1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Does a 7-day restriction on the use of social media improve cognitive functioning and emotional well-being? Results from a randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • We compared a 10% vs. 50% reduction in social media screen time in a RCT.

          • The intervention had no effect on multiple indicators of attention and wellbeing.

          • Self-control, impulsivity and FoMO did not moderate the relationships.

          • Participants reported improved attention, but behavioral attention did not improve.

          • Overall, a more severe screen time reduction intervention does not appear more beneficial.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Screen time apps that allow smartphone users to manage their screen time are assumed to combat negative effects of smartphone use. This study explores whether a social media restriction, implemented via screen time apps, has a positive effect on emotional well-being and sustained attention performance.

          Methods

          A randomized controlled trial (N = 76) was performed, exploring whether a week-long 50% reduction in time spent on mobile Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and YouTube is beneficial to attentional performance and well-being as compared to a 10% reduction.

          Results

          Unexpectedly, several participants in the control group pro-actively reduced their screen time significantly beyond the intended 10%, dismantling our intended screen time manipulation. Hence, we analyzed both the effect of the original manipulation (i.e. treatment-as-intended), and the effect of participants’ relative reduction in screen time irrespective of their condition (i.e. treatment-as-is). Neither analyses revealed an effect on the outcome measures. We also found no support for a moderating role of self-control, impulsivity or Fear of Missing Out. Interestingly, across all participants behavioral performance on sustained attention tasks remained stable over time, while perceived attentional performance improved. Participants also self-reported a decrease in negative emotions, but no increase in positive emotions.

          Conclusion

          We discuss the implications of our findings in light of recent debates about the impact of screen time and formulate suggestions for future research based on important limitations of the current study, revolving among others around appropriate control groups as well as the combined use of both subjective and objective (i.e., behavioral) measures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references74

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.

          In recent studies of the structure of affect, positive and negative affect have consistently emerged as two dominant and relatively independent dimensions. A number of mood scales have been created to measure these factors; however, many existing measures are inadequate, showing low reliability or poor convergent or discriminant validity. To fill the need for reliable and valid Positive Affect and Negative Affect scales that are also brief and easy to administer, we developed two 10-item mood scales that comprise the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). The scales are shown to be highly internally consistent, largely uncorrelated, and stable at appropriate levels over a 2-month time period. Normative data and factorial and external evidence of convergent and discriminant validity for the scales are also presented.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Factor structure of the barratt impulsiveness scale

            The purpose of the present study was to revise the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale Version 10 (BIS-10), identify the factor structure of the items among normals, and compare their scores on the revised form (BIS-11) with psychiatric inpatients and prison inmates. The scale was administered to 412 college undergraduates, 248 psychiatric inpatients, and 73 male prison inmates. Exploratory principal components analysis of the items identified six primary factors and three second-order factors. The three second-order factors were labeled Attentional Impulsiveness, Motor Impulsiveness, and Nonplanning Impulsiveness. Two of the three second-order factors identified in the BIS-11 were consistent with those proposed by Barratt (1985), but no cognitive impulsiveness component was identified per se. The results of the present study suggest that the total score of the BIS-11 is an internally consistent measure of impulsiveness and has potential clinical utility for measuring impulsiveness among selected patient and inmate populations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Addict Behav Rep
                Addict Behav Rep
                Addictive Behaviors Reports
                Elsevier
                2352-8532
                15 June 2021
                December 2021
                15 June 2021
                : 14
                : 100365
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Cognition and Communication, School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Postbus 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
                [b ]Department of Educational Sciences, Atlántico Medio University, Spain
                [c ]imec-mict-Ugent, Ghent University, Korte Meer 9-11, 9000 Gent, Belgium
                Author notes
                Article
                S2352-8532(21)00028-6 100365
                10.1016/j.abrep.2021.100365
                8664777
                34938826
                3be57959-d92d-42bd-8a42-b842fed789bc
                © 2021 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 18 February 2021
                : 20 May 2021
                : 8 June 2021
                Categories
                Research paper

                screen time,screen time intervention,sustained attention,cognitive performance,emotional well-being,self-report bias

                Comments

                Comment on this article