 4FHD). Left: N-terminal domain colored in
wheat, radical SAM domain in light blue, C-terminal domain in light
pink, [4Fe–4S] cluster in yellow and rust spheres, and SAM
in green sticks. Right: Active site of SPL where [4Fe–4S] cluster
(yellow and rust) and SAM (green carbons) are depicted in sticks with
oxygens colored red and nitrogens colored blue. Cysteines (light blue
carbons) involved in ligating cluster are depicted in lines.
10.2.6
Mechanism
of Repair of SP by SPL
A radical mechanism for repair of
SP by SPL was proposed by Mehl
and Begley in 1999 (Figure 82), where they
proposed that an H-atom abstraction from C6 of SP could promote a
radical-mediated β-scission to cleave the C–C bond linking
the two thymines.
367
This proposal was
supported by a reaction in which a synthetic SP analogue with a thiophenyl
group at C6 was subjected to radical generating conditions resulting
in clean generation of the monomerized thymine products.
367
This mechanism received additional experimental
support in 2002 when Cheek and Broderick demonstrated direct H-atom
transfer from C6 of SP into SAM.
358
They
utilized DNA generated in cells grown in media enriched with either
[C6-3H]-thymine or [methyl-3H]-thymine. The
purified DNA was then subjected to UV irradiation under optimal conditions
for generation of SP. This SP-containing, tritiated DNA was used as
the substrate for repair reactions with SPL in the presence of SAM
under reducing conditions. The results clearly demonstrated that after
turnover of C6-tritiated SP, the SAM in the reaction mixture was labeled
with tritium. The results provided the first evidence for the involvement
of a SAM-derived dAdo• in the SPL-catalyzed reaction,
and also demonstrated that Begley’s initial proposal of SP
repair via a C6 radical-mediated β-scission was most likely
correct. A subsequent DFT study of the SPL-catalyzed repair reaction
supported this basic mechanism, although it pointed to a possible
interthymine H-atom transfer prior to regeneration of the dAdo• near the end of the
catalytic cycle.
370
More recent studies by Yang et al. using 6-pro-R or 6-pro-S-deuterated SP as a substrate
demonstrated the 6-pro-R hydrogen atom is abstracted
by the dAdo•.
97b
The
results reported by Cheek and Broderick also supported a catalytic
role for SAM (detailed in section 10.2.4) because
it was SAM and not dAdoH that contained the label after enzymatic
reaction.
358
Buis et al. also demonstrated
that SAM acted catalytically by showing that with a 1:1 ratio of SAM
to SPL, hundreds of SP lesions could be repaired.
97a
The mechanism proposed by Mehl and Begley as well as by
Cheek and Broderick would also predict that label present at the 5′-position
of SAM would be incorporated into the repaired thymine in the last
step in the catalytic cycle.
358,367
Small amounts of such
label transfer have been observed.
97a
Subsequent
studies revealed, however, that the hydrogen atom incorporated into
repaired thymidine derived from solvent, not from dAdoH, thereby implicating
the involvement of protein residues with exchangeable sites in the
hydrogen transfer mechanism of SPL.
97b
Figure 82
Proposed
mechanism for the repair of SP as catalyzed by SPL.
Although only three cysteines comprise the canonical
SAM motif,
SPL contains a fourth conserved cysteine, Cys141, shown to be essential
for catalysis through a mutagenesis study.
371
A subsequent investigation found that a C141A variant of SPL was
capable of cleaving the C–C bond of the SPTpT lesion; however,
rather than producing TpT, the product contained a sulfinate group
derived from dithionite on the methyl carbon of the 3′-T of
the TpT.
368
Their results suggested Cys141
plays a role in the final steps of the catalytic mechanism by either
transferring a hydrogen atom to the allylic methyl radical of repaired
TpT or stabilizing a specific state of the enzyme preventing side
reactions with exogenous molecules.
368
The
work by Yang et al. implicating a solvent-exchangeable protein site
in the H-atom back-donation to the product thyminyl radical indicated
Cys141 plays a role in this process.
97b
Further studies of the C141A variant provided additional insight,
including the observation that SAM becomes a cosubstrate rather than
a cofactor in the C141A variant, implicating a role for Cys141 as
an H-atom donor to the product thyminyl radical.
97c
More recently, Carell and co-workers provided evidence
that Tyr98, a conserved residue located in the active site of SPL,
mediates H-atom transfer with the Cys141 residue and plays a critical
role in catalysis.
372
Their assignment
of a UV–vis feature to a tyrosyl radical has been disputed,
however, and no corresponding tyrosyl radical EPR signal has yet been
observed.
97d
Further kinetic analysis and
structural characterization of variants in which Tyr98 and Tyr96 (G. thermodenitrificans
numbering, corresponding to
Tyr99 and Tyr97 in B. subtilis) were
converted to alanine or phenylalanine provided further support for
the involvement of these two tyrosine residues in the SPL-catalyzed
repair of SP, with Tyr98 specifically implicated in an H-atom transfer
chain during the second half of the repair reaction.
97d
Computational studies have provided further thermodynamic
rationale for invoking intermediary amino acid radicals, as this would
provide an SPL mechanism that avoids any strongly endothermic or exothermic
steps.
478,479
10.3
DesII
and the Synthesis of d-Desosamine
Sugar deoxygenation
is a common biosynthetic step in the glycodiversification
of carbohydrates in biology.
373
Regioselective
C–O bond cleavage relative to an essential 4-keto group (situated
either α or β) yielding deoxyhexoses has been well characterized
for C2, C3, and C6-type deoxygenations, although at present C4 is
less well-known.
374
Interestingly, the
biosynthesis of d-desosamine, which is a required component
of numerous macrolide antibiotics (Figure 83), requires a C-4 deoxygenation step catalyzed
by the radical SAM
enzyme DesII.
375
Cloned and sequenced from
the methymycin/neomethymycin producing strain Streptomyces
venezuelae, DesII was identified as a “putative
reductase” possessing a CX3CX2C radical
SAM motif.
375,376
Gene knockout studies of desI and desII established that DesII performed
a reaction independent of DesI, an associated PLP-dependent transaminase
enzyme in C4 deoxygenation.
375
Product
formation of thymidine diphosphate (TDP)-d-quinovose instead
of the expected TDP-6-deoxy-4-keto-d-glucose product by DesII
(in the absence of DesI) implicated a novel mechanism for C4 deoxygenation
involving a possible 1,2-nitrogen shift analogous to LAM or adenosylcobalamin-dependent
enzyme ethanolamine ammonia lyase.
375b
Figure 83
Natural
products d-desosamine and methymycin. Radical
SAM enzyme DesII is involved in the biosynthesis of d-desosamine.
DesII was found to catalyze a
radical-initiated deaminase reaction.
102,376
When overexpressed
and purified under aerobic conditions, DesII
contained low iron and sulfide counts in [3Fe–4S]+ clusters based on EPR spectroscopy
(g = 2.010)
(Table 2).
87,102
Treatment
of this [3Fe–4S]+ form of the enzyme with dithionite
converted it to an EPR-silent state, postulated in the paper to be
[3Fe–4S]0.
87
Anaerobic
reconstitution resulted in enzyme containing approximately four Fe
and four sulfides per subunit and UV–vis spectrum consistent
with the presence of a [4Fe–4S] cluster (ε420 = 9200 M–1 cm–1). Reduction
with dithionite in the presence of SAM produced a rhombic EPR signal
(g = 2.01, 1.96, 1.87) characteristic of a [4Fe–4S]+ cluster (Table 2).
87
No EPR signal could be observed upon reduction in the absence
of SAM, and the authors proposed that this was due to the instability
of the cluster with respect to reduction in the absence of SAM.
87
However, when handled in the presence of SAM,
reducing agent (dithionite), and in the absence of DesI, TDP-4,6-dideoxy-d-glucose
was detected as the product from the TDP-4-amino-4,6-dideoxy-3-keto-d-glucose substrate
(Figure 84).
87,102
The biological reducing system of flavodoxin and flavodoxoin reductase
were capable of replacing dithionite to support turnover, indicating
that these or similar proteins are the electron donors in vivo.
87
Figure 84
Radical SAM enzyme DesII catalyzes a redox-neutral deamination
(top reaction), as well as an oxidative dehydrogenation (bottom reaction).
The DesII-catalyzed deamination
is a redox-neutral elimination
reaction requiring a single [4Fe–4S] cluster.
87,377
When substrate deuterated at the 3-position was used in DesII activity
assays, doubly deuterated SAM and singly deuterated dAdoH were observed.
87
These results support a mechanism in which a
dAdo• abstracts a H-atom from the C3 position of
substrate to initiate the reaction (Figure 85). While incorporation of two deuterons
into SAM suggests that SAM
is catalytically regenerated,
87
the stoichiometry
of product and SAM was found to be 1:1 implicating SAM as a cosubstrate.
377
Interestingly, redox cycling of the [4Fe–4S]
cluster has been demonstrated, where the reduced [4Fe–4S] cluster
can be used over several turnover events.
377
Figure 85
Proposed mechanism in DesII-catalyzed deamination. Depicted in
blue is an ethanolamine ammonia lyase-inspired mechanism involving
the formation of a carbinolamine intermediate. Depicted in red is
an E1cb-type mechanism involving a stabilized enol
radical. Double black full arrows represent product leaving the active
site, substrate coordination, and dAdo• generation.
While DesII has been shown to
catalyze a redox-neutral deamination
reaction, it can also catalyze the oxidative dehydrogenation of TDP-d-quinovose, yielding
TDP-6-deoxy-3-keto-d-glucose
(Figure 84).
87,377
In this alternate
mechanism as in the deamination reaction, DesII abstracts an H-atom
from the C3-position.
87
Additional evidence
for abstraction at this position came from the observation of a substrate
α-hydroxyalkyl radical, when using TDP-d-quinovose
as a substrate.
378
Assignment of this radical
was supported by a decrease in EPR line width when performed in D2O that would be
less consistent with a ketyl radical assignment.
378
Finally, solvent-dependent differences in broadening
of the hydroxyl hydrogen hyperfine have brought into question the
protonation state of the α-hydroxylalkyl radical.
378,379
A thorough solvent KIE study has shown that deprotonation of the
radical follows the initial H-atom abstraction event, implicating
a putative role for an active site base.
380
However, further structural or mutagenesis studies are necessary
to understand the role of specific site residues in the catalytic
reaction.
DesII’s remarkable versatility in catalyzing
both a redox-neutral
deamination reaction and an oxidative dehydrogenation reaction at
a single [4Fe–4S] cluster, and initiated by abstraction at
the C3 position, has some intriguing mechanistic implications. In
the case of the deamination reaction, two mechanisms have been proposed
(Figure 85).
377,378
The first
mechanism bears similarity to adenosylcobalamin-dependent enzyme ethanolamine
ammonia lyase, where migration of the C4 amine to the C3 position
produces an ethanolamine intermediate, and loss of ammonia results
in oxidation of the keto group.
87,377
The alternative mechanism
resembles an E1cb-type elimination of ammonia, where
deprotonation of the α-hydroxyalkyl radical results in a stabilized
enol radical formed.
87,377
Similarly, in the oxidative
dehydrogenation reaction, deprotonation of the α-hydroxyalkyl
radical has been proposed to result in a single electron oxidation
that may involve reduction of the [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster
(Figure 86).
378,380
This mechanism
is similar to the dehydrogenation reaction catalyzed by BtrN wherein
2-deoxy-scyllo-inosamine is converted to amino-2-deoxy-scyllo-inosose (section 8.2,
Figure 68). The idea has only recently been put forth that
the oxidative dehydrogenation reactions catalyzed by enzymes like
BtrN and anSME (Figures 66 and 68) occur via reduction of the [4Fe–4S]2+ auxiliary
clusters bound to these enzymes (section 8).
328
An interesting distinction to point out between
these systems and that of DesII, however, relates to the ability of
DesII to directly recycle the electron back to the [4Fe–4S]2+ radical SAM cluster;
377
turnover
experiments with anSME demonstrated that the electron could only be
recycled back to the radical SAM cluster via an external oxidant like
flavodoxin after it was transferred through auxiliary clusters I and
II (section 8.1.4).
80b
This perhaps suggests that the structure of DesII is such that its
active site pocket accommodates bound substrate in such a manner as
to limit the distance between the [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster
and the intermediate substrate radical species produced during turnover
to promote the rereduction of the Fe–S center. The recent BtrN
crystal structure (Figure 69) provides evidence
to support this distinction, where the substrate conformation, hydrogen-bonding
interactions with the substrate functional group, and possibly proximity
of the auxiliary [4Fe–4S] cluster help avoid an elimination
reaction observed here for DesII (section 8.2).
328
Figure 86
Proposed mechanism of DesII-catalyzed
oxidative dehydrogenation.
Note that electron transfer is proposed to occur from the product
radical back to the oxidized [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster,
as redox cycling of the FeS cluster has been demonstrated.
10.4
PhnJ: Catalysis of C–P
Bond Cleavage
The phnJ gene is part of the
14-gene bacterial
C–P lyase gene cluster, which encodes the ability to convert
alkylphosphonates to phosphate.
