42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit your manuscript, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adoption, Acceptability, and Effectiveness of a Mobile Health App for Personalized Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care: Protocol for a Realist Case Study of the Ned App

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          By 2030, prostate cancer will be the most commonly diagnosed cancer in North America. To mitigate this impending challenge, comprehensive support mechanisms for disease- and treatment-specific changes in health and well-being must be proactively designed and thoughtfully implemented for streamlined survivorship care. mHealth apps have been lauded as a promising complement to current outpatient treatment and monitoring strategies, but have not yet been widely used to support prostate cancer survivorship needs. A realist evaluation is needed to examine the impact of such apps on the prostate cancer survivorship experience.

          Objective

          We seek to gain an understanding of how an mHealth app for prostate cancer survivorship care called Ned (No Evident Disease) is adopted and accepted by patients, caregivers, and clinicians. We also aim to determine the effect of Ned on health-related quality of life, satisfaction with cancer care, unmet needs, self-efficacy, and prostate cancer-related levels of anxiety.

          Methods

          The Ned case study is a 12-month mixed-methods embedded single-case study with a nested within-group pre-post comparison of health outcomes. We will give 400 patients, 200 caregivers, and 10 clinicians access to Ned. Participants will be asked to complete study assessments at baseline, 2 months, 6 months, and 12 months. We will conduct 30 semistructured qualitative interviews with patients (n=20) and their caregivers (n=10) poststudy to gain insight into their experience with the app.

          Results

          We recruited our first survivor in October 2017 and anticipate completing this study by May 2019.

          Conclusions

          This will, to our knowledge, be the first realist case study to evaluate an app for prostate cancer survivorship care. Prostate cancer survivors are set to increase in number and longevity, heightening the need for integrated survivorship solutions to provide them with optimal and durable outcomes. The knowledge gained from this study will comprehensively inform how and why Ned works, for whom, and in what circumstances. Understanding the impact of digital health interventions such as Ned on how survivors care for themselves is critical to realizing patient-centered care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Designing and conducting mixed methods research

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Case study research: design and methods

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire.

              The present research evaluated the psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire, a quick and easy-to-administer scale for measuring treatment expectancy and rationale credibility for use in clinical outcome studies. The results suggested that this questionnaire derives the two predicted factors (cognitively based credibility and relatively more affectively based expectancy) and that these factors are stable across different populations. Furthermore, the questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency within each factor and good test-retest reliability. The expectancy factor predicted outcome on some measures, whereas the credibility factor was unrelated to outcome. The questionnaire is appended to the paper, yet the authors stress care when utilizing the scale. During the administration of the questionnaire, the participant sees two sections--one related to thinking and one related to feeling. However, the researcher needs to be aware that the 2 factors derived are not grouped into those questions. Instead credibility was found to be derived from the first three think questions and expectancy was derived from the fourth think question and the two feel questions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Res Protoc
                JMIR Res Protoc
                ResProt
                JMIR Research Protocols
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1929-0748
                October 2017
                12 October 2017
                : 6
                : 10
                : e197
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation Dalla Lana School of Public Health University of Toronto Toronto, ON Canada
                [2] 2 Centre for Global eHealth Innovation Techna Institute University Health Network Toronto, ON Canada
                [3] 3 Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto, ON Canada
                [4] 4 Carlo Fidani Regional Cancer Centre Credit Valley Hospital Trillium Health Partners Mississauga, ON Canada
                [5] 5 Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto, ON Canada
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Quynh Pham q.pham@ 123456mail.utoronto.ca
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0540-4181
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3114-4440
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0530-2246
                Article
                v6i10e197
                10.2196/resprot.8051
                5658643
                29025699
                3b0324b0-537b-4efc-9625-156a1d61cb64
                ©Quynh Pham, Joseph A Cafazzo, Andrew Feifer. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 12.10.2017.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 30 June 2017
                : 3 August 2017
                : 30 August 2017
                : 13 September 2017
                Categories
                Protocol
                Protocol

                prostate-specific antigen,prostate cancer survivorship,prostate cancer,patient-centered care,mobile health,mhealth,telemedicine,mobile health app,realist evaluation,case study

                Comments

                Comment on this article