8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Detection of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein in both serum and saliva enhances detection of infection

      Preprint
      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Detecting antibody responses during and after SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential in determining the seroepidemiology of the virus and the potential role of antibody in disease. Scalable, sensitive and specific serological assays are essential to this process. The detection of antibody in hospitalized patients with severe disease has proven straightforward; detecting responses in subjects with mild disease and asymptomatic infections has proven less reliable. We hypothesized that the suboptimal sensitivity of antibody assays and the compartmentalization of the antibody response may contribute to this effect.

          Methods:

          We systemically developed an ELISA assay, optimising different antigens and amplification steps, in serum and saliva from symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects.

          Results:

          Using trimeric spike glycoprotein, rather than nucleocapsid enabled detection of responses in individuals with low antibody responses. IgG1 and IgG3 predominate to both antigens, but more antispike IgG1 than IgG3 was detectable. All antigens were effective for detecting responses in hospitalized patients. Anti-spike, but not nucleocapsid, IgG, IgA and IgM antibody responses were readily detectable in saliva from non-hospitalized symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Antibody responses in saliva and serum were largely independent of each other and symptom reporting.

          Conclusions.

          Detecting antibody responses in both saliva and serum is optimal for determining virus exposure and understanding immune responses after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

          Funding.

          This work was funded by the University of Birmingham, the National Institute for Health Research (UK), the NIH National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the University of Southampton.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation

          Structure of the nCoV trimeric spike The World Health Organization has declared the outbreak of a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) to be a public health emergency of international concern. The virus binds to host cells through its trimeric spike glycoprotein, making this protein a key target for potential therapies and diagnostics. Wrapp et al. determined a 3.5-angstrom-resolution structure of the 2019-nCoV trimeric spike protein by cryo–electron microscopy. Using biophysical assays, the authors show that this protein binds at least 10 times more tightly than the corresponding spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)–CoV to their common host cell receptor. They also tested three antibodies known to bind to the SARS-CoV spike protein but did not detect binding to the 2019-nCoV spike protein. These studies provide valuable information to guide the development of medical counter-measures for 2019-nCoV. Science, this issue p. 1260
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19

            We report acute antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in 285 patients with COVID-19. Within 19 days after symptom onset, 100% of patients tested positive for antiviral immunoglobulin-G (IgG). Seroconversion for IgG and IgM occurred simultaneously or sequentially. Both IgG and IgM titers plateaued within 6 days after seroconversion. Serological testing may be helpful for the diagnosis of suspected patients with negative RT-PCR results and for the identification of asymptomatic infections.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans

              Here, we describe a serological enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the screening and identification of human SARS-CoV-2 seroconverters. This assay does not require the handling of infectious virus, can be adjusted to detect different antibody types in serum and plasma and is amenable to scaling. Serological assays are of critical importance to help define previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in populations, identify highly reactive human donors for convalescent plasma therapy and investigate correlates of protection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                medRxiv
                MEDRXIV
                medRxiv
                Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
                18 June 2020
                : 2020.06.16.20133025
                Affiliations
                [1. ]Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, U.K.
                [2. ]School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, U.K.
                [3. ]Oxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, U.K.
                [4. ]Binding Site Group Ltd, Birmingham, U.K.
                [5. ]Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, U.K.
                [6. ]Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K.
                [7. ]Department of Critical Care Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, U.K.
                [8. ]Immunodeficiency Centre for Wales, Cardiff, U.K.
                [9. ]Department of Immunology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, U.K.
                Author notes
                [a]

                These authors contributed equally

                [*]

                Joint senior authors.

                Authors contributions

                SEF, SEJ, MPT designed and performed experiments, interpreted results and wrote the manuscript. AMS interpreted results and wrote the manuscript. JDA, YW and MLN designed and performed experiments. AC performed experiments. CRW, MS and MG provided essential reagents. JLH, EMJ and GLM performed experiments. BT interpreted results, DCW interpreted results and wrote the manuscript. TVV provided essential clinical material. SH provided essential reagents. SJ and MJP provided essential clinical material. TP provided experimental support. AH provided essential clinical material. MKO interpreted results. BJE designed experiments and provided essential reagents. MTD designed experiments, interpreted results and wrote the manuscript. MC, AFC and AGR designed experiments, interpreted results, wrote the manuscript and supervised the project. All authors commented on drafts of the manuscript and approved the final version.

                Article
                10.1101/2020.06.16.20133025
                7310662
                32588002
                3a57a4ab-5e28-4dad-9cba-f112bc5210e5

                It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article