381
PhnJ
contains four conserved cysteines in a CX2CX21CX5C arrangement,
382
and when
aerobically purified binds approximately 2 Fe per protein.
115a
After anaerobic reconstitution with iron and
sulfide, the protein exhibits UV–vis
115a
and EPR
115b
spectroscopic properties
consistent with the presence of an iron–sulfur cluster that
can be reduced with dithionite (Table 2).
Incubation of this reconstituted enzyme with SAM, dithionite, and
α-d-ribose-1-methylphosphonate-5-phosphate (PRPn) results
in conversion of PRPn to α-d-ribose-1,2-cyclic-phosphate-5-phosphate
(PRcP) and methane (Figure 87), in addition
to dAdoH and methionine.
115a
Importantly,
no turnover can be achieved when SAM is left out of the reaction mixture,
and the collective results certainly indicate that the C–P
bond cleavage catalyzed by PhnJ is a radical SAM reaction.
115a
All four cysteines in the CX2CX21CX5C motif (cysteines 241, 244, 266, and 272 in
the E. coli enzyme) are required for
activity; however, only Cys241, Cys244, and Cys266 are needed to assemble
an intact [4Fe–4S] cluster.
115b
Through
an elegant series of experiments, Raushel and co-workers were able
to show that the dAdo• produced by reductive cleavage
of SAM abstracts the pro-R H from Gly32 of PhnJ to
generate a glycyl radical intermediate (Figure 88).
115b
This glycyl radical is proposed
to generate a thiyl radical at Cys272, which then attacks the phosphonate
moiety of PRPn.
115b
Subsequent C–P
bond cleavage involves H-atom abstraction from the pro-S position of Gly32 to yield
methane and a covalent thiophosphate
intermediate, which is released by nucleophilic attack with the 2′-hydroxyl
group (Figure 88).
115b
This mechanism is highly reminiscent of the combined actions of
PFL-AE and PFL, wherein radical SAM chemistry generates a glycyl radical
on PFL, which in turn generates a thiyl radical that attacks substrate
and causes C–C bond cleavage (section 3.1). Although the glycyl radical has not been
directly detected in
PhnJ as it has with PFL, the results reported by Raushel and co-workers
indicate that PhnJ operates in a manner remarkably similar to the
combined actions of pyruvate formate lyase and its activating enzyme.
Figure 87
C–P
bond cleavage of methylphosphonate by radical SAM enzyme
PhnJ.
Figure 88
Mechanism of C–P bond cleavage
catalyzed by radical SAM
enzyme PhnJ.
10.5
Elp3:
Demethylation by the Elongation Complex
Elp3 is one of six
subunits that comprise the elongation complex
and is responsible for the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity
of this assembly. The HAT domain of Elp3 is in the C-terminus of the
protein, while a radical SAM domain has been identified in the N-terminal
region.
383
The known biological significance
of histone methylation/demethylation events in controlling transcription,
coupled to the resemblance between Elp3 and HemN, suggests that Elp3
may catalyze a demethylation reaction,
383
although recent characterization of Elp3 from Toxoplasma shows that it localizes to
the mitochondrial surface indicating
that it may have more diverse functions beyond just transcription.
384
Experimental evidence in support of Elp3’s
role in catalyzing a demethylation reaction was ultimately provided
using three independent assays in live cells.
385
The purified radical SAM domain of Elp3 contains small
amounts of iron (∼0.3 per protein), and a red-brown color and
UV–vis features characteristic of iron–sulfur clusters.
103
Reconstitution with iron and sulfide increases
iron content up to 1.6 per protein, with similar amounts of sulfide
detected. EPR spectroscopic characterization of the reconstituted
protein reveals an isotropic signal consistent with the presence of
a [3Fe–4S]+ cluster (g = 1.96,
2.002) that becomes axial upon reduction and exhibits g-values (g = 2.03, 1.93) typical
of [4Fe–4S]+ clusters. Upon addition of SAM to reduced samples, the signal
attributed to the [4Fe–4S]+ cluster is slightly
perturbed (g = 2.02, 1.93) (Table 2). Biochemical experiments demonstrated the binding
of SAM
to the Elp3 domain, which was able to cleave SAM upon addition of
reducing agents.
103
The cumulative evidence
supports a function for Elp3 as a radical SAM demethylase, and a mechanism
has been accordingly proposed (Figure 89).
385b
Figure 89
Hypothetical mechanism for the Elp3-catalyzed
demethylation of
DNA. An alternative pathway has been proposed, which could account
for product formation in the absence of an external nucleophile; see
Wu and Zhang.
385b
10.6
Decarboxylation during Blasticidin S Biosynthesis
Catalyzed by BlsE
Blasticidin S is a peptidyl nucleoside
antibiotic that functions by inhibiting peptide bond formation in
the ribosome, thereby disrupting protein synthesis.
386
It contains a cytosyl pyranoside core structure that is
found in only a few other antibiotics that include arginomycin, mildiomycin,
and cytomycin. Interestingly, the biosynthetic gene clusters of at
least four of these antibiotics are predicted to include a gene encoding
a radical SAM enzyme. One of these radical SAM enzymes, BlsE, has
now been characterized.
81
BlsE contains
the canonical CX3CX2C radical SAM motif, and
the purified 6xHis affinity tagged enzyme contains substoichiometric
1.4 iron and 1.6 sulfide per protein. Chemical reconstitution increases
the quantities of iron and sulfide to 6.8 and 8.5 per protein, respectively,
suggesting that an accessory iron–sulfur cluster may occupy
the CXCX2C motif that is also present in the primary sequence.
The UV–vis spectrum of the enzyme shows features characteristic
of bound iron–sulfur clusters, with the absorption maxima decreasing
in intensity upon reduction. The isolated enzyme exhibits an EPR signal
with a g value of 2.01 that is consistent with the
presence of a [3Fe–4S]+ cluster, while in a reduced
state the axial spectral features (g = 2.02 and 1.93)
are typical of [4Fe–4S]+ clusters (Table 2). Addition of SAM to the reduced enzyme
causes
a rhombic perturbation to the reduced axial signal and yields g values of 2.00, 1.93,
1.86, which reflect SAM’s
coordination to the unique iron site (Table 2). Moreover, addition of substrate to
reduced samples that have been
treated with SAM causes further perturbation in the EPR signal. Purified
BlsE was shown to utilize cytosylglycuronic acid (CGA) as a substrate,
and upon incubation with either dithionite or flavodoxin/flavodoxin
reductase as electron donors decarboxylates CGA to form cytosylarabinopyranose
(CAP). dAdoH was formed in excess over CAP, pointing to uncoupled
SAM cleavage by this enzyme. Importantly, a requirement for the [4Fe–4S]
cluster in the reductive cleavage mechanism was demonstrated as mutation
of the cysteine residues in the CX3CX2C motif
abolished activity.
11
Radical SAM Enzymes in the
Synthesis of Modified
Tetrapyrroles
Modified tetrapyrrole derivatives such as chlorophyll,
heme, cobalamins,
siroheme, cytochrome heme d1, and coenzyme F430 serve as essential metalloprosthetic
components in metabolic processes
in living organisms. The structural similarity of the tetrapyrrole
derivatives underpins a similar, yet branched biosynthetic pathway
involving the derivation of the macrocyclic progenitor uroporphyrinogen
III from the metabolic precursor 5-aminolevulinic acid (Figure 90).
387
As mechanistic
details to the biosynthesis of tetrapyrroles have been elucidated,
the oxygen-independent biosynthetic pathways share a common involvement
of radical SAM enzymes. Radical SAM enzymes HemN, NirJ, AhbC, AhbD,
and BchE/BchR are described in the following section.
Figure 90
Oxygen-independent biosynthetic
pathway of heme and heme d1 from uroproporphyrinogen III.
Biosynthetic involvement of
radical SAM enzymes and the transformation catalyzed is bolded in
red, while nonradical SAM enzyme transformations are bolded in blue.
Pathway-dependent transformations that do not strictly require radical
SAM enzyme involvement are highlighted in purple.
11.1
HemN: An Oxygen-Independent Coproporphyrinogen
Oxidase
Coproporphyrinogen III oxidases (CPOs) catalyze the
conversion of coproporphyrinogen III to protoporphyrinogen IX, an
essential step in the formation of heme from uroporphyrinogen III
(Figure 90).
387
This
step involves the oxidative decarboxylation of the propionate side
chains of rings A and B to vinyl groups, producing 2 equiv of CO2. Two different enzymes
in nature catalyze this reaction but
are differentiated by their involvement of dioxygen. The oxygen-dependent
enzyme HemF in eukaryotes catalyzes this reaction using dioxygen as
an electron acceptor by a currently unknown mechanism;
388
HemN, in bacteria, catalyzes this reaction
by an oxygen-independent mechanism involving SAM.
100
Early characterization of HemN-containing cell extracts,
from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Chromatium strain D, Rhizobium japonicum, and S. cerevisiae
in the absence
of oxygen, implicated a role for SAM as the l-Met, and ATP
requirement could be replaced by SAM (in cell extracts, SAM synthetase
could synthesize SAM from Met and ATP).
389
HemN was included in the original classification of the radical
SAM enzymes,
1
thus pointing to the involvement
of an oxygen-sensitive [4Fe–4S] cluster and SAM as requirements
for activity.
11.1.1
The Iron–Sulfur
Cluster of HemN
In the absence of oxygen, HemN was found
to coordinate a single,
site-differentiated [4Fe–4S]+ cluster, as identified
by UV–vis, EPR, and Mössbauer spectroscopic studies
(Table 2).
85,100
EPR spectra
were obtainable only in the absence of SAM, and had a large line width
and substantial signal broadening, while samples in the presence of
SAM were featureless.
85
However, the noted
change in isomer shift in the obtained Mössbauer data suggested
that SAM does bind to the site-differentiated site.
85
Interestingly, direct evidence for a radical mechanism
for decarboxylation catalyzed by HemN was obtained when SAM and substrate
coproporphyrinogen III were added to reduced HemN.
390
An organic radical EPR signal was observed at g
av = 2.0029 with a complex pattern of hyperfine couplings
from at least five different hydrogen atoms. Characterization of the
substrate-derived signal (by using regiospecifically labeled 15N or 2H substrates)
showed that the unpaired electron
was delocalized over the β-carbon on the proprionate side chain
and the ring carbon atom between the methylene bridge and the pyrrole
nitrogen via allylic radical stabilization.
390
The location of this substrate radical in the porphyrin ring is
consistent with the proposed mechanism in which the dAdo• radical abstracts the pro-S
hydrogen at the position
of the propionate side chain to initiate the oxidative decarboxylation
reaction.
390
11.1.2
Structural
Characterization of HemN
HemN was the first structurally
characterized member of the radical
SAM enzyme superfamily (Figure 91).
241
The structure of HemN is a (βα)6 TIM barrel fold that binds a [4Fe–4S] cluster and
two molecules of SAM.
241
While the structure
was solved in the absence of substrate (coproporphyrinogen III) or
product (protoporphyrinogen IX), the [4Fe–4S] cluster is bound
in an amphipathic environment within the barrel; half of the cluster
is surrounded by hydrophobic residues, and the other half of the cluster
is surrounded by hydrophilic residues.
241
The first molecule of SAM (SAM #1) coordinates the unique iron atom
of the [4Fe–4S] cluster as seen in other structures. Interestingly,
the second molecule of SAM (SAM #2) binds in a position adjacent to
the [4Fe–4S] coordinated SAM #1, and is held in place by five
amino acids that are conserved to varying degrees among HemN sequences.
241
A hydrophilic pocket lined with charged residues
sits symmetrically adjacent to the sulfonium of SAM #1 and SAM #2
and appears to be positioned near the propionate side chains in the
substrate-bound model.
241
Interestingly,
a stretch of N-terminal conserved residues (PRYTSYPTA) interfaces
with the C-terminal domain, and is in proximity (9 Å) from the
coordinated SAM molecule.
241
While the
sequence cooresponded to a poorly structured region of the crystal
structure, this “trip-wire” loop has been proposed to
help stabilize binding of substrate, as well as to possibly close
the active site upon substrate binding.
241
Figure 91
HemN crystal structure (PDB ID 1OLT). Left: N-terminal domain colored in
wheat, radical SAM domain in light blue, C-terminal domain in light
pink, [4Fe–4S] cluster in yellow and rust spheres, and SAM
in green sticks. Right: Active site of HemN where the [4Fe–4S]
cluster (yellow and rust) and SAM (green carbons) are depicted in
sticks with oxygens colored red and nitrogens colored blue. Cysteines
(light blue carbons) involved in ligating clusters are depicted in
lines.
11.1.3
Insight
into the HemN Mechanism
The mechanism of iterative decarboxylation
events by HemN is intriguing,
in that 2 equiv of SAM appear essential to the chemical reaction mechanism
(Figure 92),
100,241
similar to
BioB, LipA, and RlmN (sections 4.1, 4.2, 7.1). The overall HemN
reaction involves a net four electron oxidation, probably involving
two H-atom abstractions by dAdo• followed by two
one-electron oxidations.
