9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      COVID-19 and Dermatology Practice Changes

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Synopsis:

          The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dermatology practice cannot be overstated. At its peak, the pandemic resulted in the temporary closure of ambulatory sites as resources were reallocated towards pandemic response efforts. Many outpatient clinics have since reopened and are beginning to experience a semblance of pre-pandemic routine, albeit with restrictions in place. We provide an overview of how COVID-19 has affected dermatology practice globally beginning with the rise of teledermatology. A summary of expert recommendations that shape the “new normal” in various domains of dermatology practice – namely, dermatology consultation, procedural dermatology, and phototherapy – will also be provided. Lastly, we emphasize that COVID-19 is a rapidly evolving situation with expert recommendations changing at an almost daily basis. Therefore, dermatologists must update themselves periodically and make necessary adjustments in accordance with local, state, and federal guidelines and mandates.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Early rate reductions of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 in BNT162b2 vaccine recipients

          In December, 2020, the Israeli Government approved the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine and initiated a national immunisation campaign prioritising health-care workers (HCWs), as in other countries. 1 This campaign coincided with a third wave of COVID-19, peaking at 10 116 daily new cases by mid-January, 2021. The Sheba Medical Centre, Israel's largest hospital with 9647 HCWs, began staff vaccination on Dec 19, 2020. All HCWs, excluding those with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, were eligible for vaccination. Clinical trial data of BNT162b2 vaccine estimated an early vaccine efficacy in preventing COVID-19 of 52·4% before dose two, and 90.5% on days 2–7 after dose two. 2 A recent analysis of BNT162b2 vaccine data estimated vaccine efficacy of 89–91% during days 15–28 after the first dose. 3 We examined early reductions in SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 rates in vaccinated HCWs. To assess vaccine-associated rate reductions we analysed a retrospective cohort of 9109 vaccine-eligible HCWs, comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated. Active daily symptom reporting and immediate same-day testing allowed for prompt (<24h) detection and investigation of exposed or symptomatic HCWs. 4 We defined all HCWs with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR at Sheba Medical Centre or in the community as cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. All SARS-CoV-2-infected HCWs were contacted by infection control staff and requested to respond to a contact tracing questionnaire and a clinical questionnaire specifically regarding COVID-19 symptoms. Symptomatic HCWs were defined as COVID-19 cases. We used the number of days each HCW was unvaccinated or days after the first dose as follow-up time. Rate ratios and 95% CIs associated with time after first-dose administration were adjusted for community exposure, using the distribution of probability of a positive contact by means of Poisson regression (appendix). The adjusted estimates were subtracted from 1 to obtain rate reductions. By Jan 24, 2021, of the 9109 eligible staff, 7214 (79%) had received a first dose and 6037 (66%) had received the second dose. 5505 (91%) fully vaccinated HCWs received the second dose on days 21 or 22 after the first dose. 6818 (95%) HCWs were vaccinated at Sheba Medical Centre. All employees vaccinated in the community (n=396) were required to report dates of first and second dose to the Human Resources department at Sheba Medical Centre. Overall, there were 170 SARS-CoV-2 infections among HCWs in the period between Dec 19, 2020, and Jan 24, 2021, of which 99 (58%) HCWs reported symptoms and were designated as COVID-19 cases. Of the 170 HCWs who became infected, 89 (52%) were unvaccinated, 78 (46%) tested positive after the first dose, and three (2%) tested positive after the second dose. Among the 125 infections that could be traced, 87 (70%) were community acquired and there were no nosocomial clusters. 4 Compared with a SARS-CoV-2 infection rate of 7·4 per 10 000 person-days in unvaccinated HCWs, infection rates were 5·5 per 10 000 person-days and 3·0 per 10 000 person-days on days 1–14 and 15-28 after the first dose of the vaccine, respectively. Adjusted rate reductions of SARS-CoV-2 infections were 30% (95% CI 2–50) and 75% (72–84) for days 1–14 and days 15–28 after the first dose, respectively (table ; appendix). Table Rate reductions of SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 cases in health-care workers at the Sheba Medical Centre, Israel, from December, 2020, to January, 2021 Unvaccinated Vaccinated 1–14 days after first dose 15–28 days after first dose All SARS-CoV-2 positive Number of cases 89 55 26 Number of exposure days 120 575 100 433 88 126 Rate per 10 000 person-days 7·4 5·5 3·0 Rate reduction compared with unvaccinated (95% CI) .. 26% (−4 to 47) 60% (38 to 74) Adjusted rate reduction compared with unvaccinated (95% CI)* .. 30% (2 to 50) 75% (72 to 84) Symptomatic COVID-19 Number of cases 60 28 11 Number of exposure days 120 575 100 433 88 126 Rate per 10 000 person-days 5·0 2·8 1·2 Rate reduction compared with unvaccinated (95% CI) .. 44% (12 to 64) 75% (52 to 87) Adjusted rate reduction compared with unvaccinated (95% CI)* .. 47% (17 to 66) 85% (71 to 92) SARS-CoV-2 positivity was determined by PCR. * Rate ratios of new cases in vaccinated compared with unvaccinated health-care workers each day were adjusted for community exposure rates using Poisson regression (appendix). The adjusted estimates were subtracted from 1 to obtain rate reductions. Compared with a symptomatic COVID-19 rate of 5·0 per 10 000 person-days in unvaccinated HCWs, disease rates were 2·8 and 1·2 per 10 000 person-days on days 1–14 and days 15–28 after the first dose of the vaccine, respectively. Adjusted rate reductions of COVID-19 disease were 47% (95% CI 17–66) and 85% (71–92) for days 1–14 and days 15–28 after the first dose, respectively. The limitations of this study include the observational nature of the study design. Lack of active laboratory surveillance in the cohort might have resulted in an underestimation of asymptomatic cases. Data on vaccine efficacy in preventing asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection are scarce, and our results of rate reductions in SARS-CoV-2 infections, which include asymptomatic HCWs, need further validation through active surveillance and sampling of vaccinated people and unvaccinated controls to ascertain the actual reduction of asymptomatic infection in vaccinated individuals. The early rate reductions seen in HCWs might differ from vaccine efficacy reported in the general population due to their higher exposure risk or due to exposure to more virulent or infectious strains. Our data show substantial early reductions in SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19 rates following first vaccine dose administration. Early reductions of COVID-19 rates provide support of delaying the second dose in countries facing vaccine shortages and scarce resources, so as to allow higher population coverage with a single dose. Longer follow-up to assess long-term effectiveness of a single dose is needed to inform a second dose delay policy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Teledermatology: key factors associated with reducing face-to-face dermatology visits.

