17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predictive quantitative ultrasound radiomic markers associated with treatment response in head and neck cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim:

          We aimed to identify quantitative ultrasound (QUS)-radiomic markers to predict radiotherapy response in metastatic lymph nodes of head and neck cancer.

          Materials & methods:

          Node-positive head and neck cancer patients underwent pretreatment QUS imaging of their metastatic lymph nodes. Imaging features were extracted using the QUS spectral form, and second-order texture parameters. Machine-learning classifiers were used for predictive modeling, which included a logistic regression, naive Bayes, and k-nearest neighbor classifiers.

          Results:

          There was a statistically significant difference in the pretreatment QUS-radiomic parameters between radiological complete responders versus partial responders (p < 0.05). The univariable model that demonstrated the greatest classification accuracy included: spectral intercept (SI)-contrast (area under the curve = 0.741). Multivariable models were also computed and showed that the SI-contrast + SI-homogeneity demonstrated an area under the curve = 0.870. The three-feature model demonstrated that the spectral slope-correlation + SI-contrast + SI-homogeneity-predicted response with accuracy of 87.5%.

          Conclusion:

          Multivariable QUS-radiomic features of metastatic lymph nodes can predict treatment response a priori.

          Lay abstract

          In this study, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and machine-learning classification was used to predict treatment outcomes in head and neck cancer patients. Metastatic lymph nodes in the neck were scanned using conventional frequency ultrasound (US). Quantitative data were collected from the US-radiofrequency signal a priori. Machine-learning classification models were computed using QUS features; these included the linear fit parameters of the power spectrum, and second-order texture parameters of the QUS parametric images. Treatment outcomes were measured based on radiological response. Patients were classified into binary groups: radiologic complete response (CR) or radiological partial response (PR), which was assessed 3 months following treatment. Initial results demonstrate high accuracy (%Acc = 87.5%) for predicting radiological response. The results of this study suggest that QUS can be used to predict head and neck cancer response to radiotherapy a priori.

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical pattern recognition: a review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Head and neck cancer.

            Most head and neck cancers are squamous cell carcinomas that develop in the upper aerodigestive epithelium after exposure to carcinogens such as tobacco and alcohol. Human papillomavirus has also been strongly implicated as a causative agent in a subset of these cancers. The complex anatomy and vital physiological role of the tumour-involved structures dictate that the goals of treatment are not only to improve survival outcomes but also to preserve organ function. Major improvements have been accomplished in surgical techniques and radiotherapy delivery. Moreover, systemic therapy including chemotherapy and molecularly targeted agents--namely, the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors--has been successfully integrated into potentially curative treatment of locally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In deciding which treatment strategy would be suitable for an individual patient, important considerations include expected functional outcomes, ability to tolerate treatment, and comorbid illnesses. The collaboration of many specialties is the key for optimum assessment and decision making. We review the epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis and staging, and the latest multimodal management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tumor response to radiotherapy regulated by endothelial cell apoptosis.

              About 50% of cancer patients receive radiation therapy. Here we investigated the hypothesis that tumor response to radiation is determined not only by tumor cell phenotype but also by microvascular sensitivity. MCA/129 fibrosarcomas and B16F1 melanomas grown in apoptosis-resistant acid sphingomyelinase (asmase)-deficient or Bax-deficient mice displayed markedly reduced baseline microvascular endothelial apoptosis and grew 200 to 400% faster than tumors on wild-type microvasculature. Thus, endothelial apoptosis is a homeostatic factor regulating angiogenesis-dependent tumor growth. Moreover, these tumors exhibited reduced endothelial apoptosis upon irradiation and, unlike tumors in wild-type mice, they were resistant to single-dose radiation up to 20 grays (Gy). These studies indicate that microvascular damage regulates tumor cell response to radiation at the clinically relevant dose range.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Future Sci OA
                Future Sci OA
                FSOA
                Future Science OA
                Future Science Ltd (London, UK )
                2056-5623
                26 November 2019
                January 2020
                26 November 2019
                : 6
                : 1
                : FSO433
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto M4N 3M5, Canada
                [2 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto M5T 1P5, Canada
                [3 ]Evaluative Clinical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto M4N 3M5, Canada
                [4 ]Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
                [5 ]Department of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto M5B 2K3, Canada
                [6 ]Physical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto M4N 3M5, Canada
                [7 ]Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto M5G 1L7, Canada
                [8 ]Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, Toronto M3J 1P3, Canada
                Author notes
                [* ]Author for correspondence: Tel.: +1 416 480 6128; gregory.czarnota@ 123456sunnybrook.ca
                Article
                10.2144/fsoa-2019-0048
                6920736
                3a6b52f1-dc7a-48d9-989c-1eff30ef8b68
                © 2019 Gregory J Czarnota

                This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

                History
                : 15 April 2019
                : 20 September 2019
                : 26 November 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 17
                Categories
                Research Article

                chemoradiation,head and neck carcinoma,predictive assay,quantitative ultrasound,radiation therapy,radiomic

                Comments

                Comment on this article