100
The specific
role that SAM #2 serves in the HemN mechanism is unclear; however,
it is apparent that direct reduction of SAM #2 by the [4Fe–4S]
cluster is not feasible.
85,100
Mutagenesis studies
of the amino acids responsible for binding SAM #2 provide strong evidence
for the involvement of both SAM #1 and SAM #2 in the catalytic mechanism
of protoporphyrinogen IX formation, invoking two active sites for
decarboxylation of each propionate side chain relative to each SAM
molecule.
100,241
It has been proposed that substrate
coproporphyrinogen binding may induce rotation around the C5′–S
bond of SAM #2, moving the sulfonium sulfur atom of SAM #2 closer
to SAM #1. In this case, the first electron transfer event to SAM
#1 might be immediately transferred to SAM #2, with the resulting
SAM #2-derived dAdo• then abstracting a H-atom from
the β-carbon of the substrate propionate side chain to produce
an allylically stabilized coproporphyrinogen substrate radical.
390
Decarboxylation then would then result in electron
transfer to the unknown oxidizing agent. Subsequent rereduction of
the [4Fe–4S]2+ cluster would result in cleavage
of SAM #1 and the second decarboxylation of substrate, this time via
the SAM #1-derived dAdo•.
390
Figure 92
The mechanism of iterative decarboxylation events by HemN.
The net two decarboxylation events
performed on 1 equiv of coproporphyrinogen
is a complex reaction performed at a single [4Fe–4S] cluster
(Figures 90 and 92).
The proposed sequence of events above is consistent with the appearance
of two molecules of SAM in the structure, and with the previously
discussed biochemical evidence for the catalytic relevance of SAM
#2.
390
If decarboxylation occurred only
at the SAM #1 site, then following the first reductive cleavage of
SAM #1 and subsequent oxidative decarboxylation of the first propionate
side chain, another molecule of SAM would have to replace the methionine
and dAdoH products of SAM cleavage. An alternative mechanism involves
SAM #2 serving as the initial electron acceptor following the first
decarboxylation reaction (initiated via the cleavage of SAM #1), thereby
generating the second dAdo• radical.
390
The latter mechanism bypasses the need to transfer
an electron from SAM #1 to SAM #2 for the initial cleavage event,
although it still requires the presence of an unidentified electron
acceptor molecule for the second decarboxylation reaction.
390
While the sequential decarboxylation
of the proprionate side chains
of ring A followed by ring B of coproporphyrinogen III has been well
established in oxygen-dependent HemF catalysis,
391
this aspect of the mechanism in HemN catalysis remains
uncertain. If the decarboxylation mechanism proceeds sequentially,
one proprionate side chain of either ring A or B will be decarboxlyated
first, forming either a harderoporphyrinogen (ring A) or an isoharderoporphyrinogen
(ring B) intermediate; alternatively, both proprionate side chains
could be decarboxylated simultaneously (Figure 90). Incorporating HPLC and ESI–MS
analysis, a HemN catalytic
intermediate monovinyl-tripropionic acid porphyrin, containing one
proprionate side chain decarboxylated to the corresponding vinyl group,
was observed that displayed properties similar to those of the intermediate
harderoporphyrinogen (3-vinyl-8,13,17-tripropionic acid-2,7,12,18-tetramethylporphorin)
in HemF catalysis; when synthesized, this harderoporphyrinogen intermediate
yielded the protoporphyrin IX product in the presence of HemN, thus
supporting a HemN mechanism involving sequential decarboxylation of
the propionate side chains.
392
The similarity
of the intermediates in HemN and HemF catalysis, in conjunction with
HemN product (protoporphyrinogen IX) formation from this synthesized
intermediate, implies the monovinyl intermediate from the decarboxylation
of the ring A proprionate side chain occurs first. It should be noted
that the alternative possibility that the monovinyl intermediate is
the 3-vinyl isoharderoporphyrinogen currently has not been tested,
due to lack of an isolatable isoharderoporphyrinogen standard.
392
11.2
NirJ
and Related Enzymes in the Synthesis
of Heme d1
The iron-containing cytochrome cd
1 (NirS) is a nitrite reductase that catalyzes
the conversion of nitrite to nitric oxide and water at an iron-containing
dioxo-isobacteriochlorin, called heme d1.
393
The macrocycle consists of addition of an unusual set of
oxo, methyl, and acrylate substituents that branches from the traditional
heme biosynthetic pathway at uroporphyrinogen III with formation of
bis-methylated intermediates, making siroheme (Figure 90).
394
Gene nirJ from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (orf393 from Pseudomonas stutzeri) is part of
an identified gene cluster involved in heme d1 biosynthesis that was found to have
protein sequence homology to
PqqE-related proteins
395
and later to NifB
and MoaA proteins
393c
by the CX3CX2C motif.
As a putative radical SAM enzyme, NirJ
has been proposed to be involved in the transformation of siroheme
to heme d1; however, biochemical characterization of the
other proteins involved to date remains largely uncharacterized, limiting
mechanistic insight. NirJ from Paracoccus pantotrophus has been shown to coordinate
a [4Fe–4S] cluster, likely site-differentiated,
located at the N-terminal CX3CX2C motif (Table 2).
110
Addition of SAM
resulted in an observable perturbation in an EPR signal consistent
with SAM coordination. NirJ contains an additional C-terminal CX2CX5C motif that may
coordinate an additional Fe–S
cluster, but the role that this motif serves is currently unclear.
110
Sulfate-reducing bacteria and archaea
synthesize heme through oxidation
of siroheme, involving the activity of two NirJ-like radical SAM enzymes,
Ahb-NirJ1 (AhbC) and Ahb-NirJ2 (AhbD) (from P. pantotrophus and Desulfovibrio vulgaris,
respectively)
(Figure 90).
396
That
a common precursor (siroheme) is used by NirJ and AhbC/AhbD enzymes
suggested that a common intermediate serves as a branching point between
the two pathways.
396b
Recently, didecarboxysiroheme
was identified as the common intermediate for the NirD-L, G, and H
complex lacking NirJ, as well as for D. desulfuricans AhbA–AhbB complex lacking AhbC
and AhbD (Figure 90).
396b
For the Ahb system,
incubation of anaerobically prepared cell lysates of D. vulgaris with siroheme resulted
in formation of
monodecarboxy-, didecarboxy-, monovinyl Fe-coproporphyrin III, as
well as heme that required the involvement of AhbC and AhbD.
396b
Individual recombinant overexpression of Methanosarcina barkeri AhbC and D.
desulfuricans AhbD has elucidated the likely reaction
catalyzed by these radical SAM enzymes. Coincubation of AhbC cell
extracts with didecarboxysiroheme resulted in production of Fe-coproporphyrin,
while coincubation of AhbD cell extracts with Fe-coproporphyrin, SAM,
and dithionite resulted in synthesis of predominantly heme product.
396b
Thus, it appears that AhbC catalyzes acetic
acid side chain loss at C2 and C7 to synthesize Fe-coproporphyrin,
while AphD catalyzes a reaction similar to HemN, catalyzing CO2 loss.
396b
In the case of NirJ,
an additional enzyme (NirF) is involved and has been proposed to serve
as a dehydrogenase; NirJ is therefore proposed to catalyze oxo group
formation via propionate loss to synthesize a heme d1 precursor.
396b,397
11.3
BchE in Chlorophyll and Bacteriochlorophyll
Biosynthesis
The conversion of light energy to chemical energy
(chlorophototrophy) occurs in organisms that synthesize the pigment
chlorophylls and bacteriochlorophylls or carotenoids.
398
The chlorophylls and bacteriochlorophylls are
Mg-containing tetrapyrrole prosthetic groups that are synthesized
through a coordinated biosynthetic pathway.
399
Interestingly, chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll biosyntheses
follow biosynthetic routes similar to those of heme biosynthesis,
up to protoporpyrin IX (Figures 90 and 93).
399
From here, the
respective biosyntheses branch, as Mg chelation, ring modification,
methylation, ring oxidation/reduction, and substitutent modification
result in a discrete family of chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll
pigments.
399
Figure 93
Chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll
biosynthetic pathway. Involvement
of radical SAM enzymes (and their respective transformation catalyzed)
is bolded in red, while nonradical SAM enzyme involvement is bolded
in blue.
A particularly complex step in
the synthesis of chlorophylls and
bacteriochlorophylls is the formation of a five-membered isocyclic
(E) ring from Mg-protoporphyrin-monomethyl ester, forming 3,8-divinyl-protochlorophyllide
a (Figure 93).
399
Many aspects of ring formation that are beyond the scope
of this Review are reviewed elsewhere.
400
Chlorophyll biosynthesis can occur in organisms that live in aerobic
and anaerobic environments, and redundant synthetic routes to catalyze
ring cyclization have been identified in organisms adapted to either
environment.
401
Oxygen isotope labeling
and genetics studies have shown that the oxygen-dependent oxidase/cyclase
AcsF and the oxygen-independent (radical SAM) oxidase/cyclase BchE
catalyze isocyclic ring formation as chemically distinct reactions.
402
Of the latter, the only gene that appeared
to be required for cyclase activity in Rhodobacter
capsulatus was bchE.
401a,403
Although the photosynthetic genes, including the bchE gene, were sequenced in 1995,
404
identification
of BchE as a radical SAM enzyme was not made until the grouping of
radical SAM enzymes as a superfamily in 2001.
1
BchE possesses a cobalamin-binding domain required for activity,
405
differentiating it from most other radical
SAM enzymes. Its identification as both a radical SAM enzyme and a
cobalamin-binding enzyme makes BchE structurally similar to the class
B radical SAM methyltransferase enzymes discussed in section 7.1,
285,296
although at present, no in vitro
characterization of the enzyme has been performed.
A mechanism
for ring cyclization
400
encompassing
both dAdo• generation from the radical SAM Fe–S
cluster and involvement of the cobalamin cofactor has been proposed
(Figure 94).
296
The
mechanism resembles the P-methylase mechanism proposed for class B
methyltransferases (section 7.1; Figure 57).
285,406
In such a mechanism, the dAdo• (generated from reductive cleavage of SAM at the site-differentiated
Fe–S cluster) abstracts an H-atom at the C131-position
of the Mg-protoporphyrin-monomethyl ester, forming a substrate radical.
296
The hydroxocobalamin cofactor then transfers
a hydroxyl radical to the substrate, forming the C131-hydroxo
product that has been previously isolated, as well as cob(II)alamin.
296,407
The hydroxocobalamin cofactor is regenerated via one-electron oxidation
and addition of a water molecule, thereby allowing it to transfer
a second hydroxyl radical following a second abstraction of an H-atom
at the C131-position. The resulting C131-geminal
diol then collapses, forming the C131-keto intermediate.
296,407
From here, subsequent H-atom abstraction at the C132-position
would result in ring cyclization. Protonation and oxidation of the
pyrrole ring would result in formation of 3,8-divinyl-protochlorophyllide a (Figure
94).
Figure 94
Putative mechanism of
BchE-catalyzed ring cyclization, where both
the radical SAM Fe–S cluster and the cobalamin-binding domains
participate in the ring cyclization reaction.
With the recent in vitro characterization of cobalamin-containing
class B radical SAM methyltransferase enzymes (section 7.1), in vitro characterization
of BchE should provide
insight into the diversity that the cobalamin serves in the radical
SAM-initiated mechanism expected by BchE. As noted above, BchE is
expected to initiate a unique biotransformation relative to class
B radical SAM methyltransferases, using structurally similar bound
cofactors as part of the mechanism.
11.4
BchQ/BchR:
Methyl Transfer in Chlorophyll
Biosynthesis
The biosyntheses of chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll
photosynthetic pigments share a complex diversity of chemical modifications,
including methylation, dehydration, oxidation, and esterification,
around a central tetrapyrrole ring to convert light to chemical potential
energy.
399
In addition to the rich radical
SAM chemistry involved in tetrapyrrole biosynthesis and modifications
described for AhbC, AhbD, BchE, HemN, and NirJ (sections 11.1–11.3), radical
SAM enzymes are also involved in methyltransferase-type chemistry
in chlorophyll-tetrapyrrole biosynthesis. Green sulfur bacteria have
evolved unique, self-aggregating pigment structures (chlorosomes)
to harvest solar energy. The chlorosome is composed of bacteriochlorophyll
(BChl) c, d, or e pigments (Figure 93) that differ in the modifications
around the central ring, as well as in the esterified product.
399
These central ring modifications help bacteria
adapt to different levels of light. Approximately 200 000 BChl/Chl
pigment molecules (in the green sulfur bacterium Chlorobaculum
tepidum) comprise a chlorosome, and 97% of the total
pigment content in the organism is BChl c
F (BChl c esterified with farnesol).
408
This bacteriochlorophyll comprises a mixture
of four homologues that carry different modifications at the C82 and C121 positions
(ethyl, n-propyl,
iso-butyl, or neo-pentyl at C82 and methyl
or ethyl at C121),
409
and it
has been demonstrated that these side chains are derived from methylation
reactions involving radical SAM chemistry.
