46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Relationship of organizational culture, teamwork and job satisfaction in interprofessional teams

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Team effectiveness is often explained on the basis of input-process-output (IPO) models. According to these models a relationship between organizational culture (input = I), interprofessional teamwork (process = P) and job satisfaction (output = O) is postulated. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between these three aspects using structural analysis.

          Methods

          A multi-center cross-sectional study with a survey of 272 employees was conducted in fifteen rehabilitation clinics with different indication fields in Germany. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was carried out using AMOS software version 20.0 (maximum-likelihood method).

          Results

          Of 661 questionnaires sent out to members of the health care teams in the medical rehabilitation clinics, 275 were returned (41.6 %). Three questionnaires were excluded (missing data greater than 30 %), yielding a total of 272 employees that could be analyzed. The confirmatory models were supported by the data. The results showed that 35 % of job satisfaction is predicted by a structural equation model that includes both organizational culture and teamwork. The comparison of this predictive IPO model ( organizational culture (I), interprofessional teamwork (P), job satisfaction (O)) and the predictive IO model ( organizational culture (I), job satisfaction (O)) showed that the effect of organizational culture is completely mediated by interprofessional teamwork. The global fit indices are a little better for the IO model (TLI: .967, CFI: .972, RMSEA .052) than for the IPO model (TLI: .934, CFI: .943, RMSEA: .61), but the prediction of job satisfaction is better in the IPO model (R 2 = 35 %) than in the IO model (R 2 = 24 %).

          Conclusions

          Our study results underpin the importance of interprofessional teamwork in health care organizations. To enhance interprofessional teamwork, team interventions can be recommended and should be supported. Further studies investigating the organizational culture and its impact on interprofessional teamwork and team effectiveness in health care are important.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0888-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references116

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

          Interest in the problem of method biases has a long history in the behavioral sciences. Despite this, a comprehensive summary of the potential sources of method biases and how to control for them does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which method biases influence behavioral research results, identify potential sources of method biases, discuss the cognitive processes through which method biases influence responses to measures, evaluate the many different procedural and statistical techniques that can be used to control method biases, and provide recommendations for how to select appropriate procedural and statistical remedies for different types of research settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

              P. Bentler (1990)
              Normed and nonnormed fit indexes are frequently used as adjuncts to chi-square statistics for evaluating the fit of a structural model. A drawback of existing indexes is that they estimate no known population parameters. A new coefficient is proposed to summarize the relative reduction in the noncentrality parameters of two nested models. Two estimators of the coefficient yield new normed (CFI) and nonnormed (FI) fit indexes. CFI avoids the underestimation of fit often noted in small samples for Bentler and Bonett's (1980) normed fit index (NFI). FI is a linear function of Bentler and Bonett's non-normed fit index (NNFI) that avoids the extreme underestimation and overestimation often found in NNFI. Asymptotically, CFI, FI, NFI, and a new index developed by Bollen are equivalent measures of comparative fit, whereas NNFI measures relative fit by comparing noncentrality per degree of freedom. All of the indexes are generalized to permit use of Wald and Lagrange multiplier statistics. An example illustrates the behavior of these indexes under conditions of correct specification and misspecification. The new fit indexes perform very well at all sample sizes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +49 761 203 5519 , mirjam.koerner@mps.uni-freiburg.de
                +49-761-682-350 , markus.wirtz@ph-freiburg.de
                +49 761 203 3020 , juergen.bengel@psychologie.uni-freiburg.de
                +49 761 203 5686 , goeritz@psychologie.uni-freiburg.de
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                23 June 2015
                23 June 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 243
                Affiliations
                [ ]Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Freiburg, Hebelstr. 29, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
                [ ]Department of Research Methods, Institute of Psychology, University of Education Freiburg, Kunzenweg 21, 79117 Freiburg, Germany
                [ ]Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Engelbergerstr. 41, 79085 Freiburg, Germany
                [ ]Department of Occupational and Consumer Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Engelbergerstr. 41, 79085 Freiburg, Germany
                Article
                888
                10.1186/s12913-015-0888-y
                4477418
                26099228
                397eb442-7747-4fd7-b920-286473798b8a
                © Körner et al. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 23 June 2014
                : 22 May 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Health & Social care
                organizational culture,teamwork,job satisfaction,hospital,health care
                Health & Social care
                organizational culture, teamwork, job satisfaction, hospital, health care

                Comments

                Comment on this article