4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Pathogen prevalence in commercially reared bumble bees and evidence of spillover in conspecific populations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          ► We determine the permeability of cropping systems to commercial bumble bees. ► We quantify the prevalence of pathogens in bumble bees adjacent to greenhouses. ► Up to 97% of pollen returning to commercial bumble bee hives was non-crop pollen. ► The prevalence of two gut parasites was greatest within 2 km of greenhouses. ► Pathogen spillover in this system compels national and international regulation.

          Abstract

          Worldwide, wild bumble bees ( Bombus spp.) are experiencing marked declines, with potentially up to 11% of species currently under threat. Recent studies from North America suggest that disease transmission from commercially reared bumble bees to wild populations has led to marked range contractions in some species. In Europe, data on the prevalence of pathogen spillover from commercial to wild bumble bee populations is lacking, despite the widespread production and transport of hives within the EU since the early 1980s. We determined the permeability of cropping systems to commercial bumble bees, and quantified the prevalence of four pathogens in commercial Bombus terrestris hives and adjacent conspecific populations at increasing distances from greenhouses in Ireland. Commercial bumble bees collected from 31% to 97% of non-crop pollen, depending on the cropping system, and hives had markedly higher frequencies of two gut parasites, Crithidia spp. and Nosema bombi, compared to adjacent populations, but were free of tracheal mites. The highest prevalence of Crithida was observed within 2 km of greenhouses and the probability of infection declined in a host sex- and pathogen-specific manner up to 10 km. We suggest implementing measures that prevent the interaction of commercially reared and wild bumble bees by integrating the enforcement of national best management practices for users of commercial pollinators with international legislation that regulates the sanitation of commercial hives in production facilities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bumblebee flight distances in relation to the forage landscape.

            1. Foraging range is a key aspect of the ecology of 'central place foragers'. Estimating how far bees fly under different circumstances is essential for predicting colony success, and for estimating bee-mediated gene flow between plant populations. It is likely to be strongly influenced by forage distribution, something that is hard to quantify in all but the simplest landscapes; and theories of foraging distance tend to assume a homogeneous forage distribution. 2. We quantified the distribution of bumblebee Bombus terrestris L. foragers away from experimentally positioned colonies, in an agricultural landscape, using two methods. We mass-marked foragers as they left the colony, and analysed pollen from foragers returning to the colonies. The data were set within the context of the 'forage landscape': a map of the spatial distribution of forage as determined from remote-sensed data. To our knowledge, this is the first time that empirical data on foraging distances and forage availability, at this resolution and scale, have been collected and combined for bumblebees. 3. The bees foraged at least 1.5 km from their colonies, and the proportion of foragers flying to one field declined, approximately linearly, with radial distance. In this landscape there was great variation in forage availability within 500 m of colonies but little variation beyond 1 km, regardless of colony location. 4. The scale of B. terrestris foraging was large enough to buffer against effects of forage patch and flowering crop heterogeneity, but bee species with shorter foraging ranges may experience highly variable colony success according to location.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Plight of the bumble bee: Pathogen spillover from commercial to wild populations

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Biol Conserv
                Biol. Conserv
                Biological Conservation
                Elsevier Ltd.
                0006-3207
                0006-3207
                21 January 2013
                March 2013
                21 January 2013
                : 159
                : 269-276
                Affiliations
                [a ]Teagasc, Oak Park Research Centre, Oak Park, Carlow, Co. Carlow, Ireland
                [b ]Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Biology, Department of Zoology, D-06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
                [c ]University of Limerick, Department of Life Sciences, Limerick, Ireland
                [d ]Teagasc, Advisory Office, Johnstown Castle Estate, Co. Wexford, Ireland
                [e ]International Rice Research Institute, Crop and Environmental Sciences Division, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Biology, Department of Zoology, Hoher Weg 8, D-06120 Halle (Saale), Germany. Tel.: +49 345 5526502; fax: +49 345 5527428. tomas.murray@ 123456zoologie.uni-halle.de
                Article
                S0006-3207(12)00441-7
                10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.021
                7124208
                32287339
                399a699a-fbf2-4d82-ac39-bf4fde69f71d
                Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 2 April 2012
                : 21 August 2012
                : 22 October 2012
                Categories
                Article

                Ecology
                apicystis,bombus,crithidia,locustacarus,nosema,parasite
                Ecology
                apicystis, bombus, crithidia, locustacarus, nosema, parasite

                Comments

                Comment on this article