410
Relatively recent characterization of two gene products (BchQ
and BchR) involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis demonstrate that they
belong to the radical SAM superfamily and perform methyltransferase
modifications on the BChl c pigments. BchQ modifies the C82 position with one or two
methyls, while BchR modifies the C121 position with one methyl.
409
In C. tepidum mutant strains lacking the BchQ and/or
BchR proteins, organism growth, especially at low light intensity,
was impaired relative to wild-type as the amount of Bchl c produced
could not be increased in low light.
409
By amino acid sequence, BchQ and BchR are predicted to contain
a cobalamin-binding domain, belonging to the class B radical SAM methyltransferase
subfamily (section 7).
285
Therefore, methylations at the C82 and C121 positions likely require radical activation
of the carbon
atoms, possibly paralleling methyltransferase activities in enzymes
such as GenK
84
and PhpK,
116
and TsrM
89
(section 7.1). Involvement of the cobalamin cofactor might
mechanistically rationalize multiple methylation events occurring
at the C82 position; however, a detailed investigation
of the mechanism currently remains lacking. Regardless of the mechanism,
the presence of these radical SAM methyltransferase enzymes is essential
for reaching wild-type growth levels in C. tepidum.
409
12
Synthesis
of Complex Metal Clusters
The identification of radical SAM
enzymes in the maturation pathways
of complex metallocofactors like the FeMo-cofactor of nitrogenase
and the H-cluster of [FeFe]-hydrogenase are relatively recent discoveries.
Significant results over the past few years have provided great insight
into the sophisticated reactions that are at the core of synthesizing
these biological catalysts. New results related to the biosynthesis
of these metallocofactors have shed light on the remarkable similarities
between FeMo-co and H-cluster maturation; both synthesis pathways
require standard iron sulfur cluster assembly machinery to build the
fundamental Fe–S cluster precursors, which then become modified
throughout maturation. Moreover, biosynthesis exploits scaffold, carrier,
and NTPase enzymes to foster cofactor assembly. Furthermore, the maturation
events are distinctly merged through their common dependence on radical
SAM chemistry, which is at the core of catalyzing the formation of
the unique ligand sets that convey the essential reactivity to FeMo-co
and the H-cluster. Last, maturation is completed by insertion of the
modified cluster units into cofactorless forms of the target enzymes.
411
12.1
NifB and the Biosynthesis
of the FeMoCo of
Nitrogenase
12.1.1
Nitrogenase and the
FeMoCo
The
majority of biological N2 reduction to NH3 on
Earth is catalyzed by the Mo-nitrogenase enzyme, which houses a complex
[MoFe7S9C] cluster known as FeMo-co; this cluster
exists as [Fe4S3] and [MoFe3S3] subclusters bridged by three sulfide ions, with a
carbon
at the center of the cluster. The cofactor itself is coordinated to
the nitrogenase protein through one cysteine thiolate ligand to the
terminal Fe ion and a histidine and homocitrate molecule to the Mo
ion. Importantly, at the core of the metal sulfur cluster unit is
a μ6-light atom only recently characterized as a
carbide ion.
412
The Mo-nitrogenase (Nif)
is a two-component enzyme comprised of the Fe-protein (NifH) and the
MoFe protein (NifDK), which together catalyze the reaction N2 + 8e– + 16MgATP + 8H+
→ 2NH3 + H2 + 16MgADP + 16Pi.
413
The FeMo-cofactor is responsible for N2 reduction and is housed within the α-subunit
of NifD.
A second iron–sulfur cluster, referred to as the P-cluster,
is bound at the α/β subunit interface of a single NifDK
αβ dimer. Complex formation between NifH and NifDK positions
the [4Fe–4S] cluster of the Fe-protein in proximity to the
P-cluster, forming a conduit for ATP-dependent electron flow into
the FeMo-co for N2 reduction.
414
Biosynthesis of FeMo-co and its insertion into aponitrogenase requires
the participation of a multitude of gene products that include several
scaffold and carrier proteins, the generalized Fe–S cluster
assembly proteins NifS and NifU, and the radical SAM enzyme NifB.
415
12.1.2
Biogenesis of the FeMoCo
and Nitrogenase
Maturation
Cofactor assembly begins with the synthesis of
standard Fe–S clusters by the cysteine desulfurase NifS and
the scaffold NifU, which then transfers these building block units
to NifB where assembly of the core Fe–S unit of FeMo-co occurs
(Figure 95). The identification from sequence
annotation of NifB as a putative radical SAM protein based on the
presence of an N-terminal CX3CX2C motif opened
the exciting possibility that radical SAM chemistry was essential
for FeMo-co biosynthesis, especially because deletion of nifB was shown to result
in a MoFe protein that lacked the cofactor.
132,415b,416
Early work demonstrated the
incorporation of 55Fe and 35S labeled NifB-cofactor
(NifB-co) into apo-nitrogenase,
417
and
subsequent analysis revealed the existence of six conserved cysteine
residues (in addition to the radical SAM motif) and eight conserved
histidine residues, indicating that NifB likely bound accessory Fe–S
clusters.
415b
Purification and characterization
of the nifB gene product revealed that the as-isolated
protein bound 12 iron atoms per dimer and could be reconstituted to
levels of 18 iron atoms per dimer. The protein displayed characteristic
Fe–S cluster LMCT features in the UV–vis region, which
bleached upon addition of sodium dithionite.
132
In vitro biosynthetic studies demonstrated that FeMo-co assembly
and activation of apo-nitrogenase could be accomplished with a minimal
set of components including NifB, SAM, Fe2+, S2–, molybdate, homocitrate, NifEN, and
NifH.
418
The activity of NifB was shown to be highly sensitive to O2, and the addition of the
SAM analogue S-adenosylhomocysteine
inhibited FeMo-co synthesis. Moreover, it was shown that NifB-co binds
to NifX (see below), which then transfers the intermediate to NifEN
where it is further modified via addition of iron, sulfide, molybdenum,
and homocitrate.
127b
Figure 95
Nitrogenase FeMo-cofactor
assembly.
Biochemical studies of NifX demonstrated
that this small carrier
protein binds NifB-co with a K
d ≈
1 μM (in many known diazotrophs NifB exists as a fusion protein
with a NifX domain),
419
allowing for EXAFS
and NRVS measurements to be performed on the NifX:NifB-co complex.
420
The Fe K-edge spectra of NifB-co are nearly
superimposable with that of FeMo-co, indicating that the oxidation
states and ligand environments of the Fe atoms between these two cofactors
are nearly identical. Analysis of the Fourier transform of the Fe
K-edge EXAFS region revealed a set of sulfur ligands at 2.3 Å,
a set of Fe next nearest neighbors at 2.6 Å, and a set of long-range
Fe–Fe interactions at 3.7 Å; these interactions are characteristic
of FeMo-co itself and provide evidence for the existence of a “FeMo-co
like” core in NifB-co.
420
Model
fits to the experimental data showed that the Fe–S core best
describing the experimental distances was a [Fe6–S9] trigonal prismatic D
3h
model that contained a single C, N, or O interstitial atom.
420
NRVS measurements showed the presence of a
broad band between 183 and 198 cm–1, a feature only
previously observed in NRVS of nitrogenase and isolated FeMo-co, thus
providing additional support for the [Fe6–S9] model comprised of an interstitial atom.
420
12.1.3
Radical SAM Chemistry
and the Insertion
of the Interstitial Carbide
One of the significant challenges
related to the elucidation of NifB’s role in FeMo-co maturation
is the fact that the purified NifB from Azotobacter
vinelandii is unstable.
132
By fusing the nifB and nifN genes,
Ribbe and co-workers created a NifEN-B protein complex that was amenable
to spectroscopic and kinetic analysis.
133
Metal analysis coupled with UV–vis and EPR studies of the
NifEN-B complex show that the two precursor Fe–S clusters bound
to NifB (referred to as the K-cluster) are [4Fe–4S] in nature;
given the similar decrease in S = 1/2 signal intensity
for the K-cluster and the radical SAM cluster following addition of
SAM, it was surmised that these Fe–S cluster moieties are in
close proximity with one another (Table 2).
133,421
Importantly, the concomitant decrease in [4Fe–4S]+ signal intensity following addition
of SAM is accompanied by the
formation of a specific g = 1.94 feature attributed
to an [Fe8–S9] cluster referred to as
the L-cluster. This observation implies that the redox perturbations
at the SAM cluster (presumably caused by the reductive cleavage of
SAM) have an immediate impact on the properties of the K-cluster,
resulting in formation of the eight Fe intermediate L-cluster, calling
into question the relevance of the [Fe6–S9]–X NifB-co cluster.
133
Several
studies have demonstrated that the L-cluster bound to NifEN very much
resembles FeMo-co itself, with the exception that an iron ion replaces
the Mo and homocitrate groups.
422
Valence
to core Fe Kβ X-ray emission spectroscopic studies of NifEN
established the presence of carbon in the [Fe8–S9] L-cluster, a result consistent
with the NifB-based insertion
of the carbide during K-cluster coupling.
423
The observation made in 2007 by Rubio and co-workers that
the minimal in vitro system to achieve FeMo-co biosynthesis and activation
of apo-nitrogenase required only NifB, NifEN, NifH, SAM, Fe2+, S2–, molybdate, homocitrate,
and Mg-ATP suggested
that SAM itself was a likely source for the interstitial carbide.
418
However, given the instability of NifB, this
question could not be directly biochemically probed until the NifEN-B
complex was prepared by Wiig and co-workers.
133
SAM cleavage assays in the presence of NifEN-B and reductant showed
that SAM was converted into both S-adenosylhomocysteine
(SAH) and dAdoH.
424
Experiments performed
with deuterium labeled SAM ([methyl-d
3]-SAM) showed the NifEN-B-based formation of SAH along with deuterium-enriched
and natural abundance dAdoH. Intriguingly, the two radical SAM RNA
methylases RlmN and Cfr (section 7.1), which
utilize 2 equiv of SAM in the methylation of RNA, both display similar
SAM cleavage and deuterium isotope patterns as NifEN-B.
111b,111c,295
These observations therefore
suggested that NifB also employed the methyl group of SAM as a carbon
source. Radiolabeling experiments with [methyl-14C]-SAM
demonstrate that the 14C group is incorporated into the
L-cluster during the NifB dependent coupling of the K-clusters and
that the 14C isotope can ultimately be tracked to NifDK
during the maturation process of the M-cluster.
424
Two proposals have been put forth for the NifB-catalyzed
formation
of the L-cluster and are highlighted in Figure 96.
424
The first invokes the SN2 based transfer of the methyl group of SAM to a sulfide ion
of the
K-cluster to yield a transient methanethiol ligand and SAH as products;
the methanethiol group is then activated to form a methylene radical
via H-atom abstraction from a 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical, which
is formed upon the reductive cleavage of a second molecule of SAM.
At this stage, the radical intermediate must undergo a ligand exchange
event with the Fe ions of the cluster followed by removal of two additional
hydrogen atoms to form the interstitial carbide moiety. An alternate
mechanism suggests that the reductive cleavage of SAM results in formation
of SAH and a methyl radical (Figure 96).
424
The methyl radical is thought to be captured
by an Fe2+ ion of the K-cluster, generating an Fe–C
bond.
424
Another molecule of SAM then undergoes
reductive cleavage, and the resulting dAdo• radical
is believed to abstract a H-atom from the intermediate, generating
a methylene radical species. Regardless of the mechanism, formation
of the eight iron L-cluster from the coupling of the two [4Fe–4S]
K-clusters requires addition of a bridging sulfide ion from an unknown
source, as well as the subsequent dehydrogenation or deprotonation
events from the methylene radical intermediate that accompany Fe–C
bond formation as the interstitial μ6-carbide is
ultimately generated. Another outstanding question relates to the
existence of carbide itself and why this central atom is required
for the mechanism of N2 reduction by nitrogenase. A report
monitoring the fate of either 13C or 14C labeled
FeMo-co under substrate turnover conditions demonstrated that the
interstitial carbide neither undergoes an exchange reaction nor can
it be consumed as a substrate and incorporated into products.
425
These data suggest that the carbide acts to
stabilize the structure of the cluster, although it certainly still
remains possible that it could be involved in either binding substrate
and/or tuning the electronic properties of the cofactor itself. Despite
these outstanding issues, the progress made in recent years has provided
a very clear picture as to how NifB and radical SAM chemistry are
at the heart of synthesizing one of the most elegant metallocofactors
in biology.
Figure 96
Radical SAM-based carbide insertion during FeMo-co biosynthesis.
NifB is proposed to form the [Fe8–S9]
L-cluster from the K-cluster, two [4Fe–4S] precursor units.
The left pathway invokes methylation of a cluster sulfide followed
by generation of a methylene radical upon hydrogen atom abstraction
by the dAdo•. The right pathway proposes methyl
radical formation via SAM cleavage followed by addition to an Fe ion
of the cluster where further processing to a methylene radical occurs.
12.2
Biosynthesis
of the H-Cluster of the [FeFe]-Hydrogenase
Hydrogenases are
metalloenzymes that are integral components of
metabolic pathways in a variety of microorganisms, either accepting
electrons from reduced Fe–S carrier proteins like ferredoxin
that accumulate during fermentation, or coupling the oxidation of
H2 to energy yielding processes according to the reaction
H2 ⇆ 2H+ + 2e–.
