13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Headphone and Loudspeaker Test–Part II: A comprehensive method for playback device screening in Internet experiments

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          HALT (The Headphone and Loudspeaker Test) Part II is a continuation of HALT Part I. The main goals of this study (HALT Part II) were (a) to develop screening tests and strategies to discriminate headphones from loudspeakers, (b) to come up with a methodological approach to combine more than two screening tests, and (c) to estimate data quality and required sample sizes for the application of screening tests. Screening Tests A and B were developed based on psychoacoustic effects. In a first laboratory study ( N = 40), the two tests were evaluated with four different playback devices (circumaural and intra-aural headphones; external and laptop loudspeakers). In a final step, the two screening tests A and B and a previously established test C were validated in an Internet-based study ( N = 211). Test B showed the best single-test performance (sensitivity = 80.0%, specificity = 83.2%, AUC = .844). Following an epidemiological approach, the headphone prevalence (17.67%) was determined to calculate positive and negative predictive values. For a user-oriented, parameter-based selection of suitable screening tests and the simple application of screening strategies, an online tool was programmed. HALT Part II is assumed to be a reliable procedure for planning and executing screenings to detect headphone and loudspeaker playback. Our methodological approach can be used as a generic technique for optimizing the application of any screening tests in psychological research. HALT Part I and II complement each other to form a comprehensive overall concept to control for playback conditions in Internet experiments.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13428-022-02048-3.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Approximate Is Better than "Exact" for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Headphone screening to facilitate web-based auditory experiments

            Psychophysical experiments conducted remotely over the internet permit data collection from large numbers of participants, but sacrifice control over sound presentation, and therefore are not widely employed in hearing research. To help standardize online sound presentation, we introduce a brief psychophysical test for determining if online experiment participants are wearing headphones. Listeners judge which of three pure tones is quietest, with one of the tones presented 180° out of phase across the stereo channels. This task is intended to be easy over headphones but difficult over loudspeakers due to phase-cancellation. We validated the test in the lab by testing listeners known to be wearing headphones or listening over loudspeakers. The screening test was effective and efficient, discriminating between the two modes of listening with a small number of trials. When run online, a bimodal distribution of scores was obtained, suggesting that some participants performed the task over loudspeakers despite instructions to use headphones. The ability to detect and screen out these participants mitigates concerns over sound quality for online experiments, a first step toward opening auditory perceptual research to the possibilities afforded by crowdsourcing.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Too Fast, too Straight, too Weird: Non-Reactive Indicators for Meaningless Data in Internet Surveys

              Practitioners use various indicators to screen for meaningless, careless, or fraudulent responses in Internet surveys. This study employs an experimental-like design to empirically test the ability of non-reactive indicators to identify records with low data quality. Findings suggest that careless responses are most reliably identified by questionnaire completion time, but the tested indicators do not allow for detecting intended faking. The article introduces various indicators, their benefits and drawbacks, proposes a completion speed index for common application in data cleaning, and discusses whether to remove meaningless records at all. Survey Research Methods, Vol 13 No 3 (2019)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                reinhard.kopiez@hmtm-hannover.de
                Journal
                Behav Res Methods
                Behav Res Methods
                Behavior Research Methods
                Springer US (New York )
                1554-351X
                1554-3528
                17 January 2023
                17 January 2023
                2024
                : 56
                : 1
                : 362-378
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.460113.1, ISNI 0000 0000 8775 661X, Hanover Music Lab, Hanover University of Music, Drama and Media, ; Neues Haus 1, 30175 Hannover, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Cagliari, ( https://ror.org/003109y17) Cagliari, Italy
                [3 ]State University of Music and Performing Arts Stuttgart, ( https://ror.org/057qv9h29) Stuttgart, Germany
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9969-525X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-7483
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0209-0655
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3356-3478
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9758-9434
                Article
                2048
                10.3758/s13428-022-02048-3
                10794391
                36650403
                3b5d48df-5c14-4fb5-86b3-0d2ca0e43332
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 1 December 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Hochschule für Musik, Theater und Medien Hannover (3108)
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2024

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                controlling confounding variables, combining screening tests, utility,headphone prevalence, predictive values, split convince compare

                Comments

                Comment on this article