9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evidence of vitamin D synthesis in insects exposed to UVb light

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Vertebrates obtain the prohormone vitamin D primarily by endogenous cutaneous synthesis under ultraviolet b (UVb) exposure. To date, endogenous synthesis of vitamin D in insects has never been investigated. In an initial experiment, we exposed four insect species which differ in ecology and morphology (migratory locusts, house crickets, yellow mealworms and black soldier fly larvae (BSFL)) to a low irradiance UVb source. In a second experiment we exposed these species to a higher UV irradiance, and in a third we tested the effect of exposure duration on vitamin D concentrations in yellow mealworms. Low irradiance UVb tended to increase vitamin D 3 levels in house crickets, vitamin D 2 levels in BSFL and vitamin D 2 and D 3 in yellow mealworms. Higher UVb irradiance increased vitamin D 3 levels in all species but BSFL. Both BSFL and migratory locusts had increased vitamin D 2 levels. Longer UVb exposure of yellow mealworms increased vitamin D 2 and increased vitamin D 3 until a plateau was reached at 6400 IU/kg. This study shows that insects can synthesize vitamin D de novo and that the amounts depend on UVb irradiance and exposure duration.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          From vitamin D to hormone D: fundamentals of the vitamin D endocrine system essential for good health.

          New knowledge of the biological and clinical importance of the steroid hormone 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)] and its receptor, the vitamin D receptor (VDR), has resulted in significant contributions to good bone health. However, worldwide reports have highlighted a variety of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency diseases. Despite many publications and scientific meetings reporting advances in vitamin D science, a disturbing realization is growing that the newer scientific and clinical knowledge is not being translated into better human health. Over the past several decades, the biological sphere of influence of vitamin D(3), as defined by the tissue distribution of the VDR, has broadened at least 9-fold from the target organs required for calcium homeostasis (intestine, bone, kidney, and parathyroid). Now, research has shown that the pluripotent steroid hormone 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) initiates the physiologic responses of >/=36 cell types that possess the VDR. In addition to the kidney's endocrine production of circulating 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3,) researchers have found a paracrine production of this steroid hormone in >/=10 extrarenal organs. This article identifies the fundamentals of the vitamin D endocrine system, including its potential for contributions to good health in 5 physiologic arenas in which investigators have clearly documented new biological actions of 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) through the VDR. As a consequence, the nutritional guidelines for vitamin D(3) intake (defined by serum hydroxyvitamin D(3) concentrations) should be reevaluated, taking into account the contributions to good health that all 36 VDR target organs can provide.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Complete nutrient composition of commercially raised invertebrates used as food for insectivores

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The case against ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) as a vitamin supplement.

              Supplemental vitamin D is available in 2 distinct forms: ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) and cholecalciferol (vitamin D3). Pharmacopoeias have officially regarded these 2 forms as equivalent and interchangeable, yet this presumption of equivalence is based on studies of rickets prevention in infants conducted 70 y ago. The emergence of 25-hydroxyvitamin D as a measure of vitamin D status provides an objective, quantitative measure of the biological response to vitamin D administration. As a result, vitamin D3 has proven to be the more potent form of vitamin D in all primate species, including humans. Despite an emerging body of evidence suggesting several plausible explanations for the greater bioefficacy of vitamin D3, the form of vitamin D used in major preparations of prescriptions in North America is vitamin D2. The case that vitamin D2 should no longer be considered equivalent to vitamin D3 is based on differences in their efficacy at raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, diminished binding of vitamin D2 metabolites to vitamin D binding protein in plasma, and a nonphysiologic metabolism and shorter shelf life of vitamin D2. Vitamin D2, or ergocalciferol, should not be regarded as a nutrient suitable for supplementation or fortification.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dennisoonincx@gmail.com
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                17 July 2018
                17 July 2018
                2018
                : 8
                : 10807
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0791 5666, GRID grid.4818.5, Laboratory of Entomology, Department of Plant Sciences, , Wageningen University & Research, ; P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0791 5666, GRID grid.4818.5, Animal Nutrition Group, Department of Animal Sciences, , Wageningen University & Research, ; P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Mark Finke LLC, 17028 E Wildcat Dr, Rio Verde, AZ 85263 USA
                [4 ]UV Guide UK, Greenfield, School Lane, Govilon, Abergavenny, NP7 9NT Wales UK
                [5 ]TNO Triskelion, Nutrient Analysis team, Utrechtseweg 48, Zeist, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Present Address: CCIC Europe Food Test, Lelystad, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6728-4859
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8063-6134
                Article
                29232
                10.1038/s41598-018-29232-w
                6050303
                30018318
                3a27a6de-3736-46ea-be47-f58fc1d1e5a6
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 18 December 2017
                : 9 July 2018
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article