426
Two classes of hydrogenase enzymes found in
nature are the [NiFe]- and [FeFe]-hydrogenases; these enzymes are
phylogenetically unrelated, with the [NiFe] enzymes routinely biased
toward H2 oxidation and the [FeFe] enzymes biased toward
H2 evolution.
427
[FeFe]-hydrogenases
are found in bacteria and eukarya, and contain a complex metal center,
referred to as the H-cluster, that is responsible for proton reduction.
The composition of the H-cluster was determined by X-ray crystallographic
analysis of the [FeFe]-hydrogenase (HydA) enzymes from Clostridium pasteurianum (CpI)
428
and Desulfovibrio desulfuricans,
429
complemented by FTIR spectroscopic
studies.
430
The unique active site metal
cluster consists of a [4Fe–4S] cubane that is bridged to a
2Fe subcluster through a cysteinyl thiolate linkage; the 2Fe subcluster
contains three CO, two CN–, and a bridging dithiolate
moiety as ligands.
428,429
These π-acid ligands participate
in back bonding with the metal ions, thereby stabilizing lower oxidation
states of the Fe and facilitating the rapid and reversible oxidation
and reduction reactions associated with hydrogen catalysis.
431
The 2Fe subcluster in as-purified HydA is described
as a low spin S = 1/2 state with an Fe(II)/Fe(I)
pair,
432
and the distal Fe atom is likely
the site for proton binding and reduction.
433
12.2.1
H-Cluster Maturation Machinery
Early
efforts to heterologously express HydA in Escherichia
coli (which lacks an endogenous [FeFe]-hydrogenase)
yielded inactive enzyme,
434
demonstrating
that E. coli is unable to properly
assemble the active site H-cluster. A ground-breaking discovery came
about through the work of Posewitz and King
435
who identified three hydrogenase accessory genes hydE, hydF, and hydG (hydE and hydF
exist either as separate gene products
or as a fused gene depending on the organism) that are absolutely
conserved in all organisms containing [FeFe]-hydrogenases. They also
demonstrated that active HydA is obtained when the hydrogenase gene
is coexpressed with these accessory genes. Moreover, it was soon reported
that inactive HydA overexpressed in E. coli alone (HydAΔEFG) could be activated through
the
in vitro addition of an E. coli lysate
containing overexpressed hydE, hydF, and hydG together, indicating that HydE, HydF,
and HydG were the only unique components required to properly assemble
the H-cluster.
436
Analysis of the
amino acid sequences of HydE and HydG revealed the presence of the
canonical CX3CX2C motif characteristic of the
radical SAM superfamily, while HydF contained several putative C-terminal
Fe–S cluster binding ligands and was anticipated to be a GTPase
given the presence of N-terminal Walker A P-loop and Walker B Mg2+ binding motifs.
129,435,437
Importantly, site-directed mutagenesis studies have shown that the
[4Fe–4S] cluster binding motifs in HydE and HydG, as well as
both the GTPase and the Fe–S cluster binding regions of HydF,
are all necessary to achieve proper H-cluster assembly and active
hydrogenase.
435b
Collectively, these observations
led to the development of a hypothetical pathway for H-cluster assembly
that served as a platform for biochemical studies in the following
years.
438
Peters and co-workers proposed
that HydE and HydG were involved in synthesizing the 2Fe subcluster
unit on the scaffold HydF through the modification of a [2Fe–2S]
cluster moiety; alkylation of the sulfide groups was thought to be
a first step followed by the decomposition of a glycyl radical into
CO and CN–. It was proposed that HydE, HydF, and
HydG were solely directed at 2Fe subcluster synthesis as standard
Fe–S cluster assembly machinery could be expected to synthesize
the [4Fe–4S] cubane of the H-cluster.
438
12.2.2
HydA Expressed in the Absence of HydE,
HydF, and HydG Contains a [4Fe–4S] Cluster
All [FeFe]-hydrogenases
contain a common active site domain but have a variety of distinct
arrangements of accessory cluster domains.
439
The simplest [FeFe]-hydrogenases from chlorophycean algae, such
as Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, contain
only the active site domain,
440
and accordingly
have become attractive targets for H-cluster directed studies.
441
Characterization of the C. reinhardtii HydA enzyme expressed in E. coli in
the absence of hydE, hydF, and hydG demonstrated that the purified protein contained
UV–vis,
EPR, and Mössbauer spectroscopic features characteristic of
[4Fe–4S]2+/+ clusters.
441b
Moreover, neither the as-purified nor metal free forms of HydAΔEFG were active toward
H2 production, but
activity could readily be restored through either addition of E. coli cellular extracts
containing C. acetobutylicum HydE, HydF, and HydG or addition
of this extract following chemical reconstitution of the [4Fe–4S]
cluster. The results provided a strong foundation for the requirement
of the preassembled [4Fe–4S] cubane of the H-cluster (presumably
synthesized by standard iron sulfur cluster assembly machinery) prior
to activation by the hydrogenase maturation enzymes.
441b
The nature of the immature [FeFe]-hydrogenase,
as well as insights into its activation, were clarified by the X-ray
crystal structure of C. reinhardtii HydAΔEFG (PDB ID 3LX4).
441e
This
structure shows the presence of the [4Fe–4S] cubane of the
H-cluster and the absence of electron density associated with the
2Fe subcluster. Together with the spectroscopic data, the structure
presents direct experimental evidence that HydE, HydF, and HydG are
solely directed at 2Fe subcluster maturation. Moreover, the HydAΔEFG structure shows
the presence of an electropositive
channel filled with H2O molecules leading to the active
site; comparison with the CpI WT HydA structure suggests
that the channel is formed by two conserved loop regions that are
disordered.
439,441e
Collectively, the data advocate
for the stepwise synthesis of the H-cluster, with 2Fe subcluster insertion
into HydAΔEFG and structural rearrangement of the
disordered loop regions over the channel enclosing the active site,
as is schematically represented in Figure 97 and discussed in further detail in the
following sections.
439
Additional support for this mechanism of assembly
is provided by recent NRVS and EPR studies with CpI HydA.
432c
Kuchenreuther et al. showed
that when 56Fe containing CpI HydAΔEFG is activated in vitro using 57Fe labeled
HydE, HydF, and HydG lysate mixtures enriched with exogenous 57Fe, the 57Fe isotope
becomes associated with the
2Fe subcluster of the activated hydrogenase and not the [4Fe–4S]
cubane of the H-cluster. This observation revealed that the cubane
is not synthesized by the hydrogenase maturation machinery.
Figure 97
The proposed
maturation pathway for the biosynthesis of the [FeFe]-hydrogenase
H-cluster.
12.2.3
HydF
as an Assembly Scaffold or Carrier
Protein for Radical SAM Chemistry
In vitro activation experiments
of HydAΔEFG demonstrated that H2 evolution
was only observed when the immature hydrogenase was mixed with a strain
of E. coli expressing HydE, HydF, and
HydG in concert; activation of HydAΔEFG could not
be attained when the maturation enzymes were either expressed individually
or in varying combinations.
436,441b
Analysis of C. acetobutylicum HydE, HydF, and HydG proteins purified
from E. coli-based coexpressions in
which all three proteins were present (HydEFG, HydFEG, and HydGEF) revealed that as-purified
HydF from
this genetic background activated HydAΔEFG, whereas
HydF expressed in the absence of HydE and HydG (HydFΔEG) could not.
442
These data established
that HydF acts as a scaffold or carrier protein transferring an H-cluster
like species to HydA in the final step of hydrogenase maturation.
Given the presence of putative Fe–S cluster binding residues
in HydF sequences and the requirement of these ligands in achieving
hydrogenase maturation,
435b
it was postulated
that this enzyme bound an Fe–S cluster that was somehow directly
involved in the H-cluster assembly process. Several studies have now
probed Fe–S cluster binding in both wild-type and variant forms
of heterologously and homologously expressed HydF from T. maritima, C. acetobutylicum,
Thermotoga neopolitana, and Shewanella oneidensis.
437,443
Low temperature EPR studies on C. acetobutylicum HydFEG and HydFΔEG proteins heterologously
expressed in E. coli revealed two overlapping
cluster signals in samples photoreduced using 5-deazariboflavin.
443a
On the basis of temperature dependence studies,
the more prominent signal in samples of both HydFEG and
HydFΔEG was assigned to a fast relaxing [4Fe–4S]+ cluster (g = 1.89, 2.05), while
the overlapping
feature was a slower relaxing signal attributed to a [2Fe–2S]+ cluster (g = 2.00,
1.96). FTIR studies on
the HydFEG and HydFΔEG proteins revealed
Fe–CO (1940 and 1881 cm–1) and Fe–CN– (2046 and 2027 cm–1) vibrations
in as-purified HydFEG, bands that were clearly absent in
HydFΔEG.
443a
Similarly,
Czech and co-workers observed a high field component in the EPR spectrum
of homologously expressed C. acetobutylicum HydFEG that exhibited slower relaxation
and was attributed
to a Fe–S species belonging “to a cluster which contains
three or less irons”; additionally, Fe–CN–, Fe–CO, and Fe–CO–Fe species were observed
in FTIR spectra, fully consistent with a binuclear nature of the H-cluster
intermediate bound to this enzyme.
443b
Interestingly,
purified S. oneidensis HydFEG displays very low hydrogen reduction/oxidation activity,
behavior
consistent with the presence of a 2Fe subcluster like moiety.
444
XAS studies of C. acetobutylicum HydF provided evidence for [4Fe–4S] and [2Fe–2S]
clusters
bound to HydFΔEG, while the iron species on HydFEG were highly similar to those in
HydA, leading the authors
to suggest that the 2Fe subcluster bound by HydF was directly bridged
to the [4Fe–4S] cluster in a manner analogous to the H-cluster
itself.
443c
Taken collectively, these results
have helped to clarify the nature of the H-cluster like moiety bound
to HydF and point to a role for HydE and HydG in modifying a [2Fe–2S]
cluster precursor into the 2Fe subcluster.
411
The nature of 2Fe subcluster binding to HydF is currently
unresolved,
although biomimetic studies using synthetic analogues of the 2Fe moiety
have shown that these entities can be loaded into T.
maritima HydF.
445
In addition,
spectroscopic characterization provides evidence for the unique coordination
of a CN– ligand where the carbon atom binds to an
Fe ion of the [4Fe–4S] cubane while the nitrogen atom complexes
the 2Fe unit;
445
further studies are warranted
to determine if this unique bridging coordination exists in the natural
enzyme. It is notable that EPR data collected on the S. oneidensis HydFΔEG protein
show
no evidence of [2Fe–2S]+ cluster coordination.
443e
This result coupled with the observation that
low levels of hydrogenase activation could be attained using in vitro
cell lysate mixtures that lacked either HydE or HydF (but contained
HydG) led to the proposal that HydG itself synthesizes the 2Fe subcluster
(termed HydG-co), which is subsequently transferred to HydF and then
HydAΔEFG to accomplish hydrogenase maturation.
443e
Additional experimental evidence is needed
to demonstrate whether the 2Fe subcluster is first built on HydG or
is directly synthesized on HydF.
12.2.4
Radical
SAM Chemistry and the Synthesis
of Diatomic Ligands
12.2.4.1
HydG Preliminary Characterization
and
Substrate Identification
The involvement of radical SAM chemistry
in [FeFe]-hydrogenase maturation was an exciting discovery, and insights
from the work with both HydF and HydAΔEFG acted to
clarify the importance of these enzymes in the synthesis of the H-cluster,
underscoring the need to characterize the biochemical properties of
HydE and HydG. Early analysis of T. maritima HydG demonstrated that the reconstituted
enzyme bound up to 4 irons
and 5 sulfides per protein, contained a S = 1/2 [4Fe–4S]+ cluster upon dithionite
reduction (Table 2), and cleaved SAM nonproductively.
129
HydG exhibited considerable (27%) amino acid sequence homology with
ThiH, a radical SAM enzyme that forms p-cresol and
dehydroglycine (DHG) from tyrosine during thiamine biosynthesis (section 10.1).
284b,446
Driven by this sequence
similarity, Pilet and co-workers confirmed that in the presence of
tyrosine, HydG exhibited enhanced rates of SAM cleavage, a hallmark
attribute of SAM enzymes when assayed in the presence of their substrates.
447
Further, by using LC–MS techniques,
the authors verified that p-cresol was formed during
catalysis.
447
Independent support for the
role of tyrosine in H-cluster biosynthesis came from in vitro HydAΔEFG activation
experiments that monitored H2 consumption levels following treatment with cell extracts
containing
HydE, HydF, and HydG; while either exogenously added tyrosine or 3,4-dihydroxy-l-phenylalanine
resulted in stimulated levels of H2 depletion, other tyrosine analogues lacking a
p-hydroxyl group failed to provide any stimulation.
448
This observation led to the hypothesis that the initial
H-atom abstraction event by the dAdo• radical occurred
at the para-position on the phenyl ring, similar
to the proposed mechanism for ThiH.
