52
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Development and validation of the Patient Benefit Index for peripheral arterial disease Translated title: Development and validation of the Patient Benefit Index for peripheral arterial disease

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. Background: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a specific Patient Benefit Index (PBI) version for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Patients and methods: A non-interventional longitudinal development study was conducted. The first phase comprised a qualitative pre-study with n = 50 patients, in which the PBI was adapted for peripheral arterial disease. The resulting Patient Benefit Index for peripheral arterial disease (PBI-PAD) was validated in the second phase at two points of measurement. The total PBI-PAD score was calculated by weighting item-wise the achievement of treatment goals with the initially assessed needs. Feasibility, internal consistency, and construct validity were analysed and the generic three level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) and the disease-specific instrument Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQoL) were used for convergent validation. Results: In the pre-study, the PBI-PAD, consisting of 12 items, was developed. N = 103 patients participated in the main study. At T2, data were available for n = 57 patients. Mean age was 71.0 years ± 9.1 and 66.7 % of the participants were male. The amount of missing values of the PBI-PAD score was low (< 4.0 %) and no relevant floor effects were observed. Both parts of the PBI (needs at T1 and benefits at T2) were internally consistent with Cronbach’s alpha > 0.7. PBI-PAD total score correlated significantly with the T2-T1-differences of the EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) (r = 0.4, p = 0.007) and the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (r = 0.5, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The PBI-PAD is a feasible, internally consistent, and valid instrument to assess patient-relevant benefits in PAD patients receiving minimally invasive treatment or surgical procedures. It can be recommended for use in routine care as well as in clinical studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Surgical treatment of peripheral circulation disorders.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Assessing the validity and responsiveness of disease-specific quality of life instruments in intermittent claudication.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A call to action: women and peripheral artery disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                vas
                VASA
                European Journal of Vascular Medicine
                Hogrefe AG, Bern
                0301-1526
                1664-2872
                January 25, 2018
                April 27, 2018
                : 47
                : 3
                : 219-226
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
                [ 2 ]Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
                [ 3 ]Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Asklepios Klinik Wandsbek, Hamburg, Germany
                Author notes
                Nicole Zander, M. Sc., Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany, E-mail n.zander@ 123456uke.de
                Article
                vas_47_3_219
                10.1024/0301-1526/a000687
                3b496744-dbf4-4838-a873-d7090f70ade7
                Copyright @ 2018
                History
                : October 24, 2017
                : December 2, 2017
                Categories
                Original communication

                Medicine
                patient-reported outcomes,PAD,patient benefit,health-related quality of life,validation
                Medicine
                patient-reported outcomes, PAD, patient benefit, health-related quality of life, validation

                Comments

                Comment on this article