30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Beyond measurement: the drivers of disrespect and abuse in obstetric care

      1 , 2 , 3
      Reproductive Health Matters
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Concerns about disrespect and abuse (D&A) experienced by women during institutional birth have become critical to the discourse on maternal health. The rapid growth of the field from diverse points of origin has given rise to multiple and, at times, confusing interpretations of D&A, pointing to the need for greater clarity in the concepts themselves. Furthermore, attention to measurement of the problem has been excessive when viewed in relation to the small amount of work on critical drivers of disrespect and abuse. This paper raises some key issues of conceptualisation and measurement for the field, puts forward a working definition, and explores two critical drivers of D&A - intersecting social and economic inequality, and the institutional structures and processes that frame the practice of obstetric care. By identifying gaps and raising questions about the deeper causes of D&A, we point to potentially fruitful directions for research and action.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Exploring the Prevalence of Disrespect and Abuse during Childbirth in Kenya

          Background Poor quality of care including fear of disrespect and abuse (D&A) perpetuated by health workers influences women’s decisions to seek maternity care. Key manifestations of D&A include: physical abuse, non-consented care, non-confidential care, non-dignified care, discrimination, abandonment, and detention in facilities. This paper describes manifestations of D&A experienced in Kenya and measures their prevalence. Methods This paper is based on baseline data collected during a before-and-after study designed to measure the effect of a package of interventions to reduce the prevalence of D&A experienced by women during labor and delivery in thirteen Kenyan health facilities. Data were collected through an exit survey of 641 women discharged from postnatal wards. We present percentages of D&A manifestations and odds ratios of its relationship with demographic characteristics using a multivariate fixed effects logistic regression model. Results Twenty percent of women reported any form of D&A. Manifestations of D&A includes: non-confidential care (8.5%), non-dignified care (18%), neglect or abandonment (14.3%), Non-consensual care (4.3%) physical abuse (4.2%) and, detainment for non-payment of fees (8.1). Women aged 20-29 years were less likely to experience non-confidential care compared to those under 19; OR: [0.6 95% CI (0.36, 0.90); p=0.017]. Clients with no companion during delivery were less likely to experience inappropriate demands for payment; OR: [0.49 (0.26, 0.95); p=0.037]; while women with higher parities were three times more likely to be detained for lack of payment and five times more likely to be bribed compared to those experiencing there first birth. Conclusion One out of five women experienced feeling humiliated during labor and delivery. Six categories of D&A during childbirth in Kenya were reported. Understanding the prevalence of D&A is critical in developing interventions at national, health facility and community levels to address the factors and drivers that influence D&A in facilities and to encourage clients’ future facility utilization.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Humanização da assistência ao parto no Brasil: os muitos sentidos de um movimento

            Este texto recupera as origens do termo humanização do parto, o reconhecimento da sua assistência ao parto como evento desumanizante, a crítica técnica à assistência, o surgimento de um movimento nacional e internacional de humanização do parto, as políticas de humanização do parto desenvolvidas no Brasil, e as relações entre a crítica à assistência e a criação do movimento pela medicina baseada em evidências (MBE). Com base em um estudo de duas maternidades "humanizadas" do SUS, discute os diferentes (às vezes contraditórios) sentidos do termo, e seu alcance em questionar a cultura técnico-assistencial, a anatomia, a fisiologia femininas, e as relações de gênero. Entre os diferentes sentidos estão: o uso da MBE, o respeito aos direitos (reprodutivos e sexuais, ao acesso universal e ao consumo de tecnologia), o tratamento acolhedor e respeitoso, o manejo da dor do parto e a prevenção da dor iatrogênica, novas atribuições profissionais e disputas corporativas; a relação custo-benefício etc. Longe de querer achar a "humanização certa", busca-se compreender nos diferentes sentidos um diálogo, tenso e produtivo, entre atores sociais em disputa.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Moving beyond disrespect and abuse: addressing the structural dimensions of obstetric violence.

              During recent decades, a growing and preoccupying excess of medical interventions during childbirth, even in physiological and uncomplicated births, together with a concerning spread of abusive and disrespectful practices towards women during childbirth across the world, have been reported. Despite research and policy-making to address these problems, changing childbirth practices has proved to be difficult. We argue that the excessive rates of medical interventions and disrespect towards women during childbirth should be analysed as a consequence of structural violence, and that the concept of obstetric violence, as it is being used in Latin American childbirth activism and legal documents, might prove to be a useful tool for addressing structural violence in maternity care such as high intervention rates, non-consented care, disrespect and other abusive practices.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Reproductive Health Matters
                Reproductive Health Matters
                Informa UK Limited
                0968-8080
                1460-9576
                August 14 2018
                August 27 2018
                September 07 2018
                August 27 2018
                : 26
                : 53
                : 6-18
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Distinguished Professor & Director, Ramalingaswami Centre on Equity & Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India
                [2 ] Research Associate, Ramalingaswami Centre on Equity & Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.
                [3 ] Senior Research Scientist & Adjunct Associate Professor, Ramalingaswami Centre on Equity & Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India
                Article
                10.1080/09688080.2018.1508173
                30189791
                3a8f2d29-4202-42ce-a482-f39e2f26e890
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article