77,352
12.2.4.2
Diatomic Ligand Biosynthesis
The identification of
tyrosine as the substrate and p-cresol as a reaction
product of HydG catalysis still left open the
question as to the fate of the remaining products of tyrosine degradation.
447
Subsequent analysis demonstrated the formation
of the fluorescent cyanide adduct 1-cyanobenz[f]isoindole (CBI) over
time in assays performed with purified and chemically reconstituted
HydG from C. acetobutylicum.
78a
CBI formation was shown to occur concomitantly
with p-cresol and dAdoH production in near stoichiometric
amounts. LC–MS analysis of assays performed with uniformly
labeled [U-13C,15N]-tyrosine resulted in a CBI
adduct with a mass increase of two m/z units, reflecting incorporation of the 15N-amino
and 13C-α-carbon of tyrosine.
78a
The fate of the final tyrosine fragment was soon discovered by performing
HydG kinetic assays in the presence of SAM, tyrosine, dithionite,
and deoxyhemoglobin (deoxyHb) (Figure 98).
78b
The time-based, isosbestic formation of carboxyhemoglobin
(HbCO) with λmax = 419 nm was observed concurrent
with the decrease in the deoxyHb Soret band (λmax = 430 nm).
78b
Confirmation of the HydG-catalyzed
formation of CO was made by using uniformly labeled [U-13C,15N]-tyrosine in assays,
which revealed the formation
of a FTIR vibrational feature at 1907 cm–1 characteristic
of Hb13CO. Moreover, the rate constant for HbCO formation
(k
cat = 11.4 × 10–4 s–1 at 30 °C) was similar to that of CN– formation (k
cat = 20 ×
10–4 s–1 at 37 °C), suggesting
these diatomics were derived from the same intermediate (Table 1).
78a
Figure 98
The mechanism of diatomic
ligand biosynthesis as catalyzed by HydG.
Cα–Cβ tyrosine bond cleavage has recently been
demonstrated to occur through a heterolytic process (see text).
130b,131
Formation of the diatomics requires in some capacity the presence
of the C-terminal [4Fe–4S] cluster where dehydroglycine is
further processed into CN– and CO; the in vitro
complexation/trapping of these diatomics are illustrated at the bottom.
Bottom right reprinted with permission from ref (78b). Copyright 2010 American
Chemical Society.
It is important to note
that the experiments monitoring carboxyHb
formation showed substoichiometric CO amounts, whereas the experiments
monitoring formation of CBI displayed near stoichiometric levels of
CN–.
78
This difference
was thought to arise as a direct consequence of the detection methods,
because cyanide derivatization was initiated by acidification of HydG
assay aliquots, whereas CO binding to deoxyHb precluded treatment
of the samples with acid. The inability to correlate the amounts of
CO formed to the amounts of CN– detected left open
the issue as to whether or not the three CO and two CN– ligands of the H-cluster were
all derived from tyrosine. Insight
into this issue was provided by experiments that spectroscopically
analyzed HydAΔEFG following activation by cell extract
mixtures containing HydE, HydF, and HydG that were supplemented with
either tyrosine, [1-13C]-tyrosine, [2-13C]-tyrosine,
or [U-13C,15N]-tyrosine analogues; FTIR bands
associated with the repurified hydrogenase were traced and demonstrate
that all five CO and CN– diatomic ligands of the
H-cluster indeed originated from tyrosine.
444
12.2.4.3
HydG Iron–Sulfur Cluster States
and Mechanism
Beyond the conserved N-terminal radical SAM
CX3CX2C motif, HydG contains a 90 amino acid
extension on its C-terminal end that contains a CX2CX22C accessory motif.
435
Cysteine
to serine substitutions in this C-terminal motif nearly abolished
H2 production in whole cell extract mixtures containing
HydA, HydE, HydF, and mutant HydG proteins,
435b
underscoring the results from the biochemical studies that diatomic
ligand biosynthesis absolutely required the chemical reconstitution
of as-purified HydG with iron and sulfide.
78
Characterization of T. maritima HydG
demonstrated that the reconstituted enzyme displayed a [4Fe–4S]+ cluster signal upon
treatment with dithionite, and low and
high field shoulders indicated an additional cluster was present.
129
Temperature relaxation studies of HydG from C. acetobutylicum indicated that a mixture
of [4Fe–4S]+ and [2Fe–2S]+ clusters was present in photoreduced
samples of the as-purified and inactive protein, while similar studies
performed on the chemically reconstituted and active enzyme revealed
only fast relaxing signals typical of [4Fe–4S]+ clusters.
78b
Analysis of the experimental data suggested
that the signal in reduced samples was adequately simulated by fast
relaxing [4Fe–4S]+ cluster signals. On the basis
of the presence of the N- and C-terminal motifs, sequence analysis
suggests that HydG could coordinate two site-differentiated [4Fe–4S]
clusters, and EPR spectral simulations substantiated this concept
by showing that distinct axial signals were present in the photoreduced
enzyme state when SAM was present (Table 2).
78b,130b
Fontecilla-Camps and co-workers first
explored the role of the C-terminal [4Fe–4S] cluster via site-directed
mutagenic studies in which they created two variant C. acetobutylicum HydG proteins,
one in which two
of the cysteine residues in the accessory CX2CX22C motif (C386 and C389) were mutated
to serines, and the other in
which 88 C-terminal amino acids were deleted (ΔCTD).
130a
The C386S/C389S protein did not produce CO
but did generate significant amounts of CN–, with
levels approximating 50% of wild-type enzyme. Conversely, the ΔCTD
variant did not produce either CO or CN–. The authors
assumed loss of the C-terminal [4Fe–4S] cluster in both variants
based on a decrease in absorbance in the 400–420 nm region
of UV–vis spectra. An additional study using C. acetobutylicum ΔCTD and Thermoanaerobacter
tengcongensis ΔCTD HydG variants showed that
these proteins could still cleave tyrosine into p-cresol in the absence of their C-terminal
domains, although p-cresol amounts that were generated approximated only 2%
of wild-type levels.
449
Our own studies
have recently expanded the spectroscopic and kinetic
characterization of variant C. acetobutylicum HydG proteins.
130b
EPR spectroscopy unambiguously
demonstrates the presence of [4Fe–4S]+ clusters
in ΔCTD and C96A/C100A/C103A (this variant is one in which the
cysteines of the CX3CX2C motif have been mutated
to alanines) HydG proteins. Simulations show that each of the axial
signals in the respective variants displays similar g-values as exhibited in the WT
enzyme. Addition of SAM to the ΔCTD
protein resulted in a mixture of SAM bound and unbound states, allowing
for accurate g-value assignment of each cluster form;
the C96A/C100A/C103A protein containing only the accessory C-terminal
[4Fe–4S] cluster was shown to not bind SAM, indicating that
despite its site-differentiated nature it cannot substitute for the
N-terminal cluster.
130b
Furthermore, only
subtle spectral perturbations were seen in WT and C96A/C100A/C103A
samples prepared in the presence of tyrosine, suggesting that either
substrate does not coordinate the C-terminal cluster or coordination
does not significantly alter cluster g-values.
Despite the lack of perturbation of the iron sulfur cluster EPR
signals in the presence of tyrosine, there was a substantial loss
in substrate binding affinity in the variant proteins. Even with the
increased K
M(tyrosine) values in C386S
and ΔCTD proteins relative to the WT enzyme, substantial amounts
of p-cresol were obtained in assays; the similar p-cresol formation rates for WT (4.4
× 10–3 s–1), C386S (4.3 × 10–3 s–1), and ΔCTD (3.0 × 10–3 s–1) proteins suggest that
rates of radical formation
and tyrosine cleavage are largely unaffected by mutations to residue(s)
in the C-terminus.
130b
However, diatomic
ligand production was altered in the variants, with the C386S protein
generating 2.8 mol equiv of CN– but not forming
CO, and ΔCTD HydG producing no appreciable amounts of either
diatomic species. Both variant proteins additionally displayed enhanced
levels of glyoxylate formation relative to amounts detected during
wild-type turnover, suggesting that the tyrosine Cα–Cβ
bond cleavage event is a heterolytic process (section 10.1). These results suggest
that the degradation
of tyrosine into p-cresol occurs within the TIM barrel
core, as previously suggested by Fontecilla-Camps and co-workers,
449
and that the DHG product then migrates to the
C-terminal domain where diatomic ligand production occurs. Cyanide
formation does not appear to absolutely require the C-terminal [4Fe–4S]
cluster, but does seem to require the C-terminal domain. Generation
of CO, on the other hand, does require the C-terminal cluster, and
this requirement may be related to the substoichiometric amounts of
CO detected in the wild-type HydG, deoxyHb binding assays.
78b,130
Further insights into diatomic ligand formation have been
provided
by Britt and co-workers, who have reported EPR signals at g ≈ 9.5 and 5, proposed
to arise from a [3Fe–4S]+ cluster bound to the C-terminal cluster site, in S. oneidensis
HydG.
131
Tyrosine addition causes a large decrease in the high spin FeS cluster
signal intensity concurrent with the emergence of a new axial signal
with g = 2.06, 1.91, and 1.88 that is consistent
with a [4Fe–4S]+ species; this transformation in
the EPR spectral properties is suggestive of cluster cannibalization
upon substrate addition. EPR samples prepared by rapid freeze–quench
show production of a g = 1.9 FeS-based feature and
a transient g = 2 radical signal.
131
HYSCORE and ENDOR analysis recorded at the g = 1.9 feature reveal 15N and 13C coupling
interactions to the FeS cluster in reactions carried out with 13C9,15N-tyrosine, confirming
that either
tyrosine or a tyrosine derived fragment coordinates the C-terminal
cluster.
131
The g = 2
radical signal was specifically probed through the use of various
tyrosine isotopologues, and the observed hyperfine coupling constants,
as analyzed through DFT simulations, are most consistent with a 4-oxidobenzyl
radical intermediate that would be generated upon heterolytic Cα–Cβ
tyrosine bond cleavage.
131
Last, stopped
flow FTIR spectroscopy was used to examine diatomic ligand formation
using both the wild-type enzyme and a C394S/C397S variant protein.
Both of the diatomic ligands are observed to form quite rapidly during
wild-type catalysis, whereas the C394S/C397S variant produced only
CN– at longer time points, leading the authors to
conclude that the CN– observed in the latter case
was not mechanistically relevant and that the C-terminal [4Fe–4S]+ cluster was essential
for the on-pathway generation of both
diatomics.
131
Kuchenreuther et al.
propose a mechanism for diatomic ligand production
that invokes the N-terminal cluster binding SAM and the C-terminal
cluster anchoring tyrosine.
131
SAM is first
reductively cleaved with the resulting dAdo• radical
abstracting a H-atom from the para position of the
phenyl ring of tyrosine, which is bound to the C-terminal cluster.
Heterolytic tyrosine bond cleavage then occurs, yielding both the
4-oxidobenzyl radical and the dehydroglycine as intermediate products,
with the latter tyrosine fragment remaining bound to the accessory
cluster. Concomitant with the generation of p-cresol
from the 4-oxidobenzyl radical species, scission of DHG would produce
CO and CN– species coordinated to the site-differentiated
Fe of the C-terminal cluster.
131
While tyrosine may be able to coordinate the accessory cluster
in HydG, however, our own analysis leads us to conclude that such
binding is mechanistically irrelevant. Homology models indicate that
the C-terminal cluster of HydG would be located outside the core TIM
barrel at a distance that would be too great for H-atom abstraction
by the dAdo• radical. Moreover, our results and
those of others show that ΔCTD HydG resembles ThiH catalytically,
and that tyrosine binding and degradation to p-cresol
clearly occur independent of the C-terminal domain.
130
Accordingly, we propose that the 15N and 13C coupling interactions observed by Kuchenreuther
et al.
arise from a fragment of tyrosine, possibly DHG, bound to the C-terminal
cluster, which is located adjacent to the TIM barrel; these concepts
are addressed more fully in a recent review article.
450
Several outstanding issues still remain in regards to the
catalytic formation of CN– in the variant proteins
and to the specific requirement of the [4Fe–4S] cluster for
CO formation. Elucidation of the mechanism of ligand transfer to HydF
is also necessary, specifically whether the ligands are delivered
as free diatomics to a [2Fe–2S] cluster bound to HydF (Figure 97),
443a
or whether the
diatomics are delivered to HydF as bound mononuclear Fe species, or
whether the 2Fe subcluster is synthesized through the cannibalization
of the accessory [4Fe–4S] cluster on HydG before being transferred
to HydF (section 12.2.4.2).
443e
12.2.5
Radical SAM Chemistry
and the Synthesis
of the Bridging Dithiolate
12.2.5.1
HydE and the Search
for a Substrate
The demonstration that both diatomics were
derived from HydG-based
catalysis of tyrosine suggested that HydE’s role may be in
the synthesis of the remaining component of the H-cluster, the nonprotein,
bridging dithiolate ligand. While some biochemical studies have been
reported on HydE, little is resolved about its role in maturation,
and at the date of this writing, the carbon-based substrate for this
enzyme still remains to be identified. It is very likely that the
substrate is a common metabolite, as [FeFe]-hydrogenase activation
is readily accomplished in E. coli cell
lysate mixtures coexpressing the three maturation genes.