            Teledermatology makes 3 promises: better, cheaper, and faster dermatologic care. It is "better" because, although it cannot offer as much to the patient as a traditional visit, it extends the dermatologist's reach to places and in ways not previously possible as a result of time and place limitations; it is "cheaper and faster" because it has the potential to reduce costs and increase efficiency for both patients and providers. For teledermatology to fulfill these promises, it must enable dermatologists to improve access by increasing the number of patients evaluated and treated. Increased patient access depends on maximizing a scarce resource-dermatologists' time-in part by avoiding unnecessary and time-consuming face-to-face appointments. We examined the literature to date to determine which teledermatology programs have greater or lesser success in reducing face-to-face visits. Our review highlights 4 factors that are associated with a higher number of face-to-face appointments avoided by teledermatology programs: (1) effective preselection of patients for teleconsultation, (2) high-quality photographic images, (3) dermoscopy if pigmented lesions are evaluated, and (4) effective infrastructure and culture in place to implement teleconsultation recommendations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Practice Guidelines for Teledermatology.

              Previous American Telemedicine Association (ATA) Teledermatology Practice Guidelines were issued in 2007. This updated version reflects new knowledge in the field, new technologies, and the need to incorporate teledermatology practice in a variety of settings, including hospitals, urgent care centers, Federally Qualified Health Centers, school-based clinics, public health facilities, and patient homes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Dermatol Clin
                Dermatol Clin
                Dermatologic Clinics
                Elsevier Inc.
                0733-8635
                1558-0520
                31 May 2021
                31 May 2021
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Dermatology, Makati Medical Center, Makati City, Philippines
                [2 ]Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
                [3 ]Department of Dermatology, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding Author: Angeli Eloise Torres, MD; Address: Department of Dermatology, Makati Medical Center, 2 Amorsolo St., Legaspi Village, Makati City 1229 Philippines;
                Article
                S0733-8635(21)00041-3
                10.1016/j.det.2021.05.004
                8165081
                34556248
                3ad1dbb1-30ef-4531-8764-f48462b1cf48
                © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                covid-19,dermatology practice,guidelines,new normal,pandemic,phototherapy,procedural dermatology,teledermatology

                Comments

                Comment on this article