19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Utilising a novel surveillance system to investigate species of Forcipomyia ( Lasiohelea) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as the suspected vectors of Leishmania macropodum (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) in the Darwin region of Australia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Up until recently, Australia was considered free of Leishmania due to the absence of phlebotomine sandfly species (Diptera: Phlebotominae) known to transmit Leishmania parasites in other parts of the world. The discovery of Leishmania ( Mundinia) macropodum (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) in Northern Australia sparked questions as to the existence of alternative vectors of Leishmania. This has added to the complexity of fully understanding the parasite's interaction with its vector, which is known to be very specific. Previous findings demonstrated L. macropodum infection beyond the blood meal stage in the day-biting midges Forcipomyia ( Lasiohelea) Kieffer (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) implicating them in the parasite's life cycle. Currently, there is no conclusive evidence demonstrating this suspected vector to transmit L. macropodum to a naïve host. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate the vector competency of day-biting midge F. ( Lasiohelea) to transmit L. macropodum utilising a novel technology that preserves nucleic acids. Honey-soaked Flinders Technology Associates (FTA®) filter-paper cards were used to obtain saliva expectorated from biting midges while sugar-feeding. F. ( Lasiohelea) were aspirated directly off macropods from a known Leishmania-transmission site and were kept in a waxed-paper container holding a honey-coated FTA® card for feeding. Insect identification and Taqman quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) screening assays revealed L. macropodum DNA in F. ( Lasiohelea) up to 7 days post field-collection, and in an unidentified biting midge, previously known as F. (Lasiohelea) sp.1. Moreover, 7/145 (4.83%) of FTA® cards were confirmed positive with L. macropodum DNA after exposure to field-collected F. (Lasiohelea). Additionally, FTA® cards were found to be a valuable surveillance tool, given the ease of use in the field and laboratory. Overall, our findings support previous reports on L. macropodum transmission by an alternative vector to phlebotomine sandflies. Further studies identifying and isolating infective L. macropodum promastigotes is necessary to resolve questions on the L. macropodum vector.

          Graphical abstract

          The graphical abstract illustrates the life cycle of Leishmania* within a phlebotomine sandfly vector. Infected macrophages containing Leishmania amastigotes are ingested when a sand fly feeds on an infected host (1). Within the abdominal midgut the amastigotes transform into replicative procyclic promastigotes, which are protected from digestive enzymes by the peritrophic membrane (PM) (2). The procyclic parasites differentiates into highly motile nectomonads to escape from a broken PM (3). Migrating towards the anterior midgut, nectomonads will attach to the microvilli of the midgut epithelium until reaching the stomodeal valve. To resume parasite replication, the nectomonad promastigotes are transformed into leptomonad promastigotes (4), which can either attach to the cuticle lining of the stomodeal valve as haptomonad promastigotes (5) or differentiate into metacyclic promastigotes (infective form) (5). The infective Leishmania form will colonise the stomodeal valve and are injected into the host during feeding such as on a blood meal or in this case a honey-coated FTA® card (6). *Note, the life cycle is described for suprapylarian Leishmania species where development is restricted to the sandfly midgut.

          Highlights

          • 4.83% of FTA® cards were positive for Leishmania macropodum DNA after exposure to field-collected Forcipomyia ( Lasiohelea).

          • L. macropodum DNA was detectable on cards after 10 weeks demonstrating their utility in Leishmania surveillance programs.

          • Real-time qPCR confirmed L. macropodum DNA in the previously implicated vector, F. ( Lasiohelea) sp.1.

          • Our results support previous findings suggesting L. macropodum is transmitted by an alternative vector to the sandfly.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Biology of phlebotomine sand flies as vectors of disease agents.

          Paul Ready (2013)
          Phlebotomines are the sole or principal vectors of Leishmania, Bartonella bacilliformis, and some arboviruses. The coevolution of sand flies with Leishmania species of mammals and lizards is considered in relation to the landscape epidemiology of leishmaniasis, a neglected tropical disease. Evolutionary hypotheses are unresolved, so a practical phlebotomine classification is proposed to aid biomedical information retrieval. The vectors of Leishmania are tabulated and new criteria for their incrimination are given. Research on fly-parasite-host interactions, fly saliva, and behavioral ecology is reviewed in relation to parasite manipulation of blood feeding, vaccine targets, and pheromones for lures. Much basic research is based on few transmission cycles, so generalizations should be made with caution. Integrated research and control programs have begun, but improved control of leishmaniasis and nuisance-biting requires greater emphasis on population genetics and transmission modeling. Most leishmaniasis transmission is zoonotic, affecting the poor and tourists in rural and natural areas, and therefore control should be compatible with environmental conservation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Transmission of Leishmania metacyclic promastigotes by phlebotomine sand flies

            A thorough understanding of the transmission mechanism of any infectious agent is crucial to implementing an effective intervention strategy. Here, our current understanding of the mechanisms that Leishmania parasites use to ensure their transmission from sand fly vectors by bite is reviewed. The most important mechanism is the creation of a “blocked fly” resulting from the secretion of promastigote secretory gel (PSG) by the parasites in the anterior midgut. This forces the sand fly to regurgitate PSG before it can bloodfeed, thereby depositing both PSG and infective metacyclic promastigotes in the skin of a mammalian host. Other possible factors in transmission are considered: damage to the stomodeal valve; occurrence of parasites in the salivary glands; and excretion of parasites from the anus of infected sand flies. Differences in the transmission mechanisms employed by parasites in the three subgenera, Leishmania, Viannia and Sauroleishmania are also addressed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The biology and control of phlebotomine sand flies.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl
                Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl
                International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife
                Elsevier
                2213-2244
                17 June 2020
                August 2020
                17 June 2020
                : 12
                : 192-198
                Affiliations
                [a ]Institute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia
                [b ]Mosquito Management, Brisbane City Council, Eagle Farm, QLD, 4009, Australia
                [c ]Public Health Virology, Forensic and Scientific Services, Queensland Health, Coopers Plains, QLD, 4108, Australia
                [d ]Medical Entomology, Centre for Disease Control, Top End Health Service, Casuarina, NT, 0811, Australia
                [e ]Berrimah Veterinary Laboratory, Department of Primary Industry and Resources, Berrimah, NT, 0828, Australia
                [f ]Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia
                [g ]Redland Hospital, Metro South, Queensland Health, Cleveland, QLD, 4163, Australia
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Institute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia. l.herrero@ 123456griffith.edu.au
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author. elina.panahi@ 123456griffithuni.edu.au
                Article
                S2213-2244(20)30060-2
                10.1016/j.ijppaw.2020.06.004
                7327299
                3b6f6530-d35d-4b7e-bbd6-6964ff8d5e07
                © 2020 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 29 April 2020
                : 12 June 2020
                : 12 June 2020
                Categories
                Article

                leishmania,day-biting midge,fta® cards,transmission,saliva,australia,macropod

                Comments

                Comment on this article