436,441b,448
A report exploring the effect
of exogenous additives on in vitro HydAΔEFG activation
levels discovered that both tyrosine and cysteine individually and
cooperatively enhanced H2 consumption levels.
448
While the effects of tyrosine can be attributed
to the activity of HydG, the stimulation obtained from cysteine addition
may either be a consequence of HydE’s activity or is an artifact
of more efficient cluster assembly due to the generalized Fe–S
machinery present in the cell lysate.
One of the outstanding
issues in H-cluster structure over the past decade has been the identity
of the bridgehead atom in the dithiolate ligand, an especially important
question when attempting to define the origin of this molecule. Initially
modeled as 1,3-propanedithiolate,
429
the
assignment was quickly revised to dithiomethylamine given the ability
of the amine functionality to act as a proton donor/acceptor.
430a
While computational studies suggested that
the dithiolate ligand could be dithiomethylether,
432b
spectroscopic, computational, and functional biomimetic
studies have now demonstrated that it is unequivocally dithiomethylamine.
445,451
This assignment will undoubtedly clarify the reaction mechanism
HydE catalyzes, once a putative substrate is identified. Along these
lines, it is plausible that HydE generates a carbon-based radical
species upon H-atom abstraction by the dAdo• radical
that then reacts with the sulfide groups of a [2Fe–2S] cluster;
it is also possible that the sulfur atoms of the bridging dithiolate
are derived from the substrate molecule itself.
438,452
12.2.5.2
HydE Iron–Sulfur Cluster States
and Structure
Reconstituted HydE from T. maritima binds up to eight iron and eight sulfides per
protein, contains
two S = 1/2 [4Fe–4S]+ clusters
upon treatment with dithionite (Table 2),
and cleaves SAM nonproductively at a rate of one mole of dAdoH per
mole of protein per hour.
129
Structural
characterization shows that HydE belongs to a subset of radical SAM
enzymes having a full (α/β)8 TIM barrel fold
(Figure 99).
42
Structure
determination in both SAM and methionine/dAdoH bound states provides
a clear picture of the active site in two states, and the high affinity
of the enzyme for the products indicates that SAM might be utilized
as a cofactor.
27a
HydE shares significant
sequence similarity with BioB and PylB, and contains an accessory
cluster binding site near the protein surface located 20 Å away
from the radical SAM cluster (Figure 99). Three
cysteine residues and a water molecule act as ligands to this second
Fe–S cluster, although occupancy of this site is quite variable
depending on protein preparation.
42
Notably,
the cysteines used to coordinate this cluster (Cys311, Cys319, and
Cys322) are only conserved in ∼48% of available HydE sequences,
and despite the similar positioning of the two Fe–S clusters
in HydE to those observed in MoaA, the accessory cluster in HydE directs
its unique Fe site toward solvent, not the center of the active site
cavity as is observed in MoaA (section 6.1.3). Moreover, variant HydE proteins where
these cysteines were mutated
to alanines showed no adverse effects toward hydrogenase activation
in whole cell extracts, suggesting that this auxiliary cluster plays
no role in the H-cluster maturation process.
42
Figure 99
HydE crystal structure (PDB ID 3IIZ). Left: N-terminal domain colored in
wheat, radical SAM domain in light blue, C-terminal domain in light
pink, [4Fe–4S] and [2Fe–2S] clusters in yellow and rust
spheres, and SAM in green sticks. Right: Active site of HydE where
the [4Fe–4S] and [2Fe–2S] clusters (yellow and rust)
and SAM (green carbons) are depicted in sticks with oxygens colored
red and nitrogens colored blue. Cysteines (light blue carbons) involved
in ligating clusters are depicted in lines.
Intriguingly, the HydE structure reveals a large internal
electropositive
cavity that spans the full length of the (βα)8 barrel and is the site of three distinct
anion binding sites.
42
Thiocyanate was discovered to bind with high
affinity in the third anion-binding site at the bottom of the barrel.
It still remains unclear as to why HydE would have such high affinity
for thiocyanate, although this observation may define a pathway wherein
substrate reacts at the top of barrel near the radical SAM cluster
and the product molecule then migrates to the bottom of the barrel
for transfer to either HydF or HydG.
42,453
Even
before the revelation of HydF binding the 2Fe subcluster and
diatomic ligand biosynthesis by HydG, it was surmised that the hydrogenase
maturation enzymes interacted with one another in an intimate fashion.
A reaction sequence was proposed where the alkylation of the sulfide
ions of a [2Fe–2S] cluster was suggested to precede CO and
CN– ligand addition, as modification of the sulfides
would protect these groups against further alteration and shift chemical
reactivity toward the Fe ions.
438
Experimental
evidence for protein–protein interactions was first observed
during affinity tag purifications where the maturases were observed
to coelute with one another.
442
Subsequent
work showed that HydE and HydG both independently stimulate the rate
at which HydF hydrolyzes GTP, suggesting that GTP binding and/or hydrolysis
may act to gate the interactions between the other maturation proteins
during 2Fe subcluster assembly.
443a
Recent
studies using surface plasmon resonance demonstrate that HydE binds
to HydF with a K
D value of 9.19 ×
10–8 M, displaying an order of magnitude lower value
than the K
D for HydG binding to HydF (1.31
× 10–6 M).
454
Additional
results suggest that HydG is unable to displace HydE when it is bound
to HydF and that HydG and HydE do not appear to interact with one
another. Experiments aimed at probing the GTPase functionality of
HydF show that GTP addition to either the HydF–HydE or HydF–HydG
complexes during dissociative phases result in an increase in the
rates of dissociation, suggesting that the GTPase activity of HydF
promotes displacement of the interacting partners.
454
These data certainly speak toward the tightly controlled
stepwise reaction between HydE and HydG with HydF,
411a
and the observation of the high binding affinity between
HydE and HydF is certainly not surprising given the existence of fused hydEF genes
in certain organisms.
54b
Recent sequence and structure analysis of HydE has revealed
remarkable
resemblance to PylB, the radical SAM enzyme that catalyzes the isomerization
of l-lysine to l-methylornithine in the biosynthetic
pathway of pyrrolysine (section 5.2). Superpositioning
of the HydE and PylB crystal structures (PylB 3T7V, HydE 3CIW) shows comparable SAM
and putative substrate binding pockets, with
a root moon square deviation value of only 1.3 Å.
43
Given what is known about the mechanism catalyzed
by PylB, it is likely time to reconsider the potential chemical reactivity
of HydE during H-cluster maturation. We propose that the results summarized
herein argue against the idea that HydE acts simply as a chaperone
for HydF during cluster translocation from HydG to HydAΔEFG,
443e
because if this hypothesis were
correct it would be challenging to rationalize the results of Vallese
and co-workers.
454
Instead, these findings
appear to support the action of HydE in a specific role during H-cluster
biosynthesis, and we propose this is in some first step relating to
the synthesis of the dithiomethylamine ligand.
13
Radical SAM Enzymes of Unknown Function
13.1
Radical SAM Chemistry in the Antiviral Response:
Viperin
Human Viperin, also known as RSAD2 or Cig5, plays
a key role in the host immune response system in response to a wide
variety of dsRNA and DNA viruses, microbial infection, and other immune
stimuli such as artheroschleritic lesions and pregnancy.
455
Initially, the immune system triggers release
of both type I (α/β) and type II (γ) interferons,
which stimulates a multitude of signaling cascades, including expression
of interferon stimulated genes (ISGs). Viperin, classified among the
family ISGs, was initially discovered as an antiviral using differential
display analysis by Zhu et al. in response to fibroblasts infected
with human cytomegalovirus.
455b
Since then,
several other groups including Boudinot, Grewal, and Chin and Cresswell
have expanded this subset of ISGs to include additional cig5 viperin analogues such
as vig1 (trout), best5 (rat), and mvig (mouse).
455c,455d,456
In every case, these genes were
stimulated in reaction to either viral or bacterial infection via
the immune response pathway.
Based upon sequence alignments
of Vig1 and Cig5, this family of enzymes was proposed to belong to
the radical SAM superfamily, hence the alternative name RSAD2 or radical
SAM containing domain 2, due to the presence of four conserved motifs
commonly observed in other radical SAM enzymes.
219,455d
These sequences include the CX3CX2C motif,
known to bind a [4Fe–4S] cluster, as well as the GGE, SNG,
and ISCDS motifs interact with SAM in known structures. Homology models
utilizing the Phyre
279
server program demonstrated
that human viperin (hVip) most likely bears an (α/β)6 TIM barrel with structural similarities
to MoaA, HydE, and
PFL-AE.
113c,455a
The protein is predicted to
contain three domains: the amphipathic α-helical N-terminal
domain, a middle domain (which includes both a leucine zipper motif
in all sequences except lower vertebrates as well as the strictly
conserved CX3CX2C motif), and the highly conserved
C-terminal domain. Results from Hinson and Cresswell have shown that
the amphipathic N-terminal α-helical region is capable of associating
the protein to the cytosolic face of the ER membrane as well as functioning
to inhibit protein secretion and protein transport.
457
While the N-terminal domain did not appear necessary for
antiviral activity, either mutation of the CX3CX2C motif or deletion of the C-terminal
domain completely abrogate
viperin’s antiviral properties.
458
Although the function of the highly conserved C-terminus remains
unclear, it possibly functions in substrate recognition and/or binding.
Computational modeling predicted a low-resolution viperin structure
with an Fe–S cluster bound to the CX3CX2C motif at the center of a hydrophobic core
surrounded by a partial
TIM barrel. It is hypothesized that removal of the Fe–S cluster
likely leads to instability in the core, thereby making the TIM barrel
“collapse” into itself.
113c
To substantiate this idea, mutational analysis of the CX3CX2C motif using CD and steady
state fluorescence spectroscopy
demonstrated the requirement for a bound Fe–S cluster for proper
folding. Protein lacking the Fe–S cluster was less stable and
more prone to unfolding, as demonstrated by a large decrease in secondary
and tertiary content, and easily aggregated as it was found primarily
in inclusion bodies. Such self-association may lead to dimerization
of the protein and inhibition of the interaction with the ER membrane.
113c
Additional evidence that viperin indeed
binds a [4Fe–4S]
cluster came in 2010 by two different groups. Shaveta et al. performed
NMR and CD spectroscopy on full-length and fragmented viperin, and
their results showed that deletion of the N-terminal 1–44 amino
acids led to increased solubility of the protein.
113a
Following chemical reconstitution, the stability of the
protein was enhanced, as the T
m increased
from 30 to 45 °C and the protein adopted a more ordered secondary
structure relative to the isolated fragments, suggesting that a bound
Fe–S cluster enables proper folding of the protein.
113a
Duschene and Broderick further categorized
viperin as a member of the radical SAM superfamily through their work
with N-terminally deleted viperin.
113b
The
protein was shown to bind [3Fe–4S]+ and possibly
[4Fe–4S]2+ clusters in the reconstituted state and
[4Fe–4S]+ in the reconstituted and reduced state,
as demonstrated by EPR and UV–vis spectroscopies (Table 2). HPLC analysis showed that
reconstituted viperin
catalyzes the nonproductive cleavage of SAM in vitro resulting in
the production of dAdoH.
113b
While the
substrate(s) involved in viperin’s catalytic antiviral activity
remains a mystery, based upon its known interaction with farnesyl
pyrophosphate, an enzyme involved in lipid metabolism, viperin may
act on FPPS or another related enzyme. It is also possible that viperin
utilizes a metabolite in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway as substrate,
thereby leading to eventual alteration of downstream lipids, lipid
droplets, or lipid raft domains.
459
13.2
Radical SAM Chemistry in the Synthesis of
the Iron-Guanylylpyridinol Cofactor in [Fe]-Hydrogenase?
The Hmd-hydrogenase, also referred to as the [Fe]-hydrogenase, is
expressed in methanogens that do not contain cytochromes and, along
with the F420-dependent methylenetetrahydromethanopterin
dehydrogenase, acts to reduce F420.
460
The [Fe]-hydrogenase itself heterolytically cleaves H2 and reversibly transfers a
hyride to methenyltetrahydromethanopterin
(H4MPT+), yielding methylenetetrahydromethanopterin
(H4MPT) according to the reaction CH=H4MPT+ + H2 ⇆ CH2—H4MPT + H+.
460,461
Hydrogen is cleaved
at the iron-guanylylpyridinol cofactor (FeGP-co) site, a moiety comprised
of a single low spin Fe(II) ion ligated in bidentate fashion by an
acyl carbon and a nitrogen of a pyridinol ring, as well as by two
CO molecules and a protein-based cysteine thiolate (Figure 100).
462
Figure 100
The iron-guanylylpyridinol
cofactor (FeGP-co) of [Fe]-hydrogenase.
All methanogens with the hmd gene also contain
a suite of seven co-occurring genes denoted hmdA-G that are often clustered adjacent
to hmd and are
critical for attaining active enzyme.
460,463
Two of these
genes appear to encode proteins that have been proposed to perform
SAM-dependent reactions. The colocalized hcgG gene
is annotated as a fibrillarin-like protein with homology to enzymes
involved in RNA maturation and nucleoside modification, including
methylation and methoxycarboxylation reactions.
