Blog
About

201
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    2
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Kerkhoff v Minister of Justice and Constitutionai Development 2011 2 SACR109 (GNP): Intermediary Appointment Reports and a Child's Right to Privacy Versus the Right of an Accused to Access to Information

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          General consensus exists that the adversarial nature of the South African criminal procedure with its often aggressive cross-examination of a witness, sometimes by an accused himself, will in most cases expose a child to undue mental stress or suffering when having to testify in court. In confirmation of this fact and with a notion to shield child witnesses from the stress or suffering when having to testify in the presence of an accused the function of an intermediary was introduced with the insertion of section 170A into the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977. In terms of section 170A(1) a court may if it appears to such court that it would expose any witness under the biological or mental age of eighteen years to undue mental stress or suffering if he or she testified at such hearing, appoint a competent person as an intermediary in order for the witness to give evidence through that intermediary. Section 170A(1) contemplates that a child complainant will be assessed prior to testifying in court in order to determine whether the services of an intermediary should be used. If the assessment reveals that the services of an intermediary are needed, then the state must arrange for an intermediary to be available at the commencement of the trail. The aforementioned procedure of section 170A(1) was followed in Kerkhoff v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development 2011 2 SACR 109 (GP) and is the subject of this discussion.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Administrative law in South Africa

           C Hoexter (2012)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Hiemstra's Criminal Procedure

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Constitutional Law of South Africa

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Affiliations
                orgnameUniversity of South Africa South Africa
                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Journal
                pelj
                PER: Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad
                PER
                Publication of North-West University (Potchefstroom Campus) (Potchefstroom, North-West Province, South Africa )
                1727-3781
                2017
                : 20
                : 1
                : 1-26
                S1727-37812017000100005 10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20n0a1035

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

                Counts
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 14, Pages: 26
                Product
                Product Information: SciELO South Africa

                Comments

                Comment on this article