8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Gain control with A-type potassium current: I A as a switch between divisive and subtractive inhibition

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Neurons process and convey information by transforming barrages of synaptic inputs into spiking activity. Synaptic inhibition typically suppresses the output firing activity of a neuron, and is commonly classified as having a subtractive or divisive effect on a neuron’s output firing activity. Subtractive inhibition can narrow the range of inputs that evoke spiking activity by eliminating responses to non-preferred inputs. Divisive inhibition is a form of gain control: it modifies firing rates while preserving the range of inputs that evoke firing activity. Since these two “modes” of inhibition have distinct impacts on neural coding, it is important to understand the biophysical mechanisms that distinguish these response profiles. In this study, we use simulations and mathematical analysis of a neuron model to find the specific conditions (parameter sets) for which inhibitory inputs have subtractive or divisive effects. Significantly, we identify a novel role for the A-type Potassium current ( I A ). In our model, this fast-activating, slowly-inactivating outward current acts as a switch between subtractive and divisive inhibition. In particular, if I A is strong (large maximal conductance) and fast (activates on a time-scale similar to spike initiation), then inhibition has a subtractive effect on neural firing. In contrast, if I A is weak or insufficiently fast-activating, then inhibition has a divisive effect on neural firing. We explain these findings using dynamical systems methods (plane analysis and fast-slow dissection) to define how a spike threshold condition depends on synaptic inputs and I A . Our findings suggest that neurons can “self-regulate” the gain control effects of inhibition via combinations of synaptic plasticity and/or modulation of the conductance and kinetics of A-type Potassium channels. This novel role for I A would add flexibility to neurons and networks, and may relate to recent observations of divisive inhibitory effects on neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract.

          Author summary

          Neurons process information by generating spikes in response to two types of synaptic inputs. Excitatory inputs increase spike rates and inhibitory inputs decrease spike rates (typically). The interaction between these two input types and the transformation of these inputs into spike outputs is not, however, a simple matter of addition and subtraction. Inhibitory inputs can suppress outputs in a variety of ways. For instance, in some cases, inhibition adjusts the rate of spiking activity while preserving the range of inputs that evoke spiking activity; an important computational principle known as gain control. We use simulations and mathematical analysis of a neuron model to identify properties of a neuron that determine how inhibitory inputs affect spiking activity. Specifically, we demonstrate how the gain control effects of inhibition depend on the A-type Potassium current. This novel role for the A-type Potassium current provides a way for neurons to flexibly regulate how they process synaptic inputs and transmit signals to other areas of the brain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dendritic excitability and synaptic plasticity.

          Most synaptic inputs are made onto the dendritic tree. Recent work has shown that dendrites play an active role in transforming synaptic input into neuronal output and in defining the relationships between active synapses. In this review, we discuss how these dendritic properties influence the rules governing the induction of synaptic plasticity. We argue that the location of synapses in the dendritic tree, and the type of dendritic excitability associated with each synapse, play decisive roles in determining the plastic properties of that synapse. Furthermore, since the electrical properties of the dendritic tree are not static, but can be altered by neuromodulators and by synaptic activity itself, we discuss how learning rules may be dynamically shaped by tuning dendritic function. We conclude by describing how this reciprocal relationship between plasticity of dendritic excitability and synaptic plasticity has changed our view of information processing and memory storage in neuronal networks.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Division and subtraction by distinct cortical inhibitory networks in vivo.

            Brain circuits process information through specialized neuronal subclasses interacting within a network. Revealing their interplay requires activating specific cells while monitoring others in a functioning circuit. Here we use a new platform for two-way light-based circuit interrogation in visual cortex in vivo to show the computational implications of modulating different subclasses of inhibitory neurons during sensory processing. We find that soma-targeting, parvalbumin-expressing (PV) neurons principally divide responses but preserve stimulus selectivity, whereas dendrite-targeting, somatostatin-expressing (SOM) neurons principally subtract from excitatory responses and sharpen selectivity. Visualized in vivo cell-attached recordings show that division by PV neurons alters response gain, whereas subtraction by SOM neurons shifts response levels. Finally, stimulating identified neurons while scanning many target cells reveals that single PV and SOM neurons functionally impact only specific subsets of neurons in their projection fields. These findings provide direct evidence that inhibitory neuronal subclasses have distinct and complementary roles in cortical computations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Gain modulation from background synaptic input.

              Gain modulation is a prominent feature of neuronal activity recorded in behaving animals, but the mechanism by which it occurs is unknown. By introducing a barrage of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic conductances that mimics conditions encountered in vivo into pyramidal neurons in slices of rat somatosensory cortex, we show that the gain of a neuronal response to excitatory drive can be modulated by varying the level of "background" synaptic input. Simultaneously increasing both excitatory and inhibitory background firing rates in a balanced manner results in a divisive gain modulation of the neuronal response without appreciable signal-independent increases in firing rate or spike-train variability. These results suggest that, within active cortical circuits, the overall level of synaptic input to a neuron acts as a gain control signal that modulates responsiveness to excitatory drive.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Visualization
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Comput Biol
                PLoS Comput. Biol
                plos
                ploscomp
                PLoS Computational Biology
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1553-734X
                1553-7358
                July 2018
                9 July 2018
                : 14
                : 7
                : e1006292
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pennsylvania, United States of America
                [2 ] Department of Mathematics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
                [3 ] Division of Biosciences, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
                University of Pittsburgh, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5733-9089
                Article
                PCOMPBIOL-D-18-00269
                10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006292
                6053252
                29985917
                39fbdced-cf30-4e2a-980b-f4e94b4d75ea
                © 2018 Goldwyn et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 14 February 2018
                : 11 June 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 12, Tables: 0, Pages: 23
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001, National Science Foundation;
                Award ID: DMS1410935
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000055, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders;
                Award ID: R01DC016112
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000055, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders;
                Award ID: R01DC016112
                Award Recipient :
                This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation award DMS1410935 ( http://www.nsf.gov) to DT and the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders award R01DC016112 ( http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/) to JT and DT. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Types
                Animal Cells
                Neurons
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cellular Neuroscience
                Neurons
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Electrophysiology
                Membrane Potential
                Action Potentials
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Physiology
                Electrophysiology
                Membrane Potential
                Action Potentials
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Electrophysiology
                Neurophysiology
                Action Potentials
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Physiology
                Electrophysiology
                Neurophysiology
                Action Potentials
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Neurophysiology
                Action Potentials
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Types
                Animal Cells
                Neurons
                Neuronal Dendrites
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cellular Neuroscience
                Neurons
                Neuronal Dendrites
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Limbs (Anatomy)
                Legs
                Knees
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Limbs (Anatomy)
                Legs
                Knees
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Simulation and Modeling
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmacology
                Pharmacologic Analysis
                Pharmacokinetic Analysis
                Compartment Models
                One-Compartment Models
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Approximation Methods
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
                Custom metadata
                vor-update-to-uncorrected-proof
                2018-07-19
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Quantitative & Systems biology
                Quantitative & Systems biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article