109
Moreover, the crystal structure of a fibrillarin homologue
from Methanocaldococcus janaschii contains
a catalytic domain common to SAM-dependent methyltransferases,
269,464
and it was subsequently proposed that HcgG (or HmdC) was responsible
for the methylation of the pyridinol ring of the GP cofactor.
109
The second SAM-associated gene is hcgA (or hmdB). Sequence annotation indicated that
hcgA encoded for a radical SAM-like binding protein that
comprised a CX5CX2C consensus sequence, distinct
from the typical CX3CX2C motif, suggesting that
HcgA was a new member of the radical SAM superfamily, joining a subclass
of enzymes that contain variants of the characteristic SAM binding
motif (ThiC and Elp3, sections 6.2 and 10.5).
32,103,108,258
Amino acid sequence homology
modeling of HcgA shows that it is predicted to have a complete (βα)8 TIM barrel with
analogous SAM binding motifs as observed
in other superfamily members (Figure 101) (section 2.6).
34,279
Figure 101
Structure homology
model of the amino acid sequence of HcgA (M. maripaludis) (green), aligned to the
HydE crystal
structure (PDB ID 3CIX) (pink) (section 12.2.5.2). Radical SAM motif
is colored in yellow, cysteines involved in ligating the [4Fe–4S]
are shown as yellow sticks, while the [4Fe–4S] cluster is depicted
as yellow and rust sticks. For clarity, the [2Fe–2S] cluster
of HydE has been omitted. MqnE structural model was generated using
the protein structure prediction server Phyre2,
279
where the HydE template model yielded the top hit.
Preliminary biochemical characterization
of HcgA demonstrated that
the heterologously expressed Methanococcus maripaludis protein contained a [4Fe–4S]+
cluster that interacted
with and reductively cleaved SAM into dAdoH (Table 2).
109
However, no substrate was
identified, complicating the assignment of the role of radical SAM
chemistry in FeGP biosynthesis. Nonetheless, a putative role for HcgA
was surmised on the basis of the observation that it clusters within
a sequence lineage comprising ThiH, HydE, and HydG. The role of HydE
and HydG in the synthesis of the diatomic and nonprotein ligands of
the H-cluster (sections 12.2.4 and 12.2.5) suggested that HcgA was responsible for
the
SAM-initiated synthesis of the CO ligands of FeGP;
109
an alternate proposal suggested that this enzyme was responsible
for the methylation of the pyridinol ring.
460
Insights into the biosynthesis of the FeGP cofactor were recently
obtained via supplementing media with various isotopic precursors
during growth of Methanothermobacter marburgensis and Methanobrevibacter smithii;
NMR
and MS techniques were utilized to identify positions of 13C and 2H incorporation
into the extracted cofactor.
465
Importantly, these in vivo labeling studies
reveal that the CO ligands are derived from CO2, demonstrating
that HcgA does not function in an analogous manner to HydG in diatomic
ligand synthesis. Integration of the intact methyl group of l-[methyl-2H3]methionine
into the pyridinol
moiety suggests that methyl transfer from methionine is catalyzed
by a SAM-dependent methyltransferase, as opposed to a radical SAM
enzyme.
465
While these results help to
clarify how the FeGP cofactor is synthesized, little evidence currently
exists in terms of defining the requirement of HcgA in this process.
13.3
A Radical SAM Epimerase? AviX12 in Avilamycin
A Biosynthesis
The antibiotic avilamycin A is an oligosaccharide
antibiotic of the orthosomycin subclass with known activity against
many Gram-positive bacteria.
466
Sequencing
of the avilamycin biosynthetic gene cluster identified the proteins
involved in its biosynthetic pathway. Gene knockout studies have elucidated
several details of the biosynthetic steps; however, gene characterization
has been limited by enzymes of no known function.
466,467
Sequence annotation of the gene aviX12 (positioned
between methyltransferase and sugar biosynthetic genes) revealed that
it would yield a protein containing the CX3CX2C motif, and was proposed to be involved
in an oxidation-type reaction
during biosynthesis via its postulated site-differentiated [4Fe–4S]
cluster.
467b
Metabolite analysis of a Streptomyces viridochromogenes culture with the aviX12 gene
inactivated resulted in accumulation of gavibamycin
N1, containing an epimerized heptasaccharide glucose moiety in place
of the expected mannose; this led to a proposed reaction for AviX12
in which it acts as an epimerase (Figure 102).
104
AviX12 overexpression and aerobic
purification resulted in the isolation of an enzyme that was found
to bind [3Fe–4S] clusters in the oxidized state (as gauged
by EPR spectroscopy) with an isotropic signal of g = 2.01 (Table 2).
104
However, in these studies, the enzyme was not chemically reconstituted
with Fe and S and thus had no observable activity.
Figure 102
Proposed AviX12 reaction
catalyzing the epimerization reaction
to convert gavibamycin N1 to avilamycin A.
While preliminary experiments concerning AviX12 function
have been
initiated, the nature of the epimerization reaction proposed for AviX12
is currently unknown. Given the recent characterization of radical
SAM enzymes involved in sugar modifications, it is possible that AviX12
may exhibit similarities to BtrN or DesII (sections 8.2 and 10.3). Interestingly,
similar
to the BtrN dehydrogenase enzyme, AviX12 contains several accessory
cysteine residues that could plausibly coordinate a second Fe–S
cluster. However, further biochemical and spectroscopic investigation
is needed to better clarify the putative epimerization reaction catalyzed
by this presumed radical SAM enzyme (Figure 102).
14
Radical SAM Chemistry Outside the Superfamily:
Dph2
Diphthamide is a rare amino acid synthesized by posttranslational
modification of a histidine residue on translational elongation factor
2 (EF2) that serves an essential role in ribosomal protein synthesis.
468
Since the elucidation of its structure in 1980
as 2-[3-carboxyamido-3-(trimethylammonio)propyl]-histidine (diphthamide),
it is now known to help prevent −1 frame shift mutations during
protein synthesis, as it serves as the site of ADP-ribosylation by
diphtheria toxin and Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A in eukaryotes and archaea.
469
Biosynthesis of diphthamide is associated with five genes (dph1–dph5 in yeast) that
participate
in a three-step biosynthesis generally summarized as involving C–C
bond formation between the histidine imidazole ring and a 3-amino-3-carboxypropyl
(ACP) group, methyl transfer, and carboxyl amidation.
470
Synthesis and insertion of the ACP group
involves a rare type of
translational modification (C–C bond formation) involving activation
of the poorly nucleophilic ε carbon of histidine. Initial radiolabeling
studies showed that [α-3H]-methionine and [Me-3H]-methionine were incorporated into
diphthine, suggesting
that both the backbone and the methyl groups of diphthamide originated
from methionine.
471
Considering that methionine
is a metabolic component of SAM,
472
that
the known nucleoside 3-(3-carboxy-3-aminopropyl)-uridine is synthesized
through nucleophilic attack of the γ-methylene carbon of SAM,
473
and that discrete portions of methionine were
incorporated into diphthine suggested that backbone and methyl label
incorporation likely involved different enzymes.
470a,471
Following characterization of Dph5 as a SAM-dependent
methyltransferase
470a
and association of
Dph1–Dph4 with the initial C–C bond formation event,
Dph2 stood out as an initial target.
474
Because archaeal species have only a Dph2 protein (relative to Dph1
and Dph2 in eukaryotic species) and no Dph3 and Dph4 orthologues,
Dph2 could be anticipated to perform the C–C bond insertion
reaction.
32
Crystallographic structure
determination of Pyrococcus
horikoshii Dph2 purified aerobically resulted in a
cofactorless protein that was found to have no activity.
32
Interestingly, the aerobically purified enzyme
contained a pocket of three cysteines (Cys59, Cys163, and Cys287)
that originated from different structural domains and came together
in the center of the Dph2 monomer in close enough proximity for putative
Fe–S cluster coordination (Figure 103).
32
Anaerobic preparation of the enzyme
resulted in an active enzyme with a coordinated Fe–S cluster.
Upon reduction, the EPR spectroscopic g-values (2.03,
1.92, and 1.86) and Mössbauer parameters were consistent with
a [4Fe–4S] cluster (Table 2).
32
The crystal structure with the bound [4Fe–4S]
cluster (PBD ID 3LZD; 2.10 Å resolution) revealed a homodimer with a structure that
was distinct from the traditional TIM barrel radical SAM enzymes:
each monomer was composed of three domains in a triangular orientation
with each domain consisting of a four-stranded parallel β-sheet
with three flanking α-helices, and an additional antiparallel
β-strand in domains 1 and 2, and two additional α-helices
in domains 2 and 3.
32
Overall, the structure
was similar to quinolate synthase
475
and
had a structural arrangement comparable to that of the IspH enzyme
in isoprenoid biosynthesis.
476
Figure 103
Dph2 crystal
structure (PDB ID 3LZD). Left: Domain 1 colored in wheat, domain
2 in light blue, domain 3 in light pink, C-terminal domain in light
green, and [4Fe–4S] cluster in yellow and rust spheres. Right:
Active site of Dph2 where the [4Fe–4S] cluster (yellow and
rust) is depicted in sticks. Cysteines (light blue carbons) involved
in ligating clusters are depicted in lines.
In vitro assays containing Dph2, SAM, reductant, and EF2
resulted
in production of MTA but no dAdoH, indicating bond cleavage had occurred
between the sulfonium sulfur and the γ-C of the methionine portion
of SAM.
32
In the absence of EF2, dansylated
2-aminobutyric acid and homocysteine sulfinic acid, suggested to be
products of a quenched SAM-derived 3-amino-3-carboxypropyl (ACP) radical,
were detected by LC–MS.
32
The proposed
Dph2 reaction mechanism thus involves SAM coordination to the site-differentiated
Fe of the [4Fe–4S] cluster, where electron transfer from the
cluster results in homolytic cleavage of the S–C(γ) bond
of SAM, producing the ACP radical and MTA (Figure 104).
108
The ACP radical then undergoes
electrophilic attack on the π orbitals of the ε carbon
of the imidazole ring on EF, forming an imidazole-based radical that
may be quenched via electron transfer back to the [4Fe–4S]
cluster upon deprotonation.
32,108
Figure 104
Proposed reaction mechanism
for Dph2 catalyzing the modification
of EF2-His600 during the first step of dipthamide biosynthesis.
This mechanism would appear then
to place Dph2 within the radical
SAM superfamily, as it uses a site-differentiated [4Fe–4S]
cluster and SAM to generate a SAM-derived radical intermediate. Dph2
is not, however, a member of the radical SAM superfamily, as it has
none of the sequence features that are conserved among superfamily
members that are used as indicators of their divergent evolution from
a common ancestor; Dph2 also lacks the conserved TIM barrel fold found
in the radical SAM superfamily members (Figure 103). This suggests that the Dph2-catalyzed
reaction utilizing
a [4Fe–4S] cluster and SAM is a case of convergent evolution,
with Dph2 carrying out a similar type of catalytic mechanism but doing
so in a manner that utilizes a distinct structural design from radical
SAM enzymes. What is particularly exciting about this discovery of
an enzyme that has through convergent evolution adopted radical SAM
chemistry is the prospect that there are perhaps many other enzymes
that do not belong to this superfamily but that utilize its amazingly
versatile chemistry in catalysis.
15
Concluding
Remarks
In the 13 years since Heidi Sofia first identified
the radical
SAM superfamily with its ∼600 original members,
1
there has been a veritable explosion of new radical SAM
enzymes identified with the size of the superfamily currently estimated
at nearly 50 000 members.
14
Moreover,
our understanding of the chemical transformations catalyzed by these
enzymes has grown considerably; it is now clear that radical SAM enzymatic
reactions are remarkably diverse, ranging from simple H-atom abstractions
to generate product radicals, to H-atom abstractions that initiate
a cascade of extraordinary chemical transformations. There are now
even cases of radical SAM enzymes that couple radical SAM chemistry
to other types of chemistry in a single active site, an example being
the class A methyltransferases that carry out nucleophilic methylation
together with H-atom abstraction. Radical SAM chemistry plays critical
roles in numerous biosynthetic pathways including antibiotic production,
posttranslational modifications, synthesis of protein cofactors, and
catalyzing the synthesis of the nonprotein ligands that impart chemical
reactivity to some of the most complex biological metal clusters known.
The utilization of a universal protein fold with one of the most ubiquitous
metal cofactors in biology, the [4Fe–4S] cluster, together
with a simple organic molecule, SAM, is apparently a quite remarkable
and adaptable method to carry out a wide variety of difficult transformations.
This chemical recipe is so pervasive in biology that it is not surprising
that it is also now being detected in enzymes that are not superfamily
members but whose mechanistic chemistry has converged with the radical
SAM superfamily. Given that the study of radical SAM enzymes is in
its infancy, with only a small fraction of recognized superfamily
members biochemically characterized in any detail, it is probable
that the next few years will bring with it a wealth of novel reactions
that will undoubtedly enhance our understanding and appreciation of
the fascinating chemical transformations that these enzymes carry
out in biology.