28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      Why publish your research Open Access with G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics?

      Learn more and submit today!

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Threshold Models for Genome-Enabled Prediction of Ordinal Categorical Traits in Plant Breeding

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Categorical scores for disease susceptibility or resistance often are recorded in plant breeding. The aim of this study was to introduce genomic models for analyzing ordinal characters and to assess the predictive ability of genomic predictions for ordered categorical phenotypes using a threshold model counterpart of the Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor ( i.e., TGBLUP). The threshold model was used to relate a hypothetical underlying scale to the outward categorical response. We present an empirical application where a total of nine models, five without interaction and four with genomic × environment interaction (G×E) and genomic additive × additive × environment interaction (G×G×E), were used. We assessed the proposed models using data consisting of 278 maize lines genotyped with 46,347 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and evaluated for disease resistance [with ordinal scores from 1 (no disease) to 5 (complete infection)] in three environments (Colombia, Zimbabwe, and Mexico). Models with G×E captured a sizeable proportion of the total variability, which indicates the importance of introducing interaction to improve prediction accuracy. Relative to models based on main effects only, the models that included G×E achieved 9–14% gains in prediction accuracy; adding additive × additive interactions did not increase prediction accuracy consistently across locations.

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Genomic-Enabled Prediction Based on Molecular Markers and Pedigree Using the Bayesian Linear Regression Package in R.

          The availability of dense molecular markers has made possible the use of genomic selection in plant and animal breeding. However, models for genomic selection pose several computational and statistical challenges and require specialized computer programs, not always available to the end user and not implemented in standard statistical software yet. The R-package BLR (Bayesian Linear Regression) implements several statistical procedures (e.g., Bayesian Ridge Regression, Bayesian LASSO) in a unifi ed framework that allows including marker genotypes and pedigree data jointly. This article describes the classes of models implemented in the BLR package and illustrates their use through examples. Some challenges faced when applying genomic-enabled selection, such as model choice, evaluation of predictive ability through cross-validation, and choice of hyper-parameters, are also addressed.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Comparison Between Linear and Non-parametric Regression Models for Genome-Enabled Prediction in Wheat

            In genome-enabled prediction, parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric regression models have been used. This study assessed the predictive ability of linear and non-linear models using dense molecular markers. The linear models were linear on marker effects and included the Bayesian LASSO, Bayesian ridge regression, Bayes A, and Bayes B. The non-linear models (this refers to non-linearity on markers) were reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) regression, Bayesian regularized neural networks (BRNN), and radial basis function neural networks (RBFNN). These statistical models were compared using 306 elite wheat lines from CIMMYT genotyped with 1717 diversity array technology (DArT) markers and two traits, days to heading (DTH) and grain yield (GY), measured in each of 12 environments. It was found that the three non-linear models had better overall prediction accuracy than the linear regression specification. Results showed a consistent superiority of RKHS and RBFNN over the Bayesian LASSO, Bayesian ridge regression, Bayes A, and Bayes B models.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genome-enabled prediction of genetic values using radial basis function neural networks

              The availability of high density panels of molecular markers has prompted the adoption of genomic selection (GS) methods in animal and plant breeding. In GS, parametric, semi-parametric and non-parametric regressions models are used for predicting quantitative traits. This article shows how to use neural networks with radial basis functions (RBFs) for prediction with dense molecular markers. We illustrate the use of the linear Bayesian LASSO regression model and of two non-linear regression models, reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS) regression and radial basis function neural networks (RBFNN) on simulated data and real maize lines genotyped with 55,000 markers and evaluated for several trait–environment combinations. The empirical results of this study indicated that the three models showed similar overall prediction accuracy, with a slight and consistent superiority of RKHS and RBFNN over the additive Bayesian LASSO model. Results from the simulated data indicate that RKHS and RBFNN models captured epistatic effects; however, adding non-signal (redundant) predictors (interaction between markers) can adversely affect the predictive accuracy of the non-linear regression models.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                G3 (Bethesda)
                Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
                Genetics Society of America
                2160-1836
                23 December 2014
                February 2015
                : 5
                : 2
                : 291-300
                Affiliations
                [* ]Facultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Avenida Universidad 333, Colima, México
                []Departamento de Estadística, Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas (CIMAT), Guanajuato, Guanajuato, México
                []Colegio de Postgraduados, Edo. de México, México
                [§ ]Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 443, Birmingham, Alabama 35294
                [** ]Department of Statistics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska
                [†† ]Biometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), México, D.F., México
                Author notes
                [1 ]Corresponding author: Biometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, México, D.F., México. E-mail: j.crossa@ 123456cgiar.org
                Article
                GGG_016188
                10.1534/g3.114.016188
                4321037
                25538102
                3a9ccbae-ea45-4658-940e-6695fd44814a
                Copyright © 2015 Montesinos-López et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Unported License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 31 October 2014
                : 19 December 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Categories
                Genomic Selection
                Custom metadata
                v1

                Genetics
                prediction accuracy,threshold model,disease resistance,gblup,genotype × environment interaction,genpred,shared data resource

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log