26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Analysis on monitoring results of toxicological indexes of drinking water in rural schools of Yunnan Province from 2017 to 2020

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective To understand the toxicological indexes and indexes factors of drinking water in rural schools in Yunnan Province during 2017-2020, so as to provide scientific basis for ensuring drinking water safety, and targeted intervention in rural schools.

          Methods The end water of 456, 399, 391, 387 rural primary and secondary school drinking water supply projects in 129 counties in Yunnan Province was collected from 2017 to 2020, 11 toxicological indexes were analyzed and evaluated.

          Results The overall compliance rate of drinking water toxicological indexes in rural primary and secondary schools in Yunnan Province was 99.32%; The top three indexes exceeding the standard were nitrate nitrogen (0.31%), chloroform (0.15%) and cadmium(0.09%). The difference of compliance rate by year was statistically significant (χ 2 = 11.04, P<0.05); No difference in compliance rate was found between dry and wet seasons (χ 2 = 0.05, P>0.05); The rate of the surface water meeting the standard was higher than that of the groundwater (χ 2 = 9.62, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the compliance rate between the treated and untreated projects (χ 2 = 1.55, P>0.05); The daily water supply scale was less than 500 m 3, and the rate of reaching the standard was lower than that of daily water supply is greater than 500 m 32 = 4.27, P<0.05).

          Conclusion The overall percentage of the toxicological indexes in drinking water exceeding the standard in rural primary and secondary schools in Yunnan Province is low. Nitrate nitrogen, chloroform and cadmium should be considered as the prioritirized pollutants of drinking water in rural schools of Yunnan Province.

          Abstract

          【摘要】 目的 了解云南省2017—2020年农村学校饮用水毒理学指标达标情况和影响因素, 为保障农村学校饮用水卫生 安全和采取针对性的干预措施提供科学依据。 方法 2017—2020年在云南省129个县采用方便抽样法选取456, 399, 391 和387所农村中小学校作为监测点, 采用学校饮水供水工程的末梢水, 对水样的11项毒理学指标进行检测和分析评价。 结果 云南省农村中小学校供水工程毒理学指标总达标率为99.33%, 达标率最低的是硝酸盐氮、三氯甲烷、镉, 超标率分 别为0.31%, 0.15%和0.09%;不同年份达标率差异有统计学意义(χ 2 = 11.04, P<0.05);枯、丰水期达标率差异无统计学意义 (χ 2 = 0.05, P>0.05);地表水达标率髙于地下水 (χ 2 = 9.62, P<0.05);工程经过处理与未处理达标率差异无统计学意义(χ 2 = 1.55, P>0.05); 日供水规模 ≤500 m 3达标率低于日供水规模 >500 m 32 = 4.27, P<0.05)。 结论 云南农村中小学饮用水毒 理学指标超标率均较低, 硝酸盐氮、三氯甲烷、镉应被作为云南农村学校饮水优先治理的污染物。

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          CJSH
          Chinese Journal of School Health
          Chinese Journal of School Health (China )
          1000-9817
          01 October 2021
          01 December 2021
          : 42
          : 10
          : 1575-1577
          Affiliations
          [1] 1Institute of Environmental Health, Yunnan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Kunming (650022), China
          Author notes
          *Corresponding author: DI Juan, E-mail: 452748398@ 123456qq.com
          Article
          j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.10.032
          10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2021.10.032
          398066aa-e25f-4f86-ba08-12c2245aa0d6
          © 2021 Chinese Journal of School Health

          This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

          History
          Categories
          Journal Article

          Ophthalmology & Optometry,Pediatrics,Nutrition & Dietetics,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry,Public health
          Eligibility determination,Drinking,Toxicology,Rural health

          Comments

          Comment on this article