8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Experimental Multicenter and Multivendor Evaluation of the Performance of PET Radiomic Features Using 3-Dimensionally Printed Phantom Inserts

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The sensitivity of radiomic features to several confounding factors, such as reconstruction settings, makes clinical use challenging. To investigate the impact of harmonized image reconstructions on feature consistency, a multicenter phantom study was performed using 3-dimensionally printed phantom inserts reflecting realistic tumor shapes and heterogeneity uptakes. Methods: Tumors extracted from real PET/CT scans of patients with non–small cell lung cancer served as model for three 3-dimensionally printed inserts. Different heterogeneity pattern were realized by printing separate compartments that could be filled with different activity solutions. The inserts were placed in the National Electrical Manufacturers Association image-quality phantom and scanned various times. First, a list-mode scan was acquired and 5 statistically equal replicates were reconstructed. Second, the phantom was scanned 4 times on the same scanner. Third, the phantom was scanned on 6 PET/CT systems. All images were reconstructed using EANM Research Ltd. (EARL)–compliant and locally clinically preferred reconstructions. EARL-compliant reconstructions were performed without (EARL1) or with (EARL2) point-spread function. Images were analyzed with and without resampling to 2-mm cubic voxels. Images were discretized with a fixed bin width (FBW) of 0.25 and a fixed bin number (FBN) of 64. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of each scan setup was calculated and compared across reconstruction settings. An ICC above 0.75 was regarded as high. Results: The percentage of features yielding a high ICC was largest for the statistically equal replicates (70%–91% for FBN; 90%–96% for FBW discretization). For scans acquired on the same system, the percentage decreased, but most features still resulted in a high ICC (FBN, 52%–63%; FBW, 75%–85%). The percentage of features yielding a high ICC decreased more in the multicenter setting. In this case, the percentage of features yielding a high ICC was larger for images reconstructed with EARL-compliant reconstructions: for example, 40% for EARL1 and 60% for EARL2 versus 21% for the clinically preferred setting for FBW discretization. When discretized with FBW and resampled to isotropic voxels, this benefit was more pronounced. Conclusion: EARL-compliant reconstructions harmonize a wide range of radiomic features. FBW discretization and a sampling to isotropic voxels enhances the benefits of EARL-compliant reconstructions.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Nucl Med
          J. Nucl. Med
          jnumed
          jnm
          Journal of Nuclear Medicine
          Society of Nuclear Medicine
          0161-5505
          1535-5667
          March 2020
          1 September 2020
          : 61
          : 3
          : 469-476
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
          [2 ]Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
          [3 ]Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
          [4 ]Department of Medical Physics, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
          [5 ]Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; and
          [6 ]Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
          Author notes
          For correspondence or reprints contact: Elisabeth Pfaehler, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9713GZ, The Netherlands. E-mail: e.a.g.pfaehler@ 123456umcg.nl

          Published online Aug. 16, 2019.

          Article
          PMC7067530 PMC7067530 7067530 229724
          10.2967/jnumed.119.229724
          7067530
          31420497
          3a07f2bb-ed67-480e-a6de-965b393db845
          © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
          History
          : 11 April 2019
          : 24 July 2019
          Page count
          Pages: 8
          Categories
          Physics and Instrumentation
          Basic

          image reconstruction, 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomic features,feature harmonization

          Comments

          Comment on this article