7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Physical and Chemical Connectivity of Streams and Riparian Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Synthesis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="P1">Streams, riparian areas, floodplains, alluvial aquifers and downstream waters (e.g., large rivers, lakes, oceans) are interconnected by longitudinal, lateral, and vertical fluxes of water, other materials and energy. Collectively, these interconnected waters are called fluvial hydrosystems. Physical and chemical connectivity within fluvial hydrosystems is created by the transport of nonliving materials (e.g., water, sediment, nutrients, contaminants) which either do or do not chemically change (chemical and physical connections, respectively). A substantial body of evidence unequivocally demonstrates physical and chemical connectivity between streams and riparian wetlands and downstream waters. Streams and riparian wetlands are structurally connected to downstream waters through the network of continuous channels and floodplain form that make these systems physically contiguous, and the very existence of these structures provides strong geomorphologic evidence for connectivity. Functional connections between streams and riparian wetlands and their downstream waters vary geographically and over time, based on proximity, relative size, environmental setting, material disparity, and intervening units. Because of the complexity and dynamic nature of connections among fluvial hydrosystem units, a complete accounting of the physical and chemical connections and their consequences to downstream waters should aggregate over multiple years to decades. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references145

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Biophysical controls on organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams.

            A comparative (15)N-tracer study of nitrogen dynamics in headwater streams from biomes throughout North America demonstrates that streams exert control over nutrient exports to rivers, lakes, and estuaries. The most rapid uptake and transformation of inorganic nitrogen occurred in the smallest streams. Ammonium entering these streams was removed from the water within a few tens to hundreds of meters. Nitrate was also removed from stream water but traveled a distance 5 to 10 times as long, on average, as ammonium. Despite low ammonium concentration in stream water, nitrification rates were high, indicating that small streams are potentially important sources of atmospheric nitrous oxide. During seasons of high biological activity, the reaches of headwater streams typically export downstream less than half of the input of dissolved inorganic nitrogen from their watersheds.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrate loading.

              Anthropogenic addition of bioavailable nitrogen to the biosphere is increasing and terrestrial ecosystems are becoming increasingly nitrogen-saturated, causing more bioavailable nitrogen to enter groundwater and surface waters. Large-scale nitrogen budgets show that an average of about 20-25 per cent of the nitrogen added to the biosphere is exported from rivers to the ocean or inland basins, indicating that substantial sinks for nitrogen must exist in the landscape. Streams and rivers may themselves be important sinks for bioavailable nitrogen owing to their hydrological connections with terrestrial systems, high rates of biological activity, and streambed sediment environments that favour microbial denitrification. Here we present data from nitrogen stable isotope tracer experiments across 72 streams and 8 regions representing several biomes. We show that total biotic uptake and denitrification of nitrate increase with stream nitrate concentration, but that the efficiency of biotic uptake and denitrification declines as concentration increases, reducing the proportion of in-stream nitrate that is removed from transport. Our data suggest that the total uptake of nitrate is related to ecosystem photosynthesis and that denitrification is related to ecosystem respiration. In addition, we use a stream network model to demonstrate that excess nitrate in streams elicits a disproportionate increase in the fraction of nitrate that is exported to receiving waters and reduces the relative role of small versus large streams as nitrate sinks.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
                J Am Water Resour Assoc
                Wiley
                1093474X
                April 2018
                April 2018
                March 01 2018
                : 54
                : 2
                : 323-345
                Affiliations
                [1 ]National Exposure Research Laboratory (NERL); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Cincinnati Ohio USA
                [2 ]National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Washington D.C. USA
                [3 ]NCEA; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Cincinnati Ohio USA
                [4 ]NERL; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Las Vegas Nevada USA
                [5 ]North Carolina Chapter; The Nature Conservancy; Durham North Carolina USA
                [6 ]Office of Water; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Washington D.C. USA
                Article
                10.1111/1752-1688.12632
                6145469
                30245566
                3aa6b491-0b43-456e-a1f4-183c3beadf6d
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article