38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Molecular Determinants of Regulatory T Cell Development: The Essential Roles of Epigenetic Changes

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Regulatory T (Treg) cells constitute a distinct T cell subset, which plays a key role in immune tolerance and homeostasis. The transcription factor Foxp3 controls a substantial part of Treg cell development and function. Yet its expression alone is insufficient for conferring developmental and functional characteristics of Treg cells. There is accumulating evidence that concurrent induction of Treg-specific epigenetic changes and Foxp3 expression is crucial for lineage specification and functional stability of Treg cells. This review discusses recent progress in our understanding of molecular features of Treg cells, in particular, the molecular basis of how a population of developing T cells is driven to the Treg cell lineage and how its function is stably maintained.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Regulatory T-cell suppressor program co-opts transcription factor IRF4 to control T(H)2 responses.

          In the course of infection or autoimmunity, particular transcription factors orchestrate the differentiation of T(H)1, T(H)2 or T(H)17 effector cells, the responses of which are limited by a distinct lineage of suppressive regulatory T cells (T(reg)). T(reg) cell differentiation and function are guided by the transcription factor Foxp3, and their deficiency due to mutations in Foxp3 results in aggressive fatal autoimmune disease associated with sharply augmented T(H)1 and T(H)2 cytokine production. Recent studies suggested that Foxp3 regulates the bulk of the Foxp3-dependent transcriptional program indirectly through a set of transcriptional regulators serving as direct Foxp3 targets. Here we show that in mouse T(reg) cells, high amounts of interferon regulatory factor-4 (IRF4), a transcription factor essential for T(H)2 effector cell differentiation, is dependent on Foxp3 expression. We proposed that IRF4 expression endows T(reg) cells with the ability to suppress T(H)2 responses. Indeed, ablation of a conditional Irf4 allele in T(reg) cells resulted in selective dysregulation of T(H)2 responses, IL4-dependent immunoglobulin isotype production, and tissue lesions with pronounced plasma cell infiltration, in contrast to the mononuclear-cell-dominated pathology typical of mice lacking T(reg) cells. Our results indicate that T(reg) cells use components of the transcriptional machinery, promoting a particular type of effector CD4(+) T cell differentiation, to efficiently restrain the corresponding type of the immune response.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Molecular antagonism and plasticity of regulatory and inflammatory T cell programs.

            Regulatory T (Treg) and T helper 17 (Th17) cells were recently proposed to be reciprocally regulated during differentiation. To understand the underlying mechanisms, we utilized a Th17 reporter mouse with a red fluorescent protein (RFP) sequence inserted into the interleukin-17F (IL-17F) gene. Using IL-17F-RFP together with a Foxp3 reporter, we found that the development of Th17 and Foxp3(+) Treg cells was associated in immune responses. Although TGF-beta receptor I signaling was required for both Foxp3 and IL-17 induction, SMAD4 was only involved in Foxp3 upregulation. Foxp3 inhibited Th17 differentiation by antagonizing the function of the transcription factors RORgammat and ROR*. In contrast, IL-6 overcame this suppressive effect of Foxp3 and, together with IL-1, induced genetic reprogramming in Foxp3(+) Treg cells. STAT3 regulated Foxp3 downregulation, whereas STAT3, RORgamma, and ROR* were required for IL-17 expression in Treg cells. Our data demonstrate molecular antagonism and plasticity of Treg and Th17 cell programs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Foxp3-dependent programme of regulatory T-cell differentiation.

              Regulatory CD4+ T cells (Tr cells), the development of which is critically dependent on X-linked transcription factor Foxp3 (forkhead box P3), prevent self-destructive immune responses. Despite its important role, molecular and functional features conferred by Foxp3 to Tr precursor cells remain unknown. It has been suggested that Foxp3 expression is required for both survival of Tr precursors as well as their inability to produce interleukin (IL)-2 and independently proliferate after T-cell-receptor engagement, raising the possibility that such 'anergy' and Tr suppressive capacity are intimately linked. Here we show, by dissociating Foxp3-dependent features from those induced by the signals preceding and promoting its expression in mice, that the latter signals include several functional and transcriptional hallmarks of Tr cells. Although its function is required for Tr cell suppressor activity, Foxp3 to a large extent amplifies and fixes pre-established molecular features of Tr cells, including anergy and dependence on paracrine IL-2. Furthermore, Foxp3 solidifies Tr cell lineage stability through modification of cell surface and signalling molecules, resulting in adaptation to the signals required to induce and maintain Tr cells. This adaptation includes Foxp3-dependent repression of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 3B, affecting genes responsible for Tr cell homeostasis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                20 April 2013
                10 May 2013
                2013
                : 4
                : 106
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Experimental Immunology, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University Suita, Japan
                [2] 2Department of Experimental Pathology, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan
                Author notes

                Edited by: Eyad Elkord, United Arab Emirates University, UAE; University of Salford, UK; University of Manchester, UK

                Reviewed by: Paul A. Gleeson, University of Melbourne, Australia; Ciriaco A. Piccirillo, McGill University, Canada

                *Correspondence: Naganari Ohkura and Shimon Sakaguchi, Department of Experimental Immunology, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, 3-1 Yamadaoka, Suita 565-0871, Japan. e-mail: nohkura@ 123456ifrec.osaka-u.ac.jp ; shimon@ 123456ifrec.osaka-u.ac.jp

                This article was submitted to Frontiers in Immunological Tolerance, a specialty of Frontiers in Immunology.

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2013.00106
                3650462
                23675373
                3be23fce-d2a5-4005-8041-7d59e86a466e
                Copyright © 2013 Kitagawa, Ohkura and Sakaguchi.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

                History
                : 28 March 2013
                : 25 April 2013
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 67, Pages: 10, Words: 7560
                Categories
                Immunology
                Review Article

                Immunology
                regulatory t cells,foxp3,epigenetics,dna methylation,adaptability,plasticity,lineage specification

                Comments

                Comment on this article