51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Characterization of N200 and P300: Selected Studies of the Event-Related Potential

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Event-Related Potential (ERP) is a time-locked measure of electrical activity of the cerebral surface representing a distinct phase of cortical processing. Two components of the ERP which bear special importance to stimulus evaluation, selective attention, and conscious discrimination in humans are the P300 positivity and N200 negativity, appearing 300 ms and 200 ms post-stimulus, respectively. With the rapid proliferation of high-density EEG methods, and interdisciplinary interest in its application as a prognostic, diagnostic, and investigative tool, an understanding of the underpinnings of P300 and N200 physiology may support its application to both the basic neuroscience and clinical medical settings. The authors present a synthesis of current understanding of these two deflections in both normal and pathological states.

          Related collections

          Most cited references106

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man.

            Two distinct late-positive components of the scalp-recorded auditory evoked potential were identified which differed in their latency, scalp topography and psychological correlates. The earlier component, called "P3a" (latency about 240 msec), was elicited by infrequent, unpredictable shifts of either intensity or frequency in a train of tone pips whether the subject was ignoring (reading a book) or attending to the tones (counting). The later component, called "P3a" (mean latency about 350 msec), occurred only when the subject was actively attending to the tones; it was evoked by the infrequent, unpredictable stimulus shifts, regardless of whether the subject was counting that stimulus or the more frequently occurring stimulus. Both of these distinct psychophysiological entities have previously been refered to as the "P3" or "P300" in the literature.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty.

              The average evoked-potential waveforms to sound and light stimuli recorded from scalp in awake human subjects show differences as a function of the subject's degree of uncertainty with respect to the sensory modality of the stimulus to be presented. Differences are also found in the evoked potential as a function of whether or not the sensorymodality of the stimulus was anticipated correctly. The major waveform alteration is in the amplitude of a positive-going component which reaches peak amplitude at about 300 milliseconds.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Med Sci
                ijms
                International Journal of Medical Sciences
                Ivyspring International Publisher (Sydney )
                1449-1907
                2005
                1 October 2005
                : 2
                : 4
                : 147-154
                Affiliations
                1. The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77002, USA
                2. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding address: Salil H. Patel, MD, salil.patel@ 123456christushealth.org / sp.jhem@ 123456gmail.com. Tel: 1 713 757 7529. Fax: 1 713 657 7208

                Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

                Article
                ijmsv02p0147
                10.7150/ijms.2.147
                1252727
                16239953
                3c30415e-683f-45e0-97d5-c914bc10afb8
                © Ivyspring International Publisher. This is an open access article. Reproduction is permitted for personal and noncommerical use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited.
                History
                : 8 August 2005
                : 15 September 2005
                Categories
                Review

                Medicine
                neuroimaging,n2,p3,selective attention,electroencephalography (eeg)
                Medicine
                neuroimaging, n2, p3, selective attention, electroencephalography (eeg)

                Comments

